Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 11 minutes ago
Warrant rules do not automatically protect every piece of your phone data. Riley v. California generally requires a warrant for digital searches after an arrest, but that protection has exceptions. The Atlantic argues Trump should need a warrant, yet the real safeguard is judicial review before executive access. So who decides when the exceptions apply: a judge or the executive branch? Pick a side in the comments—and send this to someone who thinks possession means permission.

Category

🤖
Tech
Transcript
00:00A Warrant Won't Protect Every Phone
00:03This is phone data, messages, location, health records.
00:08The Atlantic says Trump should need a warrant, Riley v.
00:13California generally requires one for digital searches after an arrest.
00:18But that's a default, not a guarantee.
00:22Exceptions exist.
00:25Judicial review is the real safeguard.
00:28Comment, judge first, or executive access.
00:32Send this to someone who thinks possession means permission.
Comments

Recommended