Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 minutes ago
Former NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine joins 'This Week in Space' to discuss the Artemis program's progress. While praising the successful SLS rocket, he voices significant concerns about the lack of a lunar lander, a critical component for returning astronauts to the moon.
Transcript
00:00Well, you know, I'm glad that, you know, you laid out kind of that progression for Artemis.
00:05I remember that by any means necessary speech by then Vice President Mike Pence.
00:09I remember it sounded like it was a poke with a stick, as I like to tell my staff when
00:14it's
00:14time to get things going.
00:16And I'm curious now that we've got Artemis II behind us in a spectacular fashion earlier
00:24this year.
00:25You know, what you took away from that mission, watching it unfold, knowing that, you know,
00:31you kind of helped keep that ball not just rolling, but setting it up so that that foundation
00:38was there to build on so that they could do that.
00:40And then if you think that that new goal of 2028 is on track now, we just got the Artemis
00:46III crew named earlier this week, and it seems like a lot more is happening a lot more faster,
00:52I guess, or a lot more visible for the for the public, at least.
00:55Yeah, no, I think that's good.
00:56And I think what Jared is doing is important and good.
01:00I do.
01:02I worry that we don't have a lander.
01:07The SLS rocket is working.
01:09You know, it's been criticized a lot because of cost and time and everything else.
01:13But the bottom line is the first time SLS launched, it was rated for crew and it was ready to
01:20go
01:20to the moon on the first launch.
01:23Like it's that's hard to do.
01:25And yet it did it.
01:26And in fact, on its first launch, it launched Orion to the moon with a single vehicle, one
01:32single launch.
01:34Orion went to the moon.
01:35The second launch, we had crew on it.
01:37It is a very capable machine.
01:39The RS-25 engines are stunning.
01:43The SLS rocket is the most powerful rocket ever built.
01:48You've got the ICPS upper stage, which it looks like will be replaced with Centaur 5 upper stages.
01:54You've got the Orion crew capsule.
01:57This system is fully integrated, designed from the ground to be human rated on day one.
02:04And it has all worked.
02:05Now, that doesn't mean it's perfect, but what it means is we know what works.
02:10What we don't have, and this is the challenge, we still don't have a lander.
02:14And without a lander, you can't land on the moon.
02:17It's really that simple.
02:19And I worry that over time, that's going to come back and bite us.
02:24I do think we need a lander, whatever it takes.
02:27Whatever it takes to build a lander soonest is what we ought to be doing as a country.
02:32So, that's kind of my outlook on it.
02:36And I guess I would just add, regardless of who builds the lander, it probably needs to be designed in
02:41such a way that it can fly on any of the major boosters.
02:46Because, you know, we know that Blue Origin is doing the blue moon.
02:50Now, they had that New Glenn accident.
02:53And, you know, one question that comes to mind is, can that be launched on a Falcon Heavy?
02:59And it's frustrating to watch.
03:01And as much as, you know, we really are all in for those companies to succeed, and the fact that
03:07they have skin in the game is remarkable.
03:10But it's just, I mean, I hear you from the sidelines here, not being anywhere near D.C.
03:16It really is frustrating to see the struggle with these landers.
03:20And I guess especially, you know, not to criticize anybody, but the SpaceX plan, for a person who doesn't really
03:28know much about engineering, seems very daunting.
03:30I mean, that is some really complicated choreography when you've got this orbiting stage with the cryogenic fuel boiling off,
03:40trying to refill it enough times to get to the moon.
03:42We don't know how many times yet.
03:45And it has to be human rated.
03:47Yeah.
03:48I mean, that's the hard part is people underestimate how challenging it is to do it to begin with, and
03:56then do it with the level of confidence and margin required for it to be human rated.
04:02Although, fortunately, with this unusual architecture that has been put together, it doesn't have to be human rated to bring
04:07them home, which I imagine will save a lot of time.
04:11Yeah, but yes, if you can get them there, bringing them home is kind of the next big step.
04:19But I'll just tell you, the architecture is extraordinarily complicated.
04:23I don't think there's any argument about that, and we need a lander.
04:28The genius of Apollo, and I'm just going to go back to Apollo, the genius of Apollo was its simplicity.
04:36They just said, we're going to go to the moon with a single rocket.
04:41We're going to do lunar orbit rendezvous, and we're going to go down to the surface of the moon, and
04:48we're going to come back up to our command module, and we're going to fly home.
04:51They designed that thing to be as simple as you could possibly make it, and because of that, they were
05:00able to land on the moon eight years after John F. Kennedy declared that we were doing it.
05:07It's really remarkable what they did.
05:10And that's including two years lost to the Apollo 1 fire, so when you really think about it, it was
05:15about five and a half.
05:16Although they did have, you know, let's be fair, they had a lot more funding than you did with Artemis,
05:22right?
05:22A lot of people say that, and by the way, I've been guilty of saying it too.
05:26They had a bigger percent of the federal budget for sure, a bigger percentage of the federal budget.
05:32Back then, it was like four and a half percent of the federal budget.
05:35Today, we're at less than one third of the federal, less than one third of one percent of the federal
05:42budget.
05:43So I would also say, yes, I think in real dollars, we're down significantly, but not maybe down as much
05:51as you might presume.
05:52And I'll tell you why.
05:54When you compare the spending relative to the federal budget, number one, your budget can shrink.
06:02Number two, the federal government budget grows.
06:05So because the federal budget is so much bigger than it used to be, it's a smaller portion of the
06:11federal budget.
06:11I want to be clear.
06:12I am a gomer for making sure that we have a bigger budget for NASA.
06:18I mean, the challenge with NASA is, we're talking about an agency that has a $24 billion budget.
06:27You could eliminate the entirety of NASA, and it does not have an impact on the debt or the deficit.
06:33It's just not that big of an agency.
06:37However, like I said, one third of one percent of the federal budget.
06:43So it's just not.
06:45So but here's the thing.
06:46If you increased NASA's budget by 50 percent, it would have a huge impact on the capability that we bring
06:53to this country.
06:54And if and if you crush it by 50 percent, it has a huge impact the opposite direction.
07:01And yet in either case, it doesn't really have an impact on the deficit or the debt because it is
07:08such a small agency.
07:09It is the best brand that the United States of America has by far.
07:15There is nothing close.
07:16When the NASA administrator shows up in Europe, when the NASA administrator shows up in Japan, people come in droves.
07:24It's like I'm Mick Jagger when I go to these other countries.
07:27And it is remarkable.
07:32Everybody has a thirst for NASA all around the world.
07:36And I think I think we cannot dismiss how powerful that is for our country.
07:41When when I was a NASA administrator, we landed Insight on Mars.
07:45It was the ninth time in human history that anybody landed on Mars.
07:50And and it was all every time it was done by the United States.
07:54And and we put a press release out and it was on the cover of every newspaper worldwide.
08:00Insight was just like trying to understand Mars quakes.
08:03That's what it was there to do.
08:06It wasn't like it was even looking for life or anything.
08:09It was just looking for Mars quakes.
08:10And and yet it was on the cover of every newspaper, including in Tehran, if you can.
08:17Wow.
08:18And it and the Tehran newspaper said it literally said the hardline newspaper of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
08:26And they had an article about landing on Mars.
08:30I mean, that's it's hard to get those types of good messages about the United States behind countries that really
08:38don't like us.
08:39And yet we can at NASA uniquely.
08:42And it changes the way young people think about our country in a positive way.
08:46I just don't think we can dismiss the power of that.
08:50Yeah.
Comments

Recommended