Skip to playerSkip to main content
A "layman-spokesperson" of the House prosecution panel has lectured Vice President Sara Duterte’s camp on the legal implications of "free speech", as it applies to the impeachment trial respondent's alleged death threats against President Marcos.

READ: https://mb.com.ph/2026/06/27/layman-spokesperson-lectures-vp-duterte-camp-on-freedom-of-speech


Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5664f6TkaeHgwBly50DWZQ/join

Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! - https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin

Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin

#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Sir, part po noong reply ni VP Sara, yun daw pong ginawa niyang alleged threats against President Bongbong Marcos, etc.
00:14ay bahagi daw po ng freedom of expression. Your thoughts po on that?
00:18You know, all lawyers would agree that there's no such thing as absolute freedom. All freedom are also subject to
00:27some regulation. One cannot go around the streets accusing anybody of something without the necessary consequence of that action, either
00:38verbally or acted upon.
00:41So, the threat, as we have seen during the press con na pinatawag niya, nakita natin, direct threat yun sa
00:49Presidente, it's not actually her adherences that she'll be focused on, it's the effect of that adherence on the person
00:57that is being threatened.
01:00In sinabi niya sa Presidente, sa Unang Ginang, at saka sa former speakers.
01:07I think for someone who has that, you know, who enjoys a certain privilege, influence, and following, we should also
01:16take that into consideration.
01:20Na hindi mo po pwedeng, hindi bigyan ng seriousness itong threat.
01:27And even herself, qualified the degree of threat, actually saying these words, no?
01:35Siya mismo ang nagsabi, no joke. No joke.
01:38So, it's again, it's for the court's appreciation, that's why we have forwarded this to the Senate, so that the
01:49Senate acting as impeachment court can actually and finally settle whether our claim in our allegation that this is indeed
01:58constitute betrayal of public trust,
02:01this would constitute high crimes, would the Senate be able to at least appraise with the evidence that we will
02:10present.
02:11Now, mind you, we are confident that we have the evidence to present before the Senate.
02:16So, it's for them to convince the impeachment trial na parte ito, saklaw ito, doon sa freedom of expression,
02:26na hindi wala dapat consequences sa pagbabanta ng tao.
02:31And remember, as a public official, it is also our civic duty to involve ourselves in value formation
02:43para tayo po ay pamarisan ng mga kabataan, ng bawat Pilipino, na maganda dapat ang asal na pinapakita natin sa
02:53kanila.
02:54At the very least, behavioral-wise, I think we ought to our Filipino constituents, no, sa asambayan ng Pilipino,
03:02that as elected official, we also have to carry ourselves in the best manner that we can,
03:08and also enjoy ourselves, engage ourselves in value formation.
03:14To a very least, in the societal effect of the threats, is nagiging nanonormalize yung pagbabanta sa kapwa-tao,
03:26na hindi dapat yun nangyayari, kanino man at maski anong oras.
03:44To a very least, in the societal effect of the threats, is nagiging nanonormalize yung pagbabanta sa kapwa-tao,
03:44na hindi dapat yun nangyayari, kanino man at maski anong oras.
03:44So for example, as a public official, it is nagiging nanonormalize yung pagbabanta sa kapwa-tao,
03:45na hindi dapat yun nangyayari, kanino man at maski anong oras.
03:45To a very least, when we all know the threat is a pagbabanta sa kapwa-tao,
03:46na hindi jean tiapakita, kanino man at maski anong aukita na na hindi.

Recommended