Skip to playerSkip to main content
JD Vance lies on cam? The viral JD Vance video is triggering massive controversy after claims that the Iranian delegation did not walk out of negotiations despite earlier warnings and public statements.

Iranian delegation DID NOT WALK OUT? Watch the explosive footage, reactions, and analysis that have everyone asking whether the U.S. suffered a major diplomatic humiliation.

A political firestorm is erupting after a viral video featuring JD Vance sparked intense debate across social media, news platforms, and geopolitical circles. During remarks about the Iran negotiations, JD Vance stated that there were threats suggesting the Iranian delegation might walk out, but insisted that they ultimately did not leave. Now, critics are pointing to the footage and broader developments surrounding the Iran talks, arguing that the situation exposes serious questions about U.S. strategy, messaging, and credibility.

#JDVance #IranianDelegation #IranTalks #IranUSRelations #JDVanceVideo #USHumiliation #BreakingNews #Geopolitics #MiddleEastNews #IranNews #TrumpAdministration #ForeignPolicy #USPolitics #IsraelIran #DiplomaticCrisis #ViralVideo #PoliticalNews #WorldNews #InternationalRelations #USIranTalks #MiddleEastConflict #GlobalPolitics

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00So look, yesterday was a very, very good day. We made a lot of good progress. We did exactly what
00:05we wanted to do, which is accomplish four things for the American people. First, we wanted to build
00:11a mechanism for keeping the Strait of Hormuz open. It is open. We've seen, of course, gas prices and
00:18oil prices come down, millions and millions of barrels of crude and natural gas flowing through
00:23the Strait of Hormuz that weren't flowing before. But we also wanted to make sure that we actually
00:28set up the coordination mechanism so that we could demine the Strait of Hormuz so that when there
00:33are the conflicts that inevitably come up, we can make sure we work through them rather than that
00:38leading to escalation. And that is exactly what we did yesterday. Number two, we also wanted to build
00:43a mechanism, a similar mechanism, for deconfliction for the regional ceasefire. As the President of
00:49the United States has himself said, sometimes these ceasefires just mean you're shooting a little bit
00:54less, but we wanted to make sure that we had the proper coordination set up so that if there is
00:58shooting, if Hezbollah fires at Israel or if Israel responds, if there are other conflicts that arise
01:04in the region, we're actually talking to each other and figuring out how to stop the shooting,
01:10how to make the region safer, our allies and everybody else. We set that up as well.
01:15Hello, everybody, and good morning to everybody back in the United States. I guess good afternoon to the
01:21folks assembled. So look, yesterday was a very, very good day. We made a lot of good progress. We
01:27did exactly what we wanted to do, which is accomplish four things for the American people.
01:32First, we wanted to build a mechanism for keeping the Strait of Hormuz open. It is open. We've seen,
01:39of course, gas prices and oil prices come down, millions and millions of barrels of crude and natural
01:44gas flowing through the Strait of Hormuz that weren't flowing before. But we also wanted to make sure
01:49that we actually set up the coordination mechanism so that we could demine the Strait of Hormuz so that
01:55when there are the conflicts that inevitably come up, we can make sure we work through them
01:59rather than that leading to escalation. And that is exactly what we did yesterday.
02:04Number two, we also wanted to build a mechanism, a similar mechanism, for deconfliction for the
02:09regional ceasefire. As the President of the United States has himself said, sometimes these ceasefires
02:14just mean you're shooting a little bit less. But we wanted to make sure that we had the proper
02:18coordination set up so that if there is shooting, if Hezbollah fires at Israel or if Israel responds,
02:25if there are other conflicts that arise in the region, we're actually talking to each other and
02:30figuring out how to stop the shooting, how to make the region safer, our allies and everybody else.
02:36We set that up as well. Number three, we, and this is probably what we're most excited about as
02:42Americans. The Iranians have agreed to invite IAEA inspectors back into their country. That is a
02:48major milestone for the American people and the first step in permanently denuclearizing or permanently
02:56ending a nuclear weapons program in Iran. And that's exactly what we wanted to do. That's exactly
03:02what we asked to happen. We made a lot of great progress on other nuclear talks. And that leads me
03:07to
03:07the final thing that we wanted to accomplish, which is actually set up the process for the technical
03:12negotiations that will follow. Our teams working with the Iranians, the Qataris and the Pakistanis
03:18made great progress yesterday. They will continue to work at the technical level with the teams here
03:24in Bergenstock. And then those technical negotiations are going to continue over the weeks and days to
03:29come. We wanted to set up a structure for that so that you could have proper political oversight. But
03:34obviously, as much as this place is very beautiful, I can't stay here for the next 60 days. I'm about
03:39to go back home to the United States. But the technical teams are going to be working with
03:43proper oversight to make sure that we're accomplishing the objectives that matter for everybody.
03:46So those are the things that we wanted to accomplish. We came here. We did exactly that.
03:51The way that I think about it is very simple. We laid a very good foundation for a successful final
03:57deal. The final deal is the house. We set the foundation. We haven't built the house,
04:02but we've laid a successful foundation to get to a good place for the American people. I think it's
04:07important for all of us to appreciate how much was done. But honestly, there is still a lot to do
04:13as we continue to make progress on the nuclear talks, on the economic talks, as we continue to
04:19demine the straits and ensure that that flow of traffic continues to pick back up. A lot of progress,
04:24but still some work to do. And we're very committed to doing exactly that. So with that,
04:28I'm happy to take a few questions from guys in the audience. I appreciate you guys being here.
04:33Let's start with you.
04:34Thank you, Mr. President. Did the President's threats yesterday really throw a wrench in the
04:38negotiations that Iran walked out at one point? Can you just clarify and tell us what happened?
04:43No, they didn't throw a wrench in the system. The thing with the Iranians, yes, they did threaten to
04:48walk out, or at least there were social media threats that they would walk out. But we were negotiating
04:53well past one in the morning yesterday. So they didn't walk out. And their technical team is still
04:58here in Bergenstock working with our technical team actually as we speak. Though I imagine maybe
05:02some of them are taking a break to watch this news conference. But look, what we told the Iranians
05:08yesterday is when you guys engage in what us millennials might call trash talk, you can't expect
05:15the President of the United States not to respond and not to correct the record. So when they say things
05:20that aren't true, the President is going to respond to it. I'm going to respond to it. Americans are
05:24going to respond to it. When they make threats that aren't rooted in reality, they have to accept
05:29that the President of the United States is actually going to set the record straight. That's all that
05:33happened. So yes, there was a little bit of threatening, there was a little bit of whining,
05:37but at the end of the day, the talks continued and we made great progress.
05:41When do you expect them to be welcomed into Iran? Is there a time frame that you guys are looking
05:47at,
05:48and also in terms of when we could see this entire conflict end? Do you think this can end by
05:52the
05:53midterm elections? Well, look, right now the conflict is in a ceasefire and certainly our hope
05:59is that we get to the final deal and a permanent settlement. But right now I think we've made great
06:04progress and we should all celebrate that. In terms of when the nuclear inspectors are going to start,
06:08it's funny, we were trying to call some of the inspectors last night around 2 in the morning. As you
06:17know, it will happen at the minimum this week. But we think even some of those conversations with the
06:22inspectors and with the IAEA could happen as soon as today. But I haven't checked in with our team
06:29since we made that 2 a.m. phone call to some of those inspectors.
06:34Thank you, Mr. Vice President. Did you going in expect the Iranians to make Lebanon as much of a
06:41lynchpin as they ended up doing? And how would you describe the progress on Lebanon? I know Mr. Arachi
06:46said it was very good progress, but what's your characterization of it? Yeah, I would describe it
06:51as very good progress, too. I mean, look, we want a regional ceasefire, right? We want Hezbollah to
06:55stop firing at our friends in Israel. We want Israelis to be able to live in peace. We also want
06:59to make
06:59sure that, you know, when things happen, they don't spiral into a broader escalation. And so we've been,
07:06I think, very good at setting up what we're calling a deconfliction mechanism. But what it really is,
07:11is to say that when things happen, the sides are actually talking to one another. Sometimes,
07:17you know, you've got a bit of a chicken and egg problem, that you've got a junior guy who fires
07:22a drone that didn't have approval from the high command. Okay, of course, Israel has to respond to
07:27that. But then sometimes that response, we could actually have a better and more peaceful situation
07:34if Israel responds in the context of a conversation that's ongoing between Hezbollah, Lebanon, Israel,
07:41and other partners in the region. There really hasn't been a mechanism to have those discussions
07:46until basically around 4 p.m. yesterday, Bergenstock time, when we set that up. So what we're trying to
07:52do is to say, first of all, Israel and every other nation in the region has the right of self
07:56-defense,
07:56but we want to make sure that everybody has that right of self-defense. In the background,
08:01we're talking about how to de-escalate these conflicts rather than spiraling out of control.
08:06Sometimes what will happen is that if the conflict spirals out of control, that's worse for everybody's
08:13self-defense and worse for everybody's security. So we've actually got the process in place to ensure
08:18that that escalation doesn't happen. Now, I will say you already see the fruits of that. Over the past 24
08:24hours have probably been the most peaceful that we've seen the situation in Lebanon. The previous 24 hours
08:30were pretty good. Obviously, there was some shooting about 72 hours ago. So this is a work in progress,
08:36but what we've done is actually set up the operation so that we can ensure it doesn't spiral out of
08:41control
08:41in the future. Does the U.S. want Israel to withdraw forces from southern Lebanon?
08:48Well, we want Israel's security to be protected, and we also want Lebanon's sovereignty to be protected,
08:54and this is going to be an ongoing conversation. The Israelis have been very clear they do not have
08:58territorial intentions on south Lebanon. The reason they feel they have to be there is because they're
09:03worried about Hezbollah fighters in south Lebanon firing into Israel. We do believe, of course,
09:08it's going to require a lot of hard work, that we can get to a place where Lebanon's territorial
09:13integrity and sovereignty is protected, Israel's security is protected, and that's going to require some
09:18coordination with the Lebanese armed forces, and also it's going to require the Iranians to reign
09:23in Hezbollah. That's all the sort of things that we were talking about yesterday, and again, I think
09:27that we got much further compared to where we were just 24 hours ago. Have you spoken with Prime Minister
09:33Netanyahu during any of his process at all in the recent days? Yeah, we were in constant
09:40we were in constant contact with the Israelis yesterday, but also, of course, with
09:43the Saudis and the Emiratis and others in the region. We talked to the Lebanese yesterday as well,
09:49so we're constantly trying to keep our regional friends updated about this. This is not a deal
09:54that the United States is imposing on the region. This is a deal that the region has desperately asked
10:01the United States to put in place. Obviously, the headlines have been very focused about what's been
10:05going on between the United States and Iran, but this region has been a basket case for a very long
10:10time,
10:11and what the President has set us to do, again, lay the foundation, see if we can get to a
10:16permanent
10:16peace. If we can't, the President of the United States still has a lot of options to accomplish
10:21America's security objectives, but he has certainly committed us to this pathway for now, and we're
10:26going to keep on working and seeing what we can accomplish. And then I want to just, before we
10:32depart here, I want to say one last thing. I've seen some misreporting about frozen or unfrozen Iranian
10:39assets. One of the other things that we wanted to do, and, you know, it wasn't as high of a
10:43priority
10:43for us for obvious reasons, but we wanted to make sure that we set up a process where if, if
10:50we ever
10:50unfreeze Iranian assets, we can ensure that those, that that money, that Iranian money, goes to help
10:57the people of Iran and not to fund terrorism. So Jared Kushner actually came up with a, with a very
11:03interesting solution with the Qataris, where basically, again, if there is any frozen Iranian
11:10assets that are unfrozen, then we have approval over that process, the Qataris have approval over
11:16that process, and then the money would actually go to buy American soy, American corn, and American wheat
11:24for the benefit of the Iranian people. And as much as I see some of the press misreporting on this,
11:29and of course, you know, buttressed by what the Iranians are saying, or not all Iranians,
11:34I want to be clear, there are a lot of Iranians who are telling the truth about what happened
11:37yesterday, but you see some social media reporting that gets this wrong. But fundamentally, what Jared
11:43and the Qataris and the entire team here in Bergenstock accomplished is, to me, a classic Trump deal,
11:49where if Iranian assets are ever unfrozen, they're going to go to make American farmers richer and to feed
11:57the Iranian people. That's a very, very good and very classic Trump deal that's great for our people,
12:03great for the people of Iran, and fundamentally, again, will contribute to this regional security
12:08architecture that we've built, and that we're going to work very hard to ensure that it endures.
12:14So, from Switzerland, thank you all for being here. I appreciate the questions, and I appreciate the
12:19engagement. I am looking forward to going back home, and we'll certainly keep everybody updated on what
12:25happens in the days and weeks to come. Thank you all.
Comments

Recommended