Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
On today’s episode, Editor in Chief Sarah Wheeler talks with Lead Analyst Logan Mohtashami about mortgage rates after the peace deal and in the midst of Fed week.

Related to this episode:

How much will mortgage rates fall with the Iran deal and Fed week?
https://www.housingwire.com/articles/mortgage-rates-iran-fed-week/

HousingWire | YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXDD_3y3LvU60vac7eki-6Q

More info about HousingWire
https://lnk.bio/housingwire

The Top 5:

HUD would permit multi-story manufactured homes without a permanent chassisoy Advisors says
https://www.housingwire.com/articles/hud-would-permit-multi-story-manufactured-homes-without-a-permanent-chassis/

How much will mortgage rates fall with the Iran deal and Fed week?
https://www.housingwire.com/articles/mortgage-rates-iran-fed-week/

Why housing demand is up and inventory is down in 2026
https://www.housingwire.com/articles/housing-demand-inventory-2026pending-sales-rose-to-75856-vs-72039-in-2025-as-inventory-turned-negative-year-over-year-with-mortgage-rates-near-6-58/

UWM fails to submit revised bid for Two Harbors, seller says
https://www.housingwire.com/articles/uwm-revised-bid-two-harbors/

Google listing ads raise questions about IDX licensing
https://www.housingwire.com/articles/google-idx-licensing-questions/

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:09Welcome, everyone. My guest today is lead analyst Logan Motoshami to talk about mortgage rates now
00:15that we seem to have a peace deal in place and in the midst of FedWeek. First, I want to
00:20recap
00:20the top five trending stories on HousingWire.com. And at the top is a story about HUD would permit
00:26multi-story manufactured homes without a permanent chassis. This story has been wildly popular since
00:31we published it last week. And it's closely followed by Logan's article on the topic we're
00:36discussing today, which is how much will mortgage rates fall with the Iran deal and FedWeek.
00:42Then we have the tracker why housing demand is up and inventory is down in 2026. And an update on
00:48the UWM Two Harbors deal. Lastly, our audience continues to read our coverage of Google listing
00:53ads going nationwide. Logan, welcome back to the podcast.
00:57It is wonderful to be here. A weekend with drama, but finally, something good, you know,
01:04something at least heading in the in the right direction. If they everything signed off in
01:12Switzerland on Friday, it is the end of this conflict. And then we just got to get oil flowing
01:19again. And what a journey this this has been. And we started off by saying if this thing lasts past
01:27March 21st, something went wrong. But if it goes past the second week of June, where are we?
01:34Second week of June.
01:36The second week of June.
01:37It's like the you know, we start to get to Mad Max discussion. So hopefully this is it and we
01:44can
01:45push forward with this. Right. So we got that news. Trump announced it on Sunday. It was widely
01:49expected. Right. But still need the final details. But it looks like it looks like after all of this
01:55time, we can we can count on an actual peace deal. You outlined what this meant. You know, like what
02:01does it mean a couple of weeks ago? You're like, OK, if it's over, here's what to expect with mortgage
02:06rates. And then last night you wrote a great piece that said, how low can mortgage rates go
02:11between the end of the conflict and and then with the Fed, we have to maybe competing things there.
02:16So maybe walk us through how low you think mortgage rates can fall given the end of the
02:21conflict, if at all. Not much. And and it is we sit here today. It's it's Monday morning.
02:29And what we wrote on May 25th is that if the if the conflict is over, the 10 year yield
02:35should
02:36be at 4.46 to 4.48. OK, so the bond market is saying, OK, the worst case is over.
02:45We should sit
02:46here on Sunday night. The 10 year yield fell noticeably like to 4.42, 4.43. As you and I
02:54are
02:54talking, it's 4.47. This looks very correct to me because before the conflict happened,
03:04inflation, inflation was growing hotter. But the more important thing, the labor market
03:08improved. So whatever anyone thinks about the labor market, because we have a lot of labor
03:14experts. In any case, the Federal Reserve spent a very good proportion of their time talking about
03:21their break evens. And they had said, I mean, to me, just like anything above 33000 job growth is
03:27fine for them because the growth rate of inflation is hotter. They're going, hey, listen, we're not
03:33cutting in this environment. The 10 year yield was at 4.31 before the conflict started. And then we
03:40had that one jobs report that was negative and, you know, technical levels were broken and the 10
03:45year yield got below 4 percent. Not something I agreed with, but it did. And where we are right now
03:54looks perfectly normal with the growth rate of inflation above. The worst case scenario right now
04:01has been taken off the table in terms of oil going up to 120, 150, inflation embedded, diesel,
04:07everything, Fed has to, you know, all that for now has been taken off. So now we're going to get
04:13back
04:13into the economic discussion. As long as you can get oil flowing out, it's back to, well, the growth
04:19rate of inflation is too strong. What does the Fed think neutral is now? There's no more rate cuts.
04:25Well, we're not rate hikes. But the 10 year yield, where it is today, knowing that the conflict is
04:31coming to an end, looks about right. So the best case scenario in terms of what you can look for
04:36for
04:36mortgage rates going out, especially we have to wait for the Federal Reserve and how they're going
04:41to approach things. But six and a quarter to six and a half is like the best case scenario at
04:46this
04:46point. The normal base case is six and a half to 6.75. And now, you know, to me, it's,
04:54you know,
04:54we've taken away the worst case scenario, which I outlined about 0.37 to 4.04.43% above six
05:03and a
05:04half, 6.75, excuse me. So that has been taken away. So kind of think about six and a quarter
05:09to 6.75.
05:11We're going to hang around here for a while until we get some clarity from the Fed,
05:15until we see, you know, how they look like, how they look at inflation. If the labor data started
05:21to get weaker again, that's a whole different equation, but that's not happening the first
05:25part of the year. And the Federal Reserve has a very, very low threshold on what they think is
05:30acceptable with the labor market. So I kind of wanted to get that out there because I know a lot
05:37of people just thought, oh my God, oil prices are down big, but the 10-year yield of mortgage rates,
05:42no, because the underlying economics to what drive Fed policy, which to me is 65 to 75% of what
05:49drives
05:49mortgage rates, has materially changed even before the conflict. The conflict just made it, you know,
05:57much more dicey in terms of there's no rate cuts talked now. And now we're talking about rate hikes.
06:03So we, ball is on the Fed's court and we have Kevin Warsh coming up.
06:07So, you know, it's good that the worst case has been, you know, avoided that, that you were like,
06:12listen, things are going to get really bad if it keeps going. On the other hand, sounds like
06:16pretty much more, more of the same kind of what we've had since the conflict started about those
06:21kinds of rates, which, you know, I think people can work with. It's the certainty that also helps if
06:25it's not, you know, if we're not getting dramatic headlines every day, I think that helps people run
06:30their business. Sarah, we're going to get dramatic headlines every day.
06:34Okay, but not about the conflict. Not about the conflict, but, you know,
06:40it's that line from the movie Gladiator. There's always someone to fight. There's going to be
06:44always some crazy headlines, you know, I mean, we're probably going to go back to tariffs again,
06:48stuff like this. But in any case, a little bit more kind of realistic. And it's not shocking to
06:58me what the 10-year yield is doing now, especially the Fed coming up meeting-wise. But we have to
07:05remember the dynamics shifted here because when we went into 2026, the thing was labor overinflation.
07:14If the labor data was still running at 8,000 jobs a month, it'd be different. But the labor data
07:21got
07:21better. And part of that is the first year of any trade war, things don't work right. That's always
07:25been the case. I mean, Republicans used to say this all the time, that when government gets too
07:30big and they start making rules and changing them and all this stuff, how are business supposed to
07:36operate? Yes, homies, that used to be the line all the time. Well, we had in 2018, the first trade
07:43war tap dance, we had Godzilla tariffs. So the labor data got really soft in the second half, and we're
07:49just kind of averaging out. So to me, it isn't like a big rebound, but it's just like the worst
07:56case scenario is off. And the Federal Reserve is like, if the worst case scenario is off, we're not
07:59cutting. And so we went from two to three rate cuts to now a one rate hike priced in, and
08:05what's
08:06next? And it looks about right. I mean, that's just, there has to be consequences to actions,
08:13right? So if there's no consequences, then nobody learns. But if you are complaining about higher
08:18rates, well, we did tariffs, and we did a conflict. So those things have to settle themselves out. The
08:27Federal Reserve was going to just let the tariff inflation slide off and just, you know, do the
08:33last two or three rate cuts left, you know, just to get to neutral policy. But that is no longer
08:39the
08:39case. So ball is on the Fed's court now, and Kevin Warsh is the head of the Fed.
08:43And we will see all of that on Wednesday. What happens? You know, what kind of press release does
08:48he or press conference does he hold? Does he take questions? Does he? It'll be really interesting
08:54to see how he handles this role compared to previous Fed presidents.
08:58I'm going to stay by my stance. Hashtag anyone but Warsh. But it doesn't matter what I want.
09:05People have asked you, but people have asked you why. And I thought you had some-
09:08I do not trust this man ever. And the way he looks at policy is just no. So it's just
09:15not,
09:15I don't think he's the guy for this job. But-
09:19Even though it's Warsh 2.0.
09:21He is there for one reason. He's married to the Estee Lauder's granddaughter. This is a Trump pick.
09:27This is not an ideological pick. This is a Trump pick, right? So Trump brought in him to cut rates.
09:32But now look what happened. He can't, you know, what is, how is it going to, I just,
09:37I don't trust him. And I, when I mean, I don't trust him is that if Trump is out of
09:41the white
09:41house, it's going to go back to old Kevin Warsh 1.0. And that Kevin Warsh is not very good.
09:48Okay. So for now, for everyone in the real estate, as long as Trump is in the white house,
09:56you know, he's going to be Trump's boy. He's going to do whatever he can, but this is not,
10:01you know, not my choice. I mean, Stephen Myron, the trade guy,
10:04what was he doing to the Federal Reserve? Okay. This is a government takeover of the Federal
10:08Reserve and the war made it more complicated, right? Because now all, whatever doves that
10:14were going to be on maybe Warsh's side have turned to hawks. So the growth rate of inflation has to
10:19come down, right? The whole Trinity thing that we talked about, Sarah, you and I on November 7th,
10:242024, after Trump won. If he's going to try to do this, he needs lower oil prices. The white house
10:30has said, if energy prices fall, everything will follow with it. So I might disagree on that,
10:35even myself, but still that was the game plan. And then the thing has got to get rates down.
10:39This happened. So with Warsh, he's for now he'll do Trump spitting, but I don't trust anybody who gets
10:48into this position by knowing the head guy. So, but we take it as is. And I just, it'll be
10:57interesting how he's going to massage the conversations with the Fed. The dot plots are
11:02probably going to get kicked off. He's going to make Feds not talk about policy. So it's going to
11:07be much different kind of Federal Reserve regime. But for now, for the next two years, you know,
11:12as long as Trump's in the White House, he'll do what he can to limit the rate hikes and try
11:16to cut
11:17rates as much as we possibly can. But again, it's a committee, right? As a committee, you got to
11:23rally other people to your side. And I just, he's just, he's just not that guy. But I've always been
11:30that way. So I'm not, that doesn't shock anyone. That doesn't shock anyone. Okay. Well, now let's
11:36turn to the economic data and the tracker data, because we have a one-year anniversary that just
11:42passed a very important one-year anniversary for when you said mid-June, 2025, the housing market
11:50shifted. So here we are mid-June, 2026, one year later, what shifted and where are we now?
11:56So to me, it was, it was just a basic supply and demand equilibrium discussion. This was how the
12:01tracker was designed to teach people how it really works. So they don't have to get sucked into the
12:06headlines. And because the rate variable labor over inflation, the 10-year yield was already
12:12getting to a level to where if the spreads just start improving a little bit more, like they had
12:17the previous two years, then okay, we can make this work. Because to me, housing data always improved
12:24when rates go from 6.64 down towards 6%. That's literally like, like 95% of my CNBC interviews
12:31the last three years have been the same thing. I just said, we just need near six. It could work.
12:35The data does improve. What's also happened in the last two years is that home price growth has
12:41slowed down so much that wages have outpaced it. So affordability got a little bit better now.
12:46Now, the early clue actually was in the first few months of 2025. The housing data, even with
12:54mortgage rates at 6.75 to 7.25, was holding up better than before. There's your first clue that
13:01price growth cooling down and wages made things a little bit better. So that equilibrium is there.
13:06And then our token line of last year, you know, the reports from June to October reported in July
13:12and November will shut positive year over year growth because it's doing a little bit better.
13:17But now we get past, you know, we had, we had, we had really good inventory growth. It's just that
13:22inventory growth cannot be sustained with rates under 6.64 heading towards 6%. Demand picks up a little
13:28bit. That supply and demand equilibrium changes. Our price cut percentages are now down 2% year over
13:35year. Our inventory is now down year over year, three straight weeks. Demand is positive year over
13:40year. This, even with rates going from 5.99% to 6.75. But to me, it's like in the
13:46past, it used to be
13:47when rates get above 6.64, they head above 7% and then demand gets faded out. So far that
13:53has not
13:54happened. And that's your other clue that the supply and demand equilibrium is changing because
13:59inventory is at much higher levels. This is why we like to use Florida. And as an example, Florida
14:05was already elevated, you know, higher than the national data. It already had price declines
14:11in other areas. So the supply and demand equilibrium looks, but we did, we went there in Florida in
14:16August last year. We talked about that. If the data changes, Florida will be the first. Florida's
14:22inventory has been down year over year for some time now. It's not like the U.S. data. So
14:27now we have something that we can show people how things work. This is very, very technical and
14:33economical, and it's not the most exciting thing in the world, but that's what the tracker was created
14:37to keep everyone in line to what is really happening. And last year, just plant the foot down.
14:44And if you believe in your models, Sarah Wheeler is like COVID, COVID-19 recovery model. We believe
14:49in our models, so we're gone. We're running. So now it gets a little bit more interesting.
14:55If, if hypothetically rates come back down near 6%, price growth is, you know, prices aren't taking
15:01off on a national basis. So it, that's, that's the tug of war, right? What was the chart daddy
15:08doctrine that we said at the start of the year? Tug of war, buyers versus sellers, right? That's,
15:13that's what we want. We did not want the seller market that was unhealthy, very unhealthy and
15:19savagely unhealthy. That's a much healthier marketplace. So now one year later, three straight
15:25weeks of year over year declines in inventories, three straight weeks of positive year over year
15:29weekly sales, even with rates picking up a good test case for everyone. And we just kind of move it
15:35one day at a time, one week at a time. That's what the tracker was created. Now with housing wire
15:40intelligence, because you all listen to this and you read the tracker, you can do this in your own
15:45city, zip code and everything. And that's the part of teaching, educating a society, having people
15:51read books instead of burning books, not become like the dark ages where you can't write anything
15:57down or something and not listening to YouTube and Tik TOK and Instagram fanatics. Oh my God,
16:04Instagram hurts my head. Sarah, the good thing about me is that I've gotten my Twitter account for
16:12everybody to shut up. I don't follow a lot of people. Not a lot of people talk to me because
16:16they know if they, if they get lippy, I'm going to challenge them to live debates and, you know,
16:21get out of here. You don't want to play ball, but the fact that some people are learning
16:27and that, you know, they're also telling other people, they're showing other people think about
16:31an educated society that teaches how things work. It's beautiful to watch. So one year later,
16:37everything looks normal. We always said the comps are going to be very difficult to show growth.
16:40So we're going into, it gets harder and harder up until mid June. And now we got a whole,
16:46a whole different ball game. We'll take it one day at a time, but at least now the point of
16:51the
16:51tracker is complete, right? Late 2022 to 20, or first few months of 2023, mid 2024, and now mid 2025
16:59going all the way one year. Voila, that's the framework. That's the data. All of you now understand
17:06it better. Okay. So one of the things that you track every week in the, in, in this report, in
17:10the tracker is mortgage spreads. And so we've talked about, you know, where mortgage, mortgage
17:15rates are going to be. And every week you look at, Hey, if, if the 10 year old was here
17:20and we had
17:20the same mortgage spreads of like 2023, 2024, 2025, what would it be? And it's been just really high.
17:27So those, the mortgage spreads getting better continues to keep us in that range in the sixes
17:33that you just talked about. You know, in the last decade, we just never had to talk about
17:37mortgage spreads. They were very calm. It's usually when a market event or the federal reserve gets
17:42very aggressive. Sometimes a recession, not all recessions, mortgage spreads go up, but the great
17:48financial recession in COVID it did, but 2023, like how we track mortgage spreads, uh, it got above
17:563%. That has never happened actually. And not during COVID, not during the great financial crisis,
18:01but the Silicon Valley banking crisis with the fed raising rates. It was bad. I mean, I just, I go
18:09back in time. I think about that. Just in any case, um, that got the spreads to be above 3%.
18:15That's
18:15very abnormal. So we've never would have had 8% mortgage rates back then. Uh, but now everyone
18:21could see it's mid June. You could see why the spreads were important. You can see why I was
18:25trying to teach the spreads the last three years and why that range that I have 5.75 to 6
18:31.7, I shaved
18:33off a half a percent off of my forecast from the previous year. And the previous year, we got to
18:38the
18:38seven and a quarter. The peak was seven and a quarter, but now so far this year, we've stayed within
18:43that
18:43range. And a lot of that has to do with spreads improving. I thought spreads would get toward
18:48one 80 toward the end of the year because the Freddie Fannie purchase announcement, it got down
18:53to like one 81 early, but it's just hovering around. So we're 1.99. So we're not quite back
18:58to normal, but good enough to keep things compressed and steady. And you know, again, if yields ever fell
19:05very quickly, the spreads can get worse. So if that, if something happens, let's say we have a bunch
19:09of data that's really bad and yields start to go down, that is an area where the spread gets a
19:15little
19:15bit worse because it wants to compress volatility. So, and that's why every weekend with a tracker,
19:22I show where, where would have been in 2023, where would have been in 2024, where would have been in
19:282025? If it wasn't for the spreads, we're already above 7%, you know, and we would have been near 8
19:34%
19:34in 2023. So, and now you could all see the data. It's the first real positive data curve that we've
19:39had in housing. But again, we had the snow data that impacted, we had the holidays, right? Just
19:45take those, if those two things didn't happen, it would have been a little bit more positive earlier
19:50in the year. And here we are, and we'll just take it one day at a time, one weekend at
19:54a time,
19:54one tracker at a time. The NAR is pending home sales data will come out. I'm not the biggest fan
19:59of
20:00the NAR is pending home sales because it can get very wild to the upside and to the downside.
20:04But if you just follow our weekly pending tracker data, right? And one of the things I try to teach
20:09people, I think all of you out there are putting way too much emphasis on delistings data and
20:16withdrawals. Like I think about that. I never really talk about that because in the big picture to me,
20:21it's not the biggest variable out there in the supply and demand.
20:24Okay. So, so explain that just a little bit. Delisting meaning we're seeing more in inventory
20:29because like it's affecting inventory because people are taking their listings off.
20:34Some, yes. The delistings percentage, let's say Redfin's data went from like 3.2%, but it's at an
20:41all-time high at 5, 5.8%. Okay. In the big scheme of things, that's not that important. I think
20:48a lot of
20:49doomers fought, like put so much weight on that one and they just, you know, they use that as an
20:54excuse to, well, inventory is not taking off because people are delisting their homes. They're
20:59not selling it. Yeah. Well, purchase applications positive and the weekly contracts are positive.
21:03So you're done. I do believe still, I think Redfin completely took that seller's chart away,
21:09you know? So that, that thing didn't, the model, the algorithm around that looked a little bit off,
21:15but try to think of it, how we present the tracker, right? And the spreads and the 10-year
21:20yield with demand. If demand is fading, it's very easy. Purchase application data goes down,
21:25weekly contracts go down, demand is fading, inventory increases, price cut percentage
21:30increase. The slope of the curve, why we love our slope with the curve is 2022. You saw that,
21:35right? Price cut percentages, inventory, everything was very aggressive because rates went from three to
21:40seven percent, right? But now it's a little bit different. It's very nitty gritty. So focus on
21:45the big things that matter. Try to take those little shiny objects and not make them as big as
21:51they need to be. That is good advice always. And of course, we will be talking to you about the
21:56Fed as
21:57we have a Fed day and see how all that goes. And just to note, I mean, you're hard on
22:01Fed,
22:02Fed chairs, no matter, you don't really care their political affiliation. You've been hard on
22:07Powell. Sounds like you're going to be hard on Warsh. You just have a, you have a whole different-
22:11I'm just going to say, hashtag anyone but Warsh. I don't care. Like I'm not a, I'm not a political,
22:19you know, it is interesting now because I gave up on politics a long time ago. I, let me give
22:25you my
22:25greatest story. You and I talk about this a lot. You love politics and we talk, I literally have
22:31friends that have gone to their weddings that are Republicans and Democrats. I never talked to any of
22:36them ever again. They'll go to their graves without me talking to it because they, they just, politics
22:41makes people crazy. And it's just like, and as an analyst, you don't want to become that person that
22:47well, X is president now. So I'm just going to throw away all my models and all, no, like, because
22:52I'm
22:52so detached, it's almost being unhuman. The whole Trump oil thing is really like, you know, oil prices
22:58were never really breaking high. We do these videos on Instagram trying to show charts. And I was like,
23:03you know, a lot of people just thought because they don't like him so much, there's no deal.
23:08Things are going to get worse or something. Blue Scott, blue sky. Oh my God. If you go to blue
23:13sky,
23:13they think oil is still at $140. You got to be careful of putting your ideological takes in your
23:18economic work. No matter what I think about Warsh, I have to look at it as what can possibly done
23:25under
23:26his, you know, regime change, but it doesn't change my view on where the 10 year yield I think can
23:32go.
23:32Because, because even if I didn't think somebody belonged there, I have to go what I think the,
23:37how the models work. So I might not like him, but for the real estate industry and the mortgage
23:43industry, it's better to have someone like him than let's say Powell. Powell might've been more
23:48aggressive right now with the rate, uh, uh, with rate hike discussions out there. So regardless of
23:55what I feel about person, I always stick to the economics of it. And, you know, this whole situation
24:00with the conflict and war, you could see what happened. People were just going straight into
24:04what this is very bad for the economy. It's recessions. Here we go in anything. And just
24:08not focusing on what historical data has told us about inflation spikes. If you have inflation and
24:14oil spikes without the credit breaking, it's not really recessionary. And here we are right now.
24:18If this is the end, then that's just a short blip in history.
24:21Very good. It's one of the things I really appreciate about you, even though I wish you
24:25liked to talk politics. Cause I like to talk politics, but the fact that you're just like,
24:29no, you're, you're, you really are just looking at the data.
24:32What is the first thing I ever told you about this? I'd rather take a gun and shoot myself in
24:36the thigh and be eaten by hyenas live intimately and slowly to death than to talk about politics.
24:44So that's how much I detest it, but I'm an economics guy. So whatever happens with the new
24:48Fed chair and everything, and why I've got to incorporate it into my, and let me tell you
24:53something. It's, you know, tariffs and conflicts and everything. It's a lot, right? Uh, it's not
24:59like a kind of a slow, boring government's not part of everything, you know, but we call it as it
25:05is.
25:05It doesn't matter what we think of the person left or right. We're, we're data people, nerds first.
25:10Nerds first. I love it. We'll talk again soon, Logan. Thanks again.
25:21You
Comments

Recommended