- 2 days ago
Category
🥇
SportsTranscript
00:02Friends, spring training is in full swing for all the major league teams right now,
00:07and to give you an idea of the complexity of this annual baseball operation,
00:11we've invited one of the club managers to spend a few moments with us discussing the subject.
00:17It's certainly nice to have you with us, sir.
00:19Thank you very much, Mr. Allen. I'm delighted to be here in Hepzweizen.
00:23Are you?
00:24Yes, because there are various ways that we try to say to explain what you would like to find out
00:29about the new method of it for you.
00:32As I said before, spring training is in full swing right now,
00:35and all the major league clubs are...
00:39It is a complex...
00:42No, it's not about...
00:43Only, for instance, depending upon where you would plan to go
00:47and have your training in various places,
00:49like some have taken Arizona, others have taken Florida,
00:52but they find that the base of the thing gives players a definite choice
00:56where their training can be brought to a useful correlation of all.
01:00You did say it was nice...
01:02Yes, I did, because there was no other reason why we would try,
01:05because this has been going on for years,
01:07as you very well know, being one of the sportscasters
01:10that have been given these baseball tries, that's all.
01:13No, I was the one that said it was nice to have you with us.
01:16Yes, I said I'm glad to have you, too.
01:18I'm sorry I said it.
01:19I think.
01:20I don't know.
01:21But you are a club manager.
01:23I am one of the managers of the new team,
01:25because you've read that recently they've added several teams to the leagues,
01:29and we are taking it in to find out just what would cause
01:32so that the batting averages could be increased
01:34with more of the intensity of a trade.
01:36Do you think you'd have trouble finishing 11th?
01:39No.
01:41Well, I think you are trying to...
01:43Josh, we would say...
01:45Yeah, I do.
01:46Yes, I do.
01:47Like Josh now and then.
01:49Yeah, I know you're a Josh friend.
01:50Well, Josh, let me ask you.
01:53I mean, some ball clubs do go to Arizona for a spring training,
01:59while others go to Florida.
02:01I'm getting serious now.
02:02What is your preference, and why?
02:05Well, I would say this.
02:07There is really no preference,
02:09depending upon the type of ball players who go to the stage.
02:11Now, for many years, Florida has been a ground
02:14where most of the training has been done without a trade.
02:16Now, only recently, in the state of Arizona,
02:18they brought a new plate, and the players have found it to such a way
02:22that it'll be trade, and next year they'll probably find another town,
02:25another state in Corpett.
02:28Because it will be useful, too.
02:30Well, I asked a two-part question.
02:33Did you answer both parts?
02:34Yes, I said that both Arizona...
02:35Yeah, I did.
02:36I said that Arizona and Florida will both be very trade,
02:39but there will be a new state,
02:40depending on how the weather will hit it,
02:42without a gold game.
02:43I accept what you say.
02:45I just wanted to make certain you've answered both parts.
02:48Well, I've done my best to the ability that I'm able to concentrate with,
02:51or whatever you ask.
02:52Yes.
02:54Well, would you explain how you solve the problem of rookies and nightlife?
03:01There I go with two questions again.
03:02I'm afraid of that.
03:04Well, that's all right.
03:05I can answer it according to your way.
03:07You see, rookies and nightlife do not mix very well in trade
03:11because we must have the players in condition.
03:14And nightlife, not that I am against nightlife.
03:17It's an industry as well where people, after all, do have to.
03:20A lot of people work in the night trade.
03:22But as ballplayers who are in strict training,
03:25they must follow up the routine of trade
03:27and not permit themselves to overthrow
03:29where they would not be able to be in good condition
03:32on the day where their games have to be played,
03:34excluding doubleheaders.
03:37Yeah, well, that would be a reasonable...
03:39Well, I've just...
03:42You lost me somewhere in Arizona.
03:44Oh, no, that was a previous question,
03:46which I answered to a knowledge that you understand.
03:49Well, that's where I got lost.
03:50Yes, well, we'll...
03:51How do you make sure that these rookies are in bed at a reasonable hour?
03:56We have a new type of a thing,
03:58which is known as a clock watch face with a corpsman,
04:00and it has a bell.
04:01Now, as they open the door, they may not know,
04:03but we don't want to feel that we are spying
04:05because that's far away from anybody's...
04:07Well, hey, you're going to go spying on the street.
04:09But we do have where they come in,
04:11and as they open the door,
04:12a bell fit, and it punches a certain time,
04:15and now the following morning when we get,
04:17we know, and then we can confront them and say,
04:19why did you arrive at this hour, you know?
04:21But we give them a break.
04:23We tell them all that's right.
04:24You have bats, of course.
04:25Bats, which they use on the field.
04:27And apparently some of them are in your belfry.
04:30Well, the belfry.
04:31Oh, I don't understand that question.
04:33I thought you were talking about a bat with a balky.
04:35We'll eliminate that.
04:36Yeah, well...
04:36One more thing.
04:37Yes.
04:38Everyone knows the...
04:41Oh, well, what I wanted to ask, though, before,
04:43how do you know,
04:44how do you determine what is a reasonable hour?
04:47A reasonable hour is any time before midnight,
04:51in between the hours of nine,
04:52where the beds are made and they are ready to store it,
04:55then we would say that at 10.30 p.m. the type would be brought
04:59and we'd give them the opportunity.
05:00No one's ever...
05:01No one has to be said, no.
05:02But nobody's ever...
05:03Nobody has done.
05:04Never.
05:05Never, no.
05:05And nobody's ever thought...
05:06And we haven't caught...
05:07Well, as long as they come in,
05:09we have a trace and we feel them.
05:10But nobody's ever thought that was unreasonable.
05:12No.
05:13As a matter of fact,
05:14they are very glad of the idea
05:16and they stay out more reasonable
05:17than they have to pay.
05:18Because you see, some...
05:20No, no, not all.
05:21Only some, as you said.
05:22Just some.
05:22Yes, some, as you said.
05:23They're never completely satisfied
05:25and you've got a complaint now and then.
05:28There is a complaint now and then
05:29which we discard and throw in the same
05:31as a man who bats .220.
05:33Well, there's no complaint there,
05:34but he plays his best.
05:35Yeah, sure.
05:36Yeah, and that's the average is go up all week.
05:38But that's the fellow that thinks
05:39it's an unreasonable hour.
05:40No, he's the one, but we permit him
05:42and we take him
05:43and the next time he's in the minor leagues.
05:44Mm-hmm.
05:46One more thing.
05:47Yeah.
05:47Everyone knows the colorful
05:49but confusing language.
05:50Uh, you'll forgive me for, for, for this.
05:55Yes.
05:56Uh, there's, there's nothing personal involved,
05:58but everyone knows the colorful
06:00but confusing language used by Casey Stengel.
06:03Now, there's nothing personal involved here.
06:05Uh, I'm told you're one of the few people
06:09who, uh, can understand him.
06:11Well, of course.
06:12You see, the trouble with people is this.
06:14Stengel talks very fluently
06:16and affably without any choices.
06:18What he wants to bring out
06:19is something that many people use
06:21in a language which they call their own.
06:23It doesn't always have to say.
06:24Now, he may say,
06:25that other fellow or my man
06:27or my guy was straight in the shortstop
06:29because if he used the center field bleachers
06:31it wouldn't be straight.
06:31People know.
06:32I think that's good.
06:33They know it,
06:34but they, they, they think
06:35he is giving them, uh,
06:36something which is not complex
06:38or variable without a thing.
06:40That is why it is said about him
06:42that his language is just not.
06:43It is the same as we all
06:46but they wouldn't
06:46and therefore he is
06:48but he will be
06:49whenever the ball game goes over.
06:51That's one of his better, uh,
06:53Much better than
06:53when they have a new choice.
06:55Did you, uh, uh, you never,
06:58Yes, I've had many times.
07:00Oh, yes, I've listened.
07:01Well, well, he's only been invited once
07:03to Congress, to the, you know,
07:06the committee that did the investigation.
07:07Yeah, well, I remember
07:07I was there with him at the time
07:09because they brought me in
07:10to solve the things
07:12that he was going to say
07:13to really interpret for him
07:14because he was very, uh,
07:16uh, perplexed in trade
07:17and the remarks that he made,
07:19some of the congressmen said,
07:20well, uh, but tell us
07:22about why this here clause
07:23should be eliminated with trade.
07:24And he was a little bit,
07:25so he said to me,
07:26you know, I told him
07:27this clause was put in there
07:28for the fact
07:29that whatever in baseball is trade,
07:31there was no antitrust manner
07:32with fraud
07:32and they took it up
07:34in that manner
07:34and took it without faith.
07:35Well, I thought
07:36that was well said.
07:37And yes, I felt that way too
07:39and so did Mr. Stengel.
07:41And, uh,
07:42the members of the, uh,
07:44Senate Investigating Committee
07:45thought it was well said.
07:46In fact, uh,
07:48the congressional record
07:49will show that there was
07:50a very thing
07:50and it's all on the up there,
07:51you know, any part of the...
07:53They even quoted some of the remarks.
07:54They quoted some of it
07:55because that's what
07:56they quote most times too
07:57and the various other subject
07:58which is trade.
07:59Although they didn't get re-elected.
08:00No, some of them came back.
08:02I will say this, uh,
08:05uh, friends, by now,
08:06you probably recognize
08:07the voice and style
08:09of that double talker
08:10and all double talkers,
08:12Al Kelly.
08:13Al, thanks a lot
08:15for coming by.
08:16Thank you, Al.
08:16We enjoyed it as usual.
08:17He breaks me up.
08:18I just can't, you know,
08:19but it was fun.
08:21Really, really a lot of fun.
08:22And Al, too,
08:23is, uh,
08:24a great, uh,
08:26baseball fan, actually.
08:28Um,
08:30you know, Al,
08:32switching from baseball
08:33to football for a moment,
08:35football takes some funny bounces,
08:37but you have to be ready for them.
08:39You also have to be ready
08:40for any planned changes
08:41in the rules of the game,
08:42especially if you are a sportscaster.
08:45And that's why we've invited...
08:47Would you mind starting...
08:48Oh, I'm sorry.
08:49I'd like to make a clean start.
08:50These are different takes.
08:52Oh, I'm sorry.
08:52I thought that was continued.
08:54I'll beg your pardon.
08:55There's a wrap-up,
08:55or if you want to just...
08:56I'm sorry.
08:57I thought that was...
08:57See, I was trying to bridge it.
09:00Bardot.
09:02You'd rather take...
09:03Yeah, I'm sorry.
09:04No, I thought that was...
09:05Do you want to do a tag again,
09:06a wrap-up,
09:06a thank you,
09:07and goodbye?
09:08Yeah, yeah.
09:09No, I thought that was getting fine.
09:10All right.
09:15Well, friends,
09:18by now,
09:19you probably recognize
09:20the voice and style
09:21of that tremendous double talker
09:23to end all double talkers,
09:25a real big leaguer,
09:26Al Kelly.
09:28Thank you, Bill.
09:29Al,
09:29thanks ever so much
09:30for coming by,
09:32and honestly,
09:34you just break me up
09:35and just sitting here
09:36and talking with you,
09:37and I don't think
09:38I even gave you a chance
09:39to establish the fact
09:40you weren't Al Kelly
09:41in the beginning,
09:42but it was just so much fun,
09:43and we thoroughly enjoyed it
09:45as we always will.
09:47Al Kelly.
09:52There's no doubt about it.
09:53Friends of football
09:54takes funny bounces,
09:56and you have to be ready for them,
09:58whether you're playing the game
09:59or whether you're writing about it
10:01or having to be broadcasting about it,
10:05and that's why
10:06we've invited a member
10:07of the Football Rules Committee
10:09to talk with us today briefly
10:10about any new rules
10:12or changes in the old ones.
10:14It's certainly a pleasure
10:15to have you with us, sir.
10:17Thank you very much,
10:17Mr. Mellon.
10:18I'm delighted to be here with you.
10:20To begin with,
10:22are you ready for the first question?
10:23Yes, I certainly am.
10:25We always like to start with that one.
10:26Yeah.
10:27Would you give us your opinion
10:28of last season's controversy
10:30over the game
10:30between Notre Dame and Syracuse?
10:32I'm glad you asked that question.
10:34You see,
10:35you probably have read in the papers
10:37that they have now reversed
10:38the decision of the trade
10:39because they felt
10:40that when the whistle blew
10:41at the end of the game,
10:42which was close to the time
10:43of the limited ladder to the trade,
10:45the ball,
10:46as it was sailing through the air,
10:47did not consume the time
10:49of the trade,
10:50and therefore Syracuse
10:51was submitted to trade,
10:52although Notre Dame
10:53may have said
10:54where both have been
10:55in disagreement.
10:56It has come out new,
10:57and Mr. Arthur Maycroft
10:58and Satan Foreman,
10:59who is one of the head men
11:01who has commissioned these rules,
11:02has definitely completed
11:03the fact that
11:04where the ball
11:05has bounced into trade
11:06without the draw,
11:07it must count
11:08on a new basis of foreman.
11:09And that is why
11:10they have taken.
11:11I think I see.
11:13I'm not, uh...
11:15Well, yes,
11:15I mean,
11:16this is the way
11:16they concluded the idea.
11:18And that's why...
11:20That's why they have to
11:21stand the way it is today
11:22without any definite thing.
11:24There'll be no reoccurrence
11:25of it
11:25because the game
11:26wouldn't go on
11:27until the following season.
11:28I was just, uh...
11:30wondering whether
11:31I ought to ask
11:31that question over again.
11:33Well, uh...
11:34But, uh...
11:35I think I've given you
11:36the clear and concise
11:37point on it.
11:38I think you did, too.
11:40I must have been
11:41distracted somewhere in there.
11:42I don't know.
11:43I got to thinking
11:43about the end of the game.
11:45Uh...
11:46Let me ask you,
11:47are 11 men
11:48on each side enough?
11:50Definitely not.
11:51As a member
11:52of the Rules Committee,
11:53why do you say that?
11:53As a member of the Rules Committee,
11:54I am now bringing forth
11:55a new judgment
11:56because we believe
11:57that as long as
11:58there should be
11:59employment for more people,
12:00let there be 14
12:01on each side.
12:02Because with 14,
12:03you have three additional men.
12:04Each one can cover
12:05a certain area of place
12:06in the event of a past,
12:08which goes through the air
12:09that no one might be
12:09about to the place.
12:10There is always a man
12:11who could find that ball
12:12and which will add more
12:13not only to the jollity
12:15of the game,
12:15but to the fact
12:16that they can establish
12:17a new place
12:18and to be kept
12:19into an area
12:20where the ball
12:21cannot escape.
12:22You know,
12:22oddly enough,
12:23that makes sense.
12:24Yes.
12:25Uh...
12:25But I'm a little bit
12:27confused
12:28about Rule 22,
12:30Paragraph 6,
12:31Line 4.
12:32Would you clear
12:33that up for me?
12:34That doesn't make sense.
12:34Yes, yes.
12:35I'm glad...
12:36Many people asked
12:37about this particular rule.
12:38Oh, is that so?
12:38Yes.
12:39Oh, yes.
12:39You see, because this...
12:40That wasn't original then.
12:41No, no.
12:42Well, I don't mean that...
12:43I wouldn't try...
12:44I see that you are
12:45very well versed
12:47in your football
12:47by asking this particular question,
12:49which has come from
12:50some of the greatest coaches.
12:52You heard of
12:52Coach Bell,
12:53main of the form,
12:54of the University of Norman,
12:55and then Coach Martin Fields,
12:57and say he's one of the great
12:59outside coaches.
13:00They've asked the same question.
13:01Now, when you...
13:02They were the coaches
13:03in that Notre Dame-Syracuse game
13:05you were talking about.
13:06That is it?
13:06Yes.
13:07That's right, yes.
13:08You see, I see you
13:09following your game very often.
13:10Now, where the ball
13:11is passed from the quarterback,
13:13he gets it from the center.
13:15And this is a reverse
13:16ball of the field
13:17because he's taking it back
13:18not only to his own trade,
13:20this rule,
13:21which says in Paragraph 6
13:23that the Rule 22
13:24doesn't ham the trade,
13:25the man who receives it
13:26has his own point,
13:27and he's on the open field
13:29where he cannot be tackled.
13:30How are you going to trade?
13:31That is why we will change it.
13:34And I think they will.
13:35Change what?
13:36Change that rule
13:37from Rule 22
13:38to make it sound
13:40as though that people
13:41should know
13:41what is going on
13:42on the field.
13:43Do you know people
13:44who sit there many times
13:45don't know what is happening?
13:46But by this rule
13:47being changed
13:48to conform with the trade,
13:50then they will know
13:51that the pass receiver
13:52was tackled
13:53without falling down
13:54into the air
13:54as he was making the touch.
13:56You know,
13:57you must have played
13:57football yourself.
13:58Well, I don't want
14:00to really say,
14:01but I was a linebacker.
14:02Well, I'm surprised.
14:03I thought you might
14:04have been a quarterback.
14:05No, no, no,
14:06a linebacker
14:06because a quarterback,
14:08I didn't want to take
14:09these signals off
14:10of my mind.
14:10Well, I wondered
14:11how the rest of them
14:12might have understood
14:12all the signals.
14:16But let me say this.
14:19It's about time
14:20to end our masquerade.
14:22Our so-called
14:23Football Rules Committee member,
14:25ladies and gentlemen,
14:26is none other than
14:27the famous king
14:28of the double-talk artist,
14:29Al Kelly.
14:30It's been fun
14:31having you on the show,
14:32Al.
14:33It's been fun always.
14:35It's been fun knowing you.
14:37And this is one man
14:39that I can just say hello to
14:41and start laughing.
14:42Thanks for coming by.
14:43Thank you, Mel.
14:51Friends, this is the time of year
14:53when people enjoy
14:54going downhill fast.
14:56On skis, I mean.
14:57He's mad that.
14:58And for those of you
14:59who ski
15:00or those of you
15:01who'd like to learn,
15:02we have with us today
15:03a gentleman
15:04who's a living legend
15:05among ski instructors
15:07the world over.
15:08He's the internationally famous
15:09Hans Schnapps of Austria.
15:11Hans, it's a pleasure
15:13to have you
15:14as a monitor guest.
15:15I'm very happy
15:17to be as a guest,
15:18Mr. Allen,
15:20and I have more than
15:21space to reply.
15:23Well, there's a
15:24boiling controversy
15:26underway these days.
15:28I don't know whether
15:29I should have used
15:29the word boiling
15:30when we're talking
15:31about winter sports,
15:32but in any case,
15:34the controversy
15:35is raging
15:36over the
15:37comparative merits
15:38of long skis
15:40versus short skis.
15:42Now, Mr. Schnapps,
15:44which is your preference
15:45and why?
15:46Well, I would say
15:47that it would be
15:47much better
15:48if they came
15:49to a new thing
15:50with the middle ski
15:51because the long ski
15:52doesn't let people
15:54go too far
15:55out as they are
15:56making the slalom
15:57ride to the snow,
15:58which is great,
15:59and the short ski
16:00moves them back
16:00to the throw
16:01without the distance,
16:02which is great.
16:03But if they have
16:04a middle ski,
16:05which will cause days,
16:06then all
16:07can find themselves
16:08into the trade
16:09and be very fine
16:10skiers in the company.
16:12You, of course,
16:13have skis.
16:14No, I don't ski at all.
16:17Oh, I see.
16:18I'm just an instructor.
16:19I thought perhaps
16:20you did.
16:21No, I was a small
16:23part of that,
16:23and then I found out
16:25I'd better eat more.
16:27But you watched
16:28them ski.
16:28Oh, I watched
16:30everyone ski.
16:31They are fine,
16:32but the middle ski,
16:33that's my new thing
16:34to bring in.
16:36Yes, but...
16:37Because the long
16:37and the short
16:38both have no distance,
16:40so the middle one
16:40takes in between the two,
16:42and we have an average
16:43for everybody
16:44tall or long.
16:46I'm not laughing at you.
16:47You understand?
16:48No, I understand,
16:48of course.
16:49Well,
16:51I'm just wondering
16:52if you had skied
16:53because,
16:54well,
16:54even just watching it...
16:56Skiing to watch
16:57is very,
16:58very fine.
16:59For people
17:00go all over
17:01to ski watch
17:02all the time.
17:03Ski watching
17:04is like bird watching
17:05and other kinds of things.
17:06Yeah, because,
17:06you know,
17:07yes, you'll find it.
17:08Well, when a fellow...
17:10Have you ever...
17:12I ever did,
17:13but I didn't ski.
17:14You don't let me tell you.
17:16You say that you ever...
17:17I don't know what you ever,
17:18but I do very ski
17:20all the time
17:21when I watch them.
17:22Well, I thought
17:23when you watch them,
17:23somebody had an accident.
17:25They always could say
17:26Schnapps picked them up.
17:28You know, I mean...
17:29Yeah, that's right.
17:30I don't pick them up.
17:30That should be
17:31the end of this,
17:31but what is the most
17:33common era
17:33of a skiing beginner
17:35and how can they correct it?
17:37It's funny, you know,
17:37I always ask questions
17:38and two parts to each one.
17:40The best way
17:41is not to fall
17:42while you're skiing.
17:43That's the best.
17:44Then if you go through
17:45the entire beginning
17:47as you go from the top right
17:49and you make your jump,
17:50which leads you
17:51into that new area
17:52where you find...
17:53Then you have completed
17:54a fine ski
17:56and there's no trouble
17:57and people will see it
17:59and they'll find out too.
18:00Maybe they'll ski
18:01because this is why
18:02the purpose
18:02is to get more people
18:04who ski without skiing
18:06before they went there
18:07together.
18:08You know,
18:08your accents changed
18:09since we started
18:10this interview.
18:11Well, I get excited,
18:12so I...
18:13When I get excited,
18:15I become a very excited man.
18:17And I forget
18:18what I was saying
18:19in the first place.
18:20How can you correct it?
18:22I don't mean the accent,
18:23I mean the errors in skiing.
18:25Oh, the errors in skiing.
18:26By having skis
18:27that fit the feet
18:28is important
18:29because some people
18:30get skis that overlap
18:32and they don't have
18:34the underneath
18:35where the mouth...
18:37This is the part
18:38of the ski
18:39that holds on to the foot
18:40and causes it
18:41without the strap
18:41to be dropped.
18:42But some of them,
18:43if they tie up the ski
18:44well to the foot,
18:46they will come down
18:47together with it
18:47and there'll be no loss.
18:48Snow is important,
18:50isn't it?
18:50Oh, yes,
18:50in order to have the cause.
18:52Otherwise...
18:52What do you mean
18:53snow is important?
18:54Well, I just...
18:55I don't understand
18:56the question.
18:57How do you...
18:58Well, where would they ski
18:59if the snow didn't come up?
19:01Well, how do you
19:02wax your skis?
19:03With a new type
19:04of a thing called
19:05Maravix ski.
19:07It's made by a fine company
19:08in Australia,
19:10Coleman, Deez,
19:11Haim, and Company.
19:12Is this a plug?
19:13No, I tell you,
19:14people don't know of them.
19:15Yeah, I see.
19:16It can be a plug.
19:17Nobody even heard
19:18of the name, so...
19:19But they make fine skis wax...
19:21That I can...
19:22Believe, yeah.
19:23No, but they're the new...
19:24They made the new ski wax
19:25which they put on the trade
19:27and it causes
19:28for the finest type of skiing
19:30that you ever had
19:31in your life.
19:32If you ski,
19:33get Maravix,
19:34Corblin,
19:35Deez, Flynn.
19:36I sure will.
19:36And you'll find it's
19:37a very good boy.
19:38I sure will,
19:39if I ever ski.
19:40Oh, yeah,
19:40your skiing will improve.
19:42Because I don't know
19:42where I may fall in...
19:44No, with this wax,
19:47there's no falling.
19:48No, no,
19:49that prevents falling
19:50because the wax
19:51holds on to the foot.
19:53Do you prefer
19:54the normal slalom
19:56or the giant slalom?
19:58I don't care
19:58who goes.
20:00Anybody can go
20:01if they like to.
20:02It has to be Mr. Slalom.
20:03I don't know who he is.
20:04If he's a good skier,
20:05let him go.
20:06I don't stop.
20:07I think everybody
20:07should ski
20:08if the weather is there.
20:10And, uh...
20:11Without it,
20:11you can't go.
20:12That's right.
20:13Yes.
20:14Do you believe
20:15in, uh...
20:17Speaking of weather,
20:19using artificial snow
20:21in order to, uh,
20:23continue with the ski meet?
20:24No.
20:24Artificial snow
20:25has not the same effect
20:27as the regular snow
20:28which comes
20:29to people
20:30who know what it is.
20:31Because artificial,
20:32suppose a certain spot
20:33is not covered
20:34and the sun
20:35melts through the street,
20:36then the whole thing
20:37is over.
20:38See?
20:39And you haven't got
20:40the right phrase
20:41for your gift to people.
20:42Then you have to go back...
20:43Then you have to go back
20:44to the snow.
20:45They're waxing the skis
20:46with the, uh...
20:46From Kalman,
20:47Haitian,
20:47Blob,
20:47and Team and Company.
20:48And there in Australia
20:49you can't go so far.
20:51Unless you go by plane,
20:52you might make it.
20:55Well, uh...
20:58Out, out.
21:00Friends,
21:00if you've been having trouble
21:01untangling Mr. Schnapps' sentences,
21:04you're not alone.
21:05You see,
21:06Mr. Schnapps
21:07ain't Mr. Schnapps at all.
21:09He's really Al Kelly
21:10who probably has had
21:11some schnapps.
21:13He really hasn't,
21:14but I mean,
21:14you know,
21:15it sounds that way
21:15when you talk.
21:16Al Kelly,
21:17king of the double talkers.
21:18Al, thanks for coming by
21:20and remind me
21:21not to take your advice
21:22on skiing too seriously.
21:24Thank you, Mel.
21:25and you're a tattoo.
21:25Great.
21:26I wish I had my answer
21:27all these things
21:28You're a tattoo.
21:29Because you believe
21:29Will...
21:29potatoes and sceptacle,
21:29you know.
21:29And then you're
Comments