Saltar al reproductorSaltar al contenido principal
  • hace 12 minutos
Trump sigue decepcionado con la OTAN por Irán, advierte el embajador de EEUU

El embajador estadounidense ante la UE, Andrew Pudzer, afirma que los aliados de la OTAN cometieron un gran error al no ayudar a EEUU en la guerra de Irán y sostiene, en una entrevista con Euronews, que los europeos tenían la obligación de hacerlo por el historial de EEUU defendiendo el continente.

MÁS INFORMACIÓN : http://es.euronews.com/2026/06/05/trump-sigue-descontento-con-la-otan-por-iran-advierte-el-embajador-de-eeuu

¡Suscríbete a nuestro canal! Euronews está disponible en 12 idiomas

Categoría

🗞
Noticias
Transcripción
00:14¡Gracias!
00:34Well, it's a very thick bill, and I have not had a chance to look through it very thoroughly.
00:43But I hope that this tech sovereignty doesn't drive a wedge between the United States and Europe in the tech
00:52area,
00:52because I think that it's very important that they stay united, that we partner with Europe.
00:57We've now got a, hopefully by the end of this month, we'll have a trade agreement.
01:02We've got Paxilica, which is an effort to involve our allies, including the European Union,
01:09in the chip industry, in our supply chains, and in artificial intelligence generally.
01:14We've got a critical minerals memorandum of understanding, so we can try and maybe ring-fence some economies
01:20so that we're not subject to economic coercion when it comes to these rare-earth minerals.
01:25Well, Europe is behind in the AI race.
01:28They're way behind China, and China is behind the United States.
01:32They're not going to catch up.
01:33So I think the more they separate from the US AI hardware stack, which is important if
01:38you're going to be in the AI economy, the more they separate themselves from that, the more
01:42negative it's going to be.
01:43So I'm hoping it'll be more of a partnership and less of a competition.
01:47But the EU would say, well, we're too reliant on the United States for financial services
01:52as well as digital services.
01:54And one example that has come up over the past few months is the US sanctions on judges
01:58at the International Criminal Court, where those judges who live in The Hague, in a European
02:03country, can no longer use their Microsoft accounts and can no longer use US credit cards,
02:08or credit cards that everybody else has.
02:09So they feel that that's not right, but also they shouldn't be relying on the US for supplying
02:15these services.
02:17Yeah.
02:18We definitely have disagreements with these particular judges and the way that they've dealt
02:24with international law and American companies, American individuals, as well as other people
02:30around the globe.
02:31But this is a small part of what's involved in a massive relationship, a cross-continental
02:40relationship that's very, very intertwined.
02:43You really can't break it up.
02:46You can't remove it.
02:47You can't.
02:48Europe is far enough behind the United States and China that it really can't catch up.
02:54So I don't know that separating off is going to solve the problems they're trying to solve.
02:58But the point I suppose they're making is that they need to be independent to protect themselves
03:03from a sovereign perspective.
03:05But also there are concerns because of the last year or so with the Trump administration.
03:10The Europeans feel slightly under threat or slightly coerced.
03:13If you look at maybe the trade deal that was agreed in Turnberry just at the end of last
03:19summer, that there was a 15% tariff rate imposed on the Europeans.
03:23It wasn't much of a negotiation.
03:24You have also the Greenland issue.
03:27So the Europeans feel now is the time not to decouple but to at least de-risk from the
03:32United States as well as China.
03:34So with the trade agreement, the trade agreement is an effort that President von der Leyen and
03:39President Trump mutually negotiated to try and rebalance a very unbalanced trade relationship.
03:45Our largest trade deficit in the world is with the European Union.
03:48Now it is the largest trade relationship in the world, but for years you would pay a 10% tariff
03:55to sell a Cadillac in Berlin, but you would only pay a 2.5% tariff to sell a Mercedes
03:59-Benz
04:00in Detroit.
04:01And nobody in Europe seemed to be complaining about the imbalance at that point in time.
04:05It's only now that we're trying to rebalance the relationship that that inequity created that
04:09people are complaining.
04:10The 50% tariff you mentioned is on steel and aluminum, and I will also point out that Europe
04:15has a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum.
04:18The idea of those tariffs is both to keep out subsidized product from China, where they're
04:26selling steel and aluminum at prices that really nobody in the world can compete with
04:32because they're subsidized by the Chinese government.
04:35So Europe is doing the same thing on steel and aluminum that the United States is.
04:39On Greenland, what the President said was he wouldn't take any options off the table.
04:43Greenland is a very strategically important issue for the United States.
04:47It's important for Europe.
04:48I don't think really, a year ago, if we had this discussion, people would be as aware
04:52of how strategically important Greenland is.
04:55So it's important for the United States, it's important for Europe, and it's important
05:00that people understand that this is an area of the country, an area of the world where
05:04China and Russia will try and take advantage.
05:07And I think they're a little more nervous about how the United States would react than they
05:10are about how Denmark would react.
05:12So could you say, then, that Denmark has nothing to worry about?
05:15Because we did also see the Prime Minister of Greenland saying that the U.S. envoy to Nuuk
05:20pretty much had the same intentions as Donald Trump said he did back in January.
05:24Marco Rubio said, Greenland's part of Denmark for now.
05:27So it seems to be a little bit more than highlighting the security threat from Russia and China
05:32in the high north and the Arctic.
05:33Well, but it did highlight the security threat.
05:36I think that's the important point here.
05:37Whether or not the United States becomes more involved and the extent to which we become
05:41more involved will, in fact, be decided by the President and Secretary Rubio, not by me.
05:45But I think it's important we understand that it's important that the United States be involved
05:50and remain involved in Greenland.
05:53And I think Europe has now realized that it needs to step up its defense and its position
05:59with respect to Greenland.
06:00So I think we're headed in the right direction.
06:02Where it ends up, that'll be, as I said, up to the President and the Secretary of State.
06:06And we've seen President Zelensky of Ukraine taking, I suppose, the mantle into his own hands
06:12about trying to end the Russian invasion of his country, where he wrote a letter personally
06:18for President Putin saying that he would like to meet him.
06:21Do you think this is a good idea that the Ukrainians are going to try to take control
06:25of the situation and the Europeans maybe?
06:27Because obviously the U.S. is very busy dealing with the Strait of Ormos.
06:31So the extent to which the President or Secretary Rubio are involved in that
06:36peace negotiations with Ukraine is obviously something that's in the discretion of the President.
06:43I think he's been very open that he wants to see this war end.
06:47I think it's been a great frustration to him that he hasn't been able to bring about an end to
06:51the war.
06:52I have not talked to him about it, but I'd be very surprised if he objected to Putin and Zelensky
06:57talking,
06:58particularly if it ended up with a resolution to this conflict.
07:01I think the Ukrainian people have lasted here much longer than anybody thought they were going to last.
07:06I think a lot of people thought they maybe wouldn't make it a couple of weeks and I think we're
07:10in year five.
07:12So they've been incredibly resilient and I hope they bring about an end to the war.
07:16I think it's important to everybody.
07:17One of the concerns that Europe has is that the Americans are moving away from the security architecture of the
07:25European continent,
07:25which of course the Europeans are saying this is about time, we need to step up, we need to start
07:30paying 5% and so on.
07:32But there's a real fear that that also means in times of war that maybe our allies won't be there
07:38for them.
07:39When you look at the sort of NATO force model and the reduction of the capabilities that are existing there.
07:43Do you think America is turning away from Europe?
07:46Well, I think America is refocusing some of its energies and resources on dealing with Asia,
07:53which is we have a competitor in China that really requires that we refocus how we allocate our resources.
08:01And there's certainly nothing wrong with asking Europe to step up and take care of itself.
08:06But look, America came to the defense of Europe twice in the last century.
08:09We defended Europe throughout the Cold War and actually have defended them since the fall of the Berlin Wall and
08:15the end of the Cold War.
08:16So we still have massive numbers of troops here and massive numbers of military armaments and supplies.
08:22There's nothing wrong with the United States cutting back on that and Europe taking a more assertive role in its
08:27own defense.
08:28I think that's something we want. And I believe it's something that the Europeans now realize and that the Europeans
08:33want.
08:34I think that some of the fears from the European capitals is that it's happening at a time when the
08:38United States,
08:39particularly President Trump, is extremely disappointed.
08:41He's made that very clear to Mark Rutte and so on, and to the Europeans themselves,
08:45that about their lack of support in the aftermath of the U.S. and Israeli strikes on the Iran in
08:51relation to the straighter from us.
08:52Has that situation subsided for Donald Trump?
08:56I don't know that it subsided. I mean, I know he's very disappointed.
08:59We have a situation where the president, at great political risk, I mean, nobody, you know, his party was not,
09:07the MAGA movement is not supportive of foreign wars.
09:11The Democrats were going to oppose him no matter what he did.
09:14So without really any political advantage, he assessed the situation, saw the development of the missiles and the drones in
09:22Iran,
09:24and they're continuing to try and get access to a nuclear weapon.
09:27They're having that visible nuclear material where they could create 10 or 11 bombs.
09:32And rather than kicking the can down the road or passing the buck, whichever metaphor you want to use,
09:38he decided that it was important that he act, despite the fact that it wouldn't be to his political advantage,
09:43because it was the right thing to do.
09:45We have bases in Europe that we have funded and supported for decades.
09:51We have countries that we've rescued in war and we've been a very reliable ally to.
09:56When they won't even let us fly over their country or use our bases in their countries,
10:01you're going to find the United States, and particularly President Trump, will be very upset.
10:05And I don't know when that subsides, but hopefully it will over time.
10:11But I don't know if it has yet.
10:12Do you think that this sort of reaction then at NATO is part of that,
10:15saying, look, you didn't come to our aid, so therefore we won't be there for you in times of need,
10:19and that's why we're removing capabilities?
10:21No, I don't think anybody said that.
10:23What I've heard Secretary Rubio say is, look, we're supportive of NATO,
10:26but the reason that we have an alliance is so that we defend each other and work together.
10:30And if that's not how the alliance is going to work, then we need to reassess it.
10:34I don't think anybody said, we're pulling out of NATO, we're going to pull out of NATO.
10:38What about the Europeans' perspective when they say NATO is a defensive organization,
10:43this was an offensive war outside the territory of NATO,
10:47so therefore the obligation wasn't for us, particularly when we weren't consulted?
10:51I think that's a little too technical and a little too ignoring of reality.
10:55The Iranians have been at war with at least the United States and Israel for 47 years.
11:00I mean, they've been killing people. They've got these groups like Hamas and Hezbollah that go out and attack the
11:08U.S. forces and Israeli forces.
11:10They've now bombed Cyprus. They tried to bomb. They sent a missile down to the island off of India's Diego.
11:18I can't remember what the name of it is, but the island that the British control off the coast of
11:21India.
11:22Diego Garcia.
11:22Diego Garcia. So I think that may be a technical explanation that tries to get them off the hook for
11:29something they maybe should have done.
11:31Nobody was asking them to send troops. All we wanted to do was fly over the countries we defended
11:37and use the air bases or the military bases that we maintain in those countries.
11:42So if you're not willing to do that, what are you willing to do?
11:45So it was a big mistake for a small ask. Is that what you're saying?
11:48I would say that was a very good summary.
11:52Ambassador Andrew Pudson, thank you very much for joining us on 12 Minutes at Euronews.
11:55My pleasure.
11:55Thank you.
11:55Thank you.
11:57Thank you.
Comentarios

Recomendada