Skip to playerSkip to main content
Senator Jamie Raskin delivered a fiery rebuke during a heated SPLC hearing, targeting Donald Trump over explosive allegations tied to controversial DOJ “slush funds.” In a dramatic exchange, Raskin demanded accountability and transparency over claims involving billions in taxpayer money and alleged political favoritism connected to Trump allies.

The intense hearing has sparked fresh political controversy in Washington, with Democrats accusing the former president of abusing government institutions for personal and political gain. The confrontation is fueling national debate over DOJ oversight, corruption allegations, and the growing political battle ahead of the 2026 U.S. election cycle. Watch the full explosive breakdown and reactions.







#Trump #JamieRaskin #DOJ #SlushFund #USPolitics #BreakingNews #DonaldTrump #Politics #Democrats #WashingtonDC #Congress #PoliticalNews #SPLC #USA #January6

~HT.178~PR.498~ED.102~GR.508~VG.HM~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. And I suppose the court packing like justice itself lies in the eye of
00:08the beholder. But there are many different kinds of court packing. Here's one. When Justice Scalia died in February of
00:162016, when Barack Obama was president, Senator Mitch McConnell announced 10 and a half months before the presidential election that
00:25the Senate would not be considering any replacement.
00:27The Judiciary Committee would not have any hearing. There'd be no vote in committee and there'd be no vote on
00:32the floor. When people asked why, that makes no sense to hold the Supreme Court seat open, to hold that
00:41vacancy open for nearly a year.
00:43He said it was too close to the next presidential election and the people should decide. Of course, the people
00:49had decided in electing Barack Obama to one of those genuine, bona fide, four-year terms in office, like every
00:56other president.
00:57Well, we've got a controlled experiment about what would happen because that was held open. Merrick Garland was nominated by
01:06Barack Obama and was left twisting in the wind for nearly 11 months after the death of Justice Scalia.
01:14Then Trump, when he got in, was able to nominate Neil Gorsuch to the seat in his first week in
01:22office. And that seat was open for 422 days. And Mitch McConnell bragged about it, calling it the most consequential
01:32decision of his entire public career.
01:34And, of course, it cemented the rapid movement of the Supreme Court to the right to incarnate the mega agenda
01:43on the Supreme Court.
01:45Well, look, here's what happened when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died. Now, she died on September 18th, 2020, so close to
01:53the next election, which was less than two months away,
01:57that early voting had started in a lot of the states. So it wasn't even two months away.
02:03And then the Democrats asked Mitch McConnell, some reporters asked Mitch McConnell, well, of course, you're not going to have
02:10hearings or vote or anything in the next few weeks, are you?
02:12And he laughed it off. He laughed off the suggestion that they would maintain the same rule that they had
02:18used to block Merrick Garland and President Obama from having a seat.
02:24And then they rammed through the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett within two months, consolidating the right-wing, anti-choice,
02:33anti-environmental regulation, anti-labor, anti-voting rights, anti-democracy majority on the Supreme Court.
02:40Had the original McConnell rule been applied or even a reasonable approach taken with just a few weeks before the
02:49election,
02:50that Supreme Court seat would have been filled by President Biden, not by Donald Trump.
02:55Biden won that election, by the way, by more than 7 million votes, if you're interested in what the people
03:01want, 306 to 232 in the Electoral College.
03:03I know some people came down to overthrow the election, attack our police officers in order to accomplish a political
03:11coup to deny that.
03:12But that's what happened. So right there, we've got two seats officially stolen by Mitch McConnell and the Republican Senate,
03:21giving them a 6-3 mega court with a majority of the court now made up of nominees of presidents
03:26who lost the popular vote.
03:30Lost the popular vote. Roberts and Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, all nominated the court by justices, by
03:39presidents who lost the popular vote.
03:41Now, if you don't believe that this Supreme Court has conceived and achieved a remarkable transformation in constitutional jurisprudence,
03:54ethics and behavior on everything from abortion to voting rights to political corruption cases,
04:01then you don't have to believe me or you don't have to believe your own eyes.
04:05Just listen to Donald Trump, who openly says it's really OK for them to be loyal to the person that
04:11appointed them to almost the highest position in the land,
04:15a justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.
04:17He berates and vilifies justices and judges up and down the federal system who disagree with him
04:22or who he feels have been insufficiently robotic in their loyalty to the mega agenda.
04:28It's true. He doesn't want a justice loyal to the people, as the good chairman of the subcommittee says, or
04:35the Constitution.
04:35He wants a Supreme Court loyal to him and whatever is going to advance his interests, his money, his family,
04:42his corporations.
04:43He's got a Supreme Court majority so robotically loyal that they will pluck a doctrine out of thin air,
04:50nothing to do with originalism, nothing to do with textualism,
04:53out of thin air to insulate the president from liability for felony crimes committed in office.
05:00We went for more than two centuries without any president ever claiming the right to commit crimes under his office
05:08and not to be prosecuted for it. But here we are today.
05:11The Supreme Court, we must acknowledge, has been a profoundly conservative reactionary institution
05:18for the vast majority of our history.
05:20And what did the Supreme Court ever do for enslaved people between the founding of the Civil War?
05:25Nothing other than in 1857 in the Dred Scott decision cement their subjugation into place,
05:31saying that the African slave and his descendants have no rights a white man is bound to respect in any
05:38way.
05:38And then even after the Civil War, after the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments
05:43drawn from the blood, sweat, and tears of the Union and the people who fought to defend our country
05:49against the Confederacy, the Supreme Court gutted the meaning of the Reconstruction Amendments
05:55in the civil rights cases.
05:56And then in 1896 in Plessy v. Ferguson, constitutionalized the reign of Jim Crow,
06:03separate but equal.
06:04So we have a couple decades around the Warren Court, maybe the first few years of the Berger Court,
06:10where the Supreme Court acted on the side of the people.
06:13Brown v. Board of Education striking down American apartheid, the white primary line of cases,
06:21Terry v. Ohio, Roe v. Wade.
06:23But it didn't last long before it all sank away with the Rehnquist Court and the Roberts Court.
06:30And now they've returned to the historic baseline of political white supremacy.
06:34They wiped out our Voting Rights Act, first in Shelby County v. Holder in 2013,
06:40and a couple months ago in the Calais decision.
06:44And we are about to see, they're not going to be able to accomplish it all in 2026,
06:47but by 2028, we will probably see all white congressional delegations from the Deep South,
06:54wherever the Republicans control the state legislatures.
06:57Okay, that is court packing.
06:58That's political packing by a packed Supreme Court.
07:03The court today has a legitimacy crisis,
07:05not just because of the way it's been composed and stacked and packed and gerrymandered
07:09and divided by Mitch McConnell, who laughs about it.
07:15He thinks it's funny what they did.
07:17Why do some people want 13 circuits, Mr. Chairman?
07:20Very, 13 members of the court.
07:23You don't need a conspiracy theory for that.
07:25There are 13 federal circuits in America.
07:28And traditionally, the Supreme Court has been made up of the number of justices equal to the number of circuits.
07:33And we've got 13 circuits, but we only have nine justices.
07:37So that means that under the best of circumstances,
07:41four entire federal regions, four federal circuits will be left out completely.
07:45And it's much worse than that today,
07:47because we've got five justices from New York City alone, one for each borough.
07:52But you're telling a majority of the people who live in a majority of the states
07:57that they can't find anybody qualified to serve on the Supreme Court.
08:01So that's the answer to that particular question.
08:04But we've got a complete, structural, ethical, jurisprudential crisis in the Supreme Court,
08:10whose name is in the gutter because of these terrible decisions that they keep issuing,
08:16like the overthrow of Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood v. Casey,
08:22the complete construction out of thin air of immunity of presidents to commit felony crimes while in office,
08:33and so on.
08:34And I hope that this court will do its best to try to behave like a Supreme Court.
08:38But there are things that we can do.
08:40And I introduced one bill yesterday called the SCOTUS Act.
08:45And the SCOTUS Act is creating a new way for cert to be granted,
08:51because this Supreme Court is obviously acting like a legislature.
08:54I mean, they set up an agenda where they want this case about the Voting Rights Act.
09:00They want to destroy it.
09:01Oh, now it's time for us to overthrow abortion rights.
09:04We're going to take that case.
09:05All right.
09:06A lot of countries don't leave the agenda-setting authority to the court itself.
09:11And certainly we should not leave it in the hands of this Supreme Court.
09:16It belongs with the 13 federal circuits.
09:18We should have a panel made up of the chief judge of each federal circuit or their designee,
09:23if they want another judge to do it.
09:25And they should decide when there is a meaningful circuit split or a federal question
09:29that should go up to the Supreme Court.
09:31This court obviously cannot be trusted with that agenda-setting authority.
09:35Let's begin to create a real Supreme Court in the country by moving in this direction.
09:43And I thank you, Mr. Chairman.
09:44I yield back to you.
09:47Subscribe to One India and never miss an update.
09:52Download the One India app now.
Comments

Recommended