Skip to playerSkip to main content
In a fiery address, Vladimir Putin claimed that Ukraine and NATO failed to “crush” Russia, arguing that attempts to weaken Russian statehood “within months” did not succeed. Speaking amid the ongoing Russia–Ukraine War, Putin suggested that the conflict may be approaching a decisive phase, hinting that the “end could be near.”

The remarks come as fighting continues on multiple fronts, with both sides presenting sharply different narratives about battlefield progress and future outcomes. NATO leaders have repeatedly rejected Moscow’s claims, maintaining support for Ukraine while emphasizing long-term security commitments.

#PutinSpeech #UkraineConflict #FailedToCrushRussia #NATOCriticism #RussiaUkraineWar #WarEndingClaim #WarEndNear #RussiaUkraineUpdate2026 #NATOResponse #SpeechReaction #Geopolitics #WarTurningPoint #SpeechHighlights #GlobalReaction #WarEndClaim #MilitaryUpdate #RussiaUkraineConflict #BreakingNews

~PR.152~HT.318~GR.510~ED.102~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00They expected to crush Russia to destroy the statehood within a few months, but they failed.
00:08These political forces will step by step get back to the leadership positions,
00:14or they will seize power with the support of the vast majority of the European countries.
00:20I believe that it is coming to an end, but nevertheless, that was a serious thing to do.
00:25So the question is, why did it happen? Because they expected to crush Russia to destroy the statehood within a
00:35few months, but they failed.
00:38But, well, they got stuck into this, and now they cannot get out of this.
00:44Even though there are enough smart people out there, there are those people who understand what is happening.
00:51And I hope that these political forces will step by step get back to the leadership positions,
01:00or they will seize power with the support of the vast majority of the European countries.
01:05And as for provocative statements, these decisions had been made much earlier than the so-called provocative statements were made.
01:28As for said statements, we responded to them, as you know.
01:33First, the Ministry of Defense made their statements that, in case there are any attempts to thwart or disrupt our
01:46festivities,
01:46we will be forced to do massive retaliatory rocket strikes on Kyiv downtown.
02:01But that was supposed to be a response.
02:08That wasn't all of it, it was followed by a note of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but it even
02:20didn't end there as well.
02:24We started working with our partners and friends, first of all, with our friends from the People's Republic of China,
02:31India, and some other countries,
02:37including the U.S. administration.
02:39What kind of work that was, we outlined to our friends, colleagues and partners, we outlined the picture that could
02:54have formed.
02:55We have no desire to spoil relationships with anyone.
03:01That could have happened because all decision, centers of decision-making in Kyiv are in direct vicinity of diplomatic establishments,
03:12consulates of dozens of countries.
03:15That's the problem.
03:16When we started this dialogue with the U.S. administration, we warned them, we informed them of possible consequences and
03:28asked them to do everything to ensure security of their diplomats.
03:35And as a result of those discussions, there came the initiative of U.S. President Donald Trump about the extra
03:46two days of truce and exchange of prisoners of war during those days.
03:52And we agreed to that right away, since this, I think, this idea is highly justified and dictated by considerations
04:06of respect to our common victory over Nazism.
04:11It's obviously a humanitarian move, and several days before, on the 5th of May, we passed on to Ukraine our
04:27suggestion of truce and sent them a list of 500 Ukrainian prisoners of war that are currently in Russia.
04:37The initial reaction was that they need to take a closer look at that, maybe not all 500 of them,
04:44maybe 200 of them, and then, after that, they said directly that they were not prepared for this exchange.
04:53They did want to do it.
04:57So when President Trump stepped forward with his initiative, we supported it right away, and we expect that in this
05:10case Ukraine will respond to the suggestion of the President of the United States.
05:18But there haven't been any responses from Ukraine, sadly, sadly, so far.
05:26The Ukrainian side and Mr. Zelensky, they are ready to have a personal meeting, and we heard that before, so
05:37what can I say?
05:37We have never refused, I have never refused, so if they proposed a meeting, and those who want to meet,
05:49they can travel to Moscow, and we will have a meeting, and we can meet in the third country as
05:55well.
05:55But only after there is an ultimate agreement regarding a peace deal that must be a long-term deal.
06:12Then we can meet to sign something, but then this should be the final thing to do, not to hold
06:20negotiations there, because we know what these negotiations could look like, because we have this experience from Minsk regarding Minsk
06:29Accords.
06:29We can speak hours, we can speak hours, day and night, and it would yield no results.
06:34We need specialists to take care of that, to do everything, to make it clear for both sides, to make
06:40sure that both parties agree, then we can meet, we can sign, or we can attend some ceremony where the
06:48document will be signed.
Comments

Recommended