Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 18 hours ago
JAKARTA, KOMPAS.TV - Dirjen Komunikasi Publik dan Media Kemkomdigi, Fifi Aleyda Yahya, angkat bicara soal takedown video pernyataan Amien Rais yang viral.

Fifi menyebut pengelolaan ruang digital dilakukan setiap hari terhadap berbagai isu.

Ia mencontohkan, hoaks yang ditangani tidak hanya terkait isu politik. Menurutnya, informasi yang tidak berbasis fakta tidak bisa dianggap sebagai bagian dari kebebasan berpendapat.

Komdigi menegaskan, kebebasan berpendapat memiliki batas. Ia menambahkan, kritik tetap diperbolehkan selama tidak menyesatkan.

Namun, tindakan akan diambil jika konten dinilai berpotensi merugikan publik. Terkait proses penindakan, Komdigi memastikan setiap konten melalui tahapan verifikasi.

Ia menegaskan, keputusan tidak didasarkan pada preferensi subjektif. Komdigi juga membantah adanya intervensi dalam proses pengambilan keputusan. Selain itu, masyarakat juga diberi ruang untuk melaporkan konten bermasalah.



Bagaimana menurut Anda?

Selengkapnya saksikan di sini: https://youtu.be/Wkl8NEmAtCo
Transcript
00:00Before we get to Mas Kurnia, I want us to hear first, because Mr. Amin the day after the video circulated
00:05still providing clarification and we will first hear Mr. Amin Rais' statement.
00:14Yes, so I stood up, I said,
00:20because I believe that democracy is great, that freedom of expression is guaranteed by our constitution.
00:31unrestricted, not suppressed.
00:35Well, then what is called a democratic country, for people who think that is fine, yes,
00:43in the hands of the official rulers, in the hands of these other groups of people,
00:52but, what, so the point of conflict is, yes, the point of difference is,
01:01what, which is close to the fate of the nation.
01:07Mas Kurnia, what did you think of that?
01:11It was explained earlier that, okay, the temporary quotation marks can understand what Komdigi does, but there are.
01:19Since actual, I, we announced.
01:22The current ratio is like that.
01:23But, Mr. Amin still said that this is not allowed, this is a violation of income freedom.
01:28Yes, Mas Yogi, if you have watched it earlier, I said earlier, I watched the video,
01:34then I checked the words, Mas Yogi.
01:37When checking the entire sentence, I tried to find where the public policy lies here.
01:45When I read it more than three times, there was no aspect of public policy that was discussed personally.
01:53If earlier colleagues from the People's Party talked about legislation,
01:58I just want to ask a quick question, Mas Yogi.
02:02In the context of the legislation,
02:06where the article allows attacking someone's honor.
02:11We will let go of the aspects of public officials that are attached to the parties discussed by Mr. Amin Rais.
02:18That's the basic philosophy, it's not allowed.
02:21And also, Mas Yogi, I was curious when Mr. Amin was filming that video,
02:28Who were the people in the room, was there no one to remind you, Mr. Amin,
02:33that what was conveyed was far beyond the limits of statutory regulations.
02:40Mr. Yogi, in the context of actual statutory regulations,
02:45If there is a public policy aspect there, it is never prohibited.
02:49Earlier, Mas Yogi had confirmed this with the Director General.
02:52In terms of public policy, criticism is heard every minute on social media.
02:58Nothing was taken down by Komdiji.
03:01But in this case, don't let Mas Yogi,
03:04if there is a video testimony that attacks someone's honor,
03:10exit strategy freedom of speech.
03:12That means we are not educating the public.
03:16And again trying to frame that this Republic is an anti-democratic Republic.
03:21Even though the democratic path has been violated, it has crossed the line.
03:27Therefore, the government in this case wants to remind,
03:30good to Mr. Amin Rais,
03:33or parties who consider or normalize this action,
03:39It's not good like that, Mas Yogi.
03:41Because the duties of this figure have been quite well known to the public,
03:47must carry messages of peace.
03:50Criticism is fine, but it should be substantive.
03:53That's one, Mas Yogi.
03:54Then the second one,
03:55one of them, Mas Yogi,
03:57the duties of political parties in the political party law,
04:00it is to educate the public.
04:02So, say the right things,
04:06so that the public can also understand what the context of this problem is actually like.
04:11Okay, Mr. Kurnia.
04:12Mr. Hayar,
04:14in the spotlight, however, this people's party and political party
04:18who are on their way to the election of course, right,
04:23see what Mr. Kurnia said,
04:27what do you want to convey?
04:28Because it was clear earlier that it was an attack on a person,
04:33does not disturb the honor.
04:35What do you want to convey?
04:37So, this is my response, perhaps also responding to
04:41Mr. Kurnia and Mr. Iyai, yes.
04:43So, earlier Mr. Iyai also had atomum and all sorts of things.
04:47So, maybe I want to straighten out the context, okay?
04:50So, we don't want to get into the content or this is Mr. Amin's video,
04:56but the context is,
04:58if we talk about atomum,
05:00That's more of a fallacy, right?
05:02that is, if for example we are talking about something,
05:07then from that matter we attack the individual.
05:11Well, if this is it,
05:13Indeed, Mr. Amin is not criticizing a public policy or anything,
05:19but indeed he conveyed what he knew and which had become public concern.
05:28Like that.
05:29So, that's not it,
05:30if we are talking about atomumi, what are we talking about?
05:32then he just attacks the person like that.
05:34Well, this is not really...
05:37Mr. Ayer, have you watched the video?
05:39I've already.
05:40Having looked at the details,
05:41what good words were conveyed by Mr. Amin.
05:44Yes, it is clearly stated there that two names are being accused,
05:47then continue to mention.
05:49Isn't that personal?
05:51So, here it is.
05:52Earlier Mr. Kone said,
05:55we release it from public officials.
05:58Well, that's precisely where it is,
05:59that's the mistake,
06:01because of this,
06:03the name Mr Amin mentioned was a public official.
06:05Okay.
06:06So that,
06:07why is he willing to,
06:11say,
06:13stand in front to voice the concerns of the community,
06:17because the person mentioned is a public official.
06:22For example, if
06:22say the names mentioned,
06:26nobody,
06:27or our friends,
06:29or retail traders,
06:31or something, like that,
06:33yes, that's what it's called attacking the public,
06:34what, personal attack,
06:36and has nothing to do with the public interest.
06:39Well, why Mr. Amin,
06:40to the point of releasing a video like that,
06:43Yes, because,
06:44it is related to public officials.
06:46So, we can't get away from that.
06:48I will return to Mr. Ayar later.
06:50Mrs. Vivi,
06:51What does KomDigi actually do?
06:53in the context of maintaining public digital space,
06:56to stay healthy,
06:57That's not just the case of Mr. Amin's video, right?
07:00Not related to who is mentioned in the video,
07:03our daily task is to manage the digital space,
07:08there is a hoax related to banking,
07:11related to health,
07:13even some time ago,
07:15there is a hoax regarding the death of a national figure,
07:19which we must take immediate action.
07:22So, every day we confirm there are many hoaxes,
07:27don't immediately become public consumption,
07:29because don't let the information circulating in society,
07:34which is not based on data or facts,
07:37which let's say is considered freedom of opinion.
07:41Excuse me,
07:42can't be like that,
07:44because freedom of speech is not absolute,
07:47because it must be based on data or facts.
07:50If for example it is just criticism,
07:52it's still okay,
07:54because criticism is part of democracy.
07:56But if it enters the realm of information that is not based on facts,
08:01and tends to mislead the public,
08:03we must take action,
08:05so that this digital space remains safe and conducive.
08:09This is a bit technical.
08:11If I'm not mistaken, two days after the video aired,
08:15Was there just action from KomDigi or was it immediate?
08:18Because after all,
08:20any material that has the potential to mislead the public,
08:24there has to be verification.
08:26This can't be based on likes or dislikes.
08:29But there is a team in digital space supervision under KomDigi,
08:33it does verification,
08:36conduct analysis,
08:38fact check,
08:39as is done perhaps on Kompas TV,
08:42all information that comes to the editorial desk,
08:46is everything suitable for public consumption,
08:49is it suitable for most broadcasts,
08:50Why do I ask this,
08:51More or less the same.
08:52Because there is also speculation,
08:54and I need confirmation,
08:55Wow, this must be a call from the palace,
08:57The Minister of Communication and Digital Affairs was asked to take down.
09:00This is why I confirmed.
09:01Verification runs in accordance with the mandate used.
09:05There is no such thing,
09:06Mom wants to say that it is actually something that is done routinely by,
09:09in the context of maintaining space.
09:11That's right,
09:11and also on KomDigi there are content complaints,
09:15if for example anyone feels disadvantaged,
09:18please complain to the link.
09:21So this is really an initiative from KomDigi,
09:24in the context of maintaining public digital space,
09:26and there was no intervention from the palace.
09:27Because it has been confirmed that this is a hoax,
09:29slanderous, and contains hate speech.
09:31Mr. Kiai,
09:32Mr. Kiai,
09:34seeing us,
09:36Indonesia now,
09:37in the context of freedom,
09:38it's really loose,
09:40or just Mr. Kiai's observations?
09:43According to me,
09:44I ask permission to whisper.
Comments

Recommended