Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 12 hours ago
Confused about the impeachment case against VP Sara Duterte?

Let’s break it down LIVE.

Lawyer and former COMELEC Commissioner Atty. Rowena Guanzon joins us to discuss the latest developments in the impeachment case—from last week’s key events to the upcoming clarificatory hearing and the possible committee vote to elevate it to the plenary.

Ask your questions in real time 👇

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:31Good afternoon and welcome to Beyond the Headlines. I'm DJ Moises.
00:36The House of Representatives Committee on Justice has set a final clarificatory hearing on April 29, that's tomorrow, regarding the
00:44impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte.
00:47Committee Chair Gerbil Luistro indicated that there is a strong likelihood the panel will vote on the determination of probable
00:54cause after the hearing.
00:56If probable cause is established, the case will advance to the House plenary, which will decide whether to transmit the
01:03articles of impeachment to the Senate.
01:06Impeachment is where law, politics, and public trust intersect. The real question is, which one ultimately prevails?
01:13Joining us today is Attorney Rowena Guanzon, lawyer and former commissioner of the Commission on Elections, and a seasoned public
01:21servant known for her firm positions on issues of law and governance.
01:26Hello, former commissioner Guanzon. Welcome to Beyond the Headlines.
01:32Yes. So, my first question here, former commissioner, is you've always argued against the impeachment.
01:39You can call me attorney.
01:41Yes, okay. Sige, attorney. You've always argued against the impeachment. Is it because of the process which you find is
01:50flawed, or is it also because of the evidence?
01:52In the first impeachment complaint, as I said, it's not a process. It's just a focus-focus. It's just a
02:00focus-focus. It's because he wanted to run for president in 2028.
02:06It's the same thing here in the second impeachment case. Because there's no really no new evidence except that they
02:14want to produce the salen of VP Sara so that they can play it up sa public na puno.
02:23Dumami yung pera niya.
02:25Dumami yung pera niya. They want to give the impression that naninakaw niya yung kikawat niya yung mga kuarta, which
02:34some members of the House Justice Committee objected.
02:40Congressman Rufus Rodriguez objected to the subpoena. Even the vice chair, Congressman Jennifer Labay, also objected.
02:51And another, Garbin also objected. And the same objections, which I agree,
02:57hindi, hindi pwede nga, ang wala, ang wala gi-submit niya sa complainants, ang House Justice Committee mo'y magproduce.
03:07In other words, you cannot add to the complaint. That would be violating the right-to-due process of the
03:15vice president.
03:16Ah, they're trying to make it appear na they are fair.
03:23Eh, abuse ba? Hindi naman talaga sila fair.
03:26Hindi tama naman si Loistro, eh. Fair ba yun?
03:29Anyway, pagpunta yan sa plenary, pero hindi sila sure dun, ah.
03:33Kasi, taghan na kayo yung mga congressman karoon, ah. Di na sila ganaan mo, perma.
03:38And ang grupo ni congressman po, no, NUP, there are 40 of them.
03:43Di na sila ganaan mo, perma.
03:44Ang grupo ni former president Gloria Macapagalaroyo, di na po na sila, perma.
03:50Ang mga opposition, ng mga Duterte congressmen, congresswemen, di na po na sila mo, perma.
03:56So, hindi sila ka sure na magdaog sila sa plenary.
04:03Pero in the event magdaog sila, masaka ang aso sa Senate, well, they cannot win.
04:11Because they need 16 votes, two-thirds of the votes of the Senate to convict.
04:18Based on at least the clarificatory hearings that we all saw ba,
04:24there was a debate before it started na it was a mini-trial, not a clarificatory hearing.
04:30From your observation on what transpired, did you find it as a clarificatory hearing?
04:36Or was it already a mini-trial?
04:40Loistro called it a mini-trial, which is a violation of the constitution.
04:45Because under the constitution, only the Senate has the sole power to try the case.
04:52Kasi, sabi nila, clarificatory daw sa mga witnesses nila.
04:56Kasi ginagawa nilang ano, it's a show.
04:59Kaya ng madriaga na yun.
05:01Ayak-ayak pa.
05:03Loistro had to ask him, are you crying?
05:05Please make it of record that he's crying.
05:09Ano yan?
05:10Hindi ba yan trial?
05:11Yung making it of record?
05:13Ano ba yan?
05:14Secutor ba si Luistro dyan?
05:18Ang style nila, bulok.
05:20So, let them go to the Senate.
05:24Who's afraid of this impeachment?
05:27Vice President Sarai does not seem to be afraid of this impeachment.
05:32There were some people, also, Attorney Guenzon, and I would like to also seek your thoughts about this, that during
05:39last week's clarificatory hearing, when there was said to be a discrepancy between the Vice President Salen and also the
05:47AMLAC findings and her bank transactions, how did you look at it?
05:53It's now a subject matter of a case because Attorney Man Scarpio has already filed a case against the AMLAC
06:01and the Secretariat.
06:07The AMLAC, under the law, cannot disclose the bank records that it gets us from the banks.
06:21Ang sinasabi nila, di ba sabi nga doon ng representative eh, we brought the box but we cannot open the
06:29box.
06:31How about katong the exception that they cited specifically for the impeachment?
06:37What are your thoughts about that?
06:40Eh, impeachment nila eh.
06:42Ang AMLAC kasi, exception, is if it's connected to a crime, eh wala namang impeachment dyan eh.
06:55Iba naman yan eh.
06:56So, kahit na sabihin natin na, okay, that's an exception, they can send that in cases of impeachment, you cannot
07:05skip the requirements of the law.
07:08That's why the AMLAC representative said, we brought the box of documents, bank records, but we cannot open this box.
07:17So I think that's already, para sa akin, it's not really an issue anymore.
07:24Kasi obvious na sabi itong mga tao na, gusto lang talaga nila siraan si BP Sara.
07:30And along that line, Attorney Guanzon, there are also people who think that she is being singled out, no?
07:37Among the big, so-called big fishes.
07:40What can you say also about this?
07:42I told you already that this impeachment is a hocus-pocus thing.
07:47Eh, alam nyo naman si Luistro.
07:50She's under the baton of Sandro Marcos.
07:56And you've mentioned earlier about…
07:59And of course, Sandro Marcos is afraid that if Sara Duterte wins in 2028, hindi na siya makatakbo ng president
08:05sa next presidential election.
08:09And you've mentioned earlier that there is a strong possibility that even if the Justice Committee will bring this up
08:19already for plenary voting in the House of Representatives,
08:22it may not necessarily be able to gather one-third that is required.
08:27But on the flip side, because yesterday we also interviewed Attorney Ligutan,
08:32he actually said that after the discrepancy between the SAL-IN and also the bank transactions were presented last week,
08:41he said that the tide seems to be turning against the vice president.
08:46Well, it doesn't really matter, you know, to BP Sara.
08:49Of course, they will still need 16 votes in the Senate, which they don't have.
08:53They only have 15 senators and J.B. Ayers, who told me personally, he's not going to sign that impeachment.
09:02You know, these senators will sign the impeachment and they are running for re-election.
09:07They might lose their re-election.
09:11And now I'm just down to my last three questions, attorney, no?
09:15So you've observed many public officials over the years.
09:19What do you think sets the vice president different compared to the others?
09:28Compared to the other vice presidents?
09:30Or the other presidential votes that you've seen in the past?
09:36That's why I said that I am endorsing Sara Duterte.
09:41I intend to run for senator in 2020.
09:46And I will support president for president Sara Duterte because
09:53kung si Sara Duterte ang presidente, mananagot sila.
10:00I'm really, I feel very strongly about corruption under the BBM administration and accountability.
10:11Kaya naman ng Pilipinas, ganito, puro nakao, nananakao.
10:16Mga opisyal, kasi wala naman.
10:18Nobody really goes to jail.
10:21Now that the Ombudsman is charging Martin Romaldes with plunder,
10:29let's see if they're really going to send Martin to jail.
10:34And this is already my last question, attorney, and thank you for making time.
10:37But if we are to fast forward, let's say, a decade or two decades from now
10:42and people will remember 2026, no?
10:45What will this say, manan?
10:47What will history say about 2026 and this particular impeachment?
10:53That in 2026, this is the worst, most corrupt government we've ever had.
11:02And this impeachment, just as most impeachments are,
11:11it's politically motivated, but this is the first impeachment
11:15where the design is to stop VP Sara from running and winning.
11:23So thank you very much, attorney Gwenzon, for gracing today's Beyond the Headlines
11:28and for making time.
11:30Dagang salamat!
11:31Dagang salamat!
11:33As the impeachment involving Vice President Sara Duterte continues to unfold,
11:38the responsibility rests not only on institutions, but on all of us
11:43to stay informed, to think critically, and to demand both fairness and accountability.
11:50Thank you for being with us today.
11:51I'm DJ Moises.
11:52This has been Beyond the Headlines.
11:54Have a good afternoon.
12:01I'm DJ Moises.
12:03I'm DJ Moises.
12:07I'm DJ Moises.
12:10I'm DJ Moises.
12:14I'm DJ Moises.
12:19I'm DJ Moises.
12:20I'm DJ Moises.
12:20I'm DJ Moises.
12:22I'm DJ Moises.
12:23I'm DJ Moises.
12:24I'm DJ Moises.
12:25I'm DJ Moises.
12:28I'm DJ Moises.
12:29I'm DJ Moises.
12:30I'm DJ Moises.
Comments

Recommended