- 8 hours ago
- #thedevilwearsprada2
Miranda Priestly struggles against Emily Charlton, her former assistant turned rival executive, as they compete for advertising revenue amid declining print media, while Miranda nears retirement.
#TheDevilWearsPrada2
#TheDevilWearsPrada2fullmovie
#TheDevilWearsPrada2movie2026
#TheDevilWearsPrada2film2026ondailymotion
#TheDevilWearsPrada2film2026
#TheDevilWearsPrada2
#TheDevilWearsPrada2fullmovie
#TheDevilWearsPrada2movie2026
#TheDevilWearsPrada2film2026ondailymotion
#TheDevilWearsPrada2film2026
Category
🎥
Short filmTranscript
00:06hello everyone jester bell aka female frodo baggins is here today and man do we have a bad one today
00:18i think that this is the first truly bad one that i have at least seen this year so far
00:25um i i i just
00:28get so upset even just thinking about this movie uh uh the devil wears prada 2 is everything wrong
00:37with hollywood today everything wrong with modern hollywood and i know that that might be a title
00:42that has been overused on youtube but listen if any movie deserved that title it is this one this
00:49is a movie that i saw yesterday and from every millisecond since getting away from the theater
00:54it has just become worse and worse and worse to me as i think about the actual sinister messaging of
01:03this film and how it tears down the original now now now the general consensus around devil wears
01:10prada 2 seems to be that it's just mid you know and it's okay it's not as good as the
01:17first one but
01:17it's it's fine it's mid at worst like all of that like there is criticism to be had to like
01:23other
01:23people are making about this film but most of the general consensus seems to be that it's just
01:28mid not a disaster no no no no no no and i know that this movie is going to be
01:33making a lot of money
01:34over the weekend and a lot of people are going to go see it so i want to get ahead
01:39of this this is not
01:40merely another mid hollywood sequel to a classic movie this movie has sinister messaging behind it
01:48and it completely completely destroys everything about the first movie and in modern hollywood
01:55fashion assassinates each and every one of the characters and it exemplifies everything wrong
02:03with hollywood today and what they have done with all of their sequels and remakes and and their
02:09movies in general now uh i want everyone to hear this even if you are unfamiliar with the first devil
02:14wears prada film you need to listen to this review in order to understand like what is going on with
02:19hollywood today and how this movie exemplifies it so i'm going to give a rundown for those of you who
02:24have not seen the first devil wears prada uh to explain to you what the themes of that movie were
02:31so
02:32devil wears prada is a movie from 20 years ago and it's a very good movie based off of a
02:37book and it is
02:38about a regular girl who becomes caught up in the fashion industry and the elitism and how she gets
02:45sucked into this world of um you know people backstabbing each other for uh corporate gain
02:52and more money and this world of people who will do anything that they can to get successful so what
02:58happens is you know this girl who's played by ann hathaway her name is andy sacks she wants to be
03:03a
03:03journalist but she's trying desperately after college to find a job that's just getting her foot in the door
03:08and she finally finds a job working for the magazine runway which is just based on vogue in real life
03:14literally anyway at first andy is at this job and she kind of just laughs it off she finds everyone
03:20here very very superfluous she jokes about it to her friends and now she just can't wait to get out
03:25of
03:25here but then she gets sucked up into the world she gets sucked up by wanting to please her abusive
03:32bosses including miranda priestly played excellently by merle streep who is just the epitome of
03:38a cruel boss who knows how to push her buttons who knows how to push her to her limit and
03:43get her to
03:43be what she wants her to be and the point is andy sacks starts being caught up in this world
03:48of fashion
03:49and corporate gain and she becomes more and more obsessed with it throughout the film and as you see
03:54in the beginning of the film she has a family she's close with she has friends she's close with
03:59and as she progresses in the film and gets more and more caught up in her corporate life
04:03she starts to lose those relationships her friendships start to break down her relationship
04:08with her boyfriend breaks down until eventually they go their separate ways for a time because
04:13she's become more and more obsessed with her corporate life and her corporate gain and as we
04:18see throughout the course in the film she even backstabs a fellow co-worker in order to get ahead
04:23but as the film plays out andy gets more of a look into the life of miranda priestly who is
04:28the devil in the
04:29devil wears prada and she finds out that miranda priestly doesn't live that happy a life she's had
04:35multiple failed marriages she's not really there in her kids lives at all and she backstabs one of her
04:41loyal colleagues really really hard for her own gain at the end and at the end of the movie this
04:46is
04:46important uh andy says that she doesn't believe she could ever do that that she could ever be a part
04:51of
04:51this world where people will literally mess each other over and backstab each other all for their own gain
04:57but miranda priestly notes that's what she already did with her co-worker earlier in the film so we'll
05:04get back to that ending in a minute but the moral of the story is andy sacks all played by
05:08anne
05:08hathaway ultimately makes the decision to abandon this corporate world that it's worth it to maintain
05:14her integrity and an actual life and relationships with people who actually care about her over money
05:20and success and that is the moral of the first devil wears prada is that there's more to life than
05:26corporate gain it would be better to have a modest job if it means you get to keep your integrity
05:32it's better to maintain relationships with people who actually care about you rather than just
05:37relationships that are based on what you can do for other people and what they can do for you that
05:42was the first devil wears prada and it's a great movie and it's a great comfort watch it's very well
05:47structured there's a lot of comedy in it that works really really well now now now now wouldn't you know
05:54it can you guess how devil wears prada 2 plays out would you believe would you believe that after
06:02the initial character the protagonist of devil wears prada went through an arc of understanding that
06:07there is more to life than corporate gain at the end of the first movie would you believe that this
06:13movie begins by undoing all of that character development wow i've never seen that in a modern
06:20hollywood film before yes it's true the character of andy sacks ended the first devil wears prada by
06:26reconciling with her boyfriend and wanting to start fresh with him by rejecting becoming another
06:32miranda priestly by accepting the more modest job over having to sacrifice everything about herself
06:38just from for another corporate title and guess where we find the character of andy sacks in the
06:44devil wears prada 2 well uh she doesn't have a family as she says apparently it didn't work out
06:50with her and that boyfriend that she doesn't even mention by name in the second film even though that
06:54was made into kind of a central point of the first film never doesn't have any family um most of
07:00her
07:00friends are in the corporate world her life is her job that is where we find the character of andy
07:07sacks
07:07in uh devil wears prada 2 but guess what happens in the film she loses her job in journalism right
07:14off the bat and has to take a job with runway and miranda priestly again out of necessity and she
07:21is
07:21right back to the same person she was that we saw her becoming in the first devil wears prada where
07:27she's right back to bending over backwards desperate to get the approval and the attention of miranda
07:33priestly desperate to get another notch on her belt and another step up on the corporate ladder
07:37that is what this entire movie is about in modern hollywood fashion they've done it again they took
07:44a movie that didn't need a sequel that had a simple moral story that anyone could relate to
07:50and a clear development and arc for the main character and they completely nuked it in the
07:55first five minutes establishing where we are in the sequel all of the lessons that the character of
08:01andy sacks learned are gone and she is back to groveling desperate for the attention of her abusive
08:06bosses and getting a higher notch on the corporate ladder again only this time this time there isn't a
08:13lesson to be learned from that and that is the important part about this sinister film the first film
08:20had a theme once again of rejecting the temptations of money and success mean if it means keeping your
08:27integrity and your true friendships this movie has the complete opposite message and it is very very
08:34uh illustrated in that they repeat the ending car scene from the first movie and the ending car scene
08:39in now the second movie now for those who haven't seen the film in this ending car scene from devil
08:45wears prada the first movie you've got um uh anne hathaway's character in the car with a merle
08:51streep as miranda priestly and this is an important scene in the film because miranda priestly is the
08:58devil in the devil wears prada that's literally what she is and this scene in the first movie is
09:03of anne hathaway's character rejecting an offer from the devil essentially miranda priestly admits that
09:09she backstabbed her own uh colleague in order to get ahead and that's what she's always done to get
09:15ahead and that it's all worth it to her and that it all she cares about is her own corporate
09:20success
09:21and anne hathaway's character says that she could never be a part of that even though miranda priestly
09:26notes she's already done that she herself already was put in a position where she was given the offer
09:32to backstab her colleague in order to get ahead and she took it and miranda priestly gives her once
09:38again the devil's offer i mean what if i don't want to live the way you live oh don't be
09:43ridiculous
09:44andrea everybody wants this everybody wants to be us but as she sashays out into all this fanfare
09:54andy sacks played by anne hathaway once again gets out of the car throws away her beeper and decides
09:59that she has rejected the devil's offer and that she would rather maintain her integrity in the second
10:04film they reverse that in the in the one of the final scenes you have miranda priestly and and
10:10andy sacks in the car again anne hathaway's character has won the day they were betrayed by
10:15someone that anne hathaway trusted and then she sort of betrayed them right back and got an even bigger
10:21person to buy the magazine of runway so that it wouldn't go away forever and that they could maintain
10:26their jobs and she thinks that she did it for miranda but as miranda notes no anne hathaway's character
10:33did it for herself this was all this was not anne hathaway making a decision for anyone else other
10:38than herself and maintaining her job and being able to continue climbing on the corporate ladder
10:43and guess what in total contrast to the first film this time anne hathaway's character laughs
10:50and accepts it and admits yeah i did do it all for myself but it gets even worse in the
10:56first film
10:57once again i explained to you it showed the dark side of miranda priestly uh that she wasn't really
11:03there in her kids lives and that she was on like her whatever number failed marriage or whatever
11:08and it showed that the downside of what you have to give up for all of that success and fanfare
11:14and
11:14how empty it is but in this film they have miranda admit all that she has sacrificed and that she
11:21admits
11:21that she has not been there in her kids lives but she turns to anne hathaway's character and she admits
11:28but you know what i love working so you have merle streep's character saying that not being there for
11:36her kids was all worth it because she loves working and then she invites anne hathaway and says don't you
11:43and anne hathaway's character agrees this time because this movie is made to reject the theme of the first
11:51movie the first movie that was about how there there is more important things than corporate gain no this
11:56movie rejects it we are met with a protagonist who had a life with family and friends who cared
12:01about her and who cared about more than just her job in the first film now we are met with
12:06protagonists
12:07whether it is anne hathaway's character or miranda priestly or emily's character which we'll talk about
12:12all the characters in this film are now all solely motivated by their own desire for corporate gain they
12:19are solely motivated by work and their jobs that's it there's nothing else the film has everyone start
12:25that way and end that way there is no character growth whatsoever merle streep's character begins
12:32desperate to hold on to a dying industry the magazine industry and her under threat of being
12:39shuffled out of that industry and guess what uh she claws and backstabs and schemes to be able to keep
12:46that by the end with the help of anne hathaway's character and i'm like how am i supposed to root
12:52for
12:52any of these people this is just staring down like a dark void why should i care about miranda priestly
12:58keeping her job she has already worked for decades she has millions of dollars she could retire at this
13:05point uh maybe she could actually spend time with her um ninth husband and her kids that she's not even
13:11there for but no they want you to actually feel bad that this elderly lady might finally be forced to
13:17retire at the end of her life and that she might not get the next corporate title that she's been
13:23vying for for years or something like that but the film gets even worse uh than that because once again
13:30the ending car scene uh uh after anne hathaway has done all of this and been able to keep miranda
13:38priestly
13:38as her title of editor-in-chief here at the company of runway uh miranda priestly lets her know on
13:45no
13:45uncertain terms that she will not hesitate to backstab andy if it means getting something for
13:51herself if it means more success for her merle streep's character has made it clear that she will
13:56not hesitate to backstab um anne hathaway's character even after all she's done with her if it means
14:02getting up a little higher on the corporate ladder and anne hathaway's character just kind of
14:08laughs and accepts that and once again she was horrified with herself in the first movie when she
14:12realized that she had been sucked into this world of backstabbing and this movie she laughs at it and
14:18accepts it all and she embraces continuing to work for an abusive person like miranda priestly and and
14:24just welcomes it she welcomes the idea that their relationship is solely transactional and that they
14:29will backstab each other at any notice that that merle streep has told her to her face now that she
14:34will do
14:34that she has embraced this totally transactional relationship with this abusive person and continuing to
14:40please her now that's not the only character that they've assassinated in this movie as well the
14:45character of emily played by emily blunt in the first movie she was a character in the first movie
14:50where she wanted to also you know get higher and higher in the fashion world but they gave her a
14:55little bit more depth there was indications that she didn't have much of a family life and that uh
15:00she was uh she was sad about that and even jealous of andy there were indications that she really did
15:05have a
15:06big genuine dream when it came to fashion and that she was devastated when andy uh took that away from
15:11her for a time and there was a little bit of reconciliation at the end and it indicated that
15:16maybe there was a little bit more depth to this character of emily then was led on but now in
15:21this
15:21new movie the character of emily is made into completely superfluous she like miranda priestly
15:28has been divorced she's not really there in her kids lives and she's in a relationship with a
15:33billionaire solely for what he can do for her and he's only in a relationship with her solely for
15:39what she can do for him and they kind of write it off as one big joke throughout the course
15:44of the
15:44film though uh anne hathaway tries to make a deal with emily blunt to save the magazine of runway and
15:50emily blunt stabs her in the back uh revealing that she only got her billionaire boyfriend to buy the
15:56magazine not to save their jobs but so that she could get it for herself it is a major blatant
16:02betrayal in the film and one that they take away from her by at by the end by getting an
16:07even bigger
16:08billionaire to buy the company but guess what by the end of the film for whatever reason after this
16:14totally superficial and transactional and really gross character of emily who only has relationships
16:20with people if they can give her something if they can give her more money and success and power
16:25anne hathaway's character is seen eating with her at lunch and all giggling and wanting to be friends
16:30with her after she to her face betrayed her and showed that she would only use her for her own
16:37gain and it's treated as all giggly and a fun thing and it's like what are you guys doing what
16:42we are
16:43treated to this movie is people whose entire lives are their jobs and getting more money and getting more
16:49success and and and and prioritizing that over everything else andy sacks life is her job and she
16:56really really has nothing other than that all she has to do is try to get jobs maintain them and
17:01try
17:01to climb higher on them to get more money and by the end of it she has allied herself and
17:07become friends
17:08with fake friends with people who have told her and showed her to her face that they will betray her
17:13at
17:13any moment if it means gaining something for themselves but andy just laughs and embraces it all
17:19she embraces this corporate world that she rejected in the first movie filled with transactional
17:24relationships and people using each other and she just accepts it all and we're supposed to find this
17:30a happy ending somehow and even with that they try to introduce her a new love interest but it's
17:37completely superfluous once again she meets this guy who designs apartments and he has a cute accent and
17:43they make each other giggle with unfunny jokes there is no substance to this relationship other than
17:49ann hathaway giggling hysterically at this guy's unfunny jokes they they don't have any chemistry
17:55you wouldn't even know these were supposed to be a couple unless a character announced it
17:59and there's no substance to their relationship and no indication that it's going to go anywhere
18:04substantive and she even insults him and tells him when he's trying to comfort her for like fear of
18:09losing her job she insults him and says journalism is way more important than designing the expensive
18:15apartments and guess what she never apologizes for being mean to him like every other relationship
18:22in this movie the relationship they try to give ann hathaway in this new potential love interest is
18:27completely superfluous so that is what you are given in the devil wears prada 2 uh characters whose
18:33entire lives are working in their jobs who admit that working is more important to them than spending
18:40times in the lives of their children and you're supposed to embrace it all you're supposed to
18:45embrace it all just find it a fun little uh comedy with characters who backstab each other and give each
18:51other false smiles and use each other all for their own personal gain and who have no other lives than
18:57their own jobs and no future and we're supposed to feel bad for them on the threat that they might
19:02be
19:02losing their jobs and they might not get that next shiny corporate title and we're supposed to root for
19:07them to maintain all of this but how many other hollywood films have done this at this point how
19:13many other hollywood films have i watched where an unnecessary sequel comes up and within the first
19:19five minutes they revealed that they have undid all of the character development that a protagonist had
19:24in a previous film and gone back on the themes and and and the moral lessons of the previous film
19:31let's just go from some off the top of my head a toy story 4 uh completely abandoned the fate
19:36the
19:37themes of all the other previous toy story films uh that were about being there for children the toys
19:43being there for children which a lot of people think was a representation of how parents have to
19:47put aside selfishness to be there for their kids and they rejected all of that with the idea that you
19:53should go your own way and you should live your own life all of a sudden you know that's a
19:57consistent
19:57theme in a lot of these movies lilo and stitch abandoned the live action remake abandoned the themes of
20:03family and no one gets left behind in family from the original movie with the idea that alilo's older
20:09sister now must go off to marine biology to study marine biology at college even though she could do
20:14that in hawaii she must abandon her sister to do that and her sister who's just lost her parents
20:21somehow approves of that wow movies that uh uh you know undo the themes of not being selfish from
20:28older films and now prioritize the characters doing things for their own personal gain uh you know
20:34apart from family and rejecting family even though in order to do what they want that seems to be a
20:39consistent theme in modern hollywood movies doesn't it or even like there's going to be conversations
20:45about how star wars have been has been destroyed and that happened there too in the acolyte uh tearing
20:50down the good versus evil themes of star wars and saying that evil is good actually and that you should
20:55embrace your dark side you know this is all throughout movies in hollywood tearing down the
21:01character development of the protagonist in previous films going back on the original themes of those
21:07films oftentimes those themes being you know of family and prioritizing family and friends and
21:13the relationships that should be really important to you over everything else now we just have themes
21:17over characters especially female characters rejecting all of that in order to go their own way and make
21:24their own success apart from all of that now in addition to that i just want to talk about how
21:29badly made and badly structured this movie is the first movie of devil wears prada had a simple
21:35three-act structure everyone could see the rising action the character the protagonist is a certain way
21:40she gets wayward it gets worse and worse until she realizes how bad it becomes and she makes a change
21:45you know you can say that the three-act structure is cliched as much as you want the reason it
21:49was used
21:50so much in those older films is because it worked this movie does not have any discernible structure
21:56it's just this happens this happens this happens this scene this scene this scene all of characters
22:01trying to climb the corporate ladder and trying to find ways to maintain their jobs as was very noted by
22:06the people i was with going to see this movie the opening there is so much of people staring at
22:12their
22:12phones like the way the opening sequence is structured like the first 20 10 to 20 minutes of this film
22:18is
22:18character gets a message on their phone checks phone stares that phone leaves building scene
22:22transition new building character is at place character gets a notification at their phone
22:27character answers call on their phone character gets another notification on their phone character
22:31looks at memes on their phone scene transition new building character gets a notification on their
22:35phone character reads article on their phone character comes to realization and leaves the building
22:40that is how the opening is structured now i think that with this movie they wanted to take
22:46note on how the world has changed in the 20 years since the first movie. The first movie,
22:51Runway was a magazine. Now it's something that you read online. That this movie takes notes on just,
22:56you know, how much of the world today relies on their phones and getting notifications on their
23:01phones and reading things on their phones. Yeah, I can definitely see they're making that parallel.
23:05They're talking about how everything becoming digitized is downsizing everything and people
23:10are losing their jobs left and right and people are losing their livelihoods and even people at
23:14the very top are facing uncertainty. That's what this movie is all about. It also takes notes with
23:20various humorous scenes of how Miranda Priestly would fare in a world today. Back in 2006, you
23:27could get away with being an incredibly abusive boss and doing whatever you want. Now in this film,
23:31she is afflicted with several HR complaints that now she has to hang her coat herself rather than
23:37throw it on people. There's certain language that she can't use at meetings and stuff like that.
23:41Like it makes these funny references to how the world has changed since then. Like everything
23:46going digital has lost people so many jobs and has destroyed so much of the economy and so many
23:52people face an uncertain future. HR and PR has sanitized so many things where people can't behave
23:58a certain way. People have to walk on eggshells, things like that. Our phones have defined so much
24:03of our lives. Now they take note of all of these things and even take light jokes at all of
24:09these
24:09things. But they don't say anything about them. And I've seen this in a lot of Hollywood films lately.
24:15And just because I've seen them doesn't mean I've necessarily done videos on them. But I've seen a lot
24:19of Hollywood movies that, for example, take note of how politically correct everyone is trying to be
24:24these days. But they don't actually have any answers to it. They don't have any solutions. Just like
24:31this movie takes note of all these changes in the world, but they don't actually have any solutions.
24:35It has characters cry about the uncertain future, how they're not sure how they're going to work,
24:40and how they're not sure how they're going to survive in a world where everything is downsizing
24:44and so many people are struggling to even get jobs. But it doesn't have any answers for that.
24:48They come up with a temporary solution for the digital magazine to still be bought. But even the
24:54characters admit it's only temporary and they could all lose their jobs in the end anyway. And that is
25:00one of the other problems with this movie. Once again, it has no answers. It's noting all that's
25:05going on in the world today and making all these parallels, but it doesn't have any answers for it.
25:10Why? Because the people making this movie don't have any answers for all of the downsizing and
25:16everything going digital. They don't have any answers for what is going on today. So they just
25:21make the characters create a temporary patch jobs from themselves and go on in their life of
25:26struggling to climb corporate ladders and whatnot. Which presents another problem. It just makes this film
25:32so bleak. It's all of these characters with transactional relationships, with lives that
25:37aren't actual lives. Look, anyone can relate to the fear over losing your job because we need jobs
25:43for survival. But that's just it. We need jobs to survive. But at some point, you gotta live. And that's
25:50my problem with this movie. It's all about characters focused on the survival aspect and just tearing
25:56people down to try to get more money and to try to get more titles for themselves. It's all about
26:00corporate survival. It's not about actually living because all of these characters have rejected
26:05their families and the things that would actually matter. There's no balance between any of that.
26:10And it's unfortunately probably a reflection of the people making these movies because they got the
26:16exact same director to make this movie as the first one. But just like, as it's been noted,
26:21all the visuals in this movie look worse than the past, all of the themes that are worse than they
26:27were
26:27in the past. Because the director and the people making this movie have clearly lost something in
26:32the 20 years since the first film. It's hard not to see that these characters, these shallow,
26:37superficial characters who are obsessed with their own work are just reflections of how the people
26:43behind the scenes have become in real life. Because whether they were all sitting around a table and
26:47conniving about these themes, about how well it's literally, a character literally says that it's worth it
26:53to her that she spent her life working over being in the lives of her children because she loves
26:57working. Even if they weren't conniving about putting those themes in the film, they're still
27:02there. Even if there was no thought about that, even if it was just let's get the band back together
27:07and have all these characters reunite, then that is still a reflection of how the people behind the
27:12scenes are because they didn't notice how bad any of this would be. And it's crazy to see that
27:17Hollywood was always stereotyped as being this awful, immoral place. But really, if you look
27:23at the films in the past, you'll actually find that a lot of them had positive themes and positive
27:28morals that anyone could get behind at the end. And they actually did have answers for real life
27:33problems. Like Office Space is another movie about working, and it's about a guy who hates his job and
27:39how relatable that was. But they created a solution at the end. Guy hates his job, he goes on a
27:44humorous
27:45comedy where he just decides he's not going to show up to work anymore after being hypnotized.
27:49But what is the answer? What is the answer at the end of that? You hate your job, most people
27:53do,
27:53but maybe you can find something that you're more happy with. Like, that was a simple movie that took
27:58an everyday problem, it was about the corporate world, and it created a solution at the end. But
28:03Devil Wears Prada 2 does not have any solutions to the problems that are going on in the world today
28:08that it presents. It just has a temporary patch job, once again, because the people behind the scenes
28:14don't have any answers for what is going on in the world today. Now listen, I think that this movie
28:19is everything wrong with Hollywood. How they are leeching off of anything that they can turn into
28:24content, any old success that they can currently turn into content. They have completely exhausted,
28:29you know, boy brands like Marvel and Star Wars, and now they are getting into old chick flicks like
28:36Devil Wears Prada that never needed a sequel, or, you know, we're getting a sequel to Practical Magic,
28:40another chick flick. They're trying to mine that genre now. They're trying to mine the video game
28:44genre now, and to make video game movies. They're trying to mine old comedies they did with Naked
28:48Gun. They're going to do that with Spaceballs and Scary Movie 5. They're now trying to find other
28:53genres and successful things in the past to turn into content. It's not stopping anytime soon.
28:59This is what Hollywood is right now. But each time they make one of these movies, we just get one
29:04-for-one
29:05comparisons from how morally rotten everything has become from the past, and how much the skill sets
29:12of these people have fallen in 20 years, and just how much they're devoid of anything substantive to
29:18actually say anymore. And they can't even maintain or understand the importance of the basic moral
29:24lessons that some of these films presented in the past. I want to say in closing, there are some
29:30Hollywood movies still that have themes of self-sacrifice over selfishness and personal
29:35gain. Project Hail Mary, I saw this year, is all about self-sacrifice. But the problem is, there aren't
29:42enough Project Hail Marys. For every Project Hail Mary, there's a dozen movies like this. And like I said,
29:49they are just getting started with mining this genre. And we need to call it out and continuously work
29:55to make our own stuff, because it is not going to change. We can't continue to accept an industry
30:01that puts out maybe one or two decent to good movies a year, and has everything else slop like
30:09this. But I'm not expecting any of these people to change, so I'm just going to continue networking
30:15and working on getting my own stuff off the ground behind the scenes. But once again, don't be fooled
30:19that this is simply just a mid-cash grab of a famous chick flick. This is a sinister movie,
30:25one that has assassinated all of the characters from the original films, one that has assassinated
30:30the original themes from that film that was all about the importance of prioritizing integrity
30:36and real friendships and family over money and corporate gain and more job titles and all of that,
30:43completely dashed in this film. That instead prioritizes the idea, embraces the idea
30:48of being in relationships that are purely transactional and treats it all as a fun thing
30:53and does promote the idea that, in some respects, it can be better to work for some people.
30:59It can be better to abandon being there for your own kids and your own family and prioritizing
31:05working instead and just working and trying to get to the next job title and the next level
31:09of fame and power. That that is worth it to some people over their own families and that that's all
31:15okay. But that's all I got for you guys today. Were you unfortunate enough to see Devil Wears Prada 2
31:20or are you having second thoughts on seeing it now after you what I've said in this video?
31:24I hope this rant was at least articulate enough to explain what was in this film.
31:30Thank you all for watching. Please subscribe if you haven't already or become a and consider
31:34becoming a member or a patron if you like my work. Thank you all for watching and I will see
31:39you guys
31:40next time.
Comments