00:00.
00:30.
01:00.
01:30.
01:30.
01:30.
01:30.
01:30.
01:31.
01:32.
01:32.
01:33.
01:33.
01:33.
01:33.
01:33.
01:33.
02:03and not because of their race, which are very dangerous, right Germán?
02:07Let's look at this capsule that we have prepared to you, Alejandra,
02:09where the Senador Armando Benedetti explains a little bit about the project that he presented in the Congress.
02:15Let's see.
02:20Many news that we have about dogs in Colombia,
02:23however, is it correct to affirm that dogs are a product of a certain race?
02:27For example, to say that a pitbull, by nature, is aggressive.
02:30The Defensoría del Pueblo says that between 2014 and the first bimestre of 2016,
02:3625,803 people were attacked by dogs,
02:39but they don't specify what type of race they committed.
02:42The issue generates debate,
02:44and the dueños of potentially dangerous animals
02:46is that what really determines the agresiveness of a dog
02:49is a child and not a Rottweiler or a Doberman.
02:52Recently, the Senador Armando Benedetti
02:54introduced a law to modify the laws
02:57that classifies the dangerous races
02:59and proposes that better call them
03:00animals of special care.
03:02So, the Senador Benedetti
03:03The idea of the project is that no
03:06one, that no one is stigmatizing a few quoi
03:08as, both
03:09that they can import
03:10a three, that there have an маленькую g sendiri
03:13to provide hushes of special care
03:14to主婦
03:15and even protect each other
03:19at the Swedish philanthropy
03:22that canнее 예br host
03:24to a acordent
03:24those kein town
03:25who are in a family
03:25Billy
03:26which doesn't represent any danger to society.
03:28And above all, we want to inform the ciudadanian that it's a lie,
03:31I repito, that there are 14 dangerous races.
03:34There are some special caninos according to the education that they gave them
03:37or for what they were doing.
03:39The project eliminates the list of races
03:41and only leaves two conditions that would determine this type of animals.
03:45The first are the caninos that have produced attacks to people
03:48or that have killed other dogs.
03:50And the second, the ones that have been trained to attack or defense.
03:53In this way, if a small dog, for example, a Pinscher,
03:57present these conditions and also has denunciations that support them,
04:01they would be in the special care animals.
04:03And they would be able to enter a registro that will be handled by the authorities.
04:06This also, according to the senator Benedetti,
04:09with the purpose of not abandoning dogs
04:10because a law shows them as potentially dangerous.
04:13In the end, what we have to say is that in the debate
04:15there are more scientific arguments
04:17to determine what makes a really dangerous a canino.
04:23There we have the explanation of the project of law
04:26that propone the senator Armando Benedetti
04:28to change the category of dogs potentially dangerous
04:30to dogs that require a special care.
04:33But you know that it can generate concern about this issue
04:37and it is to consider that a dog requires a special care
04:40when there has been victims.
04:41So, that could lead to think that the prevention
04:43will pass to a second plane.
04:45Of course, because although there is a victimization
04:47with the law that exists currently,
04:49it also tends to be a little bit to the prevention
04:51with some species that could generate,
04:54it could not be determined that they would be killed,
04:56but that could generate situations of risk for people.
05:00And I think there will be much more debate
05:03and much more argumentation in terms of what scientific
05:06because I can think now that a pitbull
05:08will surely bite harder than a pincher
05:11than a pinch or a teaspoon of tea,
05:12but that would have to determine
05:15the agresiveness of a pitbull
05:16or a teaspoon of tea scientifically.
05:18Yes, indeed we will need more scientific arguments
05:23in this debate.
05:24I invite you to see a capsule that has prepared
05:27Esteban Dávila,
05:28who spoke with an expert on the topic
05:29to begin to understand the doubts.
05:36According to the Código Código de Policía in Colombia,
05:39there are 14 species of dogs considered as dangerous
05:41and that require special measures
05:43if you want them to have as mascotas.
05:45They are the Doberman, the Dogo Argentinian,
05:48the Bull Terrier, the Rottweiler
05:49and, of course, the most famous and stigmatized of all,
05:52the pitbull.
05:53The races are the same
05:54contemplated in the Ley 746 of 2002,
05:57but neither of them nor the Código
05:58explain why they are considered potentially potentially dangerous.
06:01The justification of the authorities
06:03is that they have between the ojos
06:04after several attacks caninos.
06:05And it is that, according to the Defensoría
06:07of the Pueblo,
06:07only here in Bogotá
06:08there are two attacks caninos per hour.
06:11How many for each race?
06:12No idea.
06:13What we know is that
06:14they have a developed musculature,
06:16a very strong and strong mandíbula
06:18very powerful.
06:19But,
06:20are they really so dangerous?
06:22Remember that
06:22there were a time
06:23in which the pastores
06:24were the most dangerous
06:25today.
06:25They are not even in the list
06:26because we have noticed
06:27that they are very intelligent
06:29and amorous.
06:29Even the police
06:30they are trained.
06:31Something not very different
06:32can happen with the 14 races
06:33that today appear in the
06:35cartels of the most dangerous.
06:36Just look at the Pitbull
06:37that until the 70s
06:38was considered
06:39a dog in the United States.
06:41The truth is that
06:41all the races
06:42have the potential
06:43to be either very amorous
06:44or very aggressive.
06:45Or are they going to say
06:46that they have never seen
06:47a pincher
06:47with all their rabies
06:49a dog five times bigger?
06:50The key,
06:51and this is what
06:52even the police say,
06:53is the criance.
06:54That's why we ask the question,
06:55are they
06:56aggressive or
06:57dangerous?
06:58The etologist
06:59Carolina Laguna
07:00explains more
07:01of where the agresiveness
07:03comes from.
07:03The three common causes
07:05of the agresiveness
07:06are the genetic cause
07:07they have to do with the
07:09race indiscriminate
07:09of animals that
07:10present an agresiveness
07:11and therefore
07:12their crées
07:13can be aggressive.
07:14The environmental part
07:16means that
07:16if it is an animal
07:17maltratable
07:18that is in an
07:19environment hostile
07:20generally
07:21they can be
07:21animals that can
07:23present an agresiveness
07:24to defend themselves.
07:26The third cause
07:27is the education.
07:29That is,
07:29if we don't
07:30correct our
07:31dogs
07:31correctly,
07:32they can be
07:34agresive.
07:35In other words,
07:37the education
07:37of these dogs
07:38is the same
07:38that of any race.
07:40You must teach them
07:41what they can
07:42and what they can
07:43do, and to follow
07:43the rules.
07:44If they worry
07:44that their dog
07:45can be aggressive,
07:46see if their parents
07:47had violent behaviors
07:49or if they lived
07:50before they arrived
07:51before they arrived,
07:51because the fear
07:52can also be
07:52violent behavior.
07:53What important
07:54is that
07:54against any
07:55violent behavior
07:55no doubt
07:56to consult a
07:57veterinarian
07:58etologist,
07:58no help
07:59to
07:59stigmatize
07:59more
08:00as well
08:04as
08:04as
08:04as
08:07as
08:11as
08:17a
08:18as
08:18Or
08:19as
08:20as
08:20sino que es la crianza, al igual que José Porteles.
08:22Irene Pérez nos pregunta, por favor, nos pueden decir
08:25cuáles son las razas de cuidado especial.
08:27Germán, usted tiene ahí listado.
08:28Esteban las mencionaba, pero la ley dice que
08:31son los caninos que pertenecen a las razas o cruces.
08:34Ahí está el American Staffordshire Terrier,
08:36el Boomanstiff, el Doberman, el Dogo Argentino,
08:39el Dogo de Bordeaux, el Fila Brasilero,
08:42el Salbor Terrier, el Pitbull Terrier.
08:46Ahí está uno en tosa japonés.
08:47Son 14 en total las razas que actualmente la ley
08:52clasifica como razas potencialmente peligrosas.
08:55Sí, recordemos que este debate se está dando
08:57porque en el Congreso se propone que se elimine
09:00la categoría de perros potencialmente peligrosos
09:02y se cambia a perros que necesitan un cuidado especial
09:06porque han tenido antecedentes de haber agredido personas
09:09u otros perros o que han sido entrenados para el ataque.
09:13¿Qué le parece?
09:13Pueden dejar comentarios ahí, obviamente, debajo de la transmisión.
09:16Si consideran que es una culpa de la raza de los perros
09:20o si más bien es culpa de dueños irresponsables
09:22que crían sus perros de alguna determinada forma
09:26para el ataque o para la defensa.
09:27Sí, muy bien.
09:28Y hablando de redes sociales,
09:29pues vamos a ver qué se está moviendo hoy
09:31en Twitter y en Facebook.
09:43Bueno, y hoy Twitter amanece agitado por las reacciones
09:47que despertó la declaración, la respuesta del cantante panameño
09:51Rubén Blades al presidente Nicolás Maduro.
09:54Él le dijo que no sabía gobernar y que había tergiversado
09:57la idea de izquierda, que lo había convertido en un circo,
10:02que se había convertido en un herrendo ejemplo
10:04de cómo no se debe hablar y mucho menos gobernar.
10:07Estas declaraciones no son las primeras,
10:10tanto el mandatario como el cantante
10:11están envueltos desde hace unas semanas
10:14en un intercambio público de duros señalamientos.
10:16Toca esperar a ver qué pasa.
10:18Y como ustedes ya saben, ayer fue noticia mundial
10:21y tendencia la muerte del cantante Chris Cornell.
10:25Sí, Jennifer.
10:27Pues digamos, fue tendencia él y también Eddie Vedder,
10:30que es el vocalista de Pearl Jam,
10:32la gente muy preocupada de que ahora se vaya a morir Eddie Vedder,
10:37que es como el único que queda de esta generación
10:40del grunge de Seattle.
10:41Jennifer, pero hubo una polémica.
10:43Ahí veíamos las fotos.
10:44Ahí veíamos las fotos en pantalla.
10:46Bueno, ahí como lo acabamos de ver anteriormente,
10:50nosotros tomamos una imagen de la agencia Yeti Imágenes
10:54que nos provee la agencia AFP,
10:56en el que decía, si ustedes lo notaron ahí en el pie de foto,
11:00que esa imagen había sido tomada el 12 de enero de 2016
11:03por el fotógrafo Jackson Kemplin.
11:06Y había sido durante el estreno de la película
11:09a 13 horas para Paramount Picture.
11:11Sin embargo, minutos después nos dimos cuenta
11:15que la imagen no coincidía con el pie de foto de la agencia.
11:18Y lo que hicimos fue, claro, cambiar la imagen de inmediato.
11:23Esto generó una confusión en nuestras redes sociales,
11:25porque la gente sí nos advirtió,
11:27nos decía que ese efectivamente no era Chris.
11:28Que era David Vizbal.
11:29Sí, que no era Chris Cornell.
11:32Pues hubo un poco de burlas, de críticas.
11:36Nos eliminamos, obviamente, la publicación,
11:38porque no podíamos editar la foto.
11:40Ya luego en nuestra página pusimos una foto actual
11:44del último concierto que dio Chris Cornell,
11:47pero pues fue una confusión de, digamos, nuestra reacción
11:50y de la agencia, que de hecho todavía no ha cambiado el pie de foto
11:54de la imagen, ¿no?
11:55Que pertenece a otro cantante.
11:57Sin duda el parecido, pues, es evidente,
12:00pero es claro que no es él.
12:01Detalles que pasan en el día a día del periodismo.
12:04Sí, pero bueno, muy invitados a ver el tema que llevamos hoy
12:07en nuestra edición impresa sobre Chris Cornell,
12:09un poco su biografía, su perfil, su trayectoria en Soundgarden,
12:13luego en Audislave.
12:14Muy invitados a que sigan comentando.
12:17Y pues bueno, hemos llegado al final de este Abre Bocas, Germán.
12:19Bueno, desafortunadamente, pero los invitamos a que se queden conectados
12:23con El Espectador, que puedan ver toda la cantidad de noticias
12:25que tenemos en la versión digital de El Espectador.
12:27Y el lunes nos vemos a las 9 de la noche,
12:29a las 9 de la mañana nuevamente aquí en Abre Bocas de El Espectador.
12:32Chao.
12:49Chao.
Comments