Skip to playerSkip to main content
Senator Mazie Hirono directly confronts Energy Secretary Chris Wright over soaring oil and energy prices. Hirono slammed the administration, questioning whether the economic fallout of what she called an “ego war” was ever considered.

Wright responded that the government “knew exactly what would happen,” even as global oil prices continue to spike amid the ongoing conflict linked to U.S. actions in the Middle East. The situation has disrupted key supply routes like the Strait of Hormuz, driving fears of prolonged energy instability and higher costs worldwide.

The heated exchange highlights growing political pressure over rising fuel costs, economic strain, and the broader consequences of escalating geopolitical tensions.

#EgoWar #MazieHirono #USPolitics #OilPriceSurge #EnergyCrisis #ChrisWright #FuelPrices #MiddleEastConflict #USIranTensions #BreakingNews #GlobalOilCrisis #EnergyWar #OilShock #USGovernment #PoliticalClash #RisingEnergyCosts #WorldNews

~HT.318~ED.103~PR.460~GR.508~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Hawaii is increasing its use of renewables to find cheaper and cleaner sources of power
00:05because Hawaii people pay among the highest, if not the highest, for energy.
00:10And you're nodding. Thank you for acknowledging that.
00:14And our utility customers on Oahu have been warned to expect power bills to rise up to 30%
00:22over the next several months due to the higher oil prices from President Trump's war of choice.
00:30And that is a $40 to $60 higher power bill every month for an average customer
00:36on top of record amounts that we also pay probably the most at the pump, if not the most, for
00:43gasoline.
00:44Did you understand the harmful impact on energy prices for consumers in Hawaii and the rest of the country
00:50and parts of the world, as a matter of fact, before the president launched his illegal war against Iran?
01:00Absolutely, Senator. Iran has been a threat to global energy supplies for 47 years.
01:06I think it was very clear-eyed that to solve this problem...
01:10But, Mr. Secretary, a lot of the energy that is provided is through the Strait of Hormuz,
01:15which was open, and now it's closed.
01:18Because, cause and effect, rising prices of oil, rising prices of energy,
01:24is that something that you did not contemplate happening before the president declared his illegal war?
01:30No, we knew exactly what would happen.
01:32It doesn't seem like it, because the president doesn't know how to end this war,
01:36how to reopen the straits.
01:39Are you telling me you have a handle on this?
01:43Repeat the question, please, Senator.
01:45Are you telling me that you are involved in opening the Strait of Hormuz,
01:50so that the energy prices, which are directly impacted by the closure of the strait,
01:56is going to ease?
01:58Are you directly involved in making that happen?
02:02Look, I'm the primary energy advisor to the president,
02:05and have been discussing the Iran situation, potential solutions to the Iran situation,
02:09since the day I was sworn in.
02:14You mentioned that you have some background in nuclear.
02:17I didn't know that.
02:18I thought you were the CEO of an oil company.
02:22But be that as it may, there's no end in sight with this, what I would call the illegal war.
02:30You know, the reference of the war of choice, what is that?
02:33It's an illegal war that the president declared.
02:36And where is the end here?
02:38Are oil prices going to go down?
02:41Are people going to be able to look to the lowering of gasoline prices?
02:46When you have people to fill up their cars, it now costs like $50, $60 more.
02:52You see, that's something that people cannot sustain.
02:55I agree with you.
02:56Energy prices are higher than they've been before right now.
02:59They're still more than a dollar a gallon cheaper than they were during the peak in the Biden administration.
03:03And we're fixing a 47-year problem in the Middle East that will increase the security of energy supplies after
03:11this war than before the war.
03:12Frankly, that is really hard to believe.
03:17Earlier today, you said to Senator Kennedy that President Trump never demanded you to cut interest rates in your job
03:24interview.
03:24Is that your sworn testimony?
03:26That is, Senator.
03:27Well, someone here is lying, then, because it's either you or President Trump, because in an interview with the Wall
03:34Street Journal of December 12, President Trump confirmed that he pressed you on your commitment to support interest rates cuts.
03:42And I quote, during a 45-minute meeting with Walsh on Wednesday at the White House, the President pressed Walsh
03:49on whether he could trust him to support interest rate cuts if he were chosen to lead the central bank.
03:54According to people familiar with the meeting, Trump, in the general interview, confirmed that, repeating,
03:59Mr. Chairman, I'd like to enter for the record the Wall Street Journal article December 12, Trump says he's leaning
04:05towards Walsh or has it to lead the Fed.
04:07So, you know, this brings up an issue of credibility at this point.
04:11Who's lying here?
04:12Is it you or the President?
04:14Because the President confirmed that he did ask you to cut interest rates.
04:18Senator, there's, of course, a third alternative.
04:21You cite a couple of reporters for a leading financial newspaper.
04:26I recall reading that story at the time.
04:28Did you ask a correction?
04:29I think those reporters either need better sources or better journalist standards.
04:34Did you ask for a correction?
04:36There are things in the newspapers, Senator, I see all the time that don't strike my ear as correct.
04:41So, is it in your opinion that the President then is lying when he said he did not ask you?
04:47I can only repeat to you, Senator, what I said to several of your colleagues.
04:51So, you did not.
04:52You right now are, under a sworn testimony, are saying just right now that the President of the United States
04:59in that job interview did not ask you to cut interest rates.
05:02The President never asked me to commit to interest rate cuts at any particular meeting over the period of my
05:09tenure at the Fed.
05:10He didn't ask for it.
05:12He didn't demand it.
05:13He didn't require it.
05:14And nor would I have ever done so.
05:16So, if these reporters come back and say to do another follow-up on this and they confirm what they
05:21heard, what will your response be?
05:22Well, my response would be what I suggested to you a few moments ago.
05:26As I read that story in real time, I remember thinking they either need better journalistic standards or better sources.
05:33So, you know, here's my problem, Mr. Chair and colleagues.
05:38You know, and Mr. Warsh, I think you're incredibly qualified.
05:41A lot of us are actually worried about the integrity of the Federal Reserve.
05:44We're worried about what this means for the economic markets, and we're worried about what this means for inflation.
05:49We're worried about your independence, and now we're hearing direct contradictions whether or not you were directly asked by the
05:56President to cut interest rates.
05:59And you're saying no, and he's saying yes.
06:01And I think for a lot of us, there's a question now of credibility.
06:04And I think there's a real reason why many of us are not voting no.
06:08As a matter of fact, until you verbally spoke to Mr. Kennedy and answered his question that he did not
06:14ask, the President did not ask you to cut interest rates, this was not even going to be brought up.
06:20So there's definitely right now a true question about who is lying here.
06:25It's either you or it's the President.
06:26Can you tell us a little bit about your conversations with President Trump about interest rates?
06:33Yeah, I don't want to put words in the President's mouth, but I think he has said loudly and clearly
06:38his view on interest rates.
06:40I don't think I'm breaking any news here.
06:43But I can tell you what I said, and what I said the President is what I've said to this
06:48committee and what I've frankly been writing about for more than a decade.
06:53Interest rates are the much better way to be using monetary policy than buying bonds and mortgages, some of which
07:01are issued from the United States Treasury Department.
07:04That is a confusion of roles.
07:06That leads to a set of mission creep.
07:08So interest rates are the dominant tool, and interest rates, as I mentioned, get in the cracks.
07:13My broad view on the conduct of policy from here is that too many Fed officials, past and present, opine
07:22in advance about where they think interest rates should be next meeting, next quarter, next year.
07:27I think that's quite unhelpful.
07:30As we've heard today from many of your colleagues, we don't know the state of AI.
07:36We can't be certain about the state of geopolitics.
07:39The economy is going to change.
07:41You need central bankers that are humble, that are nimble, that are open-minded, that can react when we have
07:47good data, when events strike us.
07:49My broad view is that interest rates need to be forward-looking, need to be based on better data, and
07:56we should have a big, robust deliberation inside the FOMC.
08:01I tend to favor messier meetings than some, where people don't show up with rehearsed scripts, but we can have
08:07a good family fight.
08:08If the central bank has that good family fight, I think that they're going to make better decisions, and if
08:14they happen to make mistakes, they'll correct them sooner.
08:17So I'm not one for pre-deciding what interest rates should be.
08:22I never said to the president where I think rates should be.
08:26I never committed any such thing, and I wouldn't have even thought about doing so.
08:32Subscribe to OneIndia and never miss an update.
08:37Download the OneIndia app now.
08:41You
Comments

Recommended