Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 23 hours ago
In a rare in-home interview, Mary Phagan-Kean displays the April 18, 1914 Atlanta Constitution article featuring prosecutor Frank Arthur Hooper’s statement. Hooper explained he had proactively questioned Judge Roan about Leo Frank personally waiving his presence for the verdict. The judge assured him the waiver was or would be secured. Hooper was astonished when the defense later filed a motion denying it.
Mary connects this contemporary account to the discrepancies she found while researching original trial coverage at Georgia State University archives.

Support the truth: Get the second revised edition of Mary Phagan-Kean’s book, The Murder of Little Mary Phagan (2025 edition). Available on Amazon or directly at www.littlemaryphagan.com. Proceeds fund a documentary honoring Little Mary. First edition free download on the site.

Category

📚
Learning
Transcript
00:00My connection with the Frank case ceased when it was decided by the Supreme Court.
00:06However, as to the incident of the defendant's absence at the time the verdict was received,
00:13I will say that in a conference with Judge Rohn during the trial, I told him I thought it best
00:21for the defendant to agree personally to waive his presence.
00:26And I doubted it that his counsel's consent was sufficient.
00:31The judge told me that he so understood and that the defendant's personal waiver had been or would be obtained.
00:39I supposed, of course, that it had been obtained and was surprised to see a denial of this.
00:45In the extraordinary motion filed yesterday, the solicitor and myself were attempting to guard this point.
00:54And for that reason, I mentioned the matter to the judge.
Comments

Recommended