Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 12 hours ago
Trump Proposes US-Iran Joint Venture to Secure the Strait of Hormuz
By [Author Name]

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a surprising diplomatic pivot, US President Donald Trump has announced that he is considering a joint venture with Iran to protect ships passing through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. The proposal, revealed in an interview with ABC News, marks a significant departure from the administration's previous confrontational stance toward Tehran.

Trump stated that such a partnership is the only viable way to restore the Strait to a safe passage for international shipping. He noted that in the recent past, ships transiting the waterway have been attacked and burned, resulting in the loss of both vessels and crew members. Due to the absence of adequate safety measures, the area currently faces unacceptably high risks, the president explained.

Legal Experts Sound the Alarm
However, the proposal has drawn sharp criticism from maritime law experts, who argue that freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz is being systematically undermined. They view Trump's suggestion as a potential violation of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which governs international maritime behavior.

Experts contend that what Trump is proposing could be interpreted as an attempt to seize control of the Strait for private or bilateral use—a move that would violate core principles of international maritime law. Such an arrangement, they warn, would set a dangerous precedent and seriously undermine the rule of law governing the world's oceans.

It is worth noting that the United States has not ratified UNCLOS, even though the treaty is widely regarded as customary international law. Nevertheless, legal scholars emphasize that all nations are expected to adhere to its principles, regardless of whether they are formal signatories.

Iran's Unilateral Toll System
The context for Trump's proposal is Iran's recent declaration that it has assumed the role of exclusive administrator of the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran has announced that it will impose a transit fee and security charge of at least $2 million on every ship passing through the waterway. This unilateral action has drawn condemnation from numerous countries, many of which argue that Iran has no legal right to levy such fees.

Iran, however, is not a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, though it remains a member of the United Nations Charter. India and France have been among the most vocal critics, warning that the Strait of Hormuz is an international waterway subject to international law—not the exclusive domain of any single nation.

India has gone a step further, declaring that it will not tolerate Iran's actions. New Delhi has announced its intention to exercise its right to self-defense by deploying warships to protect Indian vessels transiting the Strait. Indian officials have stated that they are prepared to confront the threat posed by Iran

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00In a surprising diplomatic pivot, as President Donald Trump has announced that he is considering
00:05a joint venture with Iran to protect ships passing through the strategically vital street of Hormuz,
00:10the proposal, revealed in an interview with ABC News, marks a significant departure from
00:15the administration's previous confrontational stance toward Tehran. Trump stated that such
00:20a partnership is the only viable way to restore the street to a safe passage for international
00:25shipping. He noted that in the recent past, ships transiting the waterway have been attacked and
00:31burned, resulting in the loss of both vessels and crew members. Due to the absence of adequate
00:36safety measures, the area currently faces unacceptably high risks, the president explained.
00:42Legal experts sound the helm, however. The proposal has drawn sharp criticism from maritime law experts,
00:48who argue that freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz is being systematically undermined.
00:53They view Trump's suggestion as a potential violation of the 1980 to United Nations Convention
00:58on the Law of the Sea Unclose, which governs international maritime behavior. Experts contend
01:04that what Trump is proposing could be interpreted as an attempt to seize control of the strait for
01:09private or bilateral use and move that would violate core principles of international maritime law.
01:14Such an arrangement, they warn, would set a dangerous precedent and seriously undermine the
01:19rule of law governing the world's oceans. It is worth noting that the United States has not ratified
01:24UNCLOSE, even though the treaty is widely regarded as customary international law. Nevertheless,
01:30legal scholars emphasize that all nations are expected to adhere to its principles,
01:35regardless of whether they are formal signatories. Iran's unilateral toll-sistenti context for Trump's
01:41proposal is Iran's recent declaration that it has assumed the role of exclusive administrator of the
01:47Strait of Hormuz. Tehran has announced that it will impose a transit fee and security charge of at
01:52least $2 million on every ship passing through the waterway. This unilateral action has drawn
01:57condemnation from numerous countries, many of which argue that Iran has no legal right to levy such fees.
02:04Iran, however, is not a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
02:10though it remains a member of the United Nations Charter. India and France have been among the most vocal
02:15critics warning that the Strait of Hormuz is an international waterway subject to international
02:20law not the exclusive domain of any single nation. India has gone a step further, declaring that it
02:26will not tolerate Iran's actions. New Delhi has announced its intention to exercise its right
02:32to self-defence by deploying warships to protect Indian vessels transiting the strait. Indian officials
02:37have stated that they are prepared to confront the threat posed by Iranian warships if necessary.
02:42Many European countries have also taken measures in response to what they view as an unlawful seizure
02:47of an international passageway. Oman's refusal and Iran's regional diploma siren has attempted to
02:53bring Oman into its control scheme, given Oman's shared responsibility for the strait. Tehran has
02:59reportedly sought Omani cooperation in charging protection of fees, but the Omani government has
03:04repeatedly rejected these overtures, dismissing numerous ideas and persuasions from Iranian officials.
03:10Despite these rejections, the critical development remains Trump's statement to ABC News.
03:16The United States is willing to negotiate with Iran over joint venture to protect shipping,
03:21rather than confronting Iran militarily. This represents a dramatic shift from previous rhetoric.
03:26A history of hostility Strait of Hormuz has been a flashpoint throughout the ongoing US-Israeli war
03:32with Iran, which began on February 28. During the conflict, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard
03:38caused IRGC effectively closed the strait, demanding that all ships obtain permission
03:43before passing and firing upon those that failed to do so. Numerous vessels, including a tie-flag ship,
03:50came under attack. The strategic importance of the strait cannot be overstated. It is a vital shipping
03:56lane, accounting for at least 20% of global maritime trade, supplying goods to markets across the Asia-Pacific
04:03region and Europe. Asian nations, in particular, rely heavily on the waterway. China and India,
04:09the two most populous countries in Asia, depend on the strait for approximately 80% of their oil imports.
04:16During the first week of the war, many Chinese and Indian ships transited the strait under the
04:21protection of US warships. However, by the third and fourth weeks of the conflict, five US warships had
04:27been nearly all shot down or disabled by Iranian fire. Since then, the strait has remained relatively
04:33calm but only because Iran has asserted effective control. Iran's ability to launch missiles and
04:39torpedoes from a distance at any ship passing through the strait without IRGC consent has given
04:44Tehran a powerful deterrent. The Islamic Republic has the technical capability to strike vessels at will,
04:50and it has demonstrated that it is willing to do so. Iran's complaint to the UN Security Council
04:56has formally complained to the UN Security Council, accusing its enemies including the United States
05:02and Israel of attempting to seize control of the strait. However, the Security Council ultimately
05:07decided not to authorise military action against Iran to reclaim the waterway. This decision came
05:13after China and Russia voted against the use of force, arguing instead for a negotiated diplomatic
05:18solution to the crisis. The United States had previously announced that if it decided to open the
05:24strait by force, it would not shed benefits with non-participating nations. President Trump had
05:29stated that if the strait fell into American hands through military action, it would become the
05:35exclusive right of the United States. Trump's surprising pivot against this backdrop, Trump's revelation that
05:41he is now studying the possibility of a joint investment with Iran essentially a business partnership to
05:47manage the strait has shocked many nations. China, as the single largest user of the waterway,
05:52and India, the second largest, are watching with particular concern. Both countries are now
05:57wondering whether Iran will agree to such a compromise. Notably, just before Iran and the
06:02United States reached a recent 14-day ceasefire agreement, Iranian President Abbas Mousavi referenced
06:09as Pesach in some reports made a telling statement on Tuesday. He declared that while the strait of
06:14Hormuz belongs to Iran, Tehran has the right to share control benefits with any country capable of
06:20jointly managing the waterway. However, President Mousavi later walked back his comments,
06:25stating that they were not official, but merely his personal opinion. He acknowledged that the
06:30Iranian Revolutionary Guard cause does not want the strait to be shared with any country with the
06:35possible exception of nations that possess coastal territory along the strait, much like Iran itself.
06:40Iran has continued to lobby Oman for joint control, but Oman has consistently refused, citing violations of
06:48international law. What observers are saying political observers see a clear calculation behind
06:53Trump's announcement? They believe the President recognizes the immense economic benefits of securing
06:58the strait through cooperation rather than confrontation. It is this potential for mutual gain,
07:04they argue, that led Trump to accept the 14-day peace proposal brokered by multiple countries,
07:10and to agree to direct negotiations with Iran. If the 14-day peace plan is fully implemented,
07:15it could potentially end the war. However, observers warn that the situation remains extremely precarious.
07:22Direct negotiations between the United States and Iran could easily break down, leading to a serious
07:28new conflict. Meanwhile, Israel is waiting in the wings, ready to launch fresh attacks on Iran the
07:34moment the ceasefire is violated. The next two weeks will determine whether this unprecedented
07:39diplomatic opening leads to lasting peace or collapses into even greater violence.
07:43The next two weeks will be reached for this target.
07:43Here's the official-point-out license.
07:44We can do that, and keep going up in the meanwhile.
Comments

Recommended