Skip to playerSkip to main content
Taiwan Opposition Leader Cheng Li-wun Makes Rare Visit to China | Possible Xi Meeting Amid Tensions 2026

Taiwan’s main opposition leader, Cheng Li-wun (KMT Chair), has begun a high-stakes 6-day visit to China, the first by a KMT leader in nearly a decade.

She calls it a ‘journey of peace’ and may meet President Xi Jinping, even as Beijing increases military pressure on Taiwan and refuses talks with President Lai Ching-te.

The trip comes just weeks before the Trump-Xi summit in Beijing. Cross-strait tensions escalate as Taiwan debates defence spending. A defining moment in Taiwan-China relations.

0:00 - Taiwan Opposition Leader Heads to China
1:00 - Possible Meeting with Xi Jinping
1:30 - Peace Mission or Risky Move?

#Taiwan #China #Taiwan #XiJinping #Defence #Geopolitics #World

🔊 LIKE ➡ SHARE ➡ SUBSCRIBE

📰 Breaking news. ⚡Live updates. 🔍 Trusted stories — all in one app. Download the Asianet News App today 👇
🍎 iOS: https://apps.apple.com/in/app/asianet-news-official/id1093450032
🤖 Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.vserv.asianet&hl=en_IN

For More Updates:

Follow us on our What's app Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va5Bq3yKwqSLSQTxam0r

English: https://newsable.asianetnews.com/

Hindi: https://hindi.asianetnews.com/

Malayalam: https://www.asianetnews.com/

Kannada: https://kannada.asianetnews.com/

Tamil: https://tamil.asianetnews.com/

Telugu: https://telugu.asianetnews.com/

Bengali: https://bangla.asianetnews.com/

Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AsianetNewsa...

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/AsianetNewsEN

Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ann.newsable/

➡ If you like our video, give us a thumbs up and subscribe to our channel to get the daily dosage of news, entertainment, sports and more.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00President Trump isn't going to be able to convince the American public that he won
00:06until he can prove that he's achieved his various war aims.
00:11It's hard to say that the United States has won
00:14when Iran still continues to hamper freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz.
00:21Thank you so much for talking to me, and I really appreciate your time.
00:24Did the President make a convincing case this afternoon through his press conference
00:30that Operation Epic Fury achieved its objectives, he claimed that we won,
00:35or was it just another spin?
00:38No, President Trump isn't going to be able to convince the American public that he won
00:46until he can prove that he's achieved his various war aims.
00:51The problem is, his various war aims shift with time, sometimes from minute to minute, hour to hour.
00:59But at a minimum, he needs to account for Iran's nuclear-enriched uranium.
01:05He also needs to eliminate Iran's missile capability.
01:11And then the last issue has to do with the future of Iran's government,
01:15because different people can point to different statements the President has made
01:20in order to adjudicate whether or not he has succeeded.
01:25But at a very minimum, it's hard to say that the United States has won
01:31when Iran still continues to hamper freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz.
01:39Right. Now, President Trump, just at the beginning of this conflict,
01:45had promised to help the Iranian people.
01:48He said help was on its way.
01:49But again, today we heard that the President is threatening to bomb their power plants, infrastructure.
01:55How do you square that?
01:58Well, first of all, even by the Iranian regime's estimates,
02:04the number of people that have been killed in American bombing
02:08is far below that which the Iranian regime itself killed
02:13during an orgy of violence in two days in January.
02:18But the problem with Trump has always been his rhetoric.
02:23Many American policymakers have often joked that Trump's policies
02:29might be far more palatable if the United States pursued them
02:34with Donald Trump locked out of sight in a basement somewhere
02:39without an ability to tweet or speak.
02:45Now, with regard to the question,
02:47how do you square Donald Trump's statements
02:51with regard to his promises to help the Iranian people?
02:55On one hand, his statement's unhelpful
02:58because he seems to conflate the Iranian people
03:02with the regime he seeks to oust.
03:05On the other hand,
03:07when it comes to Iran's power plants,
03:10it's important to recognize
03:12that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
03:14controls and profits from most of them.
03:17That said,
03:19the United States should not repeat the mistakes in Iran
03:22of our engagement with Iraq.
03:26I went to Iraq right after Saddam Hussein had fallen.
03:30And what was clear
03:31is that the United States had
03:34completely destroyed
03:37Iraq's infrastructure and its economy.
03:41But the next day,
03:43the Iraqis were our allies,
03:45and we were the ones who were struggling
03:47because their economy
03:49had been destroyed.
03:51With regard to Iran,
03:53it's important to go after the Iranian regime
03:56with a scalpel,
03:58not an axe,
04:00and certainly not a flamethrower.
04:04Now,
04:05Tuesday's deadline is hours away.
04:08Do you see a deal happening, Michael?
04:10And it's a yes or a no.
04:12And what are the Americans really thinking here?
04:17I do not see a deal being made.
04:21Now,
04:22with regard to Donald Trump,
04:25his ultimatums
04:27are often
04:29drawn in pencil
04:31in the sand.
04:33They're not a traditional ultimatum.
04:37That said,
04:38there's a military strategy
04:40behind what Donald Trump is doing.
04:42Every time
04:43he issues an ultimatum,
04:46the Iranians react.
04:48And the Americans note how they react.
04:51If he keeps issuing ultimatums
04:53and then extending them,
04:56ultimately,
04:57the United States
04:58gains intelligence
04:59and Iranian readiness declines.
05:02At the very least,
05:04for those who want
05:05a diplomatic solution,
05:07it's unrealistic
05:08to expect
05:09a diplomatic solution
05:10if the Iranian leadership
05:13doesn't fear
05:14that something worse
05:16is to come.
05:18Now,
05:19the basic problem
05:20which Donald Trump
05:21doesn't understand
05:22is this.
05:23The United States
05:25has a reputation
05:27of lacking
05:28strategic patience.
05:31And because of that,
05:33the Iranian
05:35regime,
05:36or what remains of it,
05:38isn't trying to defeat
05:39the United States.
05:41It's only trying to outlast
05:43American patience.
05:45And if it does that,
05:47then it will stand up
05:49and declare victory,
05:50no matter what
05:51Donald Trump
05:52tries to spin.
05:55Now,
05:56let's talk about
05:56a country
05:57that's claiming
05:58to be the dealmaker here.
06:00Let's talk about Pakistan.
06:02They have been claiming
06:03that they are mediators here.
06:05Are they really
06:05genuine mediators
06:06or just
06:07messengers
06:08carrying the letters
06:09that neither side
06:10want to read?
06:11You know,
06:13a book should be written
06:15about insincere
06:17mediators
06:17in the 21st century.
06:19We see Turkey,
06:21we see Qatar,
06:22and we see Pakistan
06:24immunizing themselves
06:26from accountability
06:27for their own actions
06:29by insincerely
06:32posturing
06:32as mediators.
06:34The fact of the matter
06:35is,
06:36in each case,
06:37their mediation
06:38has gone nowhere,
06:39which is why
06:41we're in the conflict
06:42we're in right now.
06:44But,
06:45so long as
06:46Donald Trump
06:47seems to be
06:48as gullible
06:50as
06:51he
06:52is
06:53on these issues,
06:56Asim Mounir
06:57is simply going
06:58to extract
06:59as much
07:01as he can
07:02from Donald Trump.
07:04Donald Trump
07:05thinks of himself
07:06as the ultimate
07:07deal maker,
07:09but
07:09his
07:10vision
07:11or his
07:12understanding
07:13is the New York
07:14real estate market.
07:16As soon as
07:17he goes into
07:18the
07:19markets
07:20of Karachi
07:21or
07:22Istanbul
07:23or Doha,
07:25he gets
07:25fleeced
07:26and he doesn't
07:27even realize it.
07:31Now,
07:33Iran
07:33here
07:34is controlling
07:35the Strait of Hormuz
07:36and the oil
07:37is at
07:38$100
07:38a barrel.
07:40How exactly
07:42is this a win
07:43for America?
07:45Well,
07:46first of all,
07:47we need to recognize
07:49that the
07:50Strait of Hormuz
07:51closure
07:52has a ticking
07:53clock
07:54over it
07:54because
07:56while its
07:57closure
07:58hurts
07:58the Gulf
08:00Arab states,
08:02the Islamic
08:03Republic of
08:03Iran
08:04also needs
08:05to import
08:06its refined
08:07gasoline
08:08because it
08:09doesn't have
08:10its own
08:10adequate
08:11refining
08:11capability
08:12and capacity.
08:14Therefore,
08:15if Donald Trump
08:16wanted to,
08:17the way
08:18in which
08:19he could
08:19bring the
08:19Iranians
08:20to their
08:21knees
08:21would be
08:23if the
08:23United States
08:24blockaded
08:25the Strait of Hormuz
08:27and prevented
08:28the Iranians
08:29from importing
08:30refined
08:31gasoline.
08:32There's also
08:33a ticking
08:34clock
08:34over the
08:35Strait of Hormuz
08:36because
08:37Iran
08:37relies upon
08:39its oil
08:40exports
08:41in order
08:42to pay
08:42the salaries
08:43of the
08:44Islamic
08:44Revolutionary
08:45Guard Corps.
08:46What we're
08:47about to see
08:47is what
08:49proportion
08:49of the
08:49Islamic
08:50Revolutionary
08:51Guard Corps
08:51has been
08:52in this
08:52conflict
08:53for the
08:53money
08:54versus
08:55how many
08:55are the
08:56true
08:56ideologues.
08:57I would
08:58suspect,
08:59and we've
08:59already seen
09:00indications,
09:01of many
09:02within the
09:02Islamic
09:02Revolutionary
09:03Guard Corps
09:03not showing
09:04up for
09:05work.
09:05And so,
09:06while the
09:07Iranians
09:08have mastered
09:09the art
09:09of bluster,
09:11I don't
09:12believe that
09:12the Strait of
09:13Hormuz
09:13closure is
09:14going to
09:15be as
09:16comprehensive
09:17or permanent
09:18as the
09:19Iranians
09:19seem to
09:20claim.
09:23Now let's
09:24just talk
09:24about the
09:25details that
09:26have emerged
09:27about the
09:27U.S.
09:28airman who
09:30was rescued.
09:32Talk to us
09:33about what
09:35really this
09:36rescue operation,
09:37what you make
09:38of it, and
09:39what really is
09:40the mood
09:41within the
09:43Department of
09:44War, what is
09:45it amongst the
09:46soldiers,
09:47somebody who
09:48has been in
09:49those boots,
09:50someone as
09:51an ex-Pentagon
09:53official, what
09:54is your sense
09:55about what
09:56really is the
09:57mood within
09:58the Department
09:59of War?
10:00Well, first
10:01of all, to be
10:01clear, I'm a
10:02civilian, and I
10:03never served in
10:04the military, so
10:05I just want to
10:06make that clear so
10:07that no one
10:08accuses me of
10:08pretending
10:09otherwise.
10:10That said,
10:12look, let's
10:13be blunt, there
10:14is no other
10:15military in the
10:16world, whether
10:17you like Donald
10:18Trump or
10:19dislike Donald
10:19Trump, that
10:21could stage a
10:21rescue like the
10:23United States
10:23just staged.
10:24We set up an
10:26interim airfield
10:28just a few
10:30dozen kilometers
10:31from one of
10:32Iran's largest
10:33cities and
10:35managed without
10:36a single loss
10:37of a person
10:38to rescue
10:40airmen who
10:41were shot
10:42down.
10:43That is
10:44amazing.
10:44We've done
10:45this before.
10:46We did this
10:47once over
10:47Kosovo back
10:49in 1999, but
10:51the fact that
10:52we were able
10:52to do this
10:53against a much
10:54more foreign
10:54formidable ally
10:55shows just how
10:57potent the
10:58American military
10:59is and how
11:01empty and
11:02what a paper
11:02tiger Iran's
11:04military is.
11:06Now, if I may
11:07say with regard
11:08to the Indian
11:09discourse, one
11:11thing I think
11:11the Indian
11:12discourse gets
11:13wrong.
11:14Certainly, the
11:15Indians are
11:16right to
11:17complain about
11:18the rise in
11:19energy prices,
11:20especially since
11:21they had no
11:22say given the
11:23unilateral
11:24action of
11:25Donald Trump's
11:26decision to
11:27go to war.
11:28But, while it's
11:30all well and
11:31good to hand
11:32wring over the
11:33American decision
11:34and over
11:35international law,
11:36there needs to
11:38be much greater
11:39discussion within
11:41India about what
11:43India is going
11:44to do to
11:45achieve the
11:46capabilities which
11:47America has
11:48now demonstrated.
11:50because the
11:51fact of the
11:52matter is, as
11:53India rises as
11:55an economic
11:56power, and
11:57frankly, as a
11:58global power, the
11:59knives are going
12:00to be out in
12:01Pakistan, in
12:03China, and
12:04elsewhere, and
12:06India can't get
12:07caught simply
12:09hand-wringing and
12:11discussing endlessly
12:12about international
12:13law when it
12:14also needs to
12:15develop its
12:17military capability.
12:18The last
12:19point, which
12:20has come under
12:21discussion, which
12:22is truly
12:23interesting, and
12:24in many ways
12:25could be a
12:25diplomatic game
12:26changer, is
12:28there are a lot
12:28of rumors now
12:30that the
12:31missile which
12:33shot down the
12:34American F-15
12:35was provided by
12:37Turkey to
12:38Iran.
12:39It wasn't an
12:41indigenous Iranian
12:42missile.
12:42And if this
12:44is confirmed, then
12:46there is going
12:46to be an even
12:48greater crisis
12:49within NATO.
12:54Now, if the
12:56talks don't get
12:57through, do you
12:58see Pakistan
12:59providing any
13:01kind of ground
13:02support to the
13:03U.S.
13:04military to
13:06carry out its
13:06operations against
13:08Iran?
13:09No, and I
13:11don't see the
13:11Pakistanis doing
13:12anything, for
13:15diplomatic reasons,
13:16I don't see the
13:17Pakistanis doing
13:18anything, and
13:18frankly, the
13:19Pakistanis don't
13:20have capability.
13:21The Pakistanis, like
13:23the Iranians, are
13:24experts.
13:25I rate them 10
13:26out of 10 in
13:28fantasy, and I'm
13:29bragging about
13:30capabilities they
13:31don't have.
13:32But when push
13:33comes to shove,
13:35they're a 1 or 2
13:36out of 10 in
13:37their ability to
13:38actually achieve
13:39what they claim.
13:40Now, the biggest,
13:42another diplomatic
13:43story out of this
13:44conflict is just
13:46how disappointed
13:47Saudi Arabia is
13:49in Pakistan, because
13:51Saudi Arabia was
13:52attacked when it
13:54was sitting on the
13:54sidelines of this
13:55conflict.
13:56And just a few
13:57months ago, Pakistan
13:59and Saudi Arabia
14:00signed a so-called
14:02mutual defense
14:03alliance.
14:03Some people are
14:04talking about it
14:05being an Islamic
14:06NATO.
14:07I mean, in
14:08reality, it's an
14:09Islamic no-go,
14:11because when
14:12Saudi Arabia was
14:13in its hour of
14:14need, Pakistan
14:15simply made up
14:16some excuses.
14:17And sometimes
14:19those excuses
14:19were just empty
14:20diplomatic rhetoric.
14:21But let's also
14:22face it.
14:23When Pakistan is
14:25bombing Kabul
14:26and pretending
14:27that they're in
14:28a much greater
14:29and more
14:32existential
14:33conflict with the
14:34Taliban than
14:35they're in,
14:35what Pakistan
14:37is really
14:38doing is just
14:38creating an
14:39excuse not
14:40to have to
14:41fulfill their
14:43diplomatic bargain
14:44with Saudi
14:44Arabia.
14:45So, I mean,
14:46let's be
14:47frank.
14:48To make a
14:49military alliance
14:50with Saudi
14:51Arabia makes
14:53about as much
14:54sense as
14:55making a
14:56military alliance
14:57with Papua New
14:58Guinea.
14:59The only
14:59difference is that
15:00Papua New
15:01Guinea might have
15:02a more capable
15:02military at this
15:03point.
15:05Right.
15:06Your closing
15:07remarks,
15:08anything that
15:09you'd like to
15:09add to what
15:10we heard from
15:11the President
15:12in the next
15:1224 hours?
15:13Not even 24,
15:15less than that
15:15now.
15:16No, look,
15:17I mean,
15:18the bigger,
15:18what I would
15:19say with
15:20regard to
15:21this war
15:23is that
15:26never before
15:27have I seen
15:28such a
15:29divergence
15:29between
15:31military
15:32domination
15:32on one
15:33side
15:33and
15:35influence
15:35domination
15:36on the
15:37other.
15:38The Americans
15:39have shown,
15:40despite arguments
15:41that we don't
15:42have strategic
15:43patience,
15:44that we are
15:45capable of
15:46bombing with
15:47extreme precision
15:48and decimating
15:50targets.
15:51We control
15:51Iranian airspace.
15:53At the same
15:54time,
15:54because of
15:56Iranian bluster
15:57and the
15:59willingness of
16:00people to
16:00believe Iranian
16:01bluster,
16:02many people
16:03even believe
16:04that the
16:04United States
16:05is losing,
16:05which is
16:06absolute nonsense,
16:08given what
16:09we just
16:10pulled off
16:10rescuing
16:11the pilot.
16:12One of the
16:13other issues
16:14which is
16:14out there,
16:15and again
16:16it goes
16:17into the
16:17whole influence
16:18operations,
16:19is that
16:20in all
16:21likelihood,
16:22Iran doesn't
16:24have a
16:24supreme
16:24leader.
16:26Muchtapa
16:26Khamenei
16:27hasn't been
16:28seen,
16:29and the
16:29most recent
16:30attempt to
16:31suggest that
16:31he was in
16:32Qum appears
16:33to have been
16:34generated by
16:35artificial
16:35intelligence.
16:37How long
16:38are we going
16:38to keep up
16:39this illusion
16:40that Iran
16:42is anything
16:43other than
16:43a military
16:44dictatorship under
16:45the control
16:46of the Islamic
16:47Revolutionary
16:47Guard Corps?
16:48The clergy
16:49itself has
16:50collapsed,
16:51and that
16:52also is a
16:53story that is
16:54coming out.
16:55The last
16:56point I would
16:57make is
16:58that while
16:59people,
17:00many people
17:01are cheering
17:02for the
17:02United States
17:03to be
17:03defeated,
17:05and it's
17:05almost like
17:07Gulliver's
17:08travels,
17:09and we see
17:10this with
17:10NATO.
17:11The United
17:12States is
17:12Gulliver,
17:13and we're
17:14being tied
17:14down,
17:15and many
17:16different NATO
17:17countries,
17:17Spain for
17:18example,
17:19Austria,
17:20they're basically
17:21acting like the
17:22Lilliputians
17:22right now.
17:23However,
17:24they don't
17:25fully understand
17:26what is at
17:27stake if
17:28freedom of
17:28navigation isn't
17:30restored,
17:30or if Iran
17:31is able to
17:32claim victory.
17:33What the
17:34Americans have
17:35to reckon
17:35with is just
17:37how deep
17:38anti-Americanism
17:40is, not only
17:42among our
17:42adversaries, but
17:44among our
17:44allies, and we
17:46need to recognize
17:47that the
17:48reason why
17:49anti-Americanism
17:51is so deep
17:51is because of
17:53our unilateralism,
17:54and because of
17:55the failure over
17:57generations of
17:58our diplomacy,
17:59and because the
18:00United States
18:01doesn't
18:03adequately show
18:04respect to
18:06our allies.
18:07India is not
18:08alone in this,
18:10but until
18:11Americans understand
18:12that we can't
18:14go it alone,
18:14we are going
18:16to suffer
18:17much more,
18:18not only in
18:19victory, but
18:20also perhaps in
18:21the future in
18:22defeat.
Comments

Recommended