Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 5 days ago
We had this conversation with Thomas Frank in September, 2008. The subject was his just-published book "The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Rule".
The Republican Party had been behaving badly for quite some time. The Supreme Court's 2010 "Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission" decision defining money as "speech" and corporations as "persons" made everything worse … much worse. American Citizens must forcefully act to reclaim our faltering, flailing Democracy.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:02Welcome back. This is the Paula Gordon Show. I'm Paula, Bill Russell, Thomas Frank, not to be confused with Frank
00:08Thomas, the baseball player you just told me, liberal, liberal state.
00:15Yeah.
00:16That used to have a meaning that was liberal arts.
00:19It was broadly popular, too.
00:21Well, we liked it.
00:22Yeah. And I'm on a one-man crusade to rescue the word liberal.
00:30So we'll be on a three-man crusade, what do you say? So what does it mean that has been
00:34so trashed, much less forgotten?
00:37Well, I mean, liberalism in the classical definition is just this belief in maximizing human freedom. And then it got
00:46updated in the 1930s. There's a famous definition from the 30s that I like of liberalism where it's freedom plus
00:52groceries.
00:54Whoa! Who did that?
00:55Well, it was a congressman from Texas.
00:57Fabulous. You mean something good did come out of Texas?
00:59There used to be a lot of liberals from Texas. It's hard to believe. Like Lyndon Johnson, you know.
01:03There used to be a lot of liberals from Kansas, but that's another subject.
01:06And from Nebraska, they had a Republican senator called George Norris, and his nickname was the Fighting Liberal.
01:13Well, Wisconsin, the home of Joseph McCarthy. McCarthy displaced one of the great progressives of all time, Fighting Bob. Not
01:25just any old senator.
01:26Well, he displaced junior. Little Bob, I think they called him. But Fighting Bob LaFollette, Norris, these folks in the
01:34Midwest, which was a hotbed of taking care of each other.
01:38That's right. A hotbed of kindness. A hotbed of niceness.
01:41Holy cow!
01:42How primitive. I know that's funny, isn't it?
01:45It's not just historians, though, to whom this is important. This is important to all of us because we've forgotten,
01:51along with the idea of liberal being...
01:53Freedom plus groceries.
01:54Fabulous. And what, then, is the liberal state?
01:56The liberal state is the traditional 19th century capitalist state, but with all the safeguards thrown in, okay?
02:04With Keynesian economics, with the regulated financial markets, with a safe workplace, with a labor union so that people have
02:13some voice at the place that they work.
02:15It's democracy applied to economics.
02:19I wondered if that word would come into this.
02:21What?
02:22Democracy.
02:23That much-abused word.
02:25Democracy in the economics...
02:27The liberal state is economic democracy.
02:29So it's democracy, not only in politics, but also in the world of economics.
02:37And that's what has been undone. That's what's been under such brutal attack for 30 years.
02:41And with that goes an attack on social democracy.
02:45Yeah. Yeah. And the word liberal now, I mean, means snob or something.
02:51God, where was I the other day and I heard someone called someone a liberal as like an imprecation, like,
02:56you know, just yelling at somebody on the street, you goddamn liberal.
02:59No.
03:00Yeah.
03:00Just because they didn't like them?
03:03Yeah. I mean, yeah.
03:05And...
03:06It was probably Saturday Night Night Live.
03:08I don't remember where it was.
03:09No.
03:10I don't remember where it was, but it was really, it was shocking to me.
03:13And I was just walking along.
03:14It might have been in Iowa City.
03:16I don't know.
03:17Yeah.
03:17And it was a funny thing.
03:19There was no, you know, physical marks to identify the person as a liberal, but it was just an insult,
03:25right?
03:26And now it means snob.
03:29It means, you know, this sort of intellectual, but intellectual in the hated, in the hated sense, not in the
03:35sense like that we respect learning or something like that.
03:37But, but, you know, somebody that's wrote a lot of books and wants to interfere in every aspect of your
03:40life.
03:41It means, it means a kind of upper class tyrant.
03:44And it's been given this sort of class definition.
03:48And...
03:48Coming from the people who are the ruling, as it were, class.
03:52Oh, Paula.
03:54I know.
03:54Where to begin?
03:55Yes.
03:56Look.
03:56Yes.
03:56Yes, what you're saying is true.
03:57But isn't that part of the dilemma?
03:58Yeah.
03:59Where to begin?
04:00That's, that's, that is, what you're saying is true, that this definition has been applied to them very successfully by
04:07people who represent the actual ruling class in this country, i.e. big business, the very wealthy, high net worth
04:14individuals, you know, the great fortunes, that sort of thing.
04:17They're the ones that funded and led the attack on liberalism ever since the 1930s.
04:22And they, it's only come into flower since the 1970s.
04:26And the funded part was really, really important because this was a very considered conscious act on the part of
04:36those who were, as you say, business, the high net worth individuals, the big fortunes.
04:42Yeah, well, they, that's, they hated Roosevelt and, and, you know, Roosevelt, that's 70 years ago.
04:48Oh, no, but that's when they started, that's when they started, you know, counterattacking.
04:52And they got nowhere for a very long time.
04:55And it wasn't until the 60s and 70s.
04:57Now, why would that be that they got nowhere?
04:58There's a line in this book I read by Thomas Frank called The Wrecking Crew that says the people actually
05:04liked the liberal state.
05:06They still do.
05:07No, if you do polls all the time, do people like Social Security?
05:11Hell yeah.
05:12And then ask them, well, do you like the, even better?
05:14How about the, the idea of having, you know, a secure retirement?
05:18People really like that.
05:19How about the idea of having pure food?
05:22You know, how about the idea of having, you know, food that doesn't poison you and have, making sure that
05:26that's the case?
05:27Oh, people dig that.
05:28How do we feel about health care?
05:30People would like to be able to feel health care.
05:31We don't know anything about it.
05:32People, the idea that you, that if some, a member of your family gets sick that you're going to go
05:36bankrupt, turns out that's a really unpopular situation.
05:40People don't like that.
05:41And that all is embedded in the idea of the liberal state.
05:46That's liberalism.
05:47I want to go back to Paula's original question, which is what happens when they cheat?
05:52And this is, you know, I've been thinking about it a long time because we've had a long time to
05:55think about it.
05:57More than eight years, 40 years, plus or minus, depending on where you start.
06:01And it seems there are two problems with the cheaters.
06:05One, a lot of their cheating is illegal.
06:09And then the question is, well, one of how does one enforce, can the laws be enforced and will the
06:16laws be enforced, which is one issue with it.
06:18The other, and in some ways it's sort of an existential challenge, is that this approach is not sustainable.
06:26You mean the current cheating approach?
06:28Well, at some point you run out of somebody to steal from.
06:32Yeah.
06:33That's we're finding out right now.
06:35Exactly.
06:36And when, and, you know, we've sort of cleaned out this house.
06:40We're now borrowing from the Chinese, various Middle Eastern countries, Russia.
06:48We're all going to be working for the Qatari Sovereign Wealth Fund.
06:51If we're lucky.
06:53Yeah.
06:55But that's the capital is in action.
06:56That's not funny.
06:57I'm sorry.
06:58Look, Paula, you wonder why I think that, why I laugh at all this stuff.
07:01And it's, there is no way to write a book like this.
07:04And without taking the kind of ironic attitude that I have, otherwise you would go mad.
07:12It's too depressing.
07:14It's too awful.
07:15And it's also too systematic.
07:17I mean, one of the things that I couldn't believe when I was writing this is like, why hasn't someone
07:20written this book yet?
07:21Why do I have this field all to myself?
07:24It's not funny.
07:25What the hell is going on?
07:27One of the real insights in this book that I went back and just sort of savored is something called
07:33the Jamba Declaration.
07:35Unbelievable.
07:36I had no idea about this.
07:37And I think in some ways that sort of is almost a paradigm for all of what's gone on in
07:43the last, well, 30 years.
07:4540 is a nice round number.
07:47Tell me about the Jamba Declaration.
07:49There's a lot of backstory to it.
07:51This is a truncate.
07:53I get a one and a half minute backstory and then get to Jamba.
07:56Look, when I wrote the book, I settled on a bunch of, several different narrative strategies that I would take.
08:03I would describe Washington physically.
08:05I would describe the systems of government and how they've been wrecked.
08:09And I would describe the career of Jack Abramoff, who seemed to me to be the ideal man of conservative
08:15Washington, D.C., really the ideal figure.
08:17And had been a long time.
08:18Yes.
08:19And you're doing this not because he is a bad apple.
08:21No, he's a single bad apple.
08:23He's representative.
08:24Jack Abramoff was a great idealist.
08:27He was the protege of leaders of the movement.
08:29He was the movement for a while.
08:32Yeah.
08:32He was the leader.
08:33And he would surface here and there in all these different places that you would never expect.
08:38He was the head of the College of Republicans.
08:39He ran a think tank.
08:40He had a role in Iran-Contra.
08:42And then one of the stranger things that he did is he was running a, I don't know what you
08:47would call it, a grassroots group in D.C.
08:50And he somehow, he had developed this fund.
08:53This is actually, he had been doing this in the College of Republicans for right-wing guerrilla movements around the
08:58world.
08:59He and his friends, and this was a big deal.
09:01This is the Reagan years.
09:01Remember, we had the Mujahideen in Afghanistan.
09:03We had the Contras in Nicaragua.
09:05But there were other ones.
09:06There was a group, there was a right-wing group fighting in Mozambique, and there was a right-wing group
09:10fighting in Angola.
09:12Some of these guys were incredibly bad, okay?
09:14They were what we would call now terrorists.
09:18And we were funding them.
09:19We were funding them.
09:19These are all people on our side.
09:21Some of them were running armies, though.
09:22I mean, this is because beyond just, I mean, it was terrorism.
09:25It was terrorism by organized armies.
09:27Oh, of course.
09:27Right.
09:28And what I mean is like planting landmines all over Angola and that sort of thing.
09:31Which gets us.
09:32Slaughtering civilians.
09:33Which gets us.
09:33Slape, mutilation, the full litany.
09:36Which gets us.
09:37Not nice people.
09:38No.
09:38Gets us to Jumbo?
09:40It does, as a matter of fact.
09:41Okay.
09:42So there was this, on the right, there was this cult of what they called the Freedom Fighter,
09:46okay, meaning all these different right-wing guerrilla groups.
09:49And the idea occurred to them that what they really needed to do was get all these guys together in
09:56one place
09:57and have a kind of right-wing Woodstock.
10:00And it was their grand scheme, their sort of cultural pattern that they were always after
10:04was to do what the left had done in the 60s, but everything in reverse.
10:08So, like, they would have big protests where they'd all be wearing ties.
10:12You know?
10:13Gee, that's important.
10:16Symbolically, it was.
10:17And it was a really good fundraising strategy as well.
10:20You know, take the tactics of the left, but use them on the right.
10:24And they really took this, they went much farther than the left and were much, much more successful
10:29than the left, as you notice once you, Jack Abramoff became one of the most successful
10:34lobbyists in Washington history.
10:36But anyhow, so they decided they'd have this big get-together of all these right-wing guerrilla groups
10:41in territory liberated by force of arms from a Soviet client state in Angola.
10:47And they were going to do it at, the guy that, of all the freedom fighters, the one they loved
10:51most
10:52was this fellow called Jonas Savimbi in Angola.
10:55And he was a very charismatic guy.
10:58You know, he always walked around with a big pistol on his hip and this sort of thing.
11:01And they all got together and they got some people from Afghanistan, some Contras, some,
11:07I think, people from Laos or something like that, and brought them all to Savimbi's hideout.
11:12A few Nazis, didn't they?
11:13Yeah, you said so.
11:15They came in later.
11:16That was a different meeting.
11:17Just want to be sure.
11:18That was meeting number two.
11:20And then they went to...
11:22That was Altamont, right?
11:25You know, if I left that joke in, I believe I removed that joke to compare...
11:30This was the Altamont of the...
11:32You didn't leave it in, but it looks a lot...
11:34This first one was the Woodstock, the second one was the Altamont.
11:36Oh, gosh.
11:37But I believe I cut...
11:38How did you guess that?
11:39I cut that out of the book.
11:40So was it screamingly obvious.
11:42Besides, I was at Altamont.
11:44Oh, no!
11:45Okay.
11:45We're going to come back with that in moments.
11:48When we return, be with us.

Recommended