Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
As tensions escalate and modern conflicts grow increasingly technology driven, a new challenge is emerging on the battlefield: the rapid depletion of advanced weapons. In this interview, retired Air Vice Marshal and military analyst Sean Bell discusses the growing gap between the rate at which high-tech munitions are used and how quickly they can be produced. From the soaring cost of Patriot missiles to the strategic advantage of quantity over quality, Bell explains why stockpiles, industrial capacity and political will could shape and duration of future wars.
Transcript
00:00Now to Sean Bell, a retired Air Vice Marshal and military analyst who's speaking to us from a UK Royal
00:07Air Force Base.
00:08Sean, welcome back. Good to see you.
00:10The accountancy of war, the stocks of military hardware, as we've been hearing, how much is being deployed, how much
00:17remains is critical in this, isn't it?
00:21Good afternoon, Jamie. No, it is. But I think we don't always put the price at the forefront of this.
00:27I think part of it is that a bit like let's look at the air defense missiles that America is
00:32using.
00:33We're focusing a lot on the attack. But if you look at the defense, Patriot missiles is a really good
00:37example.
00:38They cost about four million dollars a time. But it's not so much the cost, it's the availability.
00:43There's less than, you know, a thousand of those available, about twelve hundred, I think, available in stock.
00:48But if you look at the rate of utilization at the moment compared to the rate of production, they're being
00:54consumed much quicker than the industry can provide them.
00:56And of course, on current projections, America would run out of those if they were carried on the current rate
01:02in about ten weeks of the war.
01:04At the same time, Iran would still have about 70,000 of its Shaheed drones left.
01:09The danger is we've got some very high tech weapons, very capable, but they are far overmatched what Iran has.
01:15But Iran has in quantity what America has in quality.
01:20Let's talk about time, then.
01:22How big a challenge would it be to replace those stockpiles in terms of how long it takes to manufacture
01:30new equipment, new munitions?
01:33Yeah, so one of the issues has been, let's take Patriot again, because there's about four million dollars a time.
01:39But you need two of those generally to shoot down one missile.
01:42Only one you need to fire, but their probability of kill is not always 100%, so you need two.
01:48At the moment, my understanding is they're being produced at around 17 a week.
01:52If you imagine the production is far less than the utilization.
01:56And although Donald Trump says that he's met with defense industries to quadruple the number of missiles that are being
02:03produced,
02:04just imagine all the subcontractors, the subcomponents.
02:07They won't be producing more missiles in the next few days or weeks or months.
02:11It'll probably take years before that happens.
02:13Therefore, it's almost certain that America will not have the appetite to continue conducting the war the way it is
02:19at the moment,
02:19beyond the six to eight week point.
02:21It's a real challenge that although you've got an American superpower in place that absolutely dominates Iran,
02:28Iran is able to use a number of other asymmetric capabilities to counter that American might.
02:33Can we talk about then how long perhaps American voters will tolerate the costs?
02:39Does anyone in the military worry about that?
02:44Well, Jamie, I know it sounds a bit odd, but I think the primary focus of the military will be
02:49on achieving the objectives of the war.
02:51It's not entirely clear what they are because President Trump keeps moving around.
02:55And the other thing will be the preservation of life.
02:57It won't just be me who was very moved as those six American servicemen were repatriated.
03:03And watching President Trump, who has no speaking role, he can be very much around the sound bites and around
03:10gesture politics.
03:12But actually, he was clearly moved that our politicians are the ones who send us to war.
03:17It is the military that fight those wars.
03:20Generally, they do in a fantastically professional way.
03:22But it's them who fight our nation's enemies, it's them who stand on the wall, and it's them who occasionally
03:27have to make the ultimate sacrifice.
03:29And I think that's their ultimate focus of the military, is being as professional as they can, but making sure
03:34we minimize any casualties along the way.
03:37Historically, wars often cost more than initially projected.
03:39I mean, are there parallels, do you think, with Iraq or Afghanistan in terms of how much the financial costs
03:47could get out of hand?
03:49Or it's simply the story of unforeseen costs, isn't it?
03:53I think you're right, Jamie.
03:55I think it's the unforeseen costs.
03:56I mean, we invest in defence, all nations.
03:59Defence is an insurance policy against an uncertain future.
04:02And you pay your premiums accordingly.
04:04You know, in the UK and in Europe, largely ever since the Cold War, the threat has been significantly less,
04:10and we've spent less on defence.
04:12With the Russians' invasion of Ukraine, it's been a stark reminder.
04:15Everybody's now increasing defence spending.
04:18But ultimately, the more you spend on technology, the more you avoid the need to simply mass armies and end
04:24up with a brutal, attritional war on the battlefield.
04:26That's the one thing that happened in World War II.
04:2870 million people died.
04:30That's the last thing that anybody in the West wants to do.
04:32We need to invest in defence.
04:34We need to invest in technology.
04:36And that's what the British government and the European governments are now looking to do in the near term.
04:40Sean, good to talk to you.
04:41Thank you for that.
04:42Sean Bell, the retired air vice marshal and military analyst, speaking to us from RAF Bryson-Orton.
Comments

Recommended