Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 10 hours ago
Stefan Molyneux looks at how artificial intelligence is reshaping law, healthcare, and creative fields. He thinks about the ways AI disrupts intellectual property rights and how it could make legal work more accessible for people seeking justice. He touches on ethical issues in healthcare, along with finding a middle ground between AI's efficiency and the need for human involvement. He wraps up by pushing for adaptation to these developments, while keeping human rights in focus and continuing conversations on AI's place in society.

GET FREEDOMAIN MERCH! https://shop.freedomain.com/

SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux

Follow me on Youtube! https://www.youtube.com/@freedomain1

GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/

Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!

Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows!

You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more!

See you soon!
https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025
Transcript
00:00Hey, good evening, everybody. Hope you're doing well, Stefan Molyneux from Freedom, Maine.
00:08And I had a cancellation of a call-in show. A great tragedy for the world, but a great benefit
00:15to you, my friends. Hopefully, hopefully you. And I did a show today, a shoe, I did a shoe,
00:24which was the truth about AI. Now, I've done some presentations on AI in the past,
00:32and I've thought a lot about it. I've used it a fair amount. I have created and designed my own
00:39AI
00:40for the general show, for real-time relationships, for call-in shows. I've done one for peaceful
00:48parenting, so I have a little bit of experience. For those of you who don't know, I was a chief
00:57technical officer, director of technology, and worked in the software field. Well, I first started
01:05programming around the age of 11 or 12, and it became the job, the career. I worked in the field
01:12about, well, I guess you could say about 15 years, and was programming up until not super long ago.
01:21And so, I know a fair amount about computers, technology, the business world. And since my
01:27entire experience as an entrepreneur in the software world was to bring technology to bear on questions
01:35of efficiency and automation, I know a little bit about it. Obviously, it doesn't make me any kind of
01:40final say expert, but maybe a little bit more than your average bear having worked in software and
01:47technology for many, many years. I have some idea. Now, I did a show, it's not out yet, I did
01:53a show
01:53today about AI, that AI is basically a mutant creature allowed by governments refusing to enforce
02:04property rights in the realm of books, printed words, and so on. Intellectual property rights
02:10I know it's sort of a hotly debated and contested topic in libertarianism, but certainly, if you
02:18create a book, if you write a book, you have the right to have other people not pillage it for
02:24their
02:24own profit while not paying you one thin red cent. That's wrong for sure. You think of the, like a
02:33million books in human history, and there's millions and millions of books that are hoovered up by AI.
02:40Algorithms, like a million books, a lot of writers take about two years to write a book. That's typical in
02:46the
02:46realm of fiction, probably even longer when it comes to nonfiction because of the research elements, although
02:51there's research elements in fiction as well. And the fact that millions and millions of man years are just
02:59hoovered up by AI companies for their own profits, while the writers, the authors get one, not one thin dime,
03:05is not
03:05something that would happen in a, in a free society. It's not something that would happen in a free
03:11society. So the entire specter of AI arises out of little more or less than governments refusing to
03:19enforce a copyright. Now, of course we can say, yes, but, uh, the AI folks, but they're post-copyright,
03:29man. They're, they're open source. They're creative comments. They're, they're the kind of people that,
03:34well, they just would never imagine that property rights are of any validity. So they're in full
03:39accordance with their own philosophy. And that would be not, not the case.
Comments

Recommended