Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 11 hours ago
Rubio speech friendlier but Europeans are 'not naive', top analyst tells Euronews

Rasmussen Global CEO Fabrice Pothier tells Euronews that Rubio's talk of an "intertwined destiny" for the US and Europe was not an “olive branch".


READ MORE : http://www.euronews.com/2026/02/16/rubio-speech-friendlier-but-europeans-are-not-naive-top-analyst-tells-euronews

Subscribe to our channel. Euronews is available on Dailymotion in 12 languages

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00And to discuss all of this further, I'm glad to say we're joined now by Fabrice Portier,
00:04the CEO of Rasmussen Global, who previously also served as Director of Policy Planning
00:09for the NATO Alliance. Sir, welcome. It's great to have you on the show this morning.
00:13Now, I'd like to get your take first on Rubio's Munich speech. Were you reassured when he spoke
00:19of an intertwined destiny for the US and Europe? Or does Europe still need to realise it cannot
00:25do it alone and needs a plan B for its security? I would say it's probably both. There was clearly
00:32a feeling of calm before the next tempest, where obviously Rubio cast a tone that was much more
00:40friendly than the previous US speaker at the previous MSC, J.D. Vance, who really kind of
00:49open almost hostility against Europe. However, I think nobody was naive in thinking that this is
00:57not an olive branch. This is just a way to make the past few months a bit less painful. But
01:04clearly,
01:05the roll ahead, as I mentioned, this is can't be for the next tempest because the roll ahead is still
01:10made of many differences. I think Ukraine is still lurking very much around the corner in terms of big
01:17US-Europe-Ukraine difference. And Greenland is not completely, in a way, sold. And I think the
01:24Danish prime minister was pretty clear about that.
01:26And do you think Greenland could be the next storm? Because we heard from Mette Friedrichsen,
01:30the Danish prime minister, over the weekend suggesting Donald Trump is still very serious
01:35about buying the island. Do you agree with her that there's still a big risk there for the NATO alliance?
01:42But clearly, the problem is there's a mismatch between what the Danes, the Europeans,
01:47are trying to do, which is to improve support to Greenland, both on the security and the economic
01:52front, which is a rational way of addressing possible vulnerabilities out there. And the US
02:00president who just takes a very emotional, personal view that he just wants to own that piece of
02:06estate. He's thinking like a Manhattan real estate mogul. So he doesn't take a very rational approach to
02:14it. And that's the mismatch that I think the Danes are trying to manage with a diplomatic process.
02:21How long the diplomatic process is going to keep things together? This is the big question mark.
02:26I think we have to be ready for the next crisis. And clearly, the show of unity by the Europeans
02:32in addressing the US threat on Greenland worked once and may have to work another time, but we'll have
02:38to be willing to put even more skin in this game. You obviously shaped NATO policy for many years.
02:45Do you think there's a real crisis within the HQ here in Brussels? You know, we heard EU leaders
02:51von der Leyen talking about reactivating the EU's own defence clause over the weekend, seemingly because
02:56they cannot rely on NATO's Article 5. Is the NATO alliance as we've known it for decades now dead?
03:02It's gone. Well, I think it's not reactivating the EU mutual defence clause. It's making it real
03:09as a start because it's never been taken really seriously. But on your NATO question, I think we
03:15are entering the age of parallel universes where NATO is still going to be there. It's still a very much
03:22a
03:22valid option for the Europeans, both in terms of US extended nuclear deterrent, but also in terms of
03:29framework to plan and prevent the next war against Russia. However, clearly what you hear in the
03:37corridors, but also in the main hallway, is that we need to start thinking about Plan Bs. And for that,
03:44you're going to have the European Union, but you also are going to have increasingly the development
03:49of coalitions, like the Coalition of the Wheeling for Ukraine, which maybe is going to be put with more
03:55substance or the joint expeditionary force that is led by the UK. So I think you're going to have
04:01the multiplication of all these Plan Bs in response to the fact that, answering your question, I think
04:06the US has introduced a very significant doubt as to its commitment to Europe via NATO. And therefore,
04:13NATO is still going to go on, but it's no longer the one and only Plan A.
04:18Fabrice Potier, that's all we have time for this morning, but thank you so much for coming on
04:22and joining us and sharing your insights.
Comments

Recommended