This video was produced in collaboration with the Parr Center for Ethics, housed within the renowned Philosophy Department at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The Parr Center is committed to integrating abstract work in ethical theory with the informed discussion of practical ethical issues, and prides itself on the development of innovative and inclusive approaches to moral and civic education.
00:00Alright, today we're going to tackle a question that, well, it really pits your heart against your head.
00:05Let's set the scene. It all starts on what feels like a totally normal evening.
00:09But that's all about to change in a way you could never, ever see coming.
00:14So picture it. You're at home, maybe kicking back on the couch, watching TV, just mindlessly scrolling on your phone.
00:20You know the vibe. The house is quiet. It's just one of those regular, peaceful nights where everything feels exactly as it should.
00:27Safe. Normal. And then, a knock on the door.
00:31It just cuts right through that silence, you know? It's sharp, totally unexpected.
00:36And when you open it, it's the police. And they're not there for a noise complaint.
00:40They're there to arrest the person you share your life with.
00:43Okay, so this isn't just any accusation. This is one of those moments where your entire world just gets flipped completely upside down.
00:51And suddenly, you're staring down an impossible choice.
00:54The charge? It's murder.
00:57I mean, the words just don't even compute, right?
01:00The person you know. They're kind. They're gentle.
01:03They're the last person on earth you'd think could do something so violent.
01:06But the police? They're dead serious.
01:09And the evidence they have? It's bad.
01:12They say it's damning.
01:13Your spouse's fingerprints are all over the murder weapon.
01:16And as they're being led away, your spouse just turns to you.
01:19And you can see the desperation in their eyes.
01:22They're pleading with you.
01:23They swear they're innocent.
01:25And their words just kind of hang there in the air.
01:27Like a direct challenge to everything you thought you knew.
01:29So, here it is.
01:32The big dilemma.
01:33All the facts.
01:34The hard evidence.
01:35They're pointing in one direction.
01:37But your heart.
01:38Your entire history with this person.
01:40That's pointing in the complete opposite direction.
01:43So what do you do?
01:44What are you supposed to believe?
01:46You know, this whole thought experiment?
01:48It really forces us to dive into a super interesting part of philosophy.
01:52It's all about the line between what we do and what we privately, truly believe.
01:57And that brings us to the core idea for today.
02:01Something called the ethics of belief.
02:03Now, this whole field of philosophy asks a really profound question.
02:07It's this.
02:08Do we have a moral responsibility not just for our actions,
02:11but for the actual beliefs we hold inside our own heads?
02:14And let's be super clear here.
02:16We're not talking about being on a jury or what you'd say in court.
02:19Nope.
02:20This is all about what's happening inside your own head.
02:23In the quiet, private space of your own mind,
02:26what is the right thing to believe?
02:29All right, so let's look at the first major way to approach this.
02:32This is the perspective that puts cold, hard logic above absolutely everything else.
02:37This viewpoint has a name.
02:38It's called evidentialism.
02:40And really, it's about as straightforward as it gets.
02:42The idea is that what you believe should only be based on the evidence you have.
02:47Period.
02:47Nothing more, nothing less.
02:49So if you're an evidentialist, you'd basically follow a logical checklist.
02:53Step one, look at all the evidence from a completely neutral, objective point of view.
02:58Step two, your personal feelings about their character?
03:01Well, that's a piece of evidence, sure.
03:03But it's just one piece among many.
03:05Step three, you've got to admit that hard, physical proof like fingerprints is just way stronger evidence.
03:11And that leads you to the logical conclusion.
03:13Step four, you ought to believe your spouse is guilty.
03:16Or at the very, very least, you have to stay undecided.
03:19And this isn't just about being rational, either.
03:21There was this 19th century philosopher, W.K. Clifford, and he took it even further.
03:27He actually argued that we have a moral duty, a requirement, to only believe things when we have enough evidence.
03:33So why a moral duty?
03:35I mean, that sounds pretty intense, right?
03:37Well, Clifford gave two really powerful reasons.
03:40First off, our beliefs are basically the blueprints for how we act.
03:43So if you want to act ethically, your beliefs have to be connected to reality.
03:47Makes sense.
03:48And second, choosing to ignore the evidence, that's just a form of lying to yourself.
03:52And that, he argued, is a moral failure all on its own.
03:56Okay, but what about the human cost here?
03:58I mean, the evidentialist approach is super logical, for sure.
04:02But relationships, they aren't built on pure logic, are they?
04:05So let's flip this around and look at a totally different way of thinking about this whole dilemma.
04:09I mean, just for a second, put yourself in their shoes.
04:13Imagine they are telling the truth.
04:15They're innocent.
04:16They're terrified.
04:17And the one person in the entire world they thought they could count on, you, is looking at them with doubt in their eyes.
04:23Can you imagine that feeling?
04:25This sense of betrayal would be absolutely devastating.
04:28This is where another school of thought comes in, and it's called pragmatism.
04:32A pragmatist would say, hold on a second.
04:35The practical consequences of a belief are what really matter.
04:38Things like, you know, saving your relationship, supporting the person you love, keeping that trust alive.
04:43Those can be totally valid reasons to believe something, even when the hard evidence isn't there.
04:48Or it even points in the other direction.
04:50And here is where you can see that two ideas just completely clash.
04:54On one side, you've got evidentialism, which says your duty is to the truth, and evidence is your guide.
05:00But on the other side, you have pragmatism, arguing that maybe your duty is to the person you love,
05:04and the guide is the impact on your relationship.
05:07It's like having two completely different moral compasses, and they are pointing in total opposite directions.
05:12But hang on.
05:12All of this conversation, both sides, it's based on one huge assumption.
05:17That we can actually choose what we believe.
05:20And that, right there, brings us to the final, and maybe the trickiest part of this whole puzzle.
05:26I mean, really think about that for a second.
05:29You can choose to raise your hand right now.
05:32Easy.
05:33But can you just choose to believe the sky is green?
05:36It doesn't really work like that, does it?
05:39So, even if you want to believe your spouse is innocent more than anything in the world, can you actually force your brain to believe it when the hard evidence, those fingerprints, is just staring you in the face?
05:52It's like a giant wall you can't get around.
05:54For a lot of us, belief isn't something we choose.
05:58It's just the conclusion our mind comes to with the information it has.
06:01And yet, when your spouse looks you in the eye and pleads, you have to believe me, what are they doing?
06:07They're asking you to make a choice.
06:09So, where does that leave you?
06:11You're stuck in this impossible spot.
06:13You've got the cold, hard facts on one side, and the person you love on the other.
06:17What do you think is the right thing to do?
06:18And maybe more importantly, when it all comes down to it, what will you actually believe?
Be the first to comment