- 2 days ago
Category
📺
TVTranscript
00:00This boat, you can almost row it as fast backwards as forwards.
00:12It's the fastest boat that we could row and still lift an 18, 18 and a half stone person
00:21straight over the gunnel. The police phoned me one day and asked
00:29me could I attend at the River Leaven where they had the report of a missing woman.
00:41I met police and CID and they showed me an area below the last bridge and asked me could
00:50I search it to see there was any sign of a body.
00:55Except for a couple of occasions, I've always been able to find someone who's gone in the
01:03river, either bringing them out alive or recovering their remains. Always managed that, never failed.
01:10A local woman, 55 year old Margaret Gardner, has been missing for a week. Her husband says
01:24that he last saw her at Glasgow Central Station, where she was catching a train to visit family.
01:42Police have now launched a search and are appealing to anyone who may have seen Margaret or has
01:48information about her whereabouts to come forward.
01:56The first time I came to this house was in response to a missing person report.
02:02The missing person report involved Margaret Gardner, who had been reported missing by her husband.
02:10In 2004, John Deary was a scenes of crime officer for Strathclyde police in Scotland.
02:20As part of my duties, I had oversight of all missing person inquiries.
02:28You get a lot of missing people throughout the division. Some go missing quite frequently, but turn up very quickly.
02:40We don't get many people who go missing out of character, when they've never been missing before.
02:46Margaret, mother of two grown-up children and an admin assistant for a law firm, lived in Hellensboro, 30 miles northwest of Glasgow.
03:08It's a town situated at the mouth of Gaerloch and surrounded by rivers.
03:14It is here where detectives interviewed her husband, John, who claimed to have been the last person to see her.
03:22When interviewed, John Gardner told Elizabeth Margaret had come back to the house.
03:27She was upset and she left the house and he drove her in a car up to Glasgow Central train station.
03:37Where she boarded her train to visit friends and family in England.
03:46But detectives weren't the only ones taking an interest.
03:50As the investigation into the missing persons case gathered pace, so too did the media interest.
03:58In 2004, Renfrewshire was my patch, if you like, as a news gatherer.
04:04And I serviced the national press, doing court stories and anything else that had happened on my patch.
04:12Whether it be a fire, an accident, a murder, any police investigations.
04:16Hellensboro and most of the towns on that side of the Clyde are very respectable, quiet, good towns, good people.
04:29They have a great pride in what they do and how they portray themselves to the rest of the world.
04:34And Hellensboro is a lovely place to visit.
04:42But behind the picture postcard image of Hellensboro, something darker was unfolding.
04:48And soon, 58-year-old John Gardner would find himself at the centre of a national story.
04:55John Gardner had served in the Royal Navy.
04:58He certainly looked the part.
05:00He was very much dapper dandied up.
05:03On the face of it, Margaret Gardner and John Gardner looked as though they had had a happy marriage.
05:09They'd been married for about 35 years, I believe.
05:13And, you know, grown up children.
05:17Nice house, nice town.
05:20There was nothing to suggest anything had been anything other than happy in that household.
05:31Though Margaret's disappearance made police question that perceived happiness.
05:37The husband of Margaret had reported her as a missing person several days after she went missing.
05:44His report was made to uniformed police officers who would go to the friends and family, work colleagues,
05:54and try and find any trace of Margaret.
05:58We would do follow-up inquiry with her bank cards, telephones,
06:03to try and see if there was any indication that Margaret could be identified as being in a certain place at a certain time.
06:10In this occasion, the CID were involved because of the suspicious nature of how she went missing.
06:24Despite following standard missing persons procedures, there were few leads.
06:29However, on the day Margaret was last seen, John was reported to have visited a medical centre,
06:36complaining he had injured his back when he twisted while lifting something.
06:43John Gardner went to visit her parents to tell them that she'd actually left him and that she'd gone south.
06:50And then they noticed that he was nursing an injury to his hand or his arm.
06:55There was mounting suspicion on John Gardner, especially when police inquiries visited Margaret's place of work.
07:04In interviews with Margaret's colleagues, we found out that she had been at work as usual.
07:14She was upset.
07:19She said she was going to go home and she was going to ask John to leave.
07:23John's version is that she comes home, she is upset.
07:27They argue she leaves her alone free will.
07:33He told police that he had taken his wife to Glasgow Central Station, dropped her off,
07:39and that she had intended to travel south to visit her children in London.
07:44We make a search of all CCTV on the roads up to Glasgow, in and around the Central Station area,
07:56and we find absolutely no trace of her, which made us suspicious of his story.
08:02And then came a chilling memory, something Margaret had once said to a colleague almost as a joke.
08:10But now, it didn't seem so funny.
08:13There was a four-way comment he made to Margaret's colleagues,
08:17that if she ever went missing, they would find her in the back garden of the house.
08:22In October 2004, Margaret Gardiner had been missing for a week,
08:45and according to her husband, she had got him to drop her off at Glasgow train station.
08:51And the police became suspicious because CCTV footage which they'd viewed
08:58hadn't shown him being at Central Station or anywhere near it.
09:02They couldn't even see his car.
09:04With John's story not stacking up, detectives intensified their search for Margaret,
09:10not in Glasgow, but at her home in Helensborough.
09:15The circumstances of Margaret being reported missing appeared suspicious,
09:20and we came to the house in order to search for any trace of Margaret within the house or within the gardens.
09:27I was in charge of raising with the lab scientists.
09:38I would raise with the photographers, fingerprint officers, search officers,
09:44and I would have oversight of everything to do with the location that we were searching at that time.
09:51When searching the garden area, if you are believing that someone or something is hidden in the garden,
10:02in this case we were looking for a Margaret, you would start off using human remains dogs,
10:09which can sniff out the scent of the bodies.
10:14Normally they would put poles into the ground to release gases.
10:21On this occasion they couldn't do that because the ground was so hard.
10:26So we ended up not using the dogs so much in the back garden.
10:30Visually we searched to make sure there is no obvious digging has been done.
10:40The back garden was very neat, very tidy, apart from a pile of earth on the ground,
10:45which we thought was unusual at that time of the year.
10:49And there was a hollow behind the garage that had been dug out at some point in the past.
11:00And we excavated the hollow down to rocks and sewage pipes
11:06and we were happy that there was nothing buried under there.
11:10We also took apart the mound of earth and we were happy again that there was nothing buried under there.
11:14News of the heavy police presence at the gardeners' home soon circulated around Hellensborough
11:23and rumours began to spread about what might have happened to Margaret.
11:31The community was obviously shocked and stunned at what was going on.
11:35But nonetheless I think there was still a feeling within the community
11:39that this man couldn't possibly have done such a thing.
11:42And of course as we then got further and further into it
11:47and there was more and more sharp intakes of breath as more and more came out.
11:58After conducting their search of the garden, officers entered the gardeners' home to carry out a routine search.
12:05When entering the house we found it extremely clean.
12:08There was somewhere between 90 and 100 cleaning products such as floor cleaner, disinfectant, bleach etc.
12:20The place had been cleaned with every imaginable cleaning fluid available.
12:32But despite that they were determined to see what they could find.
12:35As part of the search we also focused on the main lounge area.
12:45There was a small recess in the centre of the floor where a carpet would have been.
12:51The recess was still there but the carpet was missing.
12:54In that room as well it had recently been decorated.
12:57Very recently been decorated.
12:59And we decided that in consultation with the scientists we would recover anything behind the wallpapers
13:07to try and find any traces of blood behind the wallpaper.
13:10However we never found anything at all.
13:13We also searched under the floorboards in the area where the carpet was missing from.
13:21We brought in a human remains dog and tried to put the dog underneath.
13:26But the dog didn't like being underneath in a small tight area.
13:32So we brought the dog back out and since the crime officers went under to search.
13:38But we found nothing of any note underneath the floor.
13:43As we looked about the house we found a pair of wet training shoes on the stairway.
13:50Which had obviously been washed.
13:53And they were just in an unusual place to be on the stairway.
13:57We found that Margaret's wedding ring, engagement ring, eternity ring.
14:03Had been left on a chest of drawers in the bedroom.
14:07Which we thought was unusual.
14:08If she was going to visit family we would have expected her to take that with her.
14:15With no clear forensic evidence inside the house.
14:19Investigators widened their search.
14:22Attention turned to the family car.
14:24The family's car was parked on the driveway of the house.
14:30And that was searched.
14:32The inside of the car had obviously been cleaned.
14:35There was absolutely no debris in the car.
14:39There was no old bits of paper.
14:41The back of the car looked as if it had been cleaned and washed.
14:46It was spotless.
14:48The fact the car had been so well cleaned inside.
14:52There was suspicion as it mirrored the inside of the house.
14:57We took that car away and we took images of the tread pattern on the tyres.
15:01In case we had a secondary crime scene and we could match the tyres at a future date.
15:07We also took samples of dirt from around the vehicle.
15:11Just in case we could prove that the vehicle was in a certain area at a future date.
15:20When in the lab the car was forensically searched.
15:22But finding Margaret's DNA isn't necessarily a smoking gun.
15:30In domestic incidents when people go missing and you're searching the house or the car.
15:36You expect to find their DNA in fingerprints and other traces of them in the car and the house.
15:43So it's more focusing on where they're found and the circumstances in which they are found.
15:48rather than the fact that it is their DNA or their fingerprints as you would expect them to be there.
15:57Dead end after dead end.
16:00Police had no leads and a new search plan was needed.
16:03As the search for Margaret Gardiner continues police begin widening their efforts.
16:19With no sign of her whereabouts attention turns to the reservoirs near the family home.
16:23We decided to carry out searches in the area using police search teams and divers in the water in the reservoirs nearby.
16:36We weren't that far from the house.
16:39Bearing in mind the occupation, the previous occupation of John Gardiner as a submariner and neighbour officer.
16:46We felt that the water may have been a factor in how he disposed of Margaret.
16:53So we searched any areas of water nearby and that included reservoirs and the hills just above where they stayed.
17:01I felt sorry for the divers because it was very, very cold, very icy.
17:06But the divers did a professional job but didn't find anything at all.
17:11Seven weeks on from Margaret's disappearance and with no trace of a body and no contact with her loved ones, her family made an appeal.
17:34We're just desperate really. None of us have a clue. We don't know what to think. She just has gone.
17:44I would just ask her if she doesn't want to come home, that's fine.
17:49But please let someone know that you're actually alive and well and okay. That's all we really want to know.
17:57The family. I mean, I could almost get tearful now just thinking about that whole situation because it was a terrible thing for them to bear.
18:12Everything about it was just quite appalling. I would say it had a real impact on the family.
18:25They were still left to wonder what had truly become of Margaret.
18:30That's when the police decided to go back and have a look at the house.
18:34With a worried family and pressure building to find Margaret, the investigators turned their attention back to the gardener's home.
18:48Had they missed something?
18:50We searched the house using forensic specialists, fingerprint officers and scientists.
18:58They had a bedroom and a bathroom upstairs.
19:07The biologist who was with us found traces of blood underneath the taps in the bathroom.
19:17They were very, very small traces of blood.
19:21We then had to prove it was Margaret's.
19:22Would it lead to Margaret or confirm their worst fear that this wasn't a search for a missing woman, but a murder investigation?
19:32Margaret Gardiner had been missing for around two months.
19:47Police had begun a search.
19:48And forensics had turned the family home upside down.
20:05When the police decided to actually go over the house, literally with a fine tooth comb, they went to extraordinary levels.
20:13Mini cameras down the drains and dug the garden up.
20:16The house was incredibly clean, very spick and span.
20:22It had been meticulously cleaned.
20:25Despite the cleanliness, blood had been found in the taps and had been sent to the labs to verify the DNA.
20:33We had got various things from Margaret's house to get DNA from, like a hairbrush, toothbrushes, etc.
20:43And we also had family to fall back on if we had to use that.
20:48Scientists dealt with that part and they proved that it was Margaret's DNA.
20:54Reading us to believe that Margaret had came to significant harm because nobody had any contact with her.
21:05She hadn't used her cards. She hadn't used her phone.
21:09None of her work colleagues had heard from her. None of her family had heard from her.
21:12And it got to a stage where the senior management team decided that they were going to look at it as if it was a suspicious missing person.
21:21And they were looking at a no body murder inquiry because the suspicion was that significant harm had came to her unless she had been murdered or killed.
21:31And the prime suspect was her husband, John Gardiner.
21:41But to prove a murder without a body, detectives needed some concrete evidence.
21:46So they meticulously took apart the Gardiner's home to search for more clues.
21:51We used an endoscope type camera to go in behind the pipes and in the U-bend we found a piece of tooth.
22:03It was barely the size of a fingernail, but could it be the breakthrough police were waiting for?
22:12My name is Douglas Sheesby. I'm a forensic odontologist.
22:15Forensic odontology is that branch of forensic medicine and science that deals with dental evidence in a forensic investigation.
22:26And that dental evidence can take the form of dental fragments, part of dental anatomy, dental restorations, crowns, bridges, things of that nature.
22:38And then in terms of bite marks, teeth being used as a weapon essentially.
22:41So there's a mark, there's an injury caused by teeth.
22:47The Margaret Gardiner case, like all cases, it commences with a phone call.
22:53There's a call from the police.
22:55I was asked to examine a fragment of a tooth.
22:59In order to conduct an unbiased examination of this tooth fragment,
23:04I didn't have any other information and I was going to examine it and report my findings.
23:11The tooth fragment was small and a shard of tooth would be the best way of describing it.
23:19Approximately seven millimetres in length, three millimetres in width and a couple of millimetres in depth.
23:27Visual examination, part of it was the crown and the other half was the root surface.
23:34The question of dental identification when you only have a fragment clearly is challenging.
23:41So you had the part of the tooth where the crown and the root come together, where dental enamel meets cement.
23:49The other side of this fragment, there were traces behind the enamel of dental cement.
23:54So this tooth, prior to fracture, had some form of dental restoration placed in it.
24:02There was no biological deterioration associated with the fragment.
24:06In other words, it wasn't a historic fragment, it hadn't been fractured some time ago.
24:11This hadn't undergone any deterioration, so it was a recent, fresh fracture.
24:15But what lay hidden inside the tooth would prove to be the turning point.
24:24The x-ray, which is a routine dental x-ray taken of this piece of tooth, remarkably demonstrated a fragment of metal, which was not anticipated and it was circular in shape.
24:38Through examining Margaret's records, Douglas was able to identify the dental work that she'd had done involving a metal pin that was reflected in the tooth fragment.
24:52So although there's only one point of comparison, it was sufficient because of its distinctiveness to positively identify that this fragment came from Margaret Gardner.
25:02The identification of the tooth suggested Margaret hadn't simply vanished, but investigators needed more evidence and it would come from an everyday household appliance.
25:16So we had searched the house with forensic scientists and we'd find small traces of blood throughout the house, which were proved to be Margaret's blood.
25:33However, they were so small, we didn't prove that Margaret had come to any severe injury.
25:39The game changer came when we searched the washing machine.
25:45And when we looked in the filter of the washing machine, we found a small bone-like substance, which myself and the scientists conferred about, because we had seen bone before.
25:59But this bone was very, very white and we weren't 100% sure it was bone or not, but we decided to seize it anyway.
26:07I took it to Glasgow University Archaeological Research Division.
26:10The initial steps that a forensic pathologist would take to establish the origin of a bone fragment would be firstly to make sure that the material is actually bone and not some other type of material that may look like bone.
26:34Then the next stage would be to look to see if it was a human bone and not an animal.
26:40And then you'd be trying to work out where the bone came from in the body.
26:44The techniques I would use to ascertain where the bone came from initially would be to have a look at the size of the bone.
26:52Usually in complete bones, it's fairly obvious where the bone has come from in the body.
26:55The fragment was sent for detailed forensic analysis and soon the shape and structure of the bone began to tell its own story.
27:04The obvious signs that a bone may have come from the skull are the structure of the bone itself.
27:11Bones from the skull are generally flat and they have a kind of sandwich-like configuration where you have two layers of sheet-like solid bone which sandwich an area of spongy bone between them.
27:26In this case, this was definitive. This bone fragment was actually from the skull.
27:34Forensic anthropologists looked at this piece of bone and said that's from the skull and if that is the piece of bone from the skull, then the person that came from is dead.
27:45And at that stage, that was the big game-changer in the inquiry.
27:51After we had proved it was a piece of skull, we then had to prove it was Magritte's.
27:57So we got a DNA sample from the bone which we proved to be Magritte's DNA.
28:04The evidence was mounting. Blood, teeth and bone fragment had been discovered in their home.
28:16Detectives now had enough for an arrest. But in the interview room, Gardiner was eerily undisturbed.
28:23He was very calm, composed and controlled how he behaved in the interview.
28:35We did know that he was a martial arts expert and he could control his ceilings very well.
28:44Just like any other community, Helmsborough being the kind of place it was,
28:58no one would have ever expected something like this to happen in their community.
29:03It was just beyond belief.
29:07Despite no body, authorities felt they had enough evidence against Gardiner
29:12and so charged him with his wife's murder.
29:18The investigation continued though and officers allowed Gardiner a private moment with his daughter.
29:25A moment that would prove significant.
29:29John Gardiner spoke to his daughter at Dunbarton Police Office
29:33and he informed her that he had killed his wife.
29:38He told the daughter that he had not murdered her but she had been killed as a result of an argument.
29:48And he had pushed her and she had fell down a set of steps outside the back door and hurt her head on the steps.
29:55Margaret's killer claimed that she had suffered her skull injuries in a fall, falling down some steps.
30:06In my opinion, the nature of the skull fractures would have required a much greater level of force than that typically seen in a domestic fall.
30:16Gardiner maintained his wife's death was an accident.
30:22Now the pressure was on him to prove his account of events.
30:26And for that, he would need Margaret's body.
30:29In late December 2004, John Gardiner confessed to killing his wife Margaret, although stipulating it was an accident, she was nowhere to be found.
30:54And detectives needed to know where her body was.
31:03In John Gardiner's personal events, he says that he had initially put her in the bath, wrapped on a polythene sheet.
31:08She says that he had drove along the roads leading into Tombartan in the 82 and there was a flyover over the river.
31:19And he stopped and he disposed of the body by throwing it off the bridge into the water.
31:25It was the river Leaven, over 10 miles from Hellensboro.
31:32And a large police search operation began.
31:36The help in searching the rivers were support unit officers who searched the banks of the river.
31:43The staff guide police, underwater section divers, and also George Parsonage.
31:50George was very experienced, especially in the river Leaven.
31:59Well, we get three pairs of oars because when you're going to a rescue, you can't afford to break an oar.
32:05And you haven't taken to go back and get another one, you know.
32:12So you always have a spare pair of oars with you.
32:15George Parsonage has saved over 1,500 people in his career.
32:22He has dedicated his time working for a charity to preserve human life in and around the waterways of Greater Glasgow.
32:30Glasgow Humane Society is a strange name.
32:35It's a rescue station on the river.
32:38It was set up in 1790.
32:40The main purpose of the Glasgow Humane Society was prevention of accidents, rescue of persons in danger of drowning, and the recovery of the bodies of people drowned.
32:53I started helping my father in the early 1950s as a young boy, and then when he died in 1975, I took over entirely.
33:09During my father's time and my time, so from 1918 till present day, if a person goes in the river, we will find them.
33:21I only know of two cases where we didn't.
33:28I mean, I found people after two years in the river.
33:33The river always gives them up.
33:36You always get them to return them to the families.
33:39It means so much to their relatives to find their loved one.
33:50No matter how long it takes you, you keep doing it, you know.
33:59Police thought if anyone would be able to find Margaret, it would be George.
34:04The police phoned me one day and asked me could I attend at the river Leaven, and they showed me an area below the last bridge and asked me could I search it to see if there was any sign of a body.
34:24The first thing you do is you search up and down the river, looking at the river banks and at the edge of the water to see if there is anything floating about.
34:36Now, after that, if you had a position where a person went in, I would normally search with my grappling irons.
34:45I usually locate them if they're there. In this case, we had no idea where anything was put into the river.
34:55So it really became a case of searching the river and making sure you were going to be there at the time when a body would surface.
35:09Without a fixed point, George had no option but to wait and hope the river would eventually give something up.
35:19If a person is dead or unconscious when they are put in the water, they're not breathing in water, so they'll take a long time to sink.
35:32If a person is wearing certain types of clothing, like a padded jacket or something, it will take a long time to sink.
35:41It's only when the body sinks that a body would stay on the bed of the river at the exact position it sinks.
35:51It goes down like a child sucker onto the bottom of the river and it will not move from there until there are enough gases form in the body to burst away, to burst the suction.
36:04And it will come to the surface.
36:06And when it does rise, the river doesn't just carry it away. It plays tricks with the current.
36:16Once that body is on the surface, it could float down river with the outgoing tide.
36:23But then it floats back up again with the incoming tide. So if you went out and looked, I mean I've proved this to people.
36:32You take an object that's in the water and you leave it in the river and then you tell them to watch how it can be found a mile down river.
36:43And then a couple of days later it's back up where it started. Things go up and down with the tide.
36:50And then also in Glasgow and the Clyde and down to the Leven, the prevailing wind is from the south west.
36:58So if an object comes to the surface, it gets blown onto the north bank very quickly.
37:05Now, they never, never get washed out.
37:10But in this case, nothing surfaced. No trace, no debris, not even a shoe.
37:19If someone's in the water, you look for a piece of clothing. If they were alive, did they try to take a piece of clothing off?
37:29If they were wearing a hat, it might get washed off. A handbag.
37:35You find things that prove someone has been near the water.
37:41You're looking for the tiniest of objects, shoes.
37:46It's amazing the things that come off and you would know if someone has been in the vicinity, has been on the river bank.
37:59The search was long and gruelling and conducted in the height of winter.
38:06I think we're talking five or six weeks, maybe seven weeks.
38:09I found somebody after 18 months.
38:12After the time goes by, if you can't find a body, I have absolutely no idea what could have happened to this woman.
38:21All I can say is, in my opinion, she was not put into the water.
38:28With no body and no signs of one being dumped, police looked at the plausibility of Gardner's story, driving Margaret's body over ten miles to dispose of her.
38:46We felt that was very unlikely because the A82 is a very busy road.
38:53And even if he had confused that with other bridges, it would be unusual for him to drive from Hellensboro, past lots of countryside, lots of disposal sites, lots of water, to go in towards a big town, a city where he's more liable to be disturbed and disposing of a body.
39:13Myself and George felt the story didn't match.
39:17We felt it was probable that that was the true story.
39:23Even with no body, prosecutors felt they had enough evidence to make Gardner stand trial for the murder of his wife at Scotland's High Court in Paisley.
39:33The trial eventually lasted for two weeks, and the prosecution, the Crown, did such a convincing job at the end of the trial that it didn't take the jury all that long to come back with their verdict.
39:53The only thing that really shocked us, and it certainly shocked the family, was that the jury came back with a guilty verdict for a culpable homicide rather than murder, which he'd been charged with.
40:05Culpable homicide means someone caused another person's death without intending to kill.
40:11The jury also found Gardner guilty of perverting the course of justice due to the attempted cover-up of Margaret's death.
40:21The man made me shudder on two or three occasions.
40:25Just to look at him and to hear some of the things which he'd allegedly done made my skin creep.
40:35At the trial, I believe John Gardner's sentence on conviction was 12 years.
40:46In my opinion, I believe the sentence should have been longer.
40:54Callous, contemptible and inhuman.
40:57The words of a judge as he jailed a husband for killing his wife after a blazing...
41:02Gardner claimed throughout that his wife's death was an accident.
41:06During a fight over money at their home in Helensboro last October, he said Margaret fell, smashing her skull off concrete steps.
41:14But, rather than call for help, Gardner said he panicked, wrapped her body up in polythene and dumped it in the River Leaven.
41:23Actions that the judge today, Lord Dawson, branded cold-blooded and inhuman.
41:29Margaret's body has never been found.
41:32Locked in his cell tonight, Gardner carries with him the knowledge of his wife's final resting place.
41:38The 12 years, which was just kind of unbelievable.
41:46I think it was the creepy nature of everything about it.
41:51The duplicity, the lies, the respectable man in the community, ex-Royal Navy, and the lengths he went to kind of cover up everything that he'd done.
42:01Within two months, Gardner had appealed, and in 2007, the length of sentence was reduced.
42:19He would now serve a maximum of nine years.
42:22I thought the length of the sentence was ridiculous. I couldn't believe it.
42:29Given the comments that the judge, the trial judge, had made at the time, he called him contemptible, he was.
42:35And we all thought, well, we know what's coming, because the words were very harsh, but the sentence wasn't particularly harsh.
42:44Forensic evidence helped ensure that Gardner was convicted of killing Margaret, but the location of her body remained a mystery.
42:54My one major disappointment in this case was that we never found the rest of Margaret's remains to allow her family to grieve properly.
43:06And that's the one sad part of the inquiry that remains with me.
43:14We're never going to get her body back because they'll never tell us.
43:17We know for a fact that they didn't put her in the river.
43:19They never told the truth once.
43:22It was an animal.
43:24It was a cheat.
43:25And it was a thief.
43:52It was an animal.
43:55A VISIT.
43:56AIAWC-Newitz.
43:57AALYC-BICBIonne.
43:58WALL-TRELL
44:02A.
44:03WALL-TRELL
44:07ARGO!?
44:12World War Ordinary.
44:14подписывайтесь atiscope.
Be the first to comment