Saltar al reproductorSaltar al contenido principal
  • hace 9 horas

Categoría

🗞
Noticias
Transcripción
00:00Good afternoon, everybody. I apologize for my tardiness. We had some technical difficulties,
00:05as you can see, but I think we are ready to rock. So let's get to it.
00:08President Trump and Secretary Hegseth have made it clear that presidentially designated
00:13narco-terrorist groups are subject to lethal targeting in accordance with the laws of war.
00:19With respect to the strikes in question on September 2nd, Secretary Hegseth authorized
00:24Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes. Admiral Bradley worked well within
00:29his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed
00:34and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated. And I would just add one more point
00:39to remind the American public why these lethal strikes are taking place. Because this administration
00:44has designated these narco-terrorists as foreign terrorist organizations. The president has a
00:50right to take them out if they are threatening the United States of America and if they are bringing
00:54illegal narcotics that are killing our citizens at a record rate, which is what they are doing.
01:00You said that the follow-up strike was lawful. What law is it that allows no survivors?
01:08The strike conducted on September 2nd was conducted in self-defense to protect Americans in vital
01:14United States interests. The strike was conducted in international waters and in accordance with
01:18the law of armed conflict. Did Admiral Bradley order that second strike because there were still
01:26survivors after the initial strike? Again, as I read for you, Admiral Bradley worked well
01:31within his authority in the law. He directed the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed
01:35and the threat of narco-terrorists to the United States was completely eliminated.
01:40So was the initial order from Secretary Hague said, everyone be killed, and did that come
01:46from President Trump? I saw that quoted in a Washington Post story. I would reject that
01:50the Secretary of War ever said that. However, the President has made it quite clear that if
01:56narco-terrorists, again, are trafficking illegal drugs towards the United States, he has the authority
02:02to kill them. And that's what this administration is doing. Danny.
02:05To be clear, to clarify, Admiral Bradley was the one who gave that order for a second strike.
02:10And he was well within his authority to do so.
02:12And the Secretary of War, President Trump is going to be hosting a meeting of his national
02:15security team in the Oval Office today on Venezuela. And what are they going to discuss? Are they
02:21hoping to reach a kind of final decision on that?
02:24Out of the effort of transparency, I will confirm that the President will be meeting with his national
02:28security team on this subject and on many matters. He meets with his national security team quite
02:34often. He's the Commander-in-Chief. It's part of his responsibility to ensure that peace is ongoing
02:39throughout the world. I'm definitely not going to detail the specifics of a meeting between the
02:43President and his national security team that's taking place in the Oval Office. But I'm happy to
02:48confirm that meeting is taking place for you.
02:50What's the position on whether troops, U.S. troops on the ground is a possibility there? Is that,
02:56I know you've answered that before, but what's the current operative?
02:59In Venezuela? I think my previous answer stands. There's many options at the President's disposal
03:05that are on the table, and I'll let him speak on those. Ed.
03:09Thanks, Caroline. The U.S.
03:10Andrew, I would reiterate to you the strike was conducted in international waters and in accordance
03:15with the law of armed conflict. And since somebody asked about Congress, and it's sort of related to
03:20Venezuela, I also want to add that Secretary Hegseth spoke with members of Congress who may have
03:26expressed some concerns over the weekend. And there have also been 13 bipartisan briefings
03:31to Congress on the Venezuelan strikes. There have been a number of document reviews for members of
03:37Congress to review the classified DOJ, Office of Legal Counsel, opinion, and other related documents.
03:4329 senators and 92 representatives have reviewed those documents, which is about two-thirds of those
03:48are Democrat members. And they have been made available to all 100 senators, all 435 members
03:56of the House, and to general counsels of the relevant committees on a bipartisan basis for their review.
04:02What imminent threat would two survivors pose who were clinging presumably to the wreckage of that vote?
04:08Again, as I said, I think you guys are sort of not listening fully to the statement I've provided.
04:13Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority and the law, directing the engagement to ensure the vote
04:18was totally destroyed, and the threat to the narco-terrorists, to the United States, was eliminated.
04:24And for any further questions about his thinking, I would defer you to the Department of War.
04:28I obviously wasn't in the room for the answer.
04:30Just to follow up, just to follow up, Caroline, just on the administration's policy when it comes to survivors,
04:35was there a change in policy after this strike on September 2nd?
04:40The Washington Post is reporting that these two survivors were killed after a second strike,
04:45but then in October, two people were rescued and returned to Colombia and Ecuador.
04:51So was there a decision that was made to handle survivors differently after these strikes?
04:55Not to my knowledge, no.
04:58Thank you, Caroline.
05:00Thank you, Caroline.
Sé la primera persona en añadir un comentario
Añade tu comentario

Recomendada