Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3 months ago
Transcript
00:00You talk about Operation 2030, which is just five years away.
00:02So, do you think we should focus more on policy change other than individualistic actions?
00:07Yeah, but who will change the policy?
00:10Yeah, you see, we focus on ourselves within, right?
00:12In the ministers, the MLA's.
00:14Yeah, I get it. But who will change the policy? Just come to that.
00:16We will change.
00:17And who elects them?
00:19You allow them to get away with manifestos bereft of any mention of the climate.
00:23Even if you say 8,000 people came together to sign this document or in a protest march,
00:29aren't all of them acting as individuals, first of all?
00:32That's a big ask.
00:34If you just rely on a Masihah, on some great saviour who will do it for you, sitting in power,
00:40that's never, never, never going to happen.
00:43That's a big ask.
00:45We say we want honest politicians.
00:47If you do get an honest politician, will you allow him to function? Please tell me.
00:55Sir, recently you got the award for the most impactful environmentalist.
01:00And I've been following you on the issues of climate crisis and environmental activism.
01:06You also wrote a column in the Pioneer about greenwashing.
01:11So with regards to that, I was wondering that is the climate crisis discourse shifted
01:16emphasizing more on the individual responsibilities that I should be vegan,
01:21I should recycle, and it is my responsibility to help the climate.
01:25And in your book, okay, can you give me the book?
01:29In your book, you talk about this inner disease.
01:33It is in...
01:34About this disease you talk about.
01:38Man's hunger is not in the stomach.
01:42It resides in the mind.
01:43That hunger, blind, restless, insatiable, has destroyed everything it could touch.
01:49Climate change is only the latest, the most devastating,
01:53and perhaps the final symptom of this inner disease.
01:57This inner disease has also been manifested in industries.
02:01You see, they have their own negligence, recklessness.
02:03And you talk about Operation 2030, which is just five years away.
02:08So, do you think we should focus more on policy change rather than individualistic actions?
02:16That's my question, sir.
02:17Yeah, but who will change the policy?
02:20Yeah, see, we focus on ourselves within, right?
02:23This disease is also in the ministers, the MLAs.
02:26Yeah, I get it.
02:26But who will change the policy?
02:28Just come to that.
02:29They will change, right.
02:30And who elects them?
02:33So, it's about individual responsibility.
02:35We can vote out for that.
02:37But you see, in the manifestos,
02:39rarely any politician talks about climate change.
02:42You allowed them to.
02:43You allowed them to get away with manifestos,
02:45bereft of any mention of the climate.
02:49That's your individual flaw, is it not?
02:54How can you act on behalf of the other, when you say, individual action?
03:02Right?
03:03The word individual is redundant, because action has to be individual.
03:08Even if you get together in a group, you get together as individuals, with individual consent.
03:14So, all action, if you seek closely, is going to be any way individual.
03:24Even if you say, 8,000 people came together to sign this document, or in a protest march,
03:30aren't all of them acting as individuals, first of all?
03:32And if they aren't individuals, then they are robots, they are conditioned machines.
03:41I have my individual understanding.
03:45Right?
03:46And if I see it is aligned with that of the six of you,
03:52then we say, fine, the seven of us are together in something.
03:54But we have to be together in something,
03:58that we all of us, each of us, first of all, individually, agree to.
04:06So, the individual has to be targeted.
04:09The individual has to be awakened.
04:12No?
04:12Yes, and as students, what can we do for that?
04:16For that systemic change?
04:17Awaken the individuals?
04:20Obviously, what else?
04:21There is no option.
04:22If you think you can do it at the policy level,
04:25that sounds very tempting.
04:29But means nothing.
04:32Because you are trying to defy the very law of existence.
04:35You are saying the minister will do it.
04:36Why will the minister do it?
04:38The minister is there,
04:41because he has been voted to power by those who want no climate action.
04:46He will carry out their mandate.
04:49Why will he listen to you?
04:50So, at most, he will pay some lip service.
04:55He will say, yes, yes, yes, we must do something about the climate.
04:58Fine, fine, fine, fine.
04:59And nothing else.
05:01Yes, sir.
05:02So, what if I voted for a political leader that was advocating for climate change?
05:09But, because of democracy,
05:11the party, which does not really care about climate change, came into power.
05:17Then, his question really makes sense.
05:19Because on the individual level, what do I do?
05:22Democracy rotates the party in power.
05:25Again, you will have to awaken the individual,
05:27so that the one in power listens to you.
05:30Yes, but like,
05:32That's a big ask.
05:33You want to smile at it, right?
05:34It's a big ask.
05:35You don't want to do it.
05:36It's impractical.
05:37It's a big ask, and that's what is asked of you.
05:43Now, pick up the gauntlet.
05:48If you just rely on a Masihah,
05:51on some great Saviour,
05:53who will do it for you, sitting in power,
05:56that's never, never, never going to happen.
05:58The ones in power have the least interest in any climate action.
06:05Because they are the ones with the minimum stakes there.
06:09What does an old minister stand to lose?
06:14He would anyway be dead 10 years from here.
06:20And most politicians across the world are old people.
06:24The most powerful one,
06:26is probably the most oldest president also, ever.
06:29Think of him.
06:30The one, the one who is trying to kill the entire climate discourse.
06:36He's a very, very old man.
06:39And that's part of the explanation.
06:41He has no future.
06:42And great selfishness doesn't allow you to care for even the interest of your own kids.
06:52You say, I would be dead and long gone.
06:55When the climate effects will intensify,
07:03I'll anyway be no longer here.
07:05So, why should I worry?
07:09Or, I'm a rich man.
07:10I'm a very rich man.
07:12Temperature rises.
07:14I simply have to reset my AC.
07:19The whole space gets flooded.
07:21I have another mansion to fly away to.
07:25Great populations are displaced.
07:32Billions of them.
07:33I won't be displaced.
07:37There would be great economic loss.
07:40Ah.
07:42Why do I care?
07:44I'm a billionaire already.
07:47So, if you expect those people to act on their own.
07:52This is wishful thinking.
07:55Sir, Sir, but if a minister comes up and he does provide good policies,
08:05many, many a times the voters will pull him down.
08:09Because he won't be providing freebies and such things.
08:12So, if the audience is not awakened,
08:15even if there is a great Masihah,
08:18he'll be pulled down.
08:21Let's say,
08:23a freak of nature.
08:26Hmm?
08:27Some individual rises like an avatar
08:30and enters politics
08:32and manages to occupy a top post.
08:35Will the electorate allow him to function?
08:39If the electorate is not awakened,
08:41he'll be impeached,
08:42dismissed,
08:43brought down.
08:46We say we want honest politicians.
08:48If you do get an honest politician,
08:51will you allow him to function?
08:52Please tell me.
08:53So, similar thing happened.
09:01My chacha is a Pradhan in my village.
09:03So, he saw in our lane the roads were not very good.
09:08So, he tried to make the roads.
09:09Now, someone made a complaint that
09:11if you make the road,
09:12then we'll have to heighten our floor
09:16because in the rainy season,
09:18then water will fall inside their homes.
09:23These are the
09:26petty
09:27things
09:29that are bringing
09:32about a giant catastrophe.
09:35We all care for our little, little, little, little things.
09:39And it is the aggregation of
09:41these petty things
09:43that are resulting in this
09:45massive.
09:49Massive is an understatement.
09:53This is the sixth mass extinction.
10:02Sir, I also have a personal question.
10:04You say you cannot live wrongly
10:06and hope to consume rightly.
10:09I see myself
10:11buying stuff that I don't want
10:13because it's in trend.
10:14My friends are wearing it.
10:16I look cool if I wear it.
10:18So, this is also conditioning as you say, right?
10:22So, how can I personally,
10:23how can students like us
10:24and youth
10:25escape this?
10:26What's the definite path of this?
10:27Have a beautiful place to wisely spend your money at?
10:38You will be left with no surplus.
10:41You won't splurge it.
10:44First question is, why do you have so much money that you can blow it away?
10:47There are great places and great causes and great reasons that demand your money.
10:56Invest your money there.
10:57Spend it there.
11:01Self-development doesn't come cheap.
11:04A lot of things in this world require monetary investment.
11:08If you have money, spend it rightly.
11:12Why accumulate it?
11:13If you will accumulate it,
11:15it will be burnt at all the wrong places, rest assured.
11:19If suddenly, let's say you have 10 lakhs in your account as a student,
11:27what do you think you are going to do?
11:29You will let it remain there unlikely.
11:31Money is a very good resource.
11:40Don't let it rot in a vault.
11:44Spend it wisely.
11:47It is one kind of misfortune to not have money at all.
11:51The next kind of misfortune is to have a lot of money rotting in your bank account.
11:57Why must there be in your bank account?
11:59You are so impoverished, you couldn't find a right place where you can spend your money.
12:08Money is meant to be spent.
12:12Spend it at the right places.
12:14Go enroll into a hobby class.
12:20Get a tennis coach.
12:24All that is expensive.
12:27Spend your money.
12:28If you won't, then you will end up just buying whatever your friends buy.
12:34It hurts the environment too.
12:36Tennis doesn't hurt the environment, at least not in a big way.
12:41No, it does.
12:42I mean, if you will look at the, then there will be some minor carbon footprint that let's say racket manufacturing has.
12:50But once you buy a racket, it lasts several years.
12:53So that's fine.
12:54A clothes can change every year.
12:55Right?
12:56Training rules.
12:58And it's not that you change them.
13:00It's that you buy them, then you also have to wash them.
13:03And that washing itself consumes both energy and requires chemicals and pollutes and does a lot of things.
13:13It's not tennis versus clothes here.
13:14You get the drift, right?
13:16It's not tennis versus clothes here.
13:18You get the drift, right?
13:20.
13:30.
13:34.
13:37.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended