Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 17 hours ago
Transcript
00:00Gene, it's good to get you here with us and how fortuitous that we have you here on the day that
00:05this swap line is announced. Can you give us your instant analysis on why this is significant for
00:10the U.S. and how this helps kind of restore financial stability across North America?
00:17This is one of the toughest calls that a treasury has to make, which is currency support. And
00:23happily, the United States is blessed with a very fine treasury department with a lot of experts.
00:29Keeping international stability in these currencies is important. They don't take these
00:34things lightly. I'm sure they've thought about this from every conceivable angle. And net net,
00:40I think it's a good thing to do, but it's a very tricky thing to get right. And
00:44they're smart to try to get ahead of it. Let me ask a dumb question,
00:49because you have Scott Besson, the Treasury Secretary, saying that the U.S. Treasury is
00:53prepared immediately to take whatever exceptional measures are warranted to provide stability to
00:58markets. Some people might wonder, what is it about Argentina that the U.S. has such an
01:03investment invested stake in? Why is the U.S. so particularly focused on this country when it
01:11doesn't seem to have much impact on people's day to day lives or the U.S. economy on a day to day
01:16basis? Well, you know, it's an important country. It's it's much larger and richer than most people
01:24understand. So making sure that this stays stable as well as a currency market generally is a is a
01:31sensible move. But as I say, this is a very hard area in my day and age. We were worried about Mexico
01:38and we took some extraordinary measures at that time that worked out. But we've got competent
01:44people doing this and getting ahead of it and showing strength is a good thing. Well, that's the
01:49thing, Jean. This is a tricky area to intervene. And you think about the currency markets. There's no
01:53guarantee that intervention will have the intended effect, that it will actually be able to stabilize
01:59the exchange rate. When you look past at your tenure, I mean, what what does it typically result in? Can
02:07you be confident that the U.S. will get the intended effect when it comes to Argentina? Katie, these are
02:13enormous markets. And as powerful as the U.S. is and as well-meaning as the U.S. is, it's one of the
02:20reasons this call is so hard. Getting ahead of it, showing strength is a good thing. But but it's a
02:28roll of the dice. There's no doubt about it. Yeah, it'll be fascinating to see how this evolves with
02:33those fickle foreign exchange markets. But I do want to move on. I want to talk more about the U.S.
02:38because as Scarlett mentioned, of course, you have a new book out, The Mishmeasurement of America,
02:43How Outdated Government Statistics Mask the Economic Struggle of Everyday Americans. And I
02:48think that's really interesting because prior to the government shutdown, now we aren't getting
02:52any U.S. official data from the government. But there was a big question about the quality
02:57of U.S. data, especially when you think about the big revisions that we were seeing to the NFP
03:03results and the like. And I wonder how you think about that, the quality of U.S. data and whether
03:09or not it has eroded over the past several years. Well, Katie, this is an enormously important subject
03:16and I'm glad you've raised it. Data for the general public, for our policy leaders and how that's
03:25explained is really enormously important because if you're going to shoot at a target, you're going to
03:29make things better. And everybody tries to do that. You better know where the target is and try to hit
03:33the bullseye. The problem I've found with the government data is not the data collection
03:39itself. They're good-hearted people collecting things accurately. It changes from time to time
03:45as new data comes in. But it's actually the definitions they're using that are really long
03:52data. The definitions were put in the 1930s. And accordingly, what we've seen is a mischaracterization
03:57of the data that's profound in the headline statistics.
04:01Yeah, I mean, I just think back to the first time when I began reporting on financial markets, this idea of
04:06non-farm payrolls, it struck me as something kind of antiquated because people don't talk like that, in that
04:12farm payrolls are not a huge part of the U.S. economy. Gene, when you look at the data that does come out, which
04:17data points are perhaps overweighted, overrated versus those that are underappreciated?
04:22Well, sadly, almost every headline statistic is flawed, flawed deeply. You take unemployment.
04:31They report 4.2 percent, 4.3 percent. That is based on whether you worked even one hour in the last two
04:40weeks. So if you worked one hour in the last two weeks, you're counted as employed. Now, that's not
04:44what we, in a common sense way, think of as employed. If you're living in a tent or in Washington, D.C.,
04:50sometimes under bridges, but you get one hour's worth of work, that's not how we think of employed. So
04:56the data understates the problem. In fact, it's more like 24 to 25 percent of the American people
05:04are unemployed in a functional sense. That is, to be able to put good food on the table, have a roof over
05:11their head. So we have a much more profound problem for middle and low-income Americans than
05:15is typically reflected in the headline statistics. Right. Same is true with inflation. Right. I'm
05:20sorry. No, go ahead. No, the same is true with inflation. We use the CPI, which is a basket of
05:2780,000 goods and services, which over the last 25 years has inflated more slowly than the basket of
05:33goods and services ordinary Americans use, which is inflated more quickly. Accordingly, middle and low
05:39income Americans are hurting and they've been hurting a great deal. And we've seen that more
05:43recently in the spike in inflation. So, of course, this matters for everyday Americans,
05:48as you mentioned. But bring this conversation forward to what this also means for policymakers,
05:53not just for the Federal Reserve, but also for officials, of course, in the government trying
05:58to make policy if some of these struggles are being masked, in a sense, by the data that's being
06:04collected. Well, that is the big that is a big takeaway here, I think. Left and right, people come
06:11to government. They try to do the right thing and they try to do the right thing for their constituents.
06:16The problem is, if you basically are misled by these statistics, you don't realize how serious a
06:22problem we have in America. If we continue to decline and we have been declining in this country
06:27for the last 25 years in terms of middle and low income Americans, if we continue that trajectory,
06:32we're looking for social dislocation. It's a very, very serious problem indeed.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended