What if quantum computers have already broken Bitcoin’s cryptography — and no one knows yet? The rise of quantum computing poses the single biggest existential threat to Bitcoin and every digital asset built on public-key cryptography. With breakthroughs from Google, IBM, and top defense labs, the timeline for “quantum supremacy” might be much shorter than we think. Could Bitcoin’s private keys already be vulnerable?
👉 Subscribe for daily alpha on crypto market trends, bold Bitcoin predictions, and altcoin gems that could 10x your portfolio! – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpjN8bNE-CoAgpfMatghM9g
📧 Email: cryptorobothelp@gmail.com
💰 Affiliate Links
Sofi Checking & Savings – Get $25 free ➝ https://www.sofi.com/invite/money?gcp=16a53d0f-b4b2-441d-9100-cfb506305260&isAliasGcp=false
Sofi Investing – Free $25 in stock ➝ https://www.sofi.com/invite/invest?gcp=ab31edd8-701e-4109-9225-51b41e35d246&isAliasGcp=false
Coinbase Exchange – Earn up to $300 BTC ➝ https://coinbase.com/join/YPUQLCY?src=referral-link
Tracking Tools – CoinGecko | CoinMarketCap
Trading Tools – Get $15 off TradingView ➝ https://www.tradingview.com/pricing/?share_your_love=cryptonextsteps
#Bitcoin #QuantumComputing #CryptoNews #Blockchain #CyberSecurity #Encryption #CryptoThreat #BitcoinSecurity #QuantumTech #AI #DeFi #BitcoinFuture #DigitalAssets #CryptoMarket #TechRevolution
👉 Subscribe for daily alpha on crypto market trends, bold Bitcoin predictions, and altcoin gems that could 10x your portfolio! – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpjN8bNE-CoAgpfMatghM9g
📧 Email: cryptorobothelp@gmail.com
💰 Affiliate Links
Sofi Checking & Savings – Get $25 free ➝ https://www.sofi.com/invite/money?gcp=16a53d0f-b4b2-441d-9100-cfb506305260&isAliasGcp=false
Sofi Investing – Free $25 in stock ➝ https://www.sofi.com/invite/invest?gcp=ab31edd8-701e-4109-9225-51b41e35d246&isAliasGcp=false
Coinbase Exchange – Earn up to $300 BTC ➝ https://coinbase.com/join/YPUQLCY?src=referral-link
Tracking Tools – CoinGecko | CoinMarketCap
Trading Tools – Get $15 off TradingView ➝ https://www.tradingview.com/pricing/?share_your_love=cryptonextsteps
#Bitcoin #QuantumComputing #CryptoNews #Blockchain #CyberSecurity #Encryption #CryptoThreat #BitcoinSecurity #QuantumTech #AI #DeFi #BitcoinFuture #DigitalAssets #CryptoMarket #TechRevolution
Category
📚
LearningTranscript
00:00Welcome to the Deep Dive. Today we're tackling something pretty heavy, actually. It's what many
00:05see as, well, maybe the biggest future threat to crypto as we know it. Yeah, we're talking about
00:10quantum computing and its potential to basically crack the security underlying systems like
00:16Bitcoin. And this isn't science fiction anymore, is it? It's about a totally different way of
00:21computing. Exactly. Classical computers, they use bits, ones and zeros, sequentially, but quantum
00:27computers use quibits, these leveraged quantum phenomena like superposition, entanglement.
00:33Meaning they can do calculations like way faster, parallel processing on a massive scale.
00:39Exponentially faster for certain types of problems. And unfortunately, one of those problems is breaking
00:45the encryption we rely on. Right. So our mission today is to really unpack how that quantum speed
00:49targets elliptic curve cryptography ECC, which is, you know, the lock on pretty much every crypto wallet.
00:56It is. Bitcoin security, it fundamentally relies on this math problem. It's incredibly hard for
01:01normal computers. It takes too long, basically. But a big enough quantum computer. And that
01:05difficulty just vanishes. Theoretically, it could figure out your private key just from your public
01:11address almost instantly. Okay. And this is where it gets a bit unsettling. Some analysts we looked at
01:18are suggesting that maybe, just maybe, nation states already have early quantum machines.
01:25Machines perhaps capable of breaking smaller keys or at least running tests.
01:30Which leads to the really scary question. Has Bitcoin security, or parts of it, already been
01:36quietly compromised? Are we just waiting for someone to flip a switch?
01:40It's that uncertainty, isn't it? The unknown. And look, understanding the stuff,
01:44the real risks and the hype, it's crucial. It really is. And if you find this breakdown valuable,
01:49if it helps you sort of cut through the noise and crypto, please consider engaging with us,
01:54subscribing, commenting, sharing. It genuinely helps the channel.
01:58Yeah. It helps us boost visibility in the algorithm. Let's us keep making this kind of
02:01deep dive content for you. We really appreciate it. Absolutely.
02:04Okay. So let's get into the mechanics. How exactly would a quantum computer pull off this attack
02:08on the blockchain? You mentioned public keys.
02:10Right. It all comes down to public key exposure. This is key. If you have a Bitcoin address and
02:16you've never, ever sent Bitcoin from it. The public key isn't actually public yet.
02:21Not directly. It's protected by a hash. It's safe, or at least safer, from this specific
02:27quantum attack. But the moment I send even a tiny amount, say, to pay for coffee.
02:32Boom. Your public key is broadcast across the network. That's how the transaction gets verified.
02:37It's part of the design, the elliptic curve digital signature algorithm, ECDSA.
02:43And that's the opening for the quantum computer.
02:46That's the opening. A quantum computer running something called Shor's algorithm,
02:50a specific quantum algorithm could, in theory, take that revealed public key.
02:55And work backward to find my private key.
02:57Exactly. In maybe minutes or seconds, depending on the computer's power. And once they have your
03:02private key, they can sign transactions as if they were you. Your funds are gone.
03:06So wait, the immediate threat isn't to all Bitcoin, but specifically to the coins and addresses
03:11that have already been used to send funds that have revealed their public key.
03:15That's a really crucial distinction. Yes. Addresses that are just holding,
03:19hodling, if you will, and have never sent anything out. Their public keys are still hidden behind that
03:23hash. So my cold storage wallet that I've never touched is probably OK for now.
03:29From this specific ECDSA attack vector using Shor's algorithm, yes, it's significantly harder to attack
03:38those until that first outgoing transaction. It's a kind of temporary shield.
03:43OK, that makes the timeline debate even more pressing. We've seen sources, big names like IBM,
03:47Google, Oxford. They're estimating maybe five to 10 years before quantum computers are powerful
03:52enough for this. That's the public consensus, roughly. Based on known progress,
03:56air correction challenges, quibit stability. But, and this is the big but, if a government lab,
04:02say the NSA or a similar program in China, saw the massive advantage of breaking ECC,
04:08are we sure they'd stick to that public timeline? Well, that's the million dollar question,
04:12isn't it? Classified research. By definition, we don't know what they have. Breakthroughs could be
04:16years, maybe decades ahead of public knowledge. And the incentive is just enormous. Yeah.
04:21Breaking this kind of encryption. It's a strategic game changer. It touches finance,
04:25intelligence, military comms, everything. So this pushes us into the more speculative territory,
04:31the stuff you see on, you know, crypto Twitter or Reddit. Right. Let's go there. Because this is
04:35where it gets really interesting if a big conspiracy tinged. These theories about lost or dormant wallets
04:41suddenly showing activity. Yeah. There's persistent chatter. You hear about these old wallets maybe
04:47holding thousands of Bitcoin untouched for 10 years. And then suddenly a tiny amount like 0.001 BTC
04:54moves out. With no explanation. Exactly. And the theory goes, maybe this is someone,
04:59likely a state actor, testing a very early, maybe not fully stable quantum computer. Like dipping a
05:06toe in the water. Yeah. Seeing if they can crack an ECDSA key. Even just once on a target, nobody's
05:12watching closely. Precisely. Sort of covert proof of concept. If it works, you absolutely keep it secret.
05:18You don't want to cause a global financial panic or alert adversaries. Imagine the chaos if the
05:23government just announced, by the way, we can break Bitcoin security. Total meltdown. Confidence
05:27evaporates overnight. So if this capability exists, even in a limited form, secrecy would
05:33be paramount, which then leads to the geopolitical angle. OK, if you have this secret weapon,
05:38this decryption key, what do you use it for first? Mass surveillance. Crippling an enemy's
05:45financial system. Or maybe. Quietly confiscating assets. It's a chilling thought. Would they target
05:52activists, dissidents or just go after those huge, supposedly lost fortunes sitting in dormant
05:58wallets? Which brings us back to monitoring those wallets. Our sources flag this is critical.
06:02There's something like 1.4 million Bitcoin sitting in addresses that haven't seen activity in years.
06:07Yeah, a massive amount. Any significant unexplained movement from the specific high value dormant
06:13accounts, that would be a huge red flag. A potential early warning signal that something is happening.
06:18OK, so the threat is potentially huge, maybe even already unfolding in secret. But why hasn't the sky
06:24fallen? Why are Bitcoin core devs and other experts often quite, well, calm about this? People like
06:30Peter Todd, Adam Back. They seem confident Bitcoin can survive.
06:33There are really two main pillars to the defense argument. One is the sheer engineering difficulty,
06:39and the other is the protocol's ability to adapt.
06:43Let's start with the engineering. How hard is it really to build a quantum computer big enough?
06:48Extremely hard. To reliably break standard 256-bit ECC keys, the kind Bitcoin uses,
06:56experts estimate you'd need millions, literally millions, of stable fault-tolerant quibits.
07:01And where are we now? I saw IBM has machines around 1,000 quibits.
07:04Around that, yes. But those are generally noisy quibits prone to errors. They aren't the stable,
07:10error-corrected ones you'd need for this kind of complex calculation. There's a huge difference.
07:15So quantity isn't quality here?
07:17Not at all. Getting to millions of stable quibits is a monumental challenge.
07:21IBM's own public roadmap, for instance, is aiming for maybe 100,000 quibits,
07:25not necessarily fully error-corrected, by 2033.
07:28So we're potentially talking decades for the public tech.
07:31Potentially, yes. Based on public roadmaps, the threat is real,
07:34but the publicly available tech to execute it at scale isn't here yet.
07:38And that gap gives the network time.
07:40Time to do what? This brings us to the second pillar, adapting the protocol.
07:44Exactly. Bitcoin isn't static, it's software. It can be updated via consensus,
07:49usually through a hard fork if it's a major change.
07:52And developers have been planning for this quantum threat for years.
07:55Planning how? What's the fix?
07:57The fix is to switch to a different type of cryptography,
08:00altogether something called post-quantum cryptography, or PQC.
08:04Basically, rip out the vulnerable ECDSA signature scheme
08:08and replace it with one that quantum computers can't easily break.
08:11Okay, so what makes these PQC schemes,
08:14like you mentioned Lamport, Falcon, Dilithium,
08:18what makes them quantum resistant?
08:19They rely on different mathematical problems.
08:21ECDSA relies on the difficulty of factoring large numbers
08:25or solving the discrete logarithm problem on elliptic curves problems
08:28that Shor's algorithm is specifically good at.
08:30But PQC uses different math.
08:32Yes.
08:33For example, Falcon and Dilithium, which are strong contenders,
08:36are based on lattice-based cryptography.
08:39Imagine trying to find the shortest path between points
08:41in a massive, incredibly complex, multidimensional grid.
08:45That sounds hard even conceptually.
08:47It is.
08:48And crucially, current quantum algorithms
08:50don't offer a significant speed-up
08:52for solving these lattice problems.
08:55Other PQC methods, like Lamport, are hash-based,
08:58relying on the security of cryptographic hash functions,
09:01which are also believed to be quantum-resistant for now.
09:04So the crypto community isn't just sitting idle.
09:07They have replacements lined up.
09:08They do.
09:09The research is active.
09:10The potential algorithms exist.
09:12The challenge will be agreeing on which one
09:14and implementing the switch across the network smoothly.
09:17Which sounds like a whole other potential problem
09:19getting global consensus.
09:21But, okay, this implies a future where maybe
09:23Bitcoin forks or new blockchains emerge
09:26that are quantum-proof from day one.
09:28Absolutely.
09:29We're already seeing what you could call a PQC arms race
09:32starting in the blockchain space.
09:34It's not just about patching Bitcoin.
09:36It's becoming a core feature for new and updated protocols.
09:39Who's leading this race?
09:40Are there specific projects we should be watching?
09:42Well, Ethereum has been discussing PQC integration
09:45for its future upgrades for a while.
09:47Then you have newer platforms like QAn platform,
09:50which build quantum resistance in right from the start.
09:53So design for it.
09:54Design for it.
09:55And established players like Cardano, IOTA, Algorand,
09:59they're all actively experimenting or developing plans,
10:03looking at different approaches like lattice-based, hash-based,
10:07even multivariate cryptography, trying to find the best fit.
10:11And this isn't just crypto-ners thinking about this, right?
10:13Governments are involved, too.
10:15Hugely involved.
10:16You have to mention the U.S. government's NIST,
10:19the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
10:22They've been running a major competition for years
10:24to pick and standardize the best PQC algorithms.
10:28Why is that standardization so important?
10:30Because it creates a trusted benchmark.
10:33NIST is expected to finalize these PQC standards
10:36maybe as soon as 2025.
10:38And once they do, those standards will likely become the baseline,
10:41not just for government systems, but for secure communications.
10:45And yes, probably future blockchain protocols worldwide.
10:48It signals what SAFE looks like in the quantum era.
10:50OK, so this totally reframes the investment side.
10:52It's not just about Bitcoin surviving.
10:54It's about which platforms adopt these new standards first and best.
10:58That's right.
10:59It sets up two snarkly different potential futures for you
11:02as someone watching or invested in this space.
11:04The risk versus opportunity we talked about.
11:07Exactly that.
11:08Scenario one, the risk.
11:10If credible proof leaks that ECC is broken,
11:14maybe a state actor suddenly moves a massive amount of old Bitcoin they cracked,
11:18boom, confidence could just shatter across the board.
11:21A market crash is very possible.
11:23Scary suck.
11:24Very.
11:24Scenario two, the opportunity.
11:27The projects that successfully integrate robust, probably NIST-approved, PQC,
11:31early on could see enormous adoption and value increase.
11:35Think about the early days of DeFi or AI tokens,
11:38a major technological shift creating new winners.
11:41So being quantum safe could become a huge selling point, a major differentiator.
11:45It likely will be.
11:46So from a strategy perspective, it suggests looking closely at diversification,
11:50maybe including projects that are explicitly focused on PQC integration.
11:54And remember that Google quantum supremacy demonstration back in 2019.
11:57Vaguely, yeah.
11:58They solved some specific problem ridiculously fast.
12:00Exactly.
12:02It wasn't breaking crypto, but it was a clear signal of the potential exponential speed-up
12:07quantum offers over classical computers.
12:10It showed the underlying power is real.
12:12So for Bitcoin specifically, its long-term fate really hangs on how quickly and effectively
12:18the community can manage that transition, that upgrade or hard fork,
12:22to a quantum-resistant system.
12:24That seems to be the consensus, yes.
12:27The tech to defend exists or is being finalized, but deploying it is the hurdle.
12:32Okay, let's recap this deep dive.
12:34We've covered the quantum threat, how Shor's algorithm targets ECDSA via exposed public keys.
12:40We looked at the crucial difference between used and unused addresses.
12:44Which is the current saving grace for many holders.
12:46Right.
12:47We touched on the speculative side, those dormant wallet theories.
12:50The potential for secret state-level decryption.
12:53And the massive technical hurdles still remaining, like needing millions of stable kubits.
12:57And finally, the defense.
12:59The ongoing development and standardization of post-quantum cryptography.
13:02And the plan B of forking the network.
13:05It's a race between the attackers building the quantum computers and the defenders upgrading the cryptography.
13:09So, considering the timeline debates, you know, 5-10 years versus maybe it's already happening,
13:16and the fact that NIST is pushing to finalize PQC standards soon, likely by 2025,
13:22the tech is coming.
13:23Both the threat and the defense.
13:25That seems inevitable, yes.
13:26Which leads us to our final thought for you to chew on.
13:30If the quantum computers capable of breaking current crypto are coming,
13:34and the quantum-resistant algorithms are also being developed and standardized,
13:37maybe the biggest uncertainty isn't the technology itself.
13:42Maybe it's the social layer.
13:43Can a global decentralized network like Bitcoin actually agree on and execute a complex high-stakes hard fork
13:50before the quantum threat becomes critical?
13:53Will the consensus mechanism break before the cryptography does?
13:56That's a fascinating question.
13:57Something to ponder.
13:58Thanks for joining us for this important deep dive.
14:00Thanks, everyone.
14:01We'll see you next time.
Be the first to comment