00:00In Part 1, we saw that the traditional U.S. political spectrum, based on equality versus control, was not only flawed, but divisive.
00:11Yet, if the spectrum doesn't work, how do we fix it?
00:18The Political Spectrum Part 2. Fixing the Spectrum.
00:23Welcome to Into the Desert, exploring the wilderness of ideas.
00:27Don't forget to hit those like and subscribe buttons.
00:30And if you want to support our channel and our mission of encouraging discussion, not division, please join us on Patreon.
00:37The link is in the description.
00:40In the Political Spectrum Part 1, we looked at a common U.S. political spectrum that spanned between the far left, focusing on equality, and the far right, focusing on control.
00:52We saw that not only did the spectrum not match the U.S. political landscape, but it had a number of errors, was divisive, and thus counterproductive to an effective democracy.
01:07If you haven't seen Part 1, we highly recommend checking it out first, and then coming back to this video.
01:13The link is in the description.
01:17If the common political spectrum is so broken, how do we fix it?
01:21This question has no easy answer.
01:26The core problem is that the more accurate the depiction, the less useful it is in discussions.
01:33Depictions involving more than a one-dimensional left-right spectrum may be more accurate, but are hardly practical in most real-world political discussions.
01:43Outside of academia, political discussions in the U.S. occur on a left-right spectrum, and that is unlikely to change.
01:54Here, we will try to change the spectrum to something that is, one, more accurate, and, two, less demonizing.
02:03The first step is to drop the groups that don't have any appreciable impact on U.S. politics.
02:09This would remove communism, authoritarianism, and fascism.
02:16However applicable to discussions about world or historical politics, these groups play an insignificant role in modern U.S. politics,
02:25except as negative terms used when attacking opponents.
02:29Socialism stays because, while a small minority, there are a significant number of socialists,
02:35and even some candidates and elected officials who call themselves socialists.
02:41Next, we need to add those groups that play a notable role in U.S. politics that were left out.
02:49Progressives, moderates, and libertarians.
02:53We saw that the equity versus control spectrum didn't make sense.
02:57So, what spectrum would?
02:59While a concern for equality accurately describes the left, a desire for control is found across the spectrum.
03:09In addition, control gives a negative connotation to the right as opposed to the more positive value, equality.
03:17A better counterbalance to equality would be liberty.
03:22While both liberty and equality are positive values, they are also mutually exclusive.
03:27The more you have of one, the less you have of the other.
03:33To see this, consider economic equality.
03:36Assume for a moment that one could wave a wand, and in an instant, everyone had exactly the same amount of money and property.
03:43That everyone is, at that moment, economically equal.
03:48What would happen?
03:50Some would save it.
03:52Some would spend it.
03:53Some would invest it.
03:55And some would gamble it and win.
03:57Others would lose.
04:00In short, before long, economic equality would disappear.
04:05As time went on, the inequality would grow.
04:09The only way to prevent this inequality would be to have laws against any activity that could lead to inequality.
04:18In short, to restrict liberty.
04:20A political spectrum based on equality versus liberty makes much more sense.
04:26Starting on the left, equality is valued strongly over liberty.
04:31As you move to the right, concerns for equality reduces, while concerns about liberty grows.
04:39By the time you reach the right, liberty is strongly valued over equality.
04:43This also lines up nicely with the country's real-life political situation.
04:50At the far left are the socialists who push the hardest for equality.
04:54As you move towards the center, you come to progressives, and then liberals, with increasing emphasis on liberty at the expense of equality.
05:04Moderates, in the center, would then value equality and liberty equally, striking a balance between these ideas.
05:12As you then move to the right half of the spectrum, you have conservatives, who value liberty more than equality, and finally libertarians, who push the hardest for liberty.
05:24Such a spectrum would also work for secondary characteristics.
05:29For example, equality requires the government to enforce it at the expense of liberty.
05:36Thus, it is unsurprising that the left generally wants a larger, more centralized government, while the right wants a smaller, more decentralized one.
05:47Such a spectrum also meets the second goal, in that it does not require one to demonize those on the other side.
05:57Both equality and liberty are positive values.
06:01Most would agree that in a perfect world we would want both.
06:05Yet, they are mutually exclusive.
06:09Different people can and do have different views as to their relative value, without being in some fashion bad.
06:17Such a spectrum also leads to a better understanding of the two parties, not as monoliths, but as coalitions of various groups.
06:28The Democratic Party consists of some socialists, progressives, liberals, and more left-leaning moderates.
06:37More right-leaning moderates, along with conservatives and libertarians, make up the Republicans.
06:42It is true that not everyone fits into this two-party structure.
06:48On the far left, there are socialists and others who form other parties.
06:54Likewise, on the right, there are many libertarian and others who are not Republican and have also formed other parties.
07:02Yet, these other parties are small and insignificant at the national level.
07:06They play little, if any, significant role in elections, except occasionally as a possible spoiler.
07:15But even that is unclear, as it assumes those who vote for a third-party candidate would have voted for the two-party candidate closest to them.
07:23Yet, there is also the possible option of not voting at all.
07:28Still, if one wanted to include them, they could be added to the far left or far right.
07:34But there remains a third group, which is of significant size to have an impact, the independents.
07:41These are people who, for a variety of reasons, are not part of any political party.
07:48While they can be found throughout the political spectrum, many are moderates who could vote for either party depending on the candidates running.
07:56While the equality versus liberty political spectrum is not perfect, it is far superior than equality versus control.
08:06It gives a better understanding of the real-world political differences without resorting to the demonization that is, unfortunately, so common.
08:16Next time, we will look at some objections that have been raised.
08:21So, what do you think?
08:23Do you agree that an equality versus liberty spectrum makes more sense?
08:28Do you disagree?
08:29And if so, why?
08:31Perhaps your objections will make it into part three.
08:34We do read the comments and often post replies.
08:37If you made it this far, consider watching one of our other videos and supporting our channel on Patreon.
08:44Thank you for watching Into the Desert, Exploring the Wilderness of Ideas.
Comments