Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 16 hours ago
The Netherlands says Washington did not influence its decision to assume control of Nexperia, a Chinese-owned chipmaker, citing national security under a 1952 emergency law. Officials pointed to corporate mismanagement risks and possible technology transfers to China, and a Dutch court later suspended the company’s Chinese CEO and appointed a new director.

To learn more the never-before-used law and what the move means for European tech sovereignty, TaiwanPlus spoke with Dutch tech columnist Marc Hijink, author of “Focus: The ASML Way.”

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00The Netherlands says Washington had nothing to do with its decision to take control of Chinese-owned chipmaker Nexperia.
00:07The Dutch economy minister says the move was driven by national security concerns.
00:12Officials cited corporate mismanagement and possible tech transfers to China.
00:16A Dutch court later suspended Nexperia's Chinese CEO and appointed a new director.
00:21Nexperia is one of the world's largest makers of basic chips used in everyday products.
00:26Its main fabs are in Europe, but most of its chips are sent to China for final production.
00:31Both Wingtech and Beijing have condemned the Dutch move.
00:36For more on the Dutch government's intervention at Nexperia,
00:39reporter Chris Gorin spoke with Dutch tech columnist Mark Hayink, author of the book Focus the ASML Way.
00:46Mark, the Dutch government has taken the extraordinary step of intervening in Nexperia,
00:52a Chinese-owned but Netherlands-based semiconductor manufacturer.
00:56And they've used this law called the Availability of Goods Act.
01:00What exactly is that?
01:01It's actually a very old law.
01:04So it was in the draw since the 50s, the Cold War era.
01:09And it's like an emergency law that says, well, the Dutch government can control any company
01:17to prevent critical goods from being not present, not available for the Dutch people.
01:24In this case, it was the only option for the Dutch government to interfere or intervene in Nexperia
01:31because things were happening within the company that were not in the interest of Dutch society or European society.
01:42This is the first time the law has ever been used in the Netherlands.
01:45But with semiconductors being seen as vital to national security,
01:49should we expect to see more interventions or is Nexperia a one-off case?
01:54I think this is kind of exceptional and I hope it will stay exceptional.
01:59Well, just one simple reason.
02:03There are not so many semiconductor manufacturers in the Netherlands.
02:09So there's a limited amount of companies that would be a potential target for a law like this.
02:15They're usually very reluctant to interfere with companies at all.
02:21So my guess, this will be a one-off, like a very rare occasion where we've seen the Dutch government interfere in a way like this.
02:33But they do have this in their kit.
02:37So they do have this tool and they're not afraid to use it.
02:42And I think that's a step up from their naivety, well, from six or seven years back.
02:50What, to you, makes this intervention so significant to Europe's tech strategy?
02:55Because, after all, we need these semiconductors not only for our defense,
03:00not only for our economy, but also for daily lives.
03:06It's not the highly advanced semiconductors you use in your phones or in your AI systems,
03:11but also the standard products, the mainstream chips.
03:15So Europe has to make sure that they have their own availability and their own sovereignty.
03:21It's going to be a long journey, but I think in the end,
03:24they'll also need companies like Nexperia to act up and to expand.
03:30That was tech writer and author Mark Hyenck joining us from the Netherlands.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended