Banks Embrace Bitcoin

Crypto Robot

U.S. Bancorp has officially returned to Bitcoin services, signaling one of the most important steps yet in bank-crypto integration. This move is more than just a relaunch—it represents a validation of Bitcoin within mainstream finance, and a clear sign that regulatory clarity is opening the door for banks to enter the digital asset space.  In this video, we’ll break down why U.S. Bancorp’s Bitcoin return matters for both retail and institutional investors, how it compares to moves by Fidelity, BlackRock, and other major players, and what it could mean for the future of crypto as core financial infrastructure. With banks deepening their crypto services, the traditional financial system may soon be inseparable from Web3 adoption.  Do you think U.S. Bancorp’s move will trigger a domino effect of more banks adopting Bitcoin, or will regulation still hold them back? Let us know your thoughts in the comments 👇  👉 Subscribe for daily alpha on crypto market trends, bold Bitcoin predictions, and altcoin gems that could 10x your portfolio! – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpjN8bNE-CoAgpfMatghM9g  📧 Email: cryptorobothelp@gmail.com  💰 Affiliate Links  Sofi Checking & Savings – Get $25 free ➝ https://www.sofi.com/invite/money?gcp=16a53d0f-b4b2-441d-9100-cfb506305260&isAliasGcp=false  Sofi Investing – Free $25 in stock ➝ https://www.sofi.com/invite/invest?gcp=ab31edd8-701e-4109-9225-51b41e35d246&isAliasGcp=false  Coinbase Exchange – Earn up to $300 BTC ➝ https://coinbase.com/join/YPUQLCY?src=referral-link  Tracking Tools – CoinGecko | CoinMarketCap  Trading Tools – Get $15 off TradingView ➝ https://www.tradingview.com/pricing/?share_your_love=cryptonextsteps  #Bitcoin #CryptoNews #USBancorp #Blockchain #CryptoAdoption #BTC #CryptoInvesting #Web3 #DeFi #Altcoins #Banking #InstitutionalCrypto

Transcript

00:00Welcome back to The Deep Dive. We're the show that really tries to cut through all the noise

00:09and get you the insights that matter in finance, tailored just for you. And I am genuinely thrilled

00:16today. We're tackling something that's, well, it's more than just a headline. It feels like a real

00:21shift. You know, how traditional finance is starting to grapple with digital assets. Our

00:26mission, like always, is to give you that shortcut, to help you be truly informed so you understand

00:32not just what's up, but the deeper why behind these big moves. And that why is exactly what we

00:37need to unpack. It's easy to see these news items in isolation, right? A bank does this, a regulator

00:42says that. But the real understanding, the value comes from connecting those dots,

00:47seeing the bigger currents. So today, yeah, we've got a stack of material articles, analyses, and

00:51we're going deep. We're looking at U.S. Bancorp, getting back into Bitcoin services, what it means,

00:56why it matters for TradFi, for crypto. It's about the whole system adapting, really.

01:01Absolutely. And this core topic, U.S. Bancorp's move, it just speaks volumes. One of America's

01:07biggest banks, getting back into Bitcoin. But the really interesting part, the key thing for

01:12understanding this is that it's a re-embrace. They tried this before, didn't they? They hit some

01:17pretty big hurdles, and now they're back. Seems like a different approach this time, maybe more

01:21confident. That's what's fascinating, yeah. It's more than just, okay, we offer

01:25Bitcoin now. It signals something bigger. It suggests we're entering a new phase, maybe a

01:30more mature one, of banks and crypto figuring out how to work together. And it definitely tells us

01:35the winds are shifting, politically, maybe, but certainly on the regulatory front. A bank like

01:41U.S. Bancorp doesn't make this move lightly. It's a sign of comfort that just wasn't there a couple

01:45of years back. Okay. Let's really dig into that re-embrace then. Yeah. Because that history

01:50matters, right? It adds weight. You mentioned their first attempt got stalled. Regulatory hurdles,

01:54Biden era. Can you give us a bit more on what those challenges actually look like? Why is that

01:58context so important now? Right. That previous snag, as you called it, is absolutely key. Back

02:04then, let's say early Biden administration and even before, the whole regulatory scene for crypto in

02:09the U.S. was, well, murky is putting it kindly, sometimes even hostile. You had different agencies,

02:15the OCC, the SEC, the Fed sometimes saying inflicting things or just being extremely cautious

02:19created a lot of uncertainty for banks. And banks, you know, they live and breathe regulation,

02:25safety, soundness, scrutiny from everyone. That kind of ambiguity, it's paralyzing for them.

02:30So it wasn't like one specific rule saying no, but more a whole climate of

02:33maybe unclear guidance or maybe just the lack of guidance. That created a chill.

02:38Exactly that. It wasn't an outright ban necessarily. It was the lack of clear,

02:43positive guidance on how the existing rules applied to these new digital things. Think about

02:48it. Capital requirements for holding crypto. Could banks even offer custody legally? How do you apply

02:54anti-money laundering rules, the KYC stuff, to crypto? Is it security? A commodity? These huge

03:00questions were just hanging there. So faced with that vacuum, institutions like U.S. Bancorp back then

03:05basically had to hit pause. The risk of getting it wrong, big fines, damage reputation, maybe even

03:10losing their charter was just too high. Operating in a legal gray zone, that's a definite no-go for

03:15a major regulated bank. Makes total sense. Huge risks versus potential rewards. So that past

03:20experience, the difficult snag, what does it tell us about how they're calculating things now? It can't

03:25just be, okay, regulators seem nicer, let's go. Oh, not at all. That experience was probably painful,

03:30but incredibly valuable. Banks like U.S. Bancorp, they're fundamentally risk averse and for good

03:35reason. Fiduciary duty, regulatory oversight. So those past uncertainties likely taught them a few

03:41hard lessons. Patience is key. Talking proactively with regulators is crucial, and building a compliance

03:47system that's rock solid but also flexible, absolutely essential. Their strategy now, it's

03:52definitely built on a better read of the regulatory landscape, or at least clear signals about where

03:56it's heading. They probably had tons of quiet conversations with agencies, maybe even done some

04:01pilot programs, ask for formal guidance, anything to make sure this re-entry is on much firmer ground.

04:06They're trying to avoid another sudden stop. So they start with things like custody, trading areas

04:12where the rules are maybe a bit clearer now, or at least more predictable. Not jumping straight into,

04:16say, DeFi lending. The reward is still tapping into this growing market, sure, but the risk mitigation

04:21learned from last time, that's shaping every single move. It's pragmatic, you know, not just a bold leap.

04:26Right. A pragmatic approach, built on hard lessons. Sounds like a clear, maybe even somewhat

04:31conservative, roadmap. But crypto moves so fast. How do they balance that caution with needing to be

04:39agile, needing to innovate? That's a real tightrope walk, isn't it? It absolutely is. And that's a core

04:43challenge for TradFi in this whole space. Their first steps back in will likely be very unmeasured.

04:48Secure custody, basic trading, probably just for Bitcoin initially. Build that foundation of trust and

04:54compliance first. Yeah. But at the same time, you can bet they're investing heavily behind the

04:58scenes. R&D, right? Looking at tokenizing real world assets, how blockchain could change payments,

05:02maybe even CBDCs. Often this happens in parallel, maybe in separate innovation hubs, kind of shielded

05:08from the day-to-day regulatory heat of the main bank. They're building a bridge, carefully, not just

05:13jumping in. So cautious steps now, but definitely planning for more complex stuff down the road.

05:17Okay. That distinction is helpful. Now let's get into those deeper implications.

05:21Why does this specific move by U.S. Bancorp really matter beyond just their own business?

05:28Let's start with validation and trust. When a huge established name like U.S. Bancorp puts its weight

05:34behind Bitcoin, what message does that actually send, especially people who've been hesitant?

05:40It sends an incredibly powerful message. It's almost undeniable validation. It's not just about

05:45making Bitcoin available. It's about making it feel safe. For a lot of people, the idea of moving money

05:50from their normal FDIC-insured bank to some crypto exchange felt, well, felt like heading into the

05:56unknown, right? Unregulated, scary stories about hacks, complicated tech. U.S. Bancorp stepping in

06:01acts like a bridge, a familiar, trusted bridge. They're basically saying, okay, we've looked at

06:05this. We can secure it within our framework. It's a legitimate asset class. That lowers the

06:09psychological barrier hugely.

06:11And what about that psychological impact specifically? I mean, if you trust your bank,

06:15you see security there, and suddenly they're involved with Bitcoin. That has to reshape how

06:21you see it, right? What fears does it calm? And who might this actually bring into the market? Is it

06:26a new type of adopter?

06:27Oh, the psychological impact is massive. Think about the average person. Crypto often seemed risky,

06:32right? Fear of hacks, losing your money, wasn't sure if it was even legal. The jargon was confusing,

06:37felt like it wasn't for them. Then a brand like U.S. Bancorp, which means stability,

06:41regulation, security, like generations gets involved. It normalizes Bitcoin. The message

06:47becomes, okay, this isn't just for tech geeks or risk takers anymore. This is a real financial

06:52product. It meets our standards. That cuts through a lot of the fear and confusion. You're potentially

06:57unlocking what marketers sometimes call the late majority, people who prioritize safety and ease

07:03of use. They've been watching, maybe curious, but definitely cautious. This gives them that

07:07familiar way in, backed by the bank they already use. It could really change the whole demographic

07:12using Bitcoin, bringing in more mainstream, maybe more conservative folks.

07:15That could be a huge catalyst. Okay, moving on. Is this just a smart business play for a U.S.

07:21Bancorp new revenue stream? Keep up with competitors. Or does it signal something bigger

07:26about the regulations themselves? Is this like a definitive sign that the regulatory fog you talked

07:31about earlier is actually lifting to the whole industry? I think it strongly suggests it's much

07:36more than just a business decision. It's a pretty profound indicator that U.S. banks generally are

07:42feeling significantly more comfortable offering Bitcoin services, custody, trading. And that comfort,

07:48it doesn't just appear out of thin air. It's not wishful thinking. It implies there's now a level of

07:52regulatory clarity or at least predictable guidance that simply wasn't there before. Banks just don't

07:58gamble with their licenses or their reputations like that. Their return suggests a major shift

08:02from that earlier ambiguity that caused so much hesitation. Maybe it's recent court cases like

08:07grayscale versus the SEC pushing regulators towards clearer rules. Maybe it's ongoing quiet talks between

08:12bank lobbyists and the agencies leading to some informal nods or just a better understanding of how

08:17the rules apply. Right. So what kind of clarity might they have gotten, maybe from the OCC or the Fed?

08:22And how does this comfort actually translate into action, like operational decisions, new products,

08:28not just for U.S. Bancorp, but for other banks who are supposed to be watching this very closely?

08:31Well, we can speculate a bit. The clarity might be specific, maybe quiet guidance from the OCC,

08:37the Oversee National Banks or the Fed, guidance on, say, what's permissible, what the risk management

08:42expectations are for holding or trading crypto. Or it could just be a sense that the political appetite

08:47for really cracking down hard on crypto has lessened, making regulated participation seem safer.

08:53This comfort lets banks actually commit resources, big resources, investing in tech, hiring people

08:59with crypto skills, billing out those compliance systems, all without fearing the rug will be pulled

09:03out from under them tomorrow. For U.S. Bancorp, it means they can confidently offer direct custody,

09:08maybe even integrate it right into their online banking. Make buying Bitcoin as easy as opening a

09:14savings account. For other banks, yeah, it's a huge signal, almost a green light. We could absolutely

09:18see a domino effect, more traditional banks launching similar services, maybe even expanding

09:23later into tokenized assets, you know, putting real estate or bonds on a blockchain or offering loans

09:28backed by crypto, all within regulated guardrails. That regulatory comfort is laying the foundation.

09:33Okay, this is where it gets really, really interesting. The scale of it all. Let's talk capital flows.

09:38We always hear institutional money, trillions. What kind of money are we actually talking about?

09:45And what's the potential impact on Bitcoin's market if even a fraction of that starts moving?

09:50Yeah, this is where the long-term picture gets exciting. Banks getting back in could genuinely

09:55open the door, maybe not floodbates immediately, but definitely open the door to literally trillions

10:01in traditional finance money. Money that could start to steadily, you know, trickle into Bitcoin and

10:06maybe other digital assets eventually. It's not going to be a sudden flood causing chaos. It's more

10:12likely a significant steady stream over time. Let's think about the assets under management.

10:16Wealth management arms of these banks, huge pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, big corporate

10:21treasuries. Most of them have been on the sidelines. They manage unimaginable amounts of money, but they

10:26have strict fiduciary duties. They have to act in their client's best interest, minimize risk, ensure compliance.

10:31That trickle, not a flood, that feels like a really important distinction. Why is it a trickle? And what are the

10:38ways this capital might actually flow in? And crucially, what does that mean for Bitcoin's market cap, its price

10:44stability over the long run? The trickle is key because TradFi moves cautiously, always. Their due diligence is

10:50intense. Those fiduciary duties are serious. Compliance rules are complex. They won't just YOLO into a volatile new asset.

10:57So the capital will likely flow through specific regulated channels. Think about wealth management

11:02divisions allocating a small slice, maybe one to five percent, of client portfolios to digital assets

11:08like they do with other alternative investments. Pension funds might start exploring Bitcoin exposure,

11:13maybe through regulated custody or specific investment funds. High net worth clients and family

11:18offices get a secure way to hold BTC right alongside their traditional assets with proper reporting and

11:24security and the steady measured inflow. It's actually much healthier for the market than some sudden

11:30speculative frenzy. A flood could just create a pump and dump. A gradual trickle lets the market absorb

11:35the capital, build a stronger base and foster more organic, sustainable growth. This sustained demand,

11:41even if it's incremental, can definitely push Bitcoin's market cap up over time. And it hugely contributes

11:46to price stability. More institutional players mean more market depth. Bigger trades can happen without

11:51causing wild price swings. It reduces volatility. These players also tend to be less reactive to short-term

11:58noise than a retail, acting as a kind of stabilizing force. That makes a lot of sense. Deliberate, measured

12:03growth, not unsustainable hype. Okay, let's trace those ripple effects through the ecosystem,

12:10starting with the most direct impact. Investors and traders. For the everyday person, the retail investor.

12:16What does U.S. Bancorp offering Bitcoin actually mean for them trying to buy some?

12:21For the everyday person, it means much easier and maybe more importantly, simpler access. Directly

12:27through platforms they already use and trust their bank's app? Probably. Think about it. Right now,

12:33getting into crypto often means signing up for a whole separate exchange, right? New verification,

12:38linking bank accounts, learning a new interface. It can feel like a hassle or even intimidating.

12:42Imagine just logging into your regular banking app, seeing your checking, savings, and an option to

12:47buy Bitcoin right there. That removes so much friction. It makes it way less daunting for

12:51people who aren't super tech savvy or just don't have the time to figure out a dedicated crypto

12:55platform. It brings Bitcoin to them instead of making them go find it. That convenience factor

13:00alone could be huge for adoption. Yeah, that sounds like a big step towards the mainstream,

13:05taking away those barriers. Now, what about the big players? The institutions, wealth managers,

13:09pension funds, corporate treasurers? How does this change their thinking, their approach to Bitcoin?

13:14For institutional investors, this is really a game changer for how they see risk and how they do

13:19their homework, their due diligence, wealth managers, pension funds, endowments. They'll feel

13:23much, much safer working with a federally regulated bank offering crypto services. It's that stamp of

13:28regulatory approval, you know. Plus, the established infrastructure, the audited systems a bank

13:34provides. It fundamentally lowers the risk, both perceived and real, of dealing with digital assets.

13:40These institutions have really strict compliance rules, fiduciary duties. They have to protect the

13:45assets they manage. Knowing their Bitcoin is held by a regulated entity subject to the same kind of

13:51oversight as their stocks and bonds. It makes the whole due diligence process way easier. It ticks boxes

13:56around security, insurance, audits, reporting, all critical for managing other people's money.

14:01It basically opens Bitcoin up to a whole segment of the market that just couldn't or wouldn't touch it

14:05before because of those institutional level requirements. Right. So that moves Bitcoin out

14:10of that Wild West category and into something that fits within their normal risk management.

14:15Okay. And for the active traders, people watching the charts all day,

14:18what's the takeaway for them from more banks getting involved? For active traders,

14:22bank adoption means more on ramps, definitely. But the big thing is liquidity,

14:27a significant increase in market liquidity. Liquidity is just how easily you can buy or

14:32sell something without messing up the price too much. Think of a busy market versus a quiet shop.

14:37When big institutions come in through banks, they bring serious capital, serious trading volume

14:42that deepens the order books, more buy and sell orders sitting there at different prices.

14:46And this increased depth, it can really tighten the spreads. That's the gap between the highest buy

14:50price, bid and the lowest sell price ask. Tighter spreads mean less slippage on trades where the

14:55price you get isn't what you expected and just better execution overall. This also helps stabilize

15:00the market. Bigger trades from institutions maybe can be absorbed without causing huge price jumps or

15:06crashes. It dampens volatility. So for day traders, quant funds, even long term investors making large

15:11buys, it means a more robust, more efficient, probably fairer market to trade in. Good for efficiency,

15:17good for stability. Sounds like a win for pretty much everyone as the market gets more mature.

15:21OK, let's zoom out a bit. Broader ecosystem implications. You mentioned US Bancorp isn't

15:26the first mover here. Others are already playing in the sandbox. So what does their reentry tell us

15:32about the competition heating up among the big banks? Yeah, absolutely. They're joining a game

15:37already in progress. JP Morgan's been busy with Onyx, their own blockchain stuff, JPM Coin for years.

15:42Fidelity Digital Assets, they were super early with institutional custody back in 2018. And BlackRock,

15:49biggest asset manager in the world, getting that spot Bitcoin ETF approved, that was huge.

15:53So US Bancorp coming back in, it just underscores that no major bank wants to get left behind here.

15:59The competitive pressure is intense. It's not just about cutting fees like in some mature markets.

16:04It feels like a race to innovate and a race to hold on to client assets. Every bank wants to be the place

16:10clients go for digital assets, whether that's direct custody ETFs, maybe even fancier blockchain

16:14stuff later. They're all trying to grab a piece of this growing market, realizing that

16:18sitting it out is just not a viable strategy anymore. That dynamic is crucial. Which brings

16:23us to a really interesting question people often debate. Does all this institutional involvement

16:28mean banks are suddenly going to like plug right into DeFi, decentralized finance,

16:34which seems kind of the opposite of traditional banking? Are we building a real bridge?

16:38Well, in the short term, no, probably not directly plugging into permissionless DeFi protocols

16:43like a crypto native would. There are just too many hurdles, regulatory, security, technical for

16:47that kind of direct, immediate, anything goes integration. But this whole TradFi re-engagement

16:53led by players like US Bancorp, it absolutely could speed up the building of a more controlled,

16:58more secure bridge between traditional finance and Web3. It builds trust, it sets up familiar

17:03infrastructure, it validates the underlying tech, all of which could eventually lead to more

17:07complex but still regulated integrations later on. Think of it like building a proper highway

17:12between two cities that only had rough dirt roads before. The first step is the secure on-ramp,

17:17not merging straight into DeFi's sometimes chaotic traffic.

17:21OK, so what are those big hurdles stopping a direct plug-in today, like the main roadblocks? And what

17:27are the steps or maybe intermediate technologies that could actually build that bridge, even if it's

17:32not full on permissionless DeFi right away? The barriers are pretty significant. First off,

17:36regulation. DeFi is mostly pseudonymous. Anyone can use it. Banks operate under strict,

17:41know your customer, anti-money laundering rules. How do you square that circle of stuff? Second,

17:47security. Let's be honest, DeFi has had its share of hacks, exploits, rug pulls, billions lost. Banks

17:54handle client money. They cannot tolerate that level of risk. Their security standards are incredibly

17:59high. Third, just tech compatibility. Old banking systems weren't built to talk to smart contracts on

18:04public chains without a lot of work, a lot of new secure layers in between. But the bridge is being

18:09built just piece by piece. We're seeing tokenization of real world assets, RWAs, putting things like real

18:15estate, bonds, even art onto a blockchain as digital tokens. That makes them easier to trade,

18:19easier to own fractions of, all within a regulated setup. Regulatory sandboxes are another thing.

18:24Banks experimenting with this tech under supervision with specific oil waivers. Down the line, maybe we

18:29see hybrid models, regulated players offering access to a curated list of vetted DeFi protocols,

18:34or private bank blockchains finding secure ways to interact with public ones through specific

18:39bridges. It's an evolution, you know, driven by practical needs and regulatory green lights, not a sudden

18:44revolution. That lays out a much clearer path forward. Okay. Stepping back again, looking at

18:49the big picture trend. All of this U.S. Bancorp's return, more institutions getting involved, building

18:54these careful bridges. What does it mean for how we even perceive crypto? Is it still as rebellious

19:00outsider money or is it becoming something else? I think this signaled a really profound shift.

19:04Crypto is moving from being seen as outsider money, you know, a friend asset, mostly for speculation,

19:10towards becoming an integral, almost foundational part of the core financial infrastructure. It's

19:15moving past just speculation and showing real practical utility inside the established system.

19:21For years, TradFi has run on old rails, right? Swift, ACH, clearing houses, often slow, sometimes

19:27costly. Now, digital assets and blockchain are showing they can complement that, make it better,

19:31sometimes even replace parts of it, offering potential gains in speed, cost, transparency. It feels like a

19:37re-architecting is starting, not just adding a new asset class. What does it mean for something to

19:42become core financial infrastructure? How did that change the story, change the narrative around crypto

19:48for policymakers, for the public, getting away from that outsider view? Core financial infrastructure.

19:53That's the fundamental plumbing, right? The systems, the networks, the rules that let money and assets

19:59flow through the economy. It's the invisible stuff that makes everything work. When Bitcoin or blockchain

20:04tech more broadly starts integrating at that level, it's not just about trading anymore. It's about

20:09potentially making those pipes work better, faster, cheaper, more transparent, maybe more resilient.

20:15For policymakers, that changes the conversation dramatically. It shifts from how do we control

20:20this risky new thing to how can we use this technology to improve our financial system, lower costs

20:25for people and businesses, encourage responsible innovation. For the public, it reinforces the idea that

20:31this isn't just a fad or only for speculation or illicit use. It's becoming a legitimate,

20:36probably enduring part of the future economy. It moves from something you maybe gamble on to

20:40something that could eventually underpin how you get paid, how you invest, even how property is recorded.

20:46Okay. To really get the full picture here, it helps to look at some specific examples, some

20:50case studies from the industry. These aren't isolated. They're all part of this bigger story.

20:55Fidelity, for instance. They were one of the first big tradfine aims to really step into crypto,

21:00weren't they? Oh, absolutely. Fidelity Digital Assets, FDAS. They were pioneers launching way back

21:06in 2018 with Bitcoin custody for institutions. That was a huge early signal, a really respected

21:13financial giant saying, okay, we're taking this seriously as an asset class for our institutional

21:17clients. And they didn't rush it. They spent years researching building the specific infrastructure

21:22needed. It wasn't just a side project. What lessons can we take from what Fidelity did back then? How

21:27did they manage that early regulatory uncertainty when almost everyone else was staying away?

21:32Fidelity's move was really a textbook case in strategic patients talking to regulators and just

21:38building for the long haul. Like I said, they didn't just jump in. Years of research,

21:43building purpose-built systems for custody and trading. They understood institutions needed

21:48institutional grade everything. Security, compliance, reporting, which the early crypto market

21:53didn't really offer the big lesson. Institutions can enter uncertain markets if they absolutely nail

21:59the compliance, build fortress-like security, and constantly talk to clients and regulators

22:04educating them. They proved there was real, if initially cautious, demand from institutions that

22:09needed a trusted, regulated partner. Their careful success definitely encouraged others to start

22:14looking seriously at the space. Taved the way, really.

22:17Then came BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF approval. That felt like an earthquake, didn't it? Just massive news.

22:22Monumental is the right word. Yeah, BlackRock getting its spot Bitcoin ETF approved.

22:28That just blew the doors open for mainstream access, both institutional and retail. Suddenly,

22:33investors could get Bitcoin exposure through something they already understood and trusted in ETF.

22:38As easy as buying Apple stock right in their normal brokerage account, it wasn't just another product.

22:43It was this huge legitimizing event for Bitcoin as a mature, investable asset. And the inflows we saw

22:50right after just showed how much pent-up demand was waiting for that familiar, regulated wrapper.

22:54How does the impact of an ETF like BlackRock's compared to the direct custody services like

23:00U.S. Bancorp is offering now? Who benefits more from each? What's the strategic difference there?

23:04They really serve different, though complementary, parts of the market.

23:08And ETF, like BlackRock's IBIT, is mostly for investors who want price exposure to Bitcoin

23:14without the hassle. So wealth managers, advising clients, maybe smaller institutions, and definitely

23:19retail investors who don't want to deal with private keys, wallets, all the crypto tech stuff.

23:24The ETF handles buying, selling, storing the Bitcoin securely. It's passive exposure in a familiar

23:30package. Direct custody, like from U.S. Bancorp, is more for those who want actual ownership of the Bitcoin

23:36itself. Think larger institutions, high net worth folks, maybe corporate treasuries who want the

23:41asset directly on their balance sheet for strategic reasons. Long-term holding, maybe future use in

23:46lending or other strategies within a regulated bank environment. So ETFs bring broad access and

23:52massive passive capital. Direct custody offers more control and flexibility for those wanting to

23:57hold the underlying asset within their bank. Both are super important for integrating Bitcoin deeper into

24:02finance. And JP Morgan hasn't just been watching. They've been actively building their own blockchain

24:07tech for a while now. Exactly. JP Morgan's Onyx platform is proof positive that big banks aren't

24:13just adopting crypto. They're innovating with the underlying blockchain technology, often behind the

24:18scenes for things like interbank payments or tokenizing assets. Onyx isn't about letting retail buy

24:23Bitcoin. It's an enterprise-grade blockchain designed to rewire TradFi's plumbing, particularly for wholesale

24:29payments and digital assets. Think JPM coin, their dollar-peg stablecoin for institutions or using

24:35it to tokenize securities, make interbank transfers instant. It's strategic, leveraging blockchain's

24:40efficiency, but in a controlled, permissioned way. How is a private permission blockchain like Onyx

24:46fundamentally different from public ones like Bitcoin or Ethereum? What problem is it trying to

24:50solve specifically for TradFi? It's a night and day difference, really. Public blockchains, Bitcoin,

24:56Ethereum. They're open, decentralized. Anyone can join. Their goal is censorship resistance, global

25:02access, transparency, community control. Onyx is private, permissioned. Access is tightly controlled

25:09by JP Morgan and its approved partners. The intent is totally different. It's about taking blockchain's

25:14benefits like instant settlement, efficiency, less counterparty risk, and applying them to existing

25:20large-scale financial processes. Interbank payments, cross-border wholesale stuff, tokenizing assets

25:26within the regulated system. So the impact is mainly on back-end efficiency, cutting costs for big

25:31institutions, making multi-day settlements happen in near real-time, streamlining operations, maybe

25:36freeing up collateral faster. Bitcoin's impact is the new monetary system. Ethereum's is a decentralized

25:42app platform. Onyx is TradFi, using the tech of blockchain, but keeping centralized control

25:47and focusing on making existing wholesale finance better, faster, cheaper. Optimizing the current

25:51engine, not replacing the whole car. And it's not just banks. Web2 companies

25:55are jumping in too. PayPal launching their PYUSD stablecoin definitely made waves. Huge user base

26:00there. Oh, absolutely. PayPal's PYUSD stablecoin, which they did with Paxos, that really showed how the

26:07big fintech players from Web2 are moving into crypto services aggressively. And that puts serious

26:13pressure on traditional banks. PayPal has, what, hundreds of millions of users? Offering a stablecoin

26:18brings crypto utility directly into everyday payments for a massive audience that isn't

26:22necessarily crypto-native. It's less about speculation, more about practical use, easy payments, maybe

26:27cheaper remittances. Basically, a digital dollar moving fast and cheap. What role do stablecoins

26:32like PYUSD play in bridging TradFi and crypto, especially for payments? And how does a giant like PayPal

26:38getting involved change the game for traditional banks? Stablecoins are a critical bridge, maybe

26:44the most immediate one, because they offer the stability of fiat, like the dollar, but with the

26:49speed and programmability of blockchain. They're designed to hold their value backed by reserves,

26:54so they're great for payments, sending money internationally, even just holding value during

26:58market dips without Bitcoin's volatility. PayPal launching PYUSD. It's a huge signal to banks. It says,

27:05Look, mainstream users want efficient digital dollar transactions, and they're comfortable

27:09using these products from brands they trust for everyday stuff. That puts huge pressure on banks.

27:14They need to innovate in payments or risk losing ground, especially in cross-border transfers

27:19to these nimble fintechs. Banks have to think seriously. Do we launch our own stablecoin?

27:24Integrate existing regulated ones? Use blockchain to improve our payment rails. If they don't adapt,

27:28companies like PayPal will just step in and eat their lunch, potentially cutting banks out of core

27:33payment flows. Then there's the really extreme example. Shows how far this could potentially go,

27:38even if it's way out there compared to what US banks are doing.

27:41Right. You have to mention El Salvador. Yeah. Making Bitcoin legal tender,

27:44integrating it into their banking system alongside the US dollar. It's totally unprecedented,

27:50an extreme case of crypto bank integration at the national level. Offers a fascinating,

27:55though very high risk, look at one possible future. But the context, the risk profile,

28:00completely different from a US bank's careful steps, it was a bold, top-down government move.

28:05Even if it is an extreme case for US banks, what can we learn from El Salvador's experiment?

28:10Positives? Negatives? What are the takeaways when a whole country tries this?

28:14El Salvador offers tons of lessons, both good and bad. On the positive side, it really highlighted

28:19the potential for financial inclusion. It gave many unbanked people access to digital payments

28:24through the government's Chivo wallet. It showed Bitcoin's potential for remittances,

28:29possibly cutting costs for people sending money home, which is huge for their economy.

28:33It also forced local banks to innovate, to figure out how to integrate Bitcoin.

28:38But the negatives are really stark and relevant. Bitcoin's volatility, that's a massive challenge

28:43for a national currency. Created economic uncertainty, a lot of public doubt. The rollout

28:48was very fast, top-down, led to tech problems with the wallet, adoption wasn't maybe as high as hoped,

28:54and major international bodies like the IMF raised serious concerns about stability and

28:58illicit finance risks. For US banks, the lesson isn't make Bitcoin legal tender. It's understanding

29:04the huge societal and infrastructure changes involved. It shows the massive need for public

29:08education, rock-solid infrastructure, and really carefully designed regulations that manage risk

29:14while still allowing innovation. It's a cautionary tale, too, about trying to do too much, too fast,

29:19without broad support and meticulous planning. The tech has potential, sure, but integrating

29:24it nationally is incredibly complex, even dangerous if not done right.

29:28Okay, let's shift gears slightly. If we wanted to actually track this trend,

29:32this evolution of banks and crypto beyond just reading headlines, what data should we be looking

29:36at? How do we measure the real impact? Thinking like analysts now.

29:39That's a great question, and it helps you, listening, think critically about how to see these changes in

29:44the numbers. There are several key things we'd want to watch closely. First, a bank adoption timeline.

29:49Just mapping out which US banks, big ones, regional ones, have started offering crypto services,

29:54maybe stopped, started again since around 2020. That visualizes the trend, the institutional interest,

30:00how comfortable they feel with the regulations. Are more banks steadily coming in? That's a key

30:04indicator. Second, Bitcoin price versus institutional inflows. We need to correlate BTC price moves with

30:11known institutional buying. We can get data from custody providers, company filings, ETF flows.

30:16Does bank adoption actually lead to sustained price increases? Or is it more about steady accumulation

30:21that maybe dampens volatility? Are inflows leading or lagging price? Help separate hype from

30:27real demand. Third, compare ETF inflows versus direct banking custody. This tells us how institutions

30:32prefer to get exposure. Are they mostly using the easy passive ETF route or are more opting for direct

30:37custody through banks suggesting they want direct ownership for more strategic reasons? Shows different

30:41investor preferences. Fourth, liquidity heat maps on exchanges. These charts can show if new players

30:47like US Bancorp are actually deepening the market, tightening those bid ask spreads. Are larger orders

30:52getting filled more easily without moving the price much? That's a direct measure of market health and

30:57efficiency. And finally, on-chain adoption metrics. Looking at the blockchain data itself, are active

31:04Bitcoin wallets increasing? Is transaction volume going up? Are transactions getting larger? If we see

31:09these metrics rise alongside bank adoption, it suggests broader user growth and network health

31:14beyond just institutional holding. Are people actually using it more? Okay. Each of those metrics

31:18tells a distinct part of the story, gives us a much fuller picture, almost 3D. Why are these specific

31:24ones so important? What does each tell us about Bitcoin really maturing and integrating into the financial

31:28system? Right. Each gives a unique lens, the bank adoption timeline. That tells us about institutional

31:33acceptance and the regulatory vibe. It's the big picture view of TradFi's stance. Are they warming

31:38up or getting cold heat? Price versus institutional inflows helps us understand the market impact of

31:43this new money. Is it sustainable, institutionally driven price support or just speculative froth?

31:49Crucial distinction. ETF versus bank custody reveals investor strategy and sophistication. ETFs mean passive

31:56exposure is popular. Growing bank custody suggests deeper integration, direct ownership becoming more

32:01important for strategic plays. Liquidity heat maps measure market efficiency and resilience.

32:06Better liquidity means a healthier market for everyone, lower trading costs, more stability,

32:11a tangible sign the market's maturing. And on-chain metrics give us a peek into actual usage and network

32:16growth. Institutional buying is one thing, but are more people actually using Bitcoin? That validates

32:21its utility beyond just being digital gold and signals organic growth. Put them all together and you get a

32:26really dynamic, holistic view of Bitcoin's journey into the financial mainstream. This has been absolutely

32:31fascinating. A real deep dive into U.S. Bancorp getting back into Bitcoin. We've covered how it signals

32:37that shift in regulatory comfort brings validation, maybe unlocks huge amounts of TradFi capital. We looked

32:44at the ripples for retail institutions, traders, how it ramps up bank competition and how bridges to Web3 are

32:50being built carefully. Yeah. And the big takeaway really is that crypto is moving rapidly from the edges towards

32:55the core of finance. TradFi institutions aren't just watching anymore. They're actively engaging, innovating,

33:00integrating. It's a fundamental shift that's going to reshape finance over the coming years. Moving from just an idea to a

33:07strategic necessity for these players. And hey, before we wrap up today, if you found this deep dive useful, if it gave you

33:13some insights, we'd really appreciate it if you could, you know, hit subscribe, maybe leave a comment with your thoughts below,

33:18share it if you think others would find it interesting. Your engagement, it genuinely helps us out. Boost us in the algorithm,

33:24lets us keep making this kind of content for you. So we've explored all these implications of banks

33:28like U.S. Bancorp re-engaging with Bitcoin. And that leaves us with a pretty big question,

33:33something for you to think about after this deep dive. As Bitcoin gets more integrated into the

33:37mainstream system, adopting its security standards, its regulatory frameworks, does it still keep that

33:44original spirit, you know, the decentralized, outsider currency meant to bypass the banks? Or is it

33:50inevitably changing into something, well, something different? A new kind of digital asset may be

33:56increasingly influenced by the very institutions it aimed to disrupt? Definitely something to ponder as

34:02this whole evolution continues.

34:14I think that's important.

34:22I think that it's important for you to take a long time.

34:26Yeah.

34:28So to speak,

34:31I think that's going to be a great thing.

34:33I think that's the very important part of the world.

34:35So I think that's kind of the same thing.

34:37And I think that you're going to be a really important part of the world in the world.

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended