Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 months ago
India fears a planned Chinese mega dam in Tibet will reduce water flows on a major river by up to 85 percent during the dry season, according to four sources familiar with the matter and a government analysis seen by Reuters, prompting New Delhi to fast-track plans for its own dam to mitigate the effects. FRANCE 24 speaks to Rana Mitter, ST Lee Chair in US-Asia Relations at the Harvard Kennedy School. He says the main driver behind China's push to build mega dams is power-hungry technologies like AI.

Visit our website:
http://www.france24.com

Like us on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24.English

Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/France24_en

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00This is Apropos. Critics in New Delhi describe the project as an existential threat.
00:08China is building the world's largest dam on a river that runs through Tibet and India,
00:14prompting concerns about the effects the megastructure could have on downstream states.
00:19The project has prompted the Indian government to fast-track plans for its own dam to mitigate the effects.
00:25Monte Francis has the details.
00:26This is currently the largest hydropower plant in the world in central China,
00:33but Beijing is building another that, when finished, would be three times as powerful as the current record holder.
00:39The construction site for the Motto hydropower station is located along the Yarlang-Cangpo River in Tibet,
00:46which China annexed in 1951.
00:49India, worried that China will weaponize its control of the river,
00:52has planned to build a dam of its own in the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh.
00:56But when workers from India's largest hydropower company move survey equipment in at the construction site,
01:03nearby villagers vandalized the machinery and even demolished a nearby bridge.
01:09If the dam is constructed, how will we earn our livelihoods?
01:13So we will not allow the dam to be constructed.
01:16If the dam is built, the soil will be washed away.
01:18We produce our crops on this soil.
01:20The battle over who controls the flow of water from a glacier on the Tibetan Plateau
01:26affects millions of people living downriver in India, China and Bangladesh.
01:32India's fears appear to be founded.
01:34A report by an Australian-based think tank concluded that control over the rivers in the Tibetan Plateau
01:40would effectively give China a chokehold on India's economy.
01:44But villagers who live near the site of the Indian dam say their own country's plans
01:49would effectively destroy their way of life.
01:52If the government forcefully moves forward with this project,
01:56the existence of our community will vanish from the map because the people will be scattered.
02:02There is no plan to relocate the people of this valley.
02:06As for China's massive project, Beijing denies there would be a negative impact for those downstream,
02:13saying it expects to start generating energy from the dam by the early to mid-2030s.
02:19For more on What's at Stake, we're joined by Rana Mitter,
02:22S.T. Lee Chair in U.S.-Asia Relations at the Harvard Kennedy School.
02:27Rana, thanks so much for being with us this evening.
02:30As we heard in Monty's report, China saying there's nothing to worry about here,
02:34but both India and Bangladesh have voiced concerns about this project.
02:39Are those concerns warranted in your view?
02:43How will these countries be affected?
02:46Sharon, yes, there are genuine reasons for concern.
02:50Although China has tried to make the case that there's really nothing to worry about here,
02:55in practice, many analysts and many politicians for decades have been wondering
02:59whether one of the major possible causes of a conflict in the Himalayan region
03:04might be actually what some people call a water war.
03:07In other words, access to big rivers like the ones we've been talking about here,
03:11not just in terms of the actual water flow, but the use of them for hydroelectric power.
03:17The fact is that India and China are geopolitical rivals.
03:20They have moved a little closer to each other in recent weeks and months,
03:24partly because they both have issues with the current US administration.
03:29But the basic bottom line here is that control of the river further up the source,
03:35which enables China to use the hydroelectric power,
03:39may well cut off India's ability to do that.
03:41And that suggests that there is a sort of zero-sum potential conflict,
03:46not necessarily military, but certainly political, coming up between the two.
03:50And would that explain then what China's motive is here?
03:53Is it effectively weaponising water, as some are claiming in India?
04:00I don't think that's the primary purpose.
04:03I think the primary purpose actually is really quite simple.
04:05China needs huger and huger amounts of energy.
04:09To take one issue that's been hugely in the news recently,
04:13but people don't always associate with water, AI, artificial intelligence.
04:17It's well known that outside the United States,
04:19China is probably the leading global provider when it comes to AI.
04:25But to make AI work, you need massive data farms,
04:27which need massive amounts of electricity to go into them.
04:30And China is still a very energy-hungry country.
04:33As it becomes one of the world's major tech providers,
04:35it needs lots more energy.
04:37And huge mega-dam projects like this providing hydropower are green.
04:41They don't provide fossil fuel pollution,
04:44and therefore they don't contribute to climate change in the same sort of way.
04:47So that's good.
04:48But also the huge demands they make mean that China is likely to prioritise
04:52essentially getting maximum power out of the dam
04:55and deprioritise good relations with the neighbour.
04:58So no, I don't think the primary purpose is to weaponise the river,
05:01but that may be the secondary effect of this immense hunger for power and electricity.
05:07And locals as well concerned about India potentially constructing a mega-dam of its own.
05:12But how exactly can it go about mitigating against what might happen here
05:17if it doesn't go ahead and build that down?
05:19I think that it's going to be very tough indeed,
05:23because India is also immensely energy-hungry
05:26and also desperately needs to reduce the amount of fossil fuel emissions
05:31that are engendering climate change in India,
05:34as they are indeed in China.
05:37One of the possibilities, but again, geopolitically,
05:39it's very, very tricky,
05:40is to come to a better agreement with Pakistan,
05:43its neighbour with which actually since the 1960s,
05:45it's had an agreement over the waters on the Indus River.
05:49The problem with that is that, as is very well known,
05:52India and Pakistan have perhaps an even worse relationship in military terms
05:56than India and China.
05:57In fact, they nearly came to war.
05:59They came to a small but potentially very dangerous conflict earlier this year.
06:05Without that, I suppose it's really incumbent on India to decide
06:08if it wants to go big on nuclear power.
06:10That's the other non-fossil fuel-based pathway, aside from hydro.
06:16But the problem with that is that you can't just whip up
06:18a nuclear power station overnight.
06:20It takes time.
06:21There are issues with earthquake zones.
06:23None of these, frankly, is a very easy solution
06:26to this real problem for India.
06:28And is there a risk, realistically,
06:30that China might move to exploit these rivers
06:33so that it can have more control, so to speak,
06:36over the Indian economy?
06:37You've referred to the economy a little earlier.
06:40I think there's a risk that China would think about using that possibility.
06:46I don't think it's their primary purpose.
06:48But if you think about the way in which, overall,
06:50China has really moved towards making much more use of its control
06:53over water, maritime issues in general,
06:57South China Sea, the Taiwan Straits,
06:59these days China has tremendous capacity in naval power.
07:03Obviously, naval power isn't so usable on rivers.
07:05But the idea that you might use water as a means to essentially conduct
07:09very robust and sometimes, frankly, confrontational diplomacy,
07:13that's not outside the realm of possibility.
07:17Essentially, though, having said that,
07:19there is one factor in the last few weeks that may push in the other direction.
07:23China has seen that India, having become at least a partner,
07:27if not a full ally of the United States,
07:29is now really not happy with the Trump administration.
07:33It feels that the Trump administration has put heavy tariffs on India
07:36and that India essentially has not been given the kind of bargain
07:39it was expecting in terms of being a good security partner
07:43for the United States.
07:44In that context, it does look likely that the India-China dialogue,
07:49which was really quite frozen for a while,
07:51might begin to revive.
07:52I think recently the foreign ministers of both countries
07:54did, in fact, meet each other.
07:56If China wants to create that medium-term warmth with India,
08:00it will know that basically building an immense dam
08:03that might actually hem in India's energy choices
08:07would be a very confrontational gesture to make.
08:09So that kind of diplomacy might just push China
08:11in a different direction.
08:13Yeah, because how might that relationship be affected long-term
08:16by such a massive project?
08:18If this project goes ahead and if China gets that control,
08:24don't forget, not just on the waters into India,
08:26but also into Bangladesh and other parts,
08:29potentially, of the region beyond,
08:32then it will give China a tremendous amount of power,
08:34but it also creates a vulnerability,
08:36because every time that something is done
08:37that goes against the interests of India or Bangladesh,
08:40it will create a diplomatic crisis.
08:42And there's a question about how many diplomatic crises
08:45China actually wants to navigate at any one time,
08:47simply saying nothing to see here
08:49is probably not going to be enough.
08:51In the longer term, India and China
08:54have two of the biggest economies in Asia,
08:56let alone the world,
08:58and it seems unlikely that either one
09:00is simply going to cut the other one off.
09:02So there are negotiations here
09:03that are potentially doable around
09:05a combination of security, energy, environment, and trade,
09:10but they'll involve both sides
09:11having to have much deeper, much franker,
09:13much more complex conversations
09:15than either has had, really since the 1960s,
09:17when a massive war between India and China in 1962
09:20really broke off relations between the two
09:23for a long time in the modern sense.
09:25So it demands some pretty,
09:27how will it be, subtle diplomacy,
09:30which neither side yet has shown a very good sign
09:32of being able to do,
09:33but this may be the moment at which that has to change.
09:36And Rana, how, finally then,
09:37would you rate the possibility of,
09:40you know, all of this prompting
09:41some kind of wider regional conflict?
09:45Sharon, I don't think regional conflicts
09:47in the end are the most likely outcome
09:49because in the end,
09:50the economic growth that all of these countries,
09:53India, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh,
09:55desperately want,
09:56is in some sense dependent
09:57on there not being huge conflicts in the region.
09:59But the fact is that China
10:00is the most powerful actor in the region,
10:03and therefore it has the responsibility
10:04to make sure that its actions
10:06are negotiated diplomatically
10:08and in business terms
10:09and not simply imposed on the region.
10:12The ability to do that
10:13would show that China
10:14actually has diplomatic subtlety.
10:16Right now, that's a challenge
10:16that lots of its neighbours
10:17really are throwing at it,
10:19and it's not clear yet
10:20whether it's able to respond
10:21in a way that doesn't just satisfy
10:23the domestic Chinese audience,
10:24but also the regional Asian audience,
10:26which China says that it wants to do so much
10:29to try and woo and bring onto its side.
10:33Rana, thank you so much
10:33for that very enlightening analysis.
10:35We do appreciate your time on the programme.
10:37That's Rana Mitter,
10:39ST Lead Chair in US-Asia Relations
10:41at the Harvard Kennedy School.
10:44Well, that's it from us.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended