Go behind the scenes of the biggest legal showdowns involving payment giants like PayPal, Stripe, Razorpay, and more. In this video, we explore the lawsuits, government regulations, compliance issues, and high-stakes controversies shaping the future of fintech and digital payments.
00:03We've got this stack of source documents, you know, legal filings that really pull back the curtain on some pretty intense business disputes.
00:12Yeah, it's quite something.
00:13We're talking aggressive language, internal criticisms of products, even like surprising chats about stock trading.
00:21All found in court records.
00:22So this deep dive, it's drawing from documents in cases like Card Connect versus Shift 4 payments.
00:27We've got stuff from Pennsylvania, Nevada, Delaware Court of Chancery, too.
00:32Right, and our mission really is to guide you, the listener, through these exhibits, emails, texts, bits of depositions, policies, and pull out the key nuggets.
00:41Exactly, give you a shortcut to understanding the, well, the fascinating and sometimes kind of wild details that surface in these legal fights.
00:49So let's start with that raw emotion.
00:51There's some really confrontational language in here.
00:52An April 2018 email, for instance, it just lays it out there, words like bullshit, going to blow up in your face, even fuck me over.
01:01Wow, and threats, too, like get even.
01:03Yeah, and mentions of bringing in, I think it was 20 attorneys and talk of hundreds of millions.
01:08The sources noted this could definitely be seen as, well, intimidation.
01:12Heavy stuff.
01:13Yeah.
01:13And it wasn't just emails, right?
01:14You mentioned texts.
01:16That's right.
01:16Back in November 2016, there are texts about an earn out, you know, that extra payment based on performance.
01:22Yeah.
01:23One side felt completely screwed by how it was structured.
01:26There was a dispute about a 40, 50 millimeter minimum guarantee, big money, big feelings.
01:33And that frustration carried on.
01:34I remember seeing something about the Card Connect acquisition by FeeServe.
01:38Oh, yeah.
01:38A June 2020 email really details the headaches after that acquisition, specific operational nightmares.
01:44Like what?
01:45Okay, so a $600K recurring revenue error an executive had to catch themselves.
01:51A merchant priced wrong like a 7% effective rate, super high, took over a month to fix, and zero compensation offered.
01:57Ouch.
01:58Just basic stuff breaking down.
01:59Exactly.
02:00And getting support.
02:01Forget it.
02:01Years of trouble with U.S. government accounts, apparently.
02:04One exec was literally cold calling random numbers trying to find anyone to help.
02:08That's unbelievable.
02:09And get this.
02:10The email claims Shift 4 ended up paying more in monthly fees to FeeServe after the deal than Card Connect's entire SG&A cost before the deal.
02:19Whoa.
02:20The whole overhead.
02:22That really paints a picture, doesn't it?
02:23It really does.
02:24But, you know, alongside these external battles, you also get glimpses inside.
02:28Planning documents for things like a POS marketplace, initially free, apparently, and updates to webpages like SkyTab.
02:36So, forward-looking stuff, too.
02:38Mm-hmm.
02:38But not all positive internally.
02:40I think I saw a mention of a garbage product.
02:42Yeah, that popped up in texts and emails.
02:45Seems like some internal, pretty candid criticism about certain products.
02:49Specifically mentioning Harbor Touch in relation to that.
02:52Interesting.
02:53Real talk behind the scenes.
02:54What about that undercover agent thing?
02:56That sounded unusual.
02:57Ah, right.
02:58That was from a deposition.
02:59An executive said they forwarded an email not realizing the sender was this person alleged to be an undercover agent.
03:06Alleged, okay.
03:07Yeah.
03:07The lawyer objected to calling them that in the deposition, but the executive's perception that they thought that, it's now in the court record.
03:13A strange detail.
03:14Definitely strange.
03:15Okay, shifting from perceptions to, like, hard numbers, were there specifics?
03:20Yep.
03:20An August 2017 email chain mentioned CCN volume for July, card connect volume.
03:26It broke down over $3.2 billion in transactions.
03:36Gives you a real sense of the scale we're talking about.
03:38Okay, so huge scale, big emotions.
03:41Now, what about the stock trading stuff?
03:44That seemed like a whole other dimension.
03:46It really was.
03:46Texts from late 2017 discussing the 4UR ticker, that's shift4payments, talking acquisitions, earnings, share buybacks.
03:54And someone asked about the legality of trading on that.
03:56Explicitly.
03:57Asking if it was okay, basically.
03:59And the response came back, crystal clear.
04:00I'm not an insider.
04:02Shows awareness of the rules right there in the text.
04:04So they knew the lines.
04:05But then there were those stock twits posts.
04:07Uh-huh.
04:07Exhibits show Jaisakman posts on stock twits in November 2017, actively boosting 5UR stock, agreeing with positive comments, talking up performance, new POS, restaurant clients.
04:18And saying things like, damn.
04:19Things like, next stop, $75, going to kill it.
04:22Keep buying.
04:23Lots more upside.
04:24Pretty enthusiastic promotion.
04:26Okay, so you have the informal stock talk, the public boosting.
04:29What about the formal side, the company policies?
04:31They're in there, too.
04:32An email discussing the actual 4UR insider trading policy, noting updates to definitions like insider and the restricted trading periods.
04:41Another email asked specifically if a trading window was open for a 10B51 plan.
04:45That's a pre-scheduled trading plan, right, to avoid insider issues.
04:48Exactly.
04:49So the formal mechanisms were being discussed.
04:51But then things seemed to have gotten urgent.
04:53How so?
04:54March 2020 texts.
04:56Direct instructions.
04:58Start a quiet period.
04:59A restricted trading period, like now, the reason given, changes at hand, and 13D news.
05:06A 13D filing.
05:07That's usually significant ownership news, potentially market moving.
05:11Right.
05:11And the instruction was blunt, lock people down, and even more specifically, let's lock her up, too.
05:16Lock her up, too.
05:17Wow.
05:18That led to actual policy changes.
05:20It led straight to a formal memo.
05:22Prohibiting trading, prohibiting external communication for certain people, explicitly to avoid significant liability under securities laws.
05:31You see the direct line from urgent text to formal lockdown.
05:35And just to be clear, that phrase, lock her up, with the exclamation points, that also appeared elsewhere.
05:41Yes, it did.
05:41It showed up in a text message exhibit from a different but related case document.
05:46The source material notes, it was in the context of a personal conversation connected to demanding every single share.
05:52We're just reporting its presence as documented in the filings.
05:55Got it.
05:56So quite a journey through these documents.
05:58We've seen the sheer intensity of these disputes, the gritty details of acquisition fallout, candid internal talk, hard numbers, and then this whole layer of stock discussion, policy, and, well, urgent action.
06:12Yeah.
06:13All out there in the public record.
06:14Yeah, it really makes you think, doesn't it?
06:15You have the formal corporate rules, insider trading policies, quiet periods, all that structure.
06:19And then you see the informal reality revealed in these private messages, the high stakes, the emotion, the quick directives.
06:27What happens when those two worlds collide, especially when the private stuff becomes public court evidence?
06:33That is definitely something for you, our listeners, to chew on.
06:36How does it all fit together when you peel back the layers?
Be the first to comment