Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 6/9/2025
At a House Education Committee hearing, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) questioned Education Secretary Linda McMahon.
Transcript
00:00Thank you. I recognize the gentlelady from New York, Ms. Stefanik.
00:04Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Secretary McMahon, thank you for being here today.
00:08I want to follow up on my colleague across the aisles, back and forth,
00:12where you didn't have an opportunity to answer the question. As you know, I've been very engaged
00:16in leading this effort in terms of holding Harvard accountable.
00:20We saw the scourge of anti-Semitism
00:24after the Hamas attacks on October 7th, and Harvard failed
00:28in every respect to enforce the rules to protect Jewish students.
00:32And over the course of our investigation, it was revealed
00:36that there was anti-Semitism deep in the office of DEI
00:40at Harvard for their failure to respond to Jewish students, and it highlighted
00:44this issue of a failure of ideological diversity. I wanted to add
00:48some more details to what you pointed out. Less than 3% of the Harvard faculty
00:52are conservative, and this is a challenge in education
00:56writ large. According to the Harvard Crimson, as of 1989
01:00the ratio was 2 to 1,
01:02liberal to conservative.
01:04By 2017, it was 5 to 1,
01:06and then as of
01:082023, it's 26
01:10to 1. So when we talk
01:12about ideological diversity, it is
01:14a crisis at Harvard. Can you further elaborate
01:16on that? Well, just agreeing
01:18with what you said. I mean,
01:20when, by their own statistics,
01:22it is clear that they don't have
01:24diversity of viewpoint. And I
01:26believe, and as I mentioned a little bit earlier,
01:28the fact that Harvard had already
01:30replaced its head, or
01:32looking to replace
01:34its head of
01:36Middle East Studies, recognizing
01:38that they already had an issue,
01:40I think it's
01:42indicative that Harvard, even
01:44before we were
01:46initiating our talk,
01:48well, I actually think that we spurred
01:50them on. Absolutely. When we
01:52started putting teeth in what we were doing,
01:54they finally said, okay, we're going to make
01:56some changes, and they did do that
01:58shortly after we started our investigation.
02:00And you're spot on, Secretary
02:02McMahon. Harvard has failed to
02:04save itself. They are responding
02:06to the exceptional work of this committee,
02:08and the accountability measures that this
02:10administration has put into place.
02:12I want to thank you for your strong leadership.
02:14I want to thank President Trump for his
02:16strong leadership. I care deeply about
02:18this as an alumna of Harvard,
02:20and as the first member of my immediate family to
02:22have that opportunity. We want to make sure
02:24these institutions are excellent for generations
02:26to come. My follow-up,
02:28which is on a different subject,
02:30this has come up in virtually every
02:32meeting that I've had, whether it's with
02:34university presidents, professors, or
02:36students, is the challenge
02:38of AI,
02:40and academic integrity in the
02:42classroom. Can you talk about the
02:44department's approach in terms of how to
02:46harness the benefits of this technology,
02:48but also make sure that we are
02:50learning the basics in the classroom,
02:52and have academic integrity?
02:54You know, I think AI
02:56is probably one of the...
03:00It's so overwhelming
03:02with the abilities that it can bring, but it
03:04also has a downside and dangers.
03:06We want to make sure that AI is not,
03:08you know, leading to
03:10false
03:12essays or papers or studies
03:14that students are turning in.
03:16However, when I've looked at K-12 education
03:18and I've seen some of the tutorial
03:20benefits for individual studies
03:22through AI, I think it brings
03:24so much to the table that we can
03:26offer students who are
03:28accomplishing more in the classroom
03:30or who aren't accomplishing
03:32as much by that one-on-one
03:34tutorial advantage. So I think we
03:36need to harness and capture those
03:38opportunities from AI, but at the same
03:40time, making sure we understand,
03:42and I don't think we
03:44even have this much
03:46of a handle on it yet, of what
03:48some of the dangers of AI
03:50can be. And I think that that's what's
03:52incumbent upon us to look across the board
03:54at all of that. Well, thank you for that.
03:56And my last question, and this is
03:58primarily for K-12,
04:00and I think about this both as a policy
04:02here, but as a mom, as my young
04:04three-year-old who is finishing pre-K
04:06three, but screen time
04:08for our kids and the dangers
04:10of huge amounts of screen
04:12time. I want to credit my colleague, Kevin
04:14Kiley, who's host a hearing on this
04:16next week. Can you discuss the
04:18administration and the department's
04:20approach to tackling this very
04:22concerning issue that has had huge
04:24impacts on the mental health, but also
04:26the focus of our kids? Well,
04:28I do think this is really
04:30at state level. Yes.
04:32And there are governors who are
04:34you know, promoting policies or
04:36superintendents who are put in policies
04:38in their local areas that say, you know,
04:40bell to bell, in schools
04:42no devices.
04:44So that students aren't distracted, you know, from
04:46what they're doing. I think parents at home need
04:48to look at the amount of screen time that they're
04:50their children. This is a great
04:52deal of parental responsibility as well.
04:54And we, you know,
04:56we've looked at different aspects.
04:58I've seen reports of
05:00more and more screen time, which then
05:02reduces your ability to
05:04focus and have attention for your subject.
05:06So while there is an entertainment value,
05:08an information value to screen time,
05:10it's not always
05:12I think less could be more.
05:14Thank you so much, Secretary McMahan
05:16for your service, for the tremendous work you're doing
05:18for students across the country. Yield back.
05:20Thank you. I thank the

Recommended