Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 7 months ago
During a House Oversight Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Gary Palmer (R-AL) questioned witnesses about wasteful spending within the Department of Defense.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Now move to the distinguished gentleman, the young chairman from Alabama, Mr. Palmer.
00:05You're recognized, sir.
00:07Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:08I'm going to direct my questions a little bit differently, and I wanted to participate in this hearing
00:14because I've been looking at some of these issues for quite a while.
00:18And I realize this is focused predominantly on fraud risk management.
00:23But one of the things that I think creates an opportunity for fraud and mismanagement is how we handle big projects at the Department of Defense,
00:35whether it's a construction project or a new weapon system.
00:38And I just want to ask each of you to comment on this if you think you're able to do that.
00:47I think a lot of times when Congress approves a major weapons system or a major construction project,
00:57and this is particularly problematic on construction projects overseas,
01:01there's a tendency on the part of the Department of Defense to start those projects before the design is complete,
01:10and it results in a huge amount in change orders.
01:13I'm working on some ideas on how to mitigate that from the congressional side in terms of ensuring that the money will be there
01:22so that they don't feel the pressure to start these construction projects or other projects or weapon systems before the design is ready.
01:31But would you comment on how that, when your design is not complete, you're issuing lots of change orders,
01:38how that opens us up to mismanagement and potential fraud?
01:46Me, sir?
01:47I wouldn't be able to discuss that, but in a different sphere,
01:54I would submit that what you're talking about, large procurements of weapon systems,
01:59they are really hybrids for fraud because of, like you said, the complex nature of the,
02:11and when they come online, and then the other parts come online.
02:15So we do have a lot of worry about large weapon systems,
02:21and we have a lot of fraud work in the past and now in those kinds of things when they're in that phase.
02:29So that's what would be my feedback to you.
02:32Mr. Bagdorian?
02:33Yeah, I would fully agree with Mr. Mayo's comments.
02:37I mean, this is an element of hyper-complexity, basically.
02:41You have a big system.
02:42It has, you know, the prime contractor, I assume, leading the effort,
02:46and then the whole army of subcontractors, which is a key element of risk here.
02:52I'm not a procurement expert by any means,
02:54but I do believe that that element of complexity, uncertainty, long lead times,
02:59all kinds of different things add to heightened risk, definitely.
03:04And when you add to that just a myriad of change orders.
03:09That's right.
03:09Which I think is problematic.
03:14And then when you start talking about construction projects,
03:17and particularly in remote locations,
03:19I think it makes it very difficult for inventory management.
03:26And again, if the design is not complete and you're making all these changes,
03:32isn't that an area where we need to really bear down?
03:35And, Mr. Chairman, I've been given quite a bit of thought to this,
03:39and I've actually been thinking about this for six or eight years,
03:42about how we appropriate for major defense programs,
03:48and maybe thinking about saying that if a program design,
03:54if the project design or the weapon system design is not ready,
03:57that we carry the funding over into the next fiscal year,
04:05so that we give the Department of Defense time to get the design right.
04:10And I think that will reduce a lot of the fraud and mismanagement
04:14and save us a lot of money on that area, in those areas.
04:19And Mr. Mayo, Mr. Bogdoyan, you can comment on that.
04:25And you may have already commented sufficiently.
04:27But that's one of the areas where I really want to focus, Mr. Chairman,
04:30in terms of trying to reduce the amount of waste that we have in our defense procurement programs.
04:37That I'll be happy to yield back.
04:39If I may answer Mr. Palmer's question, Mr. Chairman,
04:43each element of complexity in a program, as I alluded to in my opening remarks,
04:48that's one of the key drivers of fraud risk in federal programs,
04:52is their complex configuration, what someone can do, can't do, and so on.
04:58So it's almost like risk is built in.
05:01And if you add multiple layers in a big, complex program of DOD,
05:06then that really exacerbates risk.
05:11So trying to control for that as part of the upfront due diligence, for example,
05:16would be an important step.
05:19I thank the witnesses.
05:20Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended