Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 7 months ago
At last Thursday's House Appropriations Committee hearing, Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-MD) questioned FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson.
Transcript
00:00Thank you, sir.
00:03The chair now recognizes the gentleman from Maryland, Mr.
00:06Ivey, for five minutes of questions.
00:08Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:10Good morning, Mr. Chairman.
00:12I want to thank you for appearing here today.
00:15I appreciate your opening comments.
00:19I look forward to the report you're going to come back with with respect to PBMs.
00:25I think it's a very important issue.
00:27It's also a very complicated issue.
00:29So adding your insight, your agency's insight, will be especially helpful.
00:35I didn't follow the medical device merger issue in detail,
00:40but I was pleased to see that you were open to enjoining a merger.
00:47Your opening comments, I think, reflect the fact that you're trying to call the balls and strikes,
00:52that you're not trying to be ideological about it.
00:55I appreciate that.
00:56Continuing the ongoing litigation with big tech, I thought was interesting as well.
01:02And I believe you, well, the FTC upheld the junk fees, I'll call it, determination,
01:10which I think is important.
01:11I think it's really one of those things that's tremendously helpful to people across the board.
01:15And I do want to join with my colleague from Washington State on the right to repair issue.
01:21I think that's one that is very important.
01:25You know, business-to-business conflicts, that's one thing.
01:28But, you know, a lot of these scenarios, we have individuals.
01:31You talked about a farmer owning a tractor with respect to John Deere,
01:34and I know that's ongoing, but that's the kind of scenario where I think we really need you to step up
01:40and make sure that people are protected so that they can just take care of basic things
01:46and run their business or take care of their appliances.
01:49McDonald's, I'm not a big McFlurry guy, but, you know, if they get a break along the way, that's fine.
01:55Click to cancel is another one that I think could really be helpful to a lot of people across the board.
02:01I know every time I try and cancel something that frequently one of my kids signed up for,
02:07it takes forever to do it.
02:09You know, you can sign up in a minute, but getting out of it can take half of a lifetime.
02:14So I appreciate anything you can do on that front as well.
02:18I do want to say this.
02:20With respect to the non-compete issue, I think that, and you opened by talking about the importance of workers
02:31and how they're the backbone of the economy and you want to take a pro-worker approach.
02:37The non-compete piece, in my experience when I was practicing,
02:43corporation to corporation, no poaching, that kind of stuff, I get it.
02:46But there's a lot of times where you have workers, individuals who really don't have negotiating capability
02:53with respect to larger corporations, and they want to try and move to do another job
03:00or, you know, find other types of employment, might have some situation where, you know, beyond their control.
03:07And these clauses can really get in the way and hamstring them.
03:10And I think I took a look at your dissent on that issue, and I appreciate your views on it.
03:18I know a lot of that's procedural, and I don't mean to belittle that,
03:24but this is a very important restriction on what regular people can do from an employment standpoint.
03:31And I hope that you'll be able to find a way to address that with respect to people who don't have that kind of power.
03:39They can't hire the big lobbyists, as you mentioned.
03:42And I want to close with this, and I know this is ongoing litigation as well.
03:47The termination of Commissioner Slaughter and Bedoya, as you know, caught a lot of people's attention.
03:54That would include me.
03:56And I know it's still kind of in court, just getting underway.
04:01But one of the things that concerned me about that was, it didn't appear that there were any grounds for the termination.
04:09Now, I note that you issued a statement with respect to it, I think, on the day they were terminated.
04:17And in the statement you issued, you didn't reference the standard for termination, inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.
04:28And, you know, you supported the termination, but not on statutory grounds, not on legal grounds.
04:38And I think that's pretty significant, especially given your background.
04:43I took a look at your 40-page dissents, Supreme Court clerk.
04:47You mentioned being from a state school.
04:49You didn't mention it was UVA, which is a little more than a regular state school.
04:54I appreciate you saying that.
04:56Well, my brother will, too.
04:57But, you know, my larger point, though, is, you know, you didn't hit on the law in the statement that you gave.
05:04You're a defendant in the case, so I know you'll have a chance to explain your position at length.
05:10But I think it's important for us to make sure we understand that independent commissions are supposed to be independent.
05:15The president certainly has the authority to make appointments.
05:19And as you pointed out, he just did.
05:21But there's supposed to be a partisan balance to these.
05:25And those terminations upset that balance from a statutory standpoint.
05:29So you're in the middle of the case.
05:33I want to commend you overall in general for a lot of the positions you've taken.
05:38And I look forward to working with you going forward.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended