Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 5/14/2025
As ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Istanbul confirms its readiness to host direct negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, questions arise over ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Kiev's past performance in peace efforts. With previous talks collapsing and ceasefires repeatedly violated, can this round bring real progress? โš–๏ธ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ

#RussiaUkraine #PeaceTalks #IstanbulNegotiations #UkraineConflict #RussiaUkraineWar #Geopolitics #Ceasefire #Diplomacy #Kiev #Moscow #TurkeyMediation #UkraineNews #RussiaNews #PeaceEfforts #ConflictResolution #UkraineTrackRecord #GlobalPolitics #IstanbulPeace #WarAndPeace #UkraineCrisis
Transcript
00:00now. Russia says it is ready for serious talks on the Ukraine conflict. The Kremlin spokesperson
00:08states that despite the collapse of the 2022 Istanbul agreement, Vladimir Putin is willing
00:14to quote, find a real diplomatic solution to the crisis. The Russian president issued a statement
00:22where he clearly and unambiguously declared our position on resuming direct talks in Istanbul
00:28without any preconditions. These are the very direct negotiations that were disrupted by the
00:34Ukrainian side in 2022. This approach, aimed precisely at finding a real diplomatic solution
00:40to the Ukraine crisis, eliminating the root causes of the conflict and establishing a lasting peace,
00:46has been met with understanding and support from the leaders of many countries, including our
00:51partners from the CIS, BRICS and other nations. The position of US President Donald Trump is also
00:57well known, as he has called on the Ukrainian side to immediately agree to participate in the
01:02meeting we proposed without any conditions. In a telephone conversation yesterday, Turkish President
01:08Recep Tayyip Erdogan confirmed his readiness to do everything possible to arrange the negotiations.
01:14Well, as Moscow considers which delegation members to send to Istanbul, Vladimir Zelenskyy has made an
01:21offer of sorts to take part personally in talks this week. Regarding that, the Russian foreign ministry
01:27spokeswoman recalled the one previous meeting between Zelenskyy and President Putin.
01:33The Paris summit in 2019 was remembered for Zelenskyy's shocking negotiating move, his unexpected refusal to
01:41approve the final document agreed in advance, including by Kiev. In August 2022, Danilov, now the former
01:48Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine admitted that Kiev was not going to do
01:54anything at that time, focusing on powerful preparations for war with Russia. As it turned
02:00out later, Berlin and Paris helped Kiev in preparing for this war. Yeah, not a good precedent. Well, first the
02:08Maidan coup, then the failed Minsk agreements, and finally the abandoned Istanbul talks. Moscow points out
02:14European involvement in supposed peace deals with Russia has only led one direction into deeper conflict. So it's perhaps no
02:22surprise, Vladimir Putin views negotiations with Kiev later this week with a dose of
02:27scepticism. Marina Kosrava takes us through that.
02:32It said,
02:32And Russia is no fool. They won't be fooled again by the very same countries who were supposed to reign in
02:43Ukraine in the past. Every time Europe sought a pause in the conflict, it was to help arm Ukraine. So how can
02:50their calls for peace are to be trusted now? And it all began over a decade ago.
02:55During the anti-Russian pro-EU protests that set off the conflict in 2013, when all hell broke loose,
03:06resulting in the deaths of up to 100 people with hundreds more injured. After initially egging on
03:12the protesters, the West decided to help defuse the situation by brokering a deal on February 21st,
03:19which saw Yanukovych and three opposition leaders sign an agreement to hold early presidential elections,
03:25form a national unity government and revert to the 2004 constitution, all supervised by the foreign
03:32ministers of Germany, Poland and France. It was largely seen as Yanukovych giving the opposition
03:39and its European supporters everything they wanted. And what happened next? Less than 24 hours later,
03:46Euromaidan activists violated the agreement by occupying the government quarter and issued new demands.
03:54They wanted the president's immediate resignation. He called the whole thing a coup and fled the country.
04:00All that is happening now for the most part is vandalism and crime. This is my strong belief.
04:06I will do everything it takes to prevent my country from splitting up to stop the bloodshed.
04:11The so-called guarantors of peace and stability from Europe had nothing to say about the mess that ensued,
04:17aside from claiming it definitely wasn't a coup. It all just happened apparently.
04:24No coup in Kyiv. Government buildings got abandoned. Speaker of Rada elected legally. President Viktor Yanukovych
04:32has 24 hours to sign 2004 constitution into law.
04:36That initial agreement was a big mistake according to Vladimir Putin. Given into the opposition's
04:42demands sent the wrong message. And the country is still paying for it to this day.
04:49I would like to draw your attention to the fact that President Yanukovych, through the mediation of
04:53the foreign ministers of three European countries, Poland, Germany and France, and in the presence of my
04:59representative, this was the Russian human rights commissioner Vladimir Lukin, signed an agreement
05:05with the opposition on February 21st. I would like to stress that under that agreement, I am not saying
05:11this was good or bad, just stating the fact, Mr. Yanukovych actually handed over power. He agreed to all the
05:18opposition's demands. He agreed to early parliamentary elections, to early presidential elections, and to
05:24return to the 2004 constitution, as demanded by the opposition. I asked myself, what was the purpose of
05:31all this? I want to understand why this was done. He had in fact given up his power already. And as I
05:38believe, as I told him, he had no chance of being re-elected. Everybody agrees on this. Everyone I have
05:45been speaking to on the telephone these past few days. What was the purpose of all those illegal,
05:50unconstitutional actions? Why did they have to create this chaos in the country?
05:58Instead of the promise of prosperity, what followed the protests and the coup were chaos and civil war
06:04between Kyiv and Donbass. After suffering a bloody defeat, which saw the deaths of hundreds of Ukrainian
06:10soldiers, Kyiv finally agreed to negotiations. Ukraine tends to want to talk when it's not doing well,
06:17politically or militarily. That was the case leading to the first Minsk protocol in September 2014. The
06:25agreement, which was supposed to end the bloodshed, was drafted and supervised by the trilateral contact
06:31group on Ukraine, consistent of Ukraine, Russia, and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
06:38Europe. It was a total failure, which led to the Minsk 2 agreement about six months later. Once again,
06:45a bloody defeat for Kyiv forced them to the negotiating table. This time they brought in the big guns,
06:52Francis Francois Hollande and Germany's Angela Merkel. They were supposed to ensure that the
06:57fighting would indeed end. But it was all a lie, as Kyiv and Europe later admitted themselves.
07:06The 2014 Minsk agreement was an attempt to give Ukraine time. It also used this time to become
07:12stronger, as you can see today. The Ukraine of 2014-15 is not the Ukraine of today,
07:18like it was in a battle for Dybaltsevo. At the beginning of 2015, Putin could easily have overrun
07:24them at that time. And I very much doubt that NATO countries could have done as much then as they do
07:30today to help Ukraine. There was an idea that Putin wanted to buy some time. No, it was us who wanted
07:38to buy time to allow Ukraine to recover, to strengthen its resources. That's why we have to defend the Minsk
07:45agreements, in which you, Poroshenko, played a very important role. They should be defended. It was
07:53precisely during these seven years that there were ways for Ukraine to strengthen itself. And this is
07:59where Putin made a mistake. He underestimated the capacity of the Ukrainians and their resistance.
08:07Neither Zelensky nor his European leaders were even hiding their total disrespect and disregard for
08:13those agreements and any new proposals. Have a look at this video, which shows how they behave when
08:20Vladimir Putin was reminding them about the terms they agreed upon in the Minsk agreements and ways
08:26to achieve peace. The Ukrainian constitution must be amended to formalize the special status of Donbass
08:33on a permanent basis. Of course, the duration of the agreement on the special status of separate
08:38Donbass districts must be extended and ultimately made permanent as it is stipulated in the Minsk agreements.
08:45After the peace agreements and Russia's concerns were completely ignored by the West,
08:50Moscow stepped in and launched the special military operation in February 2022.
08:59A month later, the situation had reached a boiling point, but there was a glimmer of hope.
09:04Russian and Ukrainian delegations were apparently very close to reaching a deal. That's before Boris
09:11Johnson decided to pay Kyiv a surprise visit and talked Zelensky out of the deal.
09:17When we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kyiv and said that we would not sign anything
09:23with Russia at all and to just fight. That is, they knew everything, especially when we already had a
09:30draft or some documents. They had access to all of it. And we consulted with them because we understood that
09:37we could not win the war ourselves. People inside Ukraine and people outside Ukraine started asking
09:44questions about whether this was a good deal. And that was at that point that it that it fell apart.
09:48But I think that plenty of people and perhaps Zelensky himself were very suspicious that they were about
09:55to fall into a trap. And if Putin could have gotten that, you know, completely neutered, demilitarized Ukraine
10:01for nothing. Why wouldn't he take it? And now Europe wants to have another go at peace. The very same
10:09countries who supervised the failed peace deals, who previously used that strategy to buy Kyiv some time
10:16and weapons. The same countries who talked Ukraine out of seeking peace each time, leading them further
10:24into a suicide mission. Well, responding to the Russian leader's offer of peace talks, Kyiv was quick
10:31to set a number of preconditions. Vladimir Zelensky is demanding an immediate ceasefire and said a direct
10:37meeting with President Putin is what he expects. Former US diplomat Jim Jatris told us such ultimatums
10:43appear part of a political game, which doesn't follow diplomatic protocol or any real efforts to reach an
10:50agreement. Well, I'll be there personally. Now, will President Putin come, meet with me,
10:56knowing that he's an illegitimate leader and really has no. And let's even go beyond that,
11:01not just his expired term. I think what he wants to do is throw that on the table and say,
11:06now, let's see if he shows up. If he shows up, then he's won a victory and saying, and now Putin is
11:11going to come and treat me like a real leader, even though I'm not. Or if he doesn't show up,
11:15he'll say, aha, see, we actually accommodated their ploy to say, let's have direct negotiations.
11:22And they wouldn't come. So then they put the monkey on the Russians back for not showing up. It's a win
11:27win for Zelensky in terms of the political, let's say theater, which is remember the basic stock and
11:33trade of the Ukrainian regime, because they're not winning the war. So they have to play political
11:39games like this. The Russians want an enduring peace that addresses the root causes of the
11:44conflict. Nobody in the West is pursuing that. They're trying to entice Russia into another
11:51Minsk-type agreement, a ceasefire that would freeze the conflict, kind of like a Korean War-type
11:57situation, and perpetuate the conflict for decades to come, but put it on hold, put it on a freeze for
12:03a while while the United States pursues other goals in the Middle East or in the Western Pacific.
12:09The signature of any of the European countries, and I'm sad to say of the United States,
12:14also means nothing. I think we've proved that so many times over the years that we can sign an
12:19agreement, we can put in a treaty, we can have a Security Council resolution, and it means exactly
12:23nothing. Because since we're all the forces of peace and light and democracy and human rights and
12:28whatever, we can also break our own agreements, and we're entirely justified in doing so. There's
12:33simply nothing except facts on the ground that Moscow can trust.
12:38That's the sign of that.
12:40That's the sign of austerity to the sites that go to the United States.
12:44So now let's go of the time to try to use that ๋น›.
12:45That's an important question.
12:46I want to be careful about that.
12:47I want to use the call to keep a separateแบฏm of the city and we can sit down for the city.
12:49That's why I don't know that.
12:50But I want to be careful about that.
12:51I want to say that there's a peace.
12:52So let's go of that.
12:53I want to say that these entities are in this country.
12:55And then I want to say that there are great.
12:56And I want to be careful about that.
12:57So let's go of that.

Recommended