🔴 SUSPENDEN LA PERICIA PSIQUIÁTRICA DE FABIOLA YÁÑEZ EN CAUSA POR REVINCULACIÓN DE SU HIJO

HighlightNow

👉 La justicia ha suspendido la pericia psiquiátrica solicitada por la defensa de Alberto Fernández en el marco de su procesamiento por violencia de género contra Fabiola Yáñez. La decisión se tomó tras una apelación que cuestionaba la jurisdicción y la revictimización de Yáñez. El caso, que comenzó con la apertura de un teléfono en una causa de corrupción, ha generado controversia por las acusaciones cruzadas entre las partes y el impacto mediático.   👉 Seguí en #ArrancaLaTardeEnA24 📺 a24.com/vivo

Transcript

00:00It solves justice for us.

00:23Well, this is the end of Fabiola's new life.

00:26We are eager to know what will happen in this audience.

00:31Yes, we have two key issues.

00:33We are waiting for, in fact it should have already come out,

00:37but it hasn't come out yet, the failure of the camera

00:40to see if Alberto Fernández's trial in the cause for gender violence is confirmed.

00:44And then there is another issue that has to do with the request for psychiatric expertise

00:49from Fernández to Fabiola Llanes.

00:51A request that, according to Llanes' legal representation,

00:54is absolutely irregular for a legal issue.

00:57They do it in capital.

00:58And well, there is an appeal.

01:00Marina, Alberto Fernández's defense insists on that expertise.

01:03That expertise is appealed.

01:04Now we are going to work a little on the arguments of why they appeal that expertise.

01:08Fernández's defense also insists that Fabiola Llanes never gave the cell phone.

01:14Now we are also going to talk about the cell phone key.

01:16But look, why is the psychological expertise appealed?

01:21The request for psychological and psychiatric expertise

01:25regarding Mrs. Llanes is underestimated,

01:27as well as any type of expertise of the remaining constancies in cars

01:30that tend to draw conclusions

01:32regarding absolutely incompatible issues with the judge who intervenes.

01:37Let us remember that the request was made in capital justice

01:40in an absolutely strange way, because there is no possible jurisdiction there.

01:45We have more.

01:47We have part of this appeal.

01:50It says, in relation to the contact with the father,

01:53if they can put it in full to read, it would be great.

01:56There is something important here, right?

01:57Because, of course, that request for expertise is appealed, among other things,

02:01because there is a minor in between.

02:02Exactly.

02:03Mrs. Llanes says,

02:04it does not present any type of inconvenience for Mr. Fernández

02:07to make virtual or even face-to-face contact with his son Francisco

02:11when he decides to leave the country and travel to the city of Madrid,

02:14since Fernández has no restriction to such effect

02:17and has all the necessary resources.

02:19This is due to the fact that Fernández denounces an impediment to contact.

02:22Llanes says,

02:23never.

02:24No, no, in fact, Marina,

02:26several times the ex-president maintained a link through the phone

02:30and even got annoyed over time.

02:33Of course, we are talking about a little boy,

02:35I do not want to go into much detail, because there is a minor in between,

02:38but this was happening.

02:40And there is more.

02:41There is more, there is more.

02:43And with this we have already closed the presentation.

02:45It says,

02:46ordering psychological and psychiatric examinations to Mrs. Llanes,

02:49in addition to being unconstitutional,

02:51constitutes a re-victimization in a context of institutional violence.

02:55Ordering such examinations to a woman like Fabiola Llanes,

02:58who has been a victim of gender violence at the hands of a processed man,

03:02is, in all lights, re-victimizing.

03:06Well.

03:07If you agree, Facu, we welcome Dr. Mauricio Alessandro.

03:10Mauricio, how are you?

03:11Thank you for joining us.

03:14Thank you very much.

03:15Where are we standing?

03:16Yes.

03:17Well, there has been breaking news.

03:21Now?

03:22Yes.

03:23The examination was suspended.

03:25The judge ordered the suspension of the examination.

03:27Well, attention to this document that we showed,

03:30to these textuals of the appeal.

03:32Those are urgent then, right?

03:33Those are urgent.

03:34Breaking news.

03:35Exclusive.

03:36Indeed.

03:37The judge handles this case with total equidistance

03:43and in a very impartial way.

03:45He understood, with good criteria,

03:47that the appeal of that decision that he himself had taken

03:51to carry out an examination,

03:53meant that the Chamber would solve it.

03:55So, the examination requested by Alberto Fernández is suspended,

03:58who was, I mean, one of the defense's battle horses, right?

04:02Of course.

04:03Well, let's see.

04:04You explained it very well here.

04:06From the beginning, how does this case begin?

04:09This case begins with the opening of a phone

04:12in the framework of a corruption case.

04:14It was not a denunciation of Yañez,

04:16nor was it Yañez who opened that phone.

04:20The court orders to kidnap a phone.

04:23And there it opens.

04:24Of course, and there it is found.

04:25When it opens, it is found with that.

04:26It is kidnapped with that.

04:27When the judge sees it, he draws the line and resolves it,

04:29as any judge would do.

04:31A telegraphic exchange, or a chat,

04:34a person with a black eye,

04:36who claims to have gender violence,

04:38what do you have to do?

04:39Get to know each other,

04:40and say, gentlemen, here is a subject to investigate.

04:42And ask the victim if she wants to demonstrate

04:44what the judge did.

04:45What was done was correct.

04:47She, at first, decided not to continue with that investigation,

04:53and two or three days later,

04:55as a result of a discussion with Alberto,

04:58which had to do with the signing of a statement

05:01that Alberto asked him as a way

05:03to guarantee him a good economic future,

05:06because what he said in text,

05:08Alberto Fernández said,

05:10if you behave well and sign this document

05:13where you say that our relationship was wonderful ...

05:15That is not co-active.

05:17Yes, well, it is a crime for which it is investigated.

05:20So, let's repeat,

05:22the psychiatric examination that Alberto Fernández requested

05:25for the defense of Alberto Fernández,

05:27this obviously had us pending.

05:30That is why we worked on those arguments

05:32with which Fabiola's defense was proposing

05:35to be suspended.

05:36Finally, the judge took place.

05:38The suspension took place,

05:39as a result of what the Chamber says.

05:41The reality is that the judge,

05:42once one appeals,

05:43is dismissed from the hearing.

05:45What he did was what corresponded,

05:46like everything the judge has done so far,

05:48beyond any discussion that we maintain,

05:51because the reality is that Alberto Fernández

05:53always wanted to stop the justice of the city.

05:55Yes.

05:56He had a vocation, like the Esporteño.

05:58Yes, the Esporteño,

05:59but the facts analyzed did not happen in the capital.

06:03No, they happened, clearly.

06:04Some happened in the capital,

06:06some happened in Olivos,

06:07but the reality is that for the person,

06:09and that has already been lost in federal justice twice,

06:12he has already appealed this twice.

06:14That is, he appeals,

06:15I say that it is Ercolini,

06:17Exactly.

06:18because he also speaks of a manifest enmity

06:20on the part of Ercolini,

06:22because they were close or friends

06:24when, perhaps, in his academic life.

06:28He says he was a very good friend

06:30and that now he is a very good enemy.

06:32Yes, he says, he hates me, he wants to see me in prison.

06:34Ercolini does not say that,

06:36he clearly does not say it,

06:37and he says, there is also something

06:39that we have to keep in mind.

06:41Every time a judge does not like someone,

06:43of course,

06:44they begin to say the judge's barbarity

06:46to generate enmity.

06:47It happened at the time as a curse.

06:48Yes, it's barbaric.

06:49They called him a gunman judge.

06:50Yes, yes.

06:51It was like forcing a refusal

06:53that someone would answer

06:55and see if they pick up something.

06:57Alberto Fernández is a professional,

06:59for years.

07:01In fact, look, it's interesting,

07:03because in his 202 pages of his defense

07:05against Ercolini,

07:07which ended with his trial,

07:09he says he never went to see Ercolini

07:11because he, as president,

07:13or as an official, was not in conditions,

07:15but that he did go to see him at the time

07:17for two trials

07:19to try that he would not put us in jail

07:21or that we would not advance in the cause.

07:23He admits having tried

07:25to influence Ercolini.

07:27As president, of course.

07:29Two important businessmen, right, doctor?

07:31If I'm not mistaken, with oil, media, etc.

07:33And how does that story end?

07:35He says that Ercolini got him out of the office

07:37and that's why he got angry.

07:39He says, I never wanted to interfere

07:41in justice, but I went to see Ercolini

07:43to talk to some businessmen

07:45and clearly,

07:47as he did not want me,

07:49he got me out of the office.

07:51The truth is that Ercolini

07:53had nothing to say against that.

07:55What was clear

07:57was that Ercolini had fulfilled his task.

07:59Mauricio, let's tell people

08:01some facts about

08:03the new life of Fabiola Llanes

08:05in Madrid, who returned to work.

08:07She came back a little in the middle

08:09because she is working

08:11for a television channel.

08:13But these are the facts.

08:15She moved out of the neighborhood.

08:17She left the house where she was living

08:19in Puerta de Alcalá,

08:21which is a building

08:23with apartments

08:25of between 50 and 80 square meters,

08:27valued at

08:29a rent of about

08:31180 to 200 euros a day.

08:33She moved to a building from the 1940s,

08:35a little less modern,

08:37logically, with five floors,

08:39with two apartments per floor,

08:41with a monthly rent

08:43a little more expensive.

08:45But she had to leave that neighborhood.

08:47She is trying to rearm

08:49her life, of course,

08:51a new life there in Madrid.

08:53And there is more.

08:55Yes, she resigned from police custody.

08:57I read everything and then I come back to this point.

08:59The Argentine government granted her

09:01custody by judicial order,

09:03with a cost of 300,000 euros per month,

09:05two federal police cash

09:07until January.

09:09Mauricio, here is an important point,

09:11with the issue of rent.

09:13It was not 300,000 per month.

09:15What Minister Burrich said

09:17was that it would take

09:19six months.

09:21All that had cost 300,000 euros.

09:23What does Fabiola live on today?

09:25There is an embargo on

09:27Alberto Fernández's salary.

09:29That is, Alberto Fernández

09:31did not go to pay Francisco's food

09:33of a good degree, but there was

09:35a temporary food that the civil justice

09:37ordered him to extract from his retirement.

09:39The retirement, which is 14 sticks.

09:41More or less between 3,500 and 4,000 euros,

09:43depending on the gap

09:45between the official and the minor.

09:47What does Fabiola live on today?

09:493,500 euros.

09:51No, no, no.

09:53That is for the minor.

09:553,500 to 4,000 euros for the minor.

09:57And does she work?

09:59She has two jobs.

10:01Both have to do with journalism

10:03and public relations, which is her activity.

10:05One is in the daily news.

10:07In March she made her presentation

10:09in the newspaper

10:11with a special segment

10:13that has to do with the life

10:15of the former First Ladies,

10:17which is what she is definitively

10:19and what draws attention in Spain.

10:21I go back a minute to the issue of the custody

10:23that I was left pending.

10:25There is a version that says

10:27that she disconnects the custody

10:29because the custodians were

10:31Alberto Fernández's henchmen

10:33or that in fact they will be presented

10:35to the judge.

10:37At the time, the custody that

10:39Alberto Fernández had

10:41was the one that remained

10:43with her in Spain.

10:45At some point she told the judge

10:47that she suspected that the custody

10:49that Alberto Fernández had brought

10:51had accompanied him.

10:53Alberto Fernández, one day before leaving,

10:55made a decree that the custody

10:57has to accompany the former presidents

10:59and the family of the former presidents

11:01all over the world.

11:03So what she said was

11:05change it because I think

11:07they agree with me,

11:09with Alberto.

11:11And then the court ordered the change.

11:13Wait a minute, Horacio.

Category

Transcript

Recommended