00:00Hugo Marcelo Perticarari, 50 years old.
00:04He's the person that we were talking about a while ago,
00:07that we were saying if he had been arrested or not,
00:10that we didn't know that he was threatening the neighbors
00:12in the town of Sapeña.
00:13On February 3rd, well, yes, he was arrested
00:17for qualified threats.
00:19The UFI number 5 of San Martín intervened,
00:21which I congratulate.
00:23Ah, well.
00:24Which I congratulate.
00:25I'm going to explain one thing to you.
00:27How does the same judicial power
00:29share different criteria?
00:31I'm never going to understand it.
00:33For example, I told you a while ago
00:35that on February 3rd as well,
00:37a week ago,
00:39a character hits a woman,
00:42a police officer gets in to defend her,
00:44they stab the police officer,
00:46the DA, the DA says,
00:48nothing happens, man.
00:49Sure.
00:50It's mild injuries, period.
00:52Nothing else.
00:54And in this case,
00:55the DA number 5 says,
00:57no, if he's threatening the person with a knife,
00:59identify him, arrest him,
01:02and put him on trial, and that's it.
01:05So the same judicial power,
01:07two very close DAs,
01:10one has one criterion and the other has another.
01:14Well, I'm going to say it.
01:15Say it all.
01:17This is a public case.
01:18When the case is public,
01:20all the tools of the state
01:22are made available
01:24to do justice, to take action.
01:26It shouldn't be like that.
01:27Because if something happens,
01:28logically, the cost paid is much higher.
01:31It shouldn't be like that.
01:32Sure.
01:33Well, that's why I'm saying it.
01:34I want to ask Zakir,
01:36Zakir, can you sit down?
01:38What did this man do,
01:40so that we all understand?
01:41The knife was kidnapped.
01:43Indeed, although images can be seen,
01:45the knife was kidnapped.
01:47It's a key evidence against him.
01:51He left the building,
01:53as you can see in the images,
01:54threatening the neighbors.
01:56The names are identified.
01:57Let's preserve the identity.
01:58They have absolutely nothing to do
02:01with these people publicly.
02:06The aggressor was transferred to the police station.
02:10February 3, 5th.
02:11The judge is consulted,
02:13and the judge has actions,
02:15what we just reported,
02:16the kidnapping of the knife,
02:19and logically,
02:20the indictment against this man,
02:22who is accused of threatening.
02:24Qualified threats.
02:25I want to ask Zakir now,
02:28why a judicial authority,
02:31the same one,
02:32the prosecution,
02:34this is the five that detains this person,
02:37and you saw that I told you a while ago
02:39that a character hit a woman,
02:41a policeman goes to defend her,
02:42the policeman stabs him,
02:44and the prosecution, number two,
02:45for example, says,
02:46it's minor injuries,
02:47don't detain him,
02:48notify him on the 60th,
02:49and nothing else.
02:50Why different criteria?
02:52Why?
02:53Because clearly,
02:55who receives the first cause,
02:56which is the prosecution,
02:58the desire to work
02:59was the same as I had
03:01now being in Antarctica.
03:03So, really,
03:04when the characters of justice,
03:07who have a hard time starting
03:09and have so much bad practice,
03:11unfortunately,
03:12it's a fatal combo and this happens.
03:14One is free,
03:15another is detained without evidence,
03:17the one we had evidence
03:19is free to kill at any time.
03:21Unfortunately,
03:22a degraded justice,
03:24an incapable justice,
03:25a justice that does not have the capacity
03:27to be able,
03:28precisely,
03:29this criminal wave that there is,
03:30to try to attack it.
03:31And we see it every day.
03:32Incredible.
03:33Incredible.
03:34It gives us the right foot for this case.
Comments