Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 year ago
Transcript
00:00I want you to watch this.
00:01This is Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mays.
00:03She's up on Capitol Hill at this hearing about violent rhetoric.
00:06And of course, it's meant to target conservatives,
00:08which is always the case.
00:10So she does something really smart here.
00:12She opens up the hearing.
00:13And what you're going to hear is all of the leftist activists
00:17at this hearing.
00:18She gets them all on the record answering
00:21yes or no about how they feel violent rhetoric is a problem.
00:25And she gets them on the record first.
00:27Super smart.
00:28She sets them up.
00:29So I want you to listen to this part first.
00:31Check this out.
00:32Is rhetoric on social media a problem and a threat
00:36to our democracy, Mr. Ward?
00:39Yes, absolutely.
00:40Mr. Siegel?
00:41Yes.
00:42Ms. Caraballo?
00:43Yes.
00:44Ms. Nomani?
00:45Yes.
00:46Ms. Tyler?
00:46Yes.
00:47Yes.
00:49Another question I have.
00:51Do you believe that rhetoric targeting officials
00:54with violence for carrying out their constitutional duties
00:59is a threat to democracy, Mr. Ward?
01:02Mr. Siegel?
01:04Yes.
01:05Yes.
01:07Yes.
01:08Yes.
01:09Yes.
01:10OK.
01:10I want to play that for you on purpose.
01:12And I broke that out separately because this is brilliant.
01:15If you're going to follow Alinsky's rules, which
01:17you should, and you're going to get them,
01:22you're going to get them on the record.
01:24You want to get them on the record
01:25about what their rule is.
01:27Do you believe X?
01:29OK.
01:30Yes.
01:31Yes.
01:31You're under oath.
01:32Yes, I do.
01:34You do?
01:35You believe that violent rhetoric can cause violence
01:38out there and people should refrain from that?
01:41OK.
01:42Well, here's one of the liberal activists, Alejandro Caraballo.
01:48So Nancy Mace proceeds to pull out some blow
01:52ups of some of her tweets.
01:55She believes in stopping all the violent rhetoric.
02:00I want you to listen to this exchange.
02:01This is just glorious.
02:02Check this out.
02:03Only a few weeks after the attempted attack
02:05on a Supreme Court justice on June 25,
02:08one of the witnesses, Alejandro Caraballo,
02:10tweeted out the following in response
02:12to a decision on abortion overturning Roe v. Wade.
02:14And I'll quote directly from the tweet.
02:16The six justices who overturned Roe
02:18should never know peace again.
02:21It is our civic duty to accost them
02:24every time they're in public.
02:26They are pariahs.
02:28Since women don't have their rights,
02:29these justices should never have a peaceful moment
02:32in public again.
02:34Should never have a peaceful moment in public again.
02:37Gosh, Joe, that sounds like you could be inciting violence.
02:40Never have a peaceful moment.
02:42I mean, you and I aren't threat analysts anymore or anything
02:46like that.
02:47I mean, we're not psychotherapists,
02:48but that kind of sounds to me like the exact kind
02:51of rhetoric the lefty activists would call out themselves.
02:57So strange.
02:59So now, of course, Alejandro Caraballo
03:02is caught off guard, like, my gosh,
03:04it kind of got me there on Alinsky rule number four.
03:07So here's a little tactic I like for you
03:09to understand the tactics.
03:10You can get ahead of these two.
03:13The tactic the left uses when they're busted,
03:15which is pretty much all the time, is they say,
03:18well, my tweets are being taken out
03:20of context, to which you should respond immediately.
03:24What other context?
03:25And not having another peaceful moment in their lives.
03:28How else can someone read?
03:30Give us, please, another context.
03:32We would love to hear it.
03:33And watch them spin and play the euphemisms game.
03:37Listen to Alejandro Caraballo use the context scam here.
03:41Check this out.
03:42My last question today of Ms. Caraballo,
03:44do you stand by these comments, this kind of rhetoric,
03:49in social media, and do you believe
03:50it's a threat to democracy?
03:53Thank you, Representative, for the opportunity
03:54to clarify and provide context to my tweets.
03:58I have a question, is it yes or no?
03:59Do you believe your rhetoric is a threat to democracy
04:02when you're calling to accost a branch of government,
04:06the Supreme Court?
04:08I don't believe that's a correct characterization
04:11of my statements.
04:12Did you not tweet that, that you thought
04:14that the Supreme Court justices should be accosted?
04:18What I'm saying is that that is not a characterization
04:22of my statements.
04:24No one's character, no one's characterizing,
04:27you said they just read it.
04:28Yeah.
04:30Nancy Mace isn't characterizing anything.
04:33You know, I hate the word literally,
04:35but she's literally reading her own tweets.
04:39There's no characterizing of anything.
04:44Nancy Mace did the country a huge favor here, folks.
04:46This is how you fight back against these people.
04:48That was a clip from the Dan Bongino Show.
04:50You can watch the full show, we recommend you do,
04:53on Rumble, go to rumble.com slash Bongino,
04:56please, and subscribe for free, we appreciate it.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended