SC nullifies previous verdict regarding Article 63A of Constitution | Waseem Badami's Report - video Dailymotion

ARY NEWS

#supremecourt #article63a #pti #pmlngovt #breakingnews #constitutionalamendment    SC nullifies previous verdict regarding Article 63A of Constitution | Waseem Badami's Report

Transcript

00:00In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.

00:01Peace be upon you.

00:02Today, a very important decision has come from the Supreme Court of Pakistan, which

00:05will certainly have an impact on the politics of Pakistan.

00:08It is possible that the effects of this decision will be seen in the near future.

00:12This decision has given rise to a debate.

00:14We will talk about this.

00:16The various questions that are arising as a result of this decision.

00:19Someone says, Sir, what was the hurry in making this decision?

00:22If you had made it a few days later, then this would not have happened.

00:25Who knows, the government might benefit from using this decision.

00:27So, it was said from the front that, Brother, hurry?

00:29It has been going on for two years.

00:31Where is 2022?

00:32Where is 2024?

00:33The decision had come then.

00:34The debate is taking place now.

00:35So, what is the hurry?

00:36How much longer will it take?

00:37There are many more things.

00:38The second thing, when we are talking to you, the Pakistan Delegation has announced

00:41a protest on D-Chowk on October 4th.

00:43Khan Sahib has told Ali Ibn Ghandapur Sahib that you have to definitely reach.

00:46And there have been press conferences of the highest level that this should not be done.

00:49International activities are going on in Islamabad.

00:51The Shingai Coordination Organization has to be declared.

00:53The head of the country has to come.

00:55The head of Malaysia has come.

00:57There are still news that the PTA is being communicated that it should not be done for you.

01:00To what extent will the protest be held?

01:02If it will not happen, then what will happen?

01:04If it will not happen, then what will happen?

01:05We will talk about this in the second part of the program.

01:07First of all, you see this.

01:08This was the case of Article 63A.

01:10We have already told you its background yesterday.

01:12It is a shikh of the Mirror of Pakistan.

01:14According to which, if a member crosses the floor,

01:18votes against the policy of his party,

01:21then that member washes his hands of his party.

01:25But the Supreme Court of Pakistan gave this decision about two years ago.

01:28No, sir.

01:29He will wash his hands of his party.

01:31His vote will also not be counted.

01:33When this decision came at that time,

01:35that decision immediately had a political effect.

01:37Just like a decision has come today,

01:39and it is not surprising that this decision has a political effect immediately.

01:41At that time, a decision had come,

01:43which had a political effect.

01:45Hamza Shahbaz Sahib, the Prime Minister of Punjab, had been elected.

01:48With the help of a few PTI agents.

01:52And when this decision came,

01:54then that help was returned.

01:56When the help was returned,

01:58then the balance was lost.

02:00They missed the number.

02:02Hamza Shahbaz Sahib said that the government has fallen.

02:04Then Parveer Dalali became the Prime Minister.

02:06So even at that time, this decision had a political effect.

02:08Even today, this decision can have a political effect.

02:10A brief summary of today's hearing.

02:12And then we will talk to the relevant guests

02:14about this case.

02:16The representative of the Chief Justice, Mr. Barrister Ali Zafar,

02:18said again today,

02:20that the formation of this bench is not correct.

02:22That is why we cannot be a part of the judicial process.

02:24That is why he did not agree with the formation of this bench.

02:28On this, the Chief Justice said,

02:30Mr. Ali Zafar,

02:32you are making a baseless claim.

02:34You are a senior lawyer.

02:36You are a former president of the Bar.

02:38Mr. Ali Zafar said,

02:40I want to say something on behalf of Bani PTI.

02:42Mr. Ali Zafar was allowed to meet yesterday.

02:44He had come today with instructions from Mr. Imran Khan.

02:46Mr. Ali Zafar said,

02:48I want to say something.

02:50The thing is that the government wants to bring some reform.

02:52When he said this,

02:54the Chief Justice said,

02:56you are having a political discussion

02:58so that there is a headline tomorrow.

03:00Mr. Ali Zafar said,

03:02I think he said it in a sarcastic way,

03:04that the headline is still there.

03:06And today's headline is that

03:08a constitutional reform is necessary before October 25.

03:10On October 25, the Chief Justice will retire.

03:12Mr. Ali Zafar said,

03:14we do not know about this.

03:16After that, Mr. Ali Zafar,

03:18the lawyer of Bani Tehrik-e-Insaf,

03:20boycotted the hearing.

03:22The Supreme Court appointed Mr. Ali Zafar

03:24as a legal assistant.

03:26Today, on social media,

03:28some people of PTI,

03:30in fact, many people,

03:32have criticized Mr. Ali Zafar

03:34for being a legal assistant.

03:36When our leader said it was a boycott,

03:38it should have been boycotted.

03:40A constitutional reform,

03:42a judicial package is being brought for you.

03:44If you give this decision,

03:46which you later gave,

03:48then it will be the permission of horse trading.

03:50On this, the Chief Justice replied,

03:52Mr. Ali Zafar,

03:54now you are crossing the limits.

03:56We can give you a notice of insulting the court.

03:58This is a very big statement.

04:00We will not give you permission for such a thing.

04:02Another judge,

04:04Justice Jamal Mandukhil,

04:06said, how can you say

04:08that the decision came

04:10that if a person votes,

04:12then the vote will not be counted,

04:14but the seat will go as a punishment.

04:16The Chief Justice said,

04:18a person just keeps thinking

04:20that I will kill such and such,

04:22but if he does not do it,

04:24will there be a punishment?

04:26Should I just think of breaking the red mark?

04:28Will I be punished?

04:30Justice Jamal said,

04:32it is the right of the parliament to vote.

04:34How can this be the right of the political community?

04:36It is the right of the parliament

04:38to vote.

04:40If you do not follow the guidelines,

04:42the party can send a reference

04:44of the headless person.

04:46According to this,

04:48voting against the party

04:50will be counted.

04:52The vote will not be counted,

04:54but the seat will go.

04:56Mr. Ali Zafar said,

04:58referring to the original decision,

05:00it was written in the article 361

05:02that horse trading is a cancer.

05:04The Chief Justice said,

05:06these words were misused

05:08in the decision.

05:10The judge can only decide

05:12whether something is legal or not.

05:14He is not a medical officer

05:16who can tell what is cancer

05:18and what is not.

05:20Justice Naeem said,

05:22why didn't the PTI

05:24legislate against

05:26not counting votes in its time?

05:28Justice Naeem said,

05:30there was going to be

05:32a reference in the Supreme Court.

05:34At that time,

05:36the reference was issued

05:38and the court was tried to use it.

05:40Justice Naeem also said,

05:42the amendment that you could not

05:44do through the parliament,

05:46you got it done through the judges.

05:48Isn't it enough to rewrite

05:50the constitution?

05:52Finally, this decision came today.

05:54The situation is in front of us.

SC nullifies previous verdict regarding Article 63A of Constitution | Waseem Badami's Report

Category

Transcript

Recommended