Grothman Grills Acting Labor Sec. Julie Su On Overtime Rule: It Will Result In ‘Irregular Paychecks’

  • 4 months ago
On Wednesday, Glenn Grothman (R-WI) questioned Acting Secretary of Labor Julie Su on proposed rules relating to overtime payment during a House Education and Workforce Committee hearing.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Ms. Bonamici. Mr. Grossman, you're recognized for five minutes.
00:04The Department of Labor refers to registered apprenticeships as the gold standard of work-based
00:09learning. As you know, there are currently 3,500 apprenticeship models registered under
00:15the competency-based model. Do you believe these competency-based registered apprenticeships
00:20are good programs? I'm sorry, Congressman, you were saying are
00:27programs good programs? We're talking about registered apprenticeships.
00:32Okay. Do you believe competency-based registered
00:36apprenticeships are good programs? So, thank you, Congressman, especially because
00:42your state has been such a leader when it comes to registered apprenticeships. And we
00:47have a million-dollar state apprenticeship expansion grant in Wisconsin to help build
00:52the infrastructure to make sure that registered apprenticeships can thrive and employers can
00:58get what they need and working people in your state can get opportunity. I believe that
01:03registered apprenticeship programs are the gold standard. They provide for earn while
01:07you learn so that people who can't afford to just stop earning in order to train can
01:14actually get into training programs. They provide for a good job at the end. They provide
01:20for wage progression and other protections for skill standards. And we are seeing across
01:28the country right now, again, especially because of the historic investments that are being
01:32made in construction, in infrastructure, in clean energy, in manufacturing, that there's
01:37a need for good, reliable, tested job training programs and registered apprenticeships are
01:44one of the best examples we have of that. Okay. Your department, and I'm going to ask
01:48you, what was the basis for your department issuing a proposed rule that eliminates the
01:54successful competency-based model for registered apprenticeships, a model that's been referred
02:00to the bread and butter of apprenticeship expansion, and will constitute more than one-third
02:06of the overall growth in the apprenticeships in the next decade, according to Labor Zone
02:11projections? Again, Congressman, just in this administration,
02:18the Department of Labor has invested over $445 million in apprenticeship programs across
02:26the country, and another $200 million that is out now that will be announced in June.
02:32We believe in programs that are tested, that have support so that workers are actually
02:39going to end up in the job that they're training for, and that have real standards, in part
02:44because the standards in registered apprenticeships also give working people a chance to work
02:51in a model that they're tested over time and really have been a pathway into the middle
03:02class for many, many American workers. Okay. Wisconsin's a big manufacturing state.
03:08We're actually, percentage-wise, the biggest manufacturing state in the country, 20 percent
03:13of our workforces are manufacturing. When I meet with industry leaders, they cite workforce
03:18issues such as attracting and retaining skilled employees as their biggest challenge.
03:24The Biden administration's Department of Labor has proposed increasing the overtime salary
03:29threshold by about 70 percent, which would subject millions of currently salaried workers
03:35to overtime laws. So instead of increasing pay, the proposed rule would cause employers
03:42to shift millions of salaried workers to hourly workers, eliminating the remote and
03:47flexible work options, and potentially resulting in fewer work hours, irregular paychecks,
03:54and lower overall compensation. Would you comment on the negative consequences of the
04:02big increase in the overtime salary threshold, how you believe that's going to affect the
04:06American industry? So, Congressman, there's nothing about the
04:10rule that would require that outcome. The reason why we did an overtime rule was because
04:16it's really important for working people to get a fair day's pay for a hard day's work.
04:21And our overtime rule helps to ensure that working people who work on a salary basis
04:28have more money in their pockets. A couple decades ago, the overtime threshold covered
04:37over 60 percent of working people. In the last administration, the threshold was set
04:44to a point where it was less than 10 percent. And so the overtime protections have been
04:49eroded over time because of that threshold, and that is why we undertook a rulemaking
04:55process to make sure that the threshold combined with the duties test that is the heart of
05:03protecting salaried employees when it comes to overtime remained real.
05:09Thank you.

Recommended