Mark Zuckerberg's brutal take on Apple's Vision Pro

Australian Community Media

Can Apple do to VR headsets what its iPhone did for smartphones? Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg doesn't think so, as he states his company's Quest 3 is "the better product, period."

Transcript

00:00 I don't just think that Quest is the better value, I think the Quest is the better product, period.

00:04 All right guys, so I finally tried Apple's Vision Pro, and you know I have to say that before this,

00:23 I expected that Quest would be the better value for most people since it's really good and it's

00:27 like seven times less expensive. But after using it, I don't just think that Quest is the better

00:33 value, I think the Quest is the better product, period. And you know the different companies

00:37 made different design decisions for the headsets, they have different strengths, but overall Quest

00:42 is better for the vast majority of things that people use mixed reality for. Now my friend Kenny

00:48 is actually capturing this video on Quest's high resolution mixed reality pass-through right now,

00:53 we're just here in my living room and you can see his browser windows and you know whatever else

00:58 he's got running up here. So yeah, Quest 3 does high quality pass-through with big screens,

01:04 just like Vision Pro. But we also designed it to be great for a lot of other things,

01:10 moving around, playing games, hanging out with friends and socializing, working out, and more.

01:15 Quest, you know, I think is just a lot more comfortable. You know, we designed it to weigh

01:20 120 grams less, which makes a really big difference on your face. There's no wires that get in the way

01:26 when you move around, it's a big deal. Our field of view is wider and I found our screen to be

01:31 brighter also. I also noticed that, you know, Apple's headset has this motion blur as you move

01:36 around, which Quest is just a lot crisper. Now Apple's screen does have a higher resolution

01:43 and that's really nice, but I was surprised by how many trade-offs they had to make to the quality

01:49 of the device and the comfort and ergonomics and other aspects of the display and artifacts in

01:54 order to get to that. Now for input, Quest supports precision controllers that are great for games.

02:00 Both headsets support hand tracking, but you know I found ours to be a little more accurate.

02:04 Apple's eye tracking is really nice. We actually had those sensors back in Quest Pro. We took them

02:10 out for Quest 3 and we're going to bring them back in the future. It's a nice interface. It's not

02:15 perfect for everything though. For typing or complex tasks, you're going to want things like

02:20 hands or a keyboard or controllers or eventually a neural interface for those kind of inputs.

02:25 Quest's immersive content library is a lot deeper. You know, we've been working with studios,

02:31 building virtual and mixed reality games and other content for a long time now,

02:35 and if you want to watch YouTube or play Xbox on a big screen anywhere you go, that's only

02:40 available on Quest for now. So you know when I look around it, it seems like there are a lot

02:46 of people who just assumed that Vision Pro would be higher quality because it's Apple and it costs

02:51 $3,000 more, but you know honestly I'm pretty surprised that Quest is so much better for the

02:57 vast majority of things that people use these headsets for with that price differential.

03:03 you

03:03 [BLANK_AUDIO]

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended