Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 14 minutes ago
Jack Smith Grilled by Senate Judiciary Over Trump Probes. Here's what each side is saying, and what none of them are telling you.

🌐 Full story, every source, both narratives: https://cvrdnews.com/story/jack-smith-grilled-by-senate-judiciary-over-trump-probes
Support us by checking out our own app, MigraineMe, automated migraine tracking: https://migraineme.app/getstarted

πŸ“° THE FULL STORY

Former special counsel Jack Smith appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee. There, he defended the charges he brought against Trump, according to the New York Times and Roll Call.

During the hearing, Smith was pressed on his Justice Department probes. Lawmakers questioned the decisions he made across those investigations.

Much of the coverage centered on Sen. Eric Schmitt. His perjury claim against Smith fell apart during the hearing, as reported by the New York Times and CNN.

⬅️ HOW THE LEFT COVERS IT
Left outlets frame the hearing as a win for Smith, casting him as a confident witness whose defense held up while a Republican senator's perjury claim collapsed. They foreground the backfired attack and Schmitt's basketball mixup as the defining moments, emphasizing GOP missteps over the substance of the probes. What they downplay is any detailed accounting of the underlying DOJ investigations themselves. (New York Times, CNN)

⬛ HOW THE CENTER COVERS IT
Center coverage presents the hearing as Smith being pressed on his DOJ probes, treating the basketball moment as a notable but secondary feature alongside the substantive questioning. It foregrounds the dual nature of the session: the probes and the basketball flub. It skips the partisan scorekeeping that colors other coverage. (Roll Call)

➑️ HOW THE RIGHT COVERS IT
Not enough coverage yet, check back soon.

⚠️ WHAT THEY AREN'T TELLING YOU
No clear blindspot surfaced in the available coverage.

🌐 WHAT THE INTERNET IS SAYING
On Telegram, @newsmax framed the hearing as a "Smith Showdown." The account reported that Jack Smith told lawmakers he will not be silenced by threats of prosecution over his two Trump indictments. @newsmax also amplified Republican attacks, quoting Sen. Chuck Grassley saying there was no legitimate basis for Smith's handling of whistleblowers, and Sen. John Kennedy telling Smith he makes him want to throw up.

On TikTok, C-SPAN and ABC News reported that Smith defended bringing the two criminal cases based on the facts and without political considerations. The Washington Post described the proceeding turning into a public tongue-lashing from his critics.

TikTok's pbsnews noted that Sen. Eric Schmitt questioned Smith about attending an Atlanta NBA game. According to the report, Schmitt seemingly confused two different basketball teams.

πŸ“Ž SOURCES
β€’ New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/29/us/politics/jack-smith-congress-testimony.html
β€’ Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/09/29/jack-smith-clashes-with-gop-senators-over-trump-investigations/
β€’

Category

πŸ—ž
News
Transcript
00:00The prosecutor who indicted a former president answered to Congress today.
00:04Former special counsel Jack Smith faced the Senate Judiciary Committee.
00:08Smith appeared to defend the criminal charges he brought against Donald Trump, according to the New York Times and Roll
00:15Call.
00:16Lawmakers pressed him on his Justice Department probes, questioning the decisions he made across those investigations.
00:23Much of the attention fell on Senator Eric Schmidt, whose perjury claim against Smith collapsed during the hearing, as reported
00:31by the New York Times and CNN.
00:33No new charges were announced.
00:35The full story is in the description below.
00:38Watch CVRDnews.com for more videos.

Recommended