00:00Before watching the video, remember to check out trending websites for more content!
00:03Many people feel that there is a golf course right in front of their house.
00:08That kind of life must be very comfortable, right?
00:10But for Na, a 61-year-old retired civil servant in Jidara, Jeddah...
00:15For Zli, what about
00:16That was truly a nightmare for him.
00:18Because in the past seven years
00:20He was on tenterhooks every day.
00:22Because golf balls were flying into his house one after another.
00:26When one can no longer tolerate it...
00:27He filed a lawsuit two years ago.
00:29And what about the High Court of Arrosh?
00:31The verdict was finally handed down yesterday.
00:32That is, the stadium operator and that landlord.
00:36These two companies must compensate the homeowner RM100,000.
00:39The judge also spoke very frankly.
00:42It's right next to this lush green sports field.
00:44It should have been a time to comfortably enjoy life at home.
00:48And what happened to the Nazley homeowner?
00:50One team, however, suffered a mis-ball from the seventh tee box of this course.
00:54Living for a long time in the shadow of that unexpected disaster.
00:59Just how exaggerated is it?
01:00They moved into this villa in December 2018.
01:04Golf balls started arriving at his home almost immediately.
01:08Nawuwa was smashed
01:10The exterior wall was hit and the glass windows were shattered.
01:12Even the roof of the chicken sanatorium was punched through.
01:16From August 2019 to January of this year
01:19He called the police 16 times in total.
01:21They also kept complaining to the stadium management.
01:24You might ask, is it possible that he's just being overly sensitive?
01:28It really isn't.
01:29Seven of his neighbors also testified in court.
01:32He said his home was also invaded by the flying ball.
01:36The judge said the evidence was right in front of him.
01:38WhatsApp message with photos of police report
01:41Local government directives
01:42Plus 8 witnesses
01:44This is not an isolated incident.
01:46It's a problem that has persisted for many years.
01:49Why
01:50What a pitiful homeowner.
01:51Poor chicken!
01:54So what about this lawsuit?
01:552024 Construction Report
01:57At that time?
01:57The number of people in the village with large openings is very large.
02:00He's asking for 7 million ringgit in compensation.
02:03Including 1 million in general damages
02:063 million in punitive damages
02:09That is, it is specifically used to punish the other party.
02:11With the money to fulfill filial piety
02:12An additional 3 million in aggravated damages
02:15This is the kind of compensation for mental suffering.
02:19compensation
02:19So why did you only receive 100,000 in the end?
02:21Because the court only accepts the argument of private harassment.
02:25Simply put
02:26It's about you doing business at the stadium.
02:28It seriously disrupts the normal lives of the neighbors.
02:31As for what kind of punishment...
02:33Increased compensation?
02:34The judge rejected them all.
02:36And what about this charge of unauthorized intrusion?
02:40The judge also did not accept it.
02:41The reason is...
02:42The ball was hit off course by a few individual players.
02:45It wasn't launched from the stadium itself.
02:47At this point, you might ask...
02:49Has the stadium done absolutely nothing?
02:51some
02:52But the judge was completely dissatisfied.
02:54The stadium in December 2020
02:57Near the 7th tee box
02:59It crashed into a safety net that was 28 feet high and 80 feet wide.
03:02By 2024, it will be increased to 40 feet.
03:05And widened to 122 feet.
03:07But the ball still flew into the resident's home.
03:11The judge described these measures as passive delays.
03:14Moreover, it is clearly ineffective.
03:16Therefore, the court was still ordered to pay compensation.
03:20The more exciting part?
03:21It is the landlord
03:22It is a building land strike
03:24This company
03:25The company protested its innocence.
03:27It was just a landlord.
03:29Daily operation of the stadium
03:31It's beyond its control.
03:33Just give up the land
03:34Let them run it
03:35It sounds reasonable.
03:37But what about the judge?
03:38He gambled it back with just one sentence.
03:39It is said that the landlords are actually the holding companies of the operators.
03:42Security Network Upgrade
03:44This landlord was also involved in the discussion.
03:46Moreover, these nearby residences
03:49These houses
03:50Back then, it was developed by the landlords themselves.
03:52He sold them to those residents himself.
03:53In other words
03:54When the landlord built the house back then
03:57No consideration was given to the area next to the golf course.
03:59This house will be affected by non-spherical interference.
04:01Or is the safety net high enough?
04:03These factors may not have been taken into account.
04:04Whether he really didn't expect it or not
04:06Or pretend you don't know
04:07In short, they want to shift the blame now.
04:09It's not that easy.
04:10What happened next?
04:12The court awarded the two companies
04:1460 days
04:16The safety netting near hole 7 must be installed.
04:18Increase height and length
04:20Check the location of the tee box.
04:22And the route for playing ball.
04:23Also, erect obvious safety warning signs.
04:26Secure the golf ball
04:27No more flying into Nasri's house
04:29Those two companies
04:31They also have to bear additional costs.
04:32RM20,000 for lying down
04:33In his 21-page judgment, the judge...
04:36Leaving behind a sentence
04:37Words that all businesses should remember
04:39Operating a golf course is a legal business.
04:42But unreasonable methods cannot be used.
04:45To infringe upon the most basic safety of the neighboring residents
04:48In short
04:49It's fine if you just play your game.
04:51But don't break into other people's homes.
04:54Please like, subscribe, and share!
05:01Protect
05:01Subtitle volunteer Yang Qianqian
