- 3个月前
八点最热报 | 一年多前，执法当局在一间所谓的安全屋起获1亿7000万令吉现金、16公斤金条案，震撼全国；但等了超过一年，前首相依斯迈沙比里今天真正面对的控罪，却是蓄意提交不符合反贪会资产申报通知的书面声明，“未申报资产”。 如果罪成，最高刑罚是5年监禁，以及罚款最高10万令吉。面对价值上亿令吉的资产，为什么今天法庭上的控状，看起来却“轻”了这么多呢？（主播：梁宝仪）
类别
🗞
新闻消息文字稿
00:00A reminder before watching the video
00:01There's more content on trending websites.
00:04More than a year ago
00:05Law enforcement authorities in a so-called safe house
00:08RM170 million in cash was seized.
00:10The case involving 16 kilograms of gold bars shocked the nation.
00:14But after waiting for more than a year
00:16Former Prime Minister Ismail Sabri
00:18The real charges we face today
00:20However, it was a document submitted intentionally that did not comply with the Anti-Corruption Commission's asset declaration notice.
00:24Face statement
00:26Failure to truthfully declare assets
00:28If convicted
00:29The maximum penalty is five years in prison.
00:32And a maximum fine of RM100,000
00:35Facing assets worth hundreds of millions of ringgit
00:37So why are the charges in court today...?
00:39Yet it looks so much lighter!
00:44The biggest question from the outside world is
00:46The huge amount of wealth seized
00:47Between this slight control
00:50There seems to be a significant gap.
00:53So, does this indictment today mean...?
00:55This is not the whole story.
00:57Is the prosecution playing a much bigger game?
01:01Or will other control-related items be coming soon?
01:03However, what the general public is more worried about is
01:05Could this be yet another compromise by the power apparatus?
01:10From the initial seizure of huge amounts of cash and gold during the anti-accounting investigation
01:13To this day, Ismail Sabri has control
01:16Every step taken along the way left behind many questions worth exploring.
01:20Legal issues
01:21Especially this huge amount of assets?
01:23It was simply a matter of not declaring.
01:25Or is it related to corruption, abuse of power, or money laundering?
01:29At this point, it is not possible to draw a conclusion based solely on today's charge.
01:34So what's truly worth watching today?
01:35Not only has the former prime minister finally been charged.
01:38Rather, the prosecution had only taken the first step.
01:41It's still about this RM170 million asset case.
01:44In the end, will only this one charge of failing to declare assets remain?
01:50Or perhaps the prosecution will eventually step forward to explain the mystery.
01:56February 27, 2025
01:58Anti-accounting disclosure in a so-called safe house
02:01Futures deal worth RM170 million in cash
02:04Sixteen kilograms of gold
02:05Also has a large amount of foreign currency assets.
02:07Former Prime Minister Ismail Sabri, who is accused of being one of the holders,
02:11Finally, I entered the courtroom today to face the charges.
02:14But what's most puzzling isn't whether he's guilty or not.
02:18But why are there hundreds of millions of assets of unknown origin?
02:21Under the relevant charges
02:23The maximum penalty for this offense is a fine of RM100,000 and a maximum imprisonment of five years.
02:28The two lawyers emphasized in the interview
02:30Today's charges are not actually related to the RM170 million in assets.
02:35Instead, they failed to truthfully declare their assets as required by the Anti-Corruption Commission.
02:39Why is there so little crime among the people?
02:44Because this is solely for the purpose of asset-related crimes.
02:49Not for the crimes of others
02:51So to be honest, we don't know either.
02:53If there is sufficient evidence of guilt
03:09Simply put, if the crime is certain, then jail time is required.
03:11How long he/she has to sit depends on the judge's decision.
03:12He did not specify the amount based on undeclared assets.
03:16The fine is calculated as a percentage or multiple.
03:20Therefore, the total amount of assets involved today cannot be directly stated.
03:23If it were that sentence
03:27So today's charge only answers one question.
03:30Did Ismail Sabri declare his assets as required?
03:34As for where this money actually came from...
03:36Why is there such a large amount of cash?
03:38Did it involve embezzlement, abuse of power, or money laundering?
03:41That's a different question.
03:43It is also not within the scope of today's control over equipment.
03:46However, Siti Kassi believes
03:47Ismail was charged today with failing to declare assets.
03:50This does not mean that it cannot be controlled later.
03:51The source of the money, or whether there was any embezzlement.
03:54Because as long as the prosecution subsequently obtains sufficient evidence...
03:57In theory, there is still a possibility of facing other charges.
04:00If the certificate is changed to an asset of interest
04:03With anti-production
04:04So the power of judgment or assets
04:08Or the judgment of judgment
04:10A more accurate judgment
04:11He might also be taken to him
04:13So as long as you maintain
04:14Because on the last date
04:16These judgments are immortal.
04:17They have no time limit.
04:19So let our butler
04:22Find the certificate and replace it with a complete one.
04:23Therefore, let this judgment not be lost.
04:25In the center
04:26But these are from Malaysia.
04:38However, Zheng Yihua believes
04:40The most worthy questions to be asked in today's case are...
04:42Instead, it was this RM170 million in cash
04:45Last year, a period of confiscation had already been completed.
04:48But without mentioning legal proceedings
04:50Ismail Sabri and his former political secretary
04:52They did not oppose or challenge the relevant confiscation application.
04:56In his opinion
04:57The practice of confiscating without prior notice
04:59It is itself a kind of thing that defies common sense.
05:02Unusual handling
05:04They cited Article 41 of the law.
05:07In the absence of any control measures
05:09Apply for this confiscated assets
05:10Then no one objected.
05:12This was originally a
05:14A phenomenon that is extremely beyond the realm of common sense
05:18Under what circumstances will we confiscate [goods]?
05:20It seems I just mentioned a few thresholds
05:22The first problem is that no one claims it.
05:23A sum of money has been found.
05:25No one came to claim it.
05:26And of course, if it remains unclaimed for a long time...
05:28You should certainly apply for confiscation.
05:29Then it will be returned to the government for proper use.
05:30The second is the suspicion surrounding this asset.
05:32Or perhaps the accounts involve certain criminal activities.
05:36Therefore you can apply for confiscation.
05:38Then without mentioning control
05:39Then, in the case of applying for confiscation...
05:42Basically, I think it's about the holder of this asset.
05:45That's quite a generous gesture.
05:48In other words, it could be the Anti-Corruption Bureau or law enforcement agencies.
05:51There are suspicions that these assets may have been acquired through some illegitimate means.
05:56However, this investigation is not yet complete.
05:57Then as a condition for exchange
06:00Not provided
06:00Then it was confiscated and used for national development purposes.
06:04Both parties may have previously held such an agreement.
06:07The money has been confiscated.
06:08But today another event has occurred.
06:10Criminal charges related to this money
06:12This is why Ismail Sabri's lawyer...
06:16Today, we will seize on this point to question it.
06:18The prosecution had previously stated in an affidavit
06:21After reviewing the investigation files, it was decided not to issue charges.
06:24But now it is under control.
06:25Something seems amiss.
06:27Therefore, he might advise his client, Sabri, to challenge the charges.
06:35Regardless, Ismail Sabri is a former prime minister
06:38The anti-accounting investigation has lasted for more than a year.
06:40Assets exceeding 170 million yuan were seized and confiscated.
06:43Now he has been formally charged.
06:46Does this mean the government is sending a signal to the public?
06:50No matter who has ever held a high position
06:53That means anything that violates the law will be investigated.
06:56He was charged and faces legal sanctions.
06:58Today's charge
07:00I didn't actually see the charge.
07:01Zeng Gu was used as a means or purpose to combat corruption.
07:04Go and provide for our former prime minister
07:06It is truly because
07:08When required to declare assets
07:11Then they found an asset.
07:13It was something he hadn't declared before.
07:14Then make this provision
07:16Therefore, the same control
07:18In fact, for any ordinary person
07:20He could also be executed.
07:22Therefore, I personally believe
07:23On the topic of whether or not to embezzle
07:25Today's noodles are not directly related to the problem.
07:33Confiscated without mention of charges
07:34The prosecution did not mention corruption.
07:37Such points of contention have already emerged today.
07:39From the confiscation of assets last year to today
07:42Isman Shabri He faced
07:43Charges of failing to declare assets
07:45The case has indeed taken another step forward.
07:49But where exactly has this step taken us?
07:51The prosecution is holding back for now.
07:53Waiting for more evidence
07:54Or the case itself
07:56Is this the only charge of underreporting assets?
08:01The law cannot be guessed
08:02A crime cannot be convicted based on public opinion.
08:04That corruption, abuse of power, money laundering
08:06He hasn't appeared in the indictment today.
08:09This does not mean that it will definitely not happen in the future.
08:11But that doesn't mean it will definitely happen.
08:13So the real answer to the case
08:15Perhaps not in today's charges
08:17That 170 million ringgit
08:19It is now owned by the government.
08:22The unreported assets have been formally charged and are currently under trial.
08:27So where did the funds behind this money come from?
08:29What exactly is involved?
08:31How much longer will the public have to wait to see the answer?
08:34Everyone is probably eager to know the answer.
08:45infant heart