- 1 week ago
Category
📚
LearningTranscript
00:00Today, a movie trailer was launched
00:02picturing a top actress in an action role
00:04but one thing that stood out was
00:06she was trolled very badly.
00:07Where are we going with this trolling culture?
00:09Have you seen the trollers?
00:11They rarely show up in their own person.
00:15No name, no identity, no picture, just abuses.
00:20And that's none of your fault, please.
00:22You have done your best as a professional, as a performer.
00:24You have done what you could do, what you're supposed to do.
00:27And that's not really the woman's fault.
00:31It's a man's world.
00:33And women are prized for the right amount of fat
00:37at the right places.
00:38Irrespective of how she performs at the workplace,
00:43she's still going to be assessed on her looks.
00:46In a beastly world, you expect the beasts to...
00:57Dacharji, today, a movie trailer was launched
01:00featuring a top actress in an action role.
01:02Someone sent it to me.
01:05So, apart from all the other things,
01:07I'm not going to the quality of the movie or the trailer.
01:10But one thing that stood out was
01:11she was trolled very badly.
01:13Apparently, for being too thin for the role.
01:17So, no one really saw that the actress
01:19would have had to go through intense training
01:21to perform that role.
01:22She also has a two-year-old daughter, which is known.
01:25And most of the critics and trollers
01:27have probably not even gone to the gym.
01:31Also, I thought that
01:32this would probably not have happened like this
01:35if it was a male lead.
01:36My question was,
01:38where are we going with this online trolling culture?
01:40Which seems to be increasing every day
01:42and it's all over the internet.
01:44The first reaction that comes
01:47from people is trolling.
01:49Trollers are everywhere.
01:51So, just wanted to know
01:53where are we going with this?
02:00They always existed.
02:02Just that they now have a platform.
02:04That's all.
02:08Earlier, they ran the risk of being caught.
02:10Now, your account name could be
02:15Ninja123.
02:17And you can troll the entire world
02:19from behind that
02:21from behind that
02:22cowardly
02:23AI generated
02:26TP.
02:29Have you seen the trollers?
02:32They rarely
02:35show up
02:36in their own person.
02:39No name
02:40no identity
02:41no picture
02:43just abuses.
02:45They always existed.
02:47It's not a new breed.
02:51But
02:51social media especially
02:53has
02:54given them
02:55a platform
02:57where their voice
02:58gets amplified.
03:00That's all.
03:02Not just amplified
03:03sometimes mainstreamed.
03:04mainstreamed.
03:07Ideally,
03:08what should happen is that
03:10since
03:11the social media profile
03:14is your de facto
03:15personality now,
03:17therefore,
03:18every single profile
03:19must be personally verified.
03:21As simple as that.
03:23And you cannot hide behind
03:25some anonymous
03:28Twitter handle.
03:31that's what should happen.
03:34Just as you cannot
03:35speak in a public place
03:37from behind a wheel.
03:38Is that allowed?
03:39You'll say,
03:40come out,
03:40show your face.
03:41We want to know
03:42who's speaking
03:43and who am I addressing.
03:46That's all that
03:47is there.
03:48The same person,
03:49you meet him
03:50in the marketplace
03:53might be acting
03:54pretty nicely,
03:57decently,
03:58sensibly,
03:58humbly.
04:01Because the fellow
04:03has the privilege
04:06of acting
04:07from behind
04:08a wheel,
04:10therefore,
04:11he
04:12misuses that privilege.
04:14That's all that there is.
04:15It's actually
04:16a regulatory issue.
04:18Simply have
04:19the right regulation
04:20and this
04:22will drop by a lot.
04:26Now the
04:27thing about
04:28the woman's
04:29thinness.
04:31Women are not
04:32supposed to be thin.
04:35It's a man's world.
04:39And women are
04:40prized for
04:41the right amount
04:43of fat
04:44at the right places.
04:48a woman
04:49too thin
04:50for a man's
04:51pleasure
04:53is not
04:54to be
04:55accepted,
04:56let alone
04:57celebrated.
04:58Even if that
04:59thinness
05:00makes her
05:00functionally
05:01more capable,
05:03even if that
05:04thinness,
05:05I don't know
05:06which movie
05:06you're talking of,
05:07I haven't seen
05:08the trailer.
05:08I'm
05:10proceeding on
05:11certain assumptions,
05:13a hypothesis.
05:14Even if that
05:15thinness
05:15makes her
05:16better suited
05:17to the role
05:18she is performing,
05:20she's still
05:21not going to be
05:21celebrated.
05:24Because,
05:25and women
05:26better
05:27understand
05:28that
05:30quickly
05:31and fully,
05:33it's not
05:34about
05:35the
05:37excellence
05:38in your
05:39performance.
05:41A lot
05:43of the
05:44value
05:44that you
05:45hold
05:46is
05:47because
05:48of your
05:49woman-ness.
05:54Getting it?
05:56You
05:57strip
05:58your
05:59persona
05:59of that
06:00woman-ness
06:02and the
06:03man's
06:03world
06:04will
06:06withdraw
06:07a big
06:09proportion
06:09of the
06:10value
06:10it used
06:11to give
06:11to you.
06:13A big
06:14proportion.
06:16So,
06:17let's say
06:17you are
06:18being praised
06:19in a
06:20professional
06:21meeting
06:22as a
06:23team lead
06:25for your
06:27annual
06:27performance.
06:29Right?
06:30The
06:31typical
06:31kind of
06:32corporate
06:32gathering.
06:34Yes,
06:35obviously
06:35you must
06:35have done
06:36something
06:36right and
06:37there are
06:37numerical
06:38metrics to
06:39prove that
06:40you have
06:40performed
06:41well and
06:41that's fine.
06:43But still,
06:44lady,
06:45rest assured,
06:46a lot of
06:47admiration,
06:49adulation
06:49coming your
06:50way is
06:52because of
06:52your
06:52woman-ness.
06:54And that's
06:55none of
06:55your fault,
06:56please.
06:57You have
06:57done your
06:58best as a
06:58professional
06:59as a
06:59performer.
07:00You have
07:00done what
07:01you could
07:01do,
07:02what you're
07:02supposed to
07:02do.
07:04But still,
07:07from the
07:07side of
07:08the
07:08evaluator,
07:10there is
07:11a hidden
07:13percentage
07:15in terms
07:16of
07:17weightage
07:18that has
07:19been
07:19accorded to
07:20something that
07:21you,
07:21dear lady,
07:22do not
07:23know of.
07:23so when
07:25he praises
07:25you,
07:26some part
07:27of that
07:29is for
07:30your
07:30performance
07:30and some
07:31part of
07:31that is
07:32for your
07:32looks,
07:35your charm,
07:37your sensualness
07:39and all
07:39that.
07:43Some women
07:44do not
07:45see that
07:46at all,
07:46some see
07:47that to
07:47some extent,
07:48some see
07:48that fully.
07:53therefore,
07:54more women
07:55than men
07:57take care
07:58to be
07:59presentable.
08:01That's not
08:02without reason.
08:05If you
08:06conduct a
08:06research today
08:07on office
08:08going men
08:09versus
08:09office going
08:10women
08:13and simple
08:14clockwork,
08:15measure
08:16the time
08:17each of
08:18these two
08:19groups
08:20take on
08:21average
08:22to set
08:24themselves up,
08:25to dress
08:25themselves up
08:26for their
08:27professional
08:27workplace,
08:29you will
08:29find a
08:30difference
08:34of
08:35multiples,
08:37not 10-20%.
08:38If the
08:40man takes
08:40seven and
08:41a half
08:41minutes,
08:42probably the
08:42woman is
08:43taking 20
08:43minutes.
08:44That's a
08:45multiple.
08:48and that's
08:49not really
08:51the woman's
08:52fault.
08:54Experience
08:55and conditioning
08:56have
08:58trained her
08:59into believing
08:59that irrespective
09:01of how she
09:03performs at
09:04the workplace,
09:05she is still
09:06going to be
09:06assessed on
09:07her looks.
09:09I'm not
09:10saying 100%
09:11of the
09:11assessment
09:11would be
09:13on the
09:13looks.
09:14It varies.
09:1520%,
09:1640%,
09:17and if
09:18the boss
09:18is a
09:19creep,
09:19maybe 80%.
09:22But minimum
09:2320-30%
09:24I would
09:24say.
09:25And the
09:25woman knows
09:26that.
09:27So she
09:28says if
09:28only 70%
09:30of my
09:30evaluation
09:31would come
09:32from my
09:32performance
09:33and the
09:33remaining
09:3430%
09:34is going
09:35to come
09:36from how
09:37hot I
09:38look,
09:38I better
09:39take care
09:40to look
09:40hot.
09:45she has
09:45been brought
09:46to the
09:46workplace.
09:48But at
09:49most
09:49workplaces
09:50she is
09:50still at
09:51least
09:51partially
09:52a thing
09:54of
09:54demonstration.
09:58A
09:59doll to
10:00please
10:03the crowd
10:04of male
10:05eyes,
10:05the
10:06colleagues
10:06there
10:10helps
10:11keep
10:11the
10:13environment
10:13cheerful,
10:14you know.
10:17And a
10:18lot of
10:18HR
10:18managers
10:18would
10:19actually
10:19say that
10:20in private.
10:22Yeah,
10:23there should
10:23be gender
10:24diversity.
10:25Keeps
10:26the men
10:26happy.
10:30You are
10:31looking at
10:31an
10:31actress.
10:33The
10:34only
10:34rightful
10:35metric
10:35should be
10:37has she
10:37lived up
10:38to the
10:38role?
10:39Did she
10:39surrender
10:40herself
10:40fully to
10:41the
10:41role?
10:42Or did
10:43she allow
10:43her ego
10:44to obstruct
10:45her role?
10:46I don't
10:46know how
10:47the person
10:48in question
10:49how much
10:51she
10:52thinned
10:53herself down.
10:54No idea.
10:56But
10:56prima facie,
10:59this
11:00involves
11:01the ego
11:02challenging
11:02itself.
11:04The role
11:05desires me,
11:06the role
11:06requires me
11:08to thin
11:10down,
11:10lose weight,
11:10I don't
11:11know how
11:11much.
11:12And I'll
11:13do that.
11:16Because
11:16that's the
11:17job.
11:17I'm not
11:18here to
11:18play myself.
11:20I'm here to
11:21play the
11:21character in
11:22question.
11:23So one
11:24should be
11:24applauded for
11:25that.
11:26But instead
11:27it would be
11:28more about
11:29size zero,
11:30this,
11:30that.
11:35Equally,
11:36there are so
11:36many celebrated
11:39actresses.
11:41And they
11:42were very
11:42ordinary,
11:43very mediocre
11:44performers.
11:47And not
11:47only in
11:48India,
11:48but in
11:49film industries
11:50across the
11:50globe,
11:51they still
11:52managed to
11:53have a
11:54reasonable
11:54kind of
11:55career.
11:56Because they
11:57looked good.
12:00As actors,
12:02they were
12:02very mediocre.
12:03A lot of
12:04them.
12:04I'm not
12:04saying all
12:05actresses are
12:05mediocre,
12:05please.
12:07What I'm
12:08saying is a
12:08lot of
12:09mediocre
12:09actresses had
12:10reasonably good
12:11careers just
12:12because they
12:14looked good.
12:15And women are
12:16seeing that
12:16every day.
12:17The little
12:17girl is seeing
12:18that every
12:18day.
12:23What
12:23lessons is
12:24she to
12:24draw?
12:25She's
12:26sensible.
12:26She draws
12:27her lessons.
12:33It's a
12:33good middle,
12:34upper middle
12:35class family.
12:35The little
12:36girl is
12:37seeing mama
12:37do nothing,
12:38watch TV,
12:39entertain herself
12:40all day.
12:40But she
12:41still has so
12:42much hold
12:42over papa.
12:43Why?
12:44Because she
12:45is desirable
12:46to papa.
12:47Physically
12:48desirable.
12:49The little
12:49girl draws
12:50her lesson.
12:53We are not
12:54talking of
12:54lower middle
12:55class households
12:55here where the
12:56housewife has
12:57to slog the
12:57entire day.
12:58No.
12:59We are talking
12:59of affluent
13:00families.
13:03We are
13:03talking of
13:07women and
13:08that's a
13:09sizable chunk
13:09there.
13:11Let's not
13:12close our
13:12eyes to that.
13:17I don't know
13:18whether there is
13:18a research
13:19conducted there,
13:19but why are
13:21secretaries to
13:22CXOs?
13:24Mostly women.
13:30not sure what
13:31kind of
13:32nursing is
13:32involved there.
13:36The
13:41problem is
13:42not that
13:42this is
13:42happening.
13:43The problem
13:43is that
13:44this is
13:44happening
13:44with women's
13:46cooperation.
13:48And that's
13:49what I find
13:50very
13:51indignified.
13:54That's
13:55what I find
13:55appalling.
13:58Genuinely
13:59pathetic.
14:00Women
14:01participating
14:01in this
14:02kind of
14:02system.
14:03Not just
14:04participating,
14:05furthering
14:05the system.
14:07What
14:08stakes do
14:08you have?
14:09What are
14:09you getting?
14:11What
14:13is there
14:14in this
14:16for you?
14:17Why are
14:17you a
14:18participant?
14:20Why don't
14:20you drop
14:20out?
14:21Why don't
14:21you walk
14:21out?
14:22What
14:23holds
14:23you
14:23here?
14:28Those
14:29same
14:29systems,
14:30those
14:30same
14:31stupidities,
14:32and you
14:32are
14:33constantly
14:33participating.
14:37Playing
14:38the good
14:38daughter,
14:39the good
14:39wife,
14:40the good
14:40mother,
14:42the good
14:43girl in
14:43the office.
14:48The
14:49mannequin
14:49even,
14:49even,
14:53and not
14:53just
14:54playing
14:55those
14:55dirty
14:56roles,
14:57also
14:57feeling
14:58proud
14:58of it.
14:59You
14:59know
14:59how
15:00much
15:00I
15:00am
15:00admired?
15:02Didi,
15:02do you
15:02know
15:03for
15:03what?
15:05Oh,
15:06the
15:07meeting
15:07won't
15:07begin
15:08without
15:08me.
15:09Yes,
15:09it
15:09won't,
15:10but
15:10do you
15:10know
15:10why?
15:20Noose,
15:21Papa loves
15:21me so
15:22much.
15:23Yes,
15:24there is
15:24something
15:25there,
15:25but do
15:26you know
15:26what exactly
15:26that is?
15:28Do you
15:29understand
15:29the difference
15:30between
15:31love and
15:32lust?
15:34You
15:34do.
15:36You
15:36do.
15:38But you
15:39don't want
15:39to bear
15:40the cost
15:41of
15:41acknowledging
15:42that you
15:43do.
15:54And
15:55one
15:55very
15:59regrettable
15:59result of
16:00all this
16:01has been
16:01that now
16:02when you
16:02assess a
16:03woman purely
16:04on merit,
16:06she
16:08finds it
16:09unjust.
16:20You
16:20speak to
16:21her not
16:21as a
16:22woman but
16:22as a
16:23human being
16:24and she
16:25feels she
16:25is being
16:25insulted.
16:27But where
16:27is that
16:28extra credit
16:30for my
16:30woman-ness?
16:32No,
16:32I don't
16:32want to
16:33give you
16:33that extra
16:33credit and
16:34that is
16:34the respect
16:35I pay
16:35you.
16:36I don't
16:36think you
16:37need to
16:38be assessed
16:39on your
16:40woman-ness.
16:40I don't
16:41think I
16:41need to
16:42give you
16:42extra points
16:43because you
16:43are a
16:43woman.
16:46And you
16:47do that
16:47and women
16:48find you
16:48insensitive.
16:53No,
16:53but that
16:53guy just
16:54weed you
16:55in there,
16:55you know?
16:59He
16:59behaves so
17:00politely
17:00and sweetly.
17:03Yeah,
17:04he does.
17:04But do you
17:05know why?
17:07But you
17:07are always
17:08just being
17:09so rough.
17:09No,
17:10I'm not
17:10being rough.
17:13I'm
17:14behaving
17:14with you
17:14as a
17:15human
17:15being
17:16does.
17:19Bro code.
17:23Yeah.
17:25Bro.
17:27You just
17:28called me
17:28bro.
17:29You
17:29mean
17:29bro?
17:31Does it
17:31come to
17:32this?
17:36That's
17:36the
17:37respect.
17:43not that
17:44I'm
17:44elevating
17:45you
17:45to
17:45manhood.
17:45No,
17:46not that.
17:50Just that
17:50I'm
17:51removing
17:51something
17:52that is
17:52unnecessary.
18:01Treat me
18:02differently.
18:04Behave
18:05nicely.
18:05Why should
18:06I behave
18:06nicely?
18:09If I
18:10act
18:10stupidly,
18:11you slap
18:11me.
18:12And?
18:15Vice
18:16versa.
18:21You
18:22just
18:22slapped
18:23me.
18:24I
18:25did.
18:29And
18:29that's
18:30a tribute.
18:33That's
18:33real
18:33feminism.
18:38Achharji,
18:39I was
18:39just
18:39thinking
18:40if
18:41it was
18:41a
18:43male
18:43actor
18:44man
18:44doing
18:44all
18:45this,
18:45even
18:45if
18:46whatever
18:46be
18:46his
18:46physique,
18:47he'll
18:47mostly
18:47be
18:48called
18:48fearless
18:49and
18:49celebrated
18:50like
18:50most
18:51of
18:51our
18:52superstars
18:53are.
18:54Actually,
18:54the
18:55actress's
18:56name is
18:56a movie's
18:58name is
18:58a fight
18:59came
18:59just
19:00yesterday.
19:01She
19:01is
19:02earlier
19:02also being
19:03trolled
19:03frequently
19:04for her
19:05physique.
19:06But
19:07this
19:07would
19:08not
19:08happen
19:09especially
19:10in so
19:10many
19:10movies.
19:11South
19:11India
19:11also we
19:11have
19:11seen
19:12Have
19:12you
19:12seen
19:13even
19:13in
19:13the
19:13spiritual
19:14field
19:16when we
19:17depict
19:17the
19:17ancient
19:18rishis
19:18and
19:19tapaswees
19:21at least
19:22sometimes
19:24we
19:25dare to
19:26show them
19:27physically
19:27unattractive.
19:29Have
19:29you
19:29seen
19:30that?
19:30For
19:31example,
19:31Muni Ashtavakra.
19:34For
19:35example,
19:36a certain
19:36sage
19:39who
19:39practiced
19:40austerity
19:41for so
19:42long
19:43that
19:44termites
19:45grew all
19:45over his
19:45body.
19:48Right?
19:49And you
19:49will find
19:50but when
19:51it comes
19:51even to
19:53spiritual
19:54figures,
19:55even to
19:55that field,
19:56women are
19:57still shown
19:57as attractive.
20:01I don't
20:01see what
20:02is going
20:02on.
20:03Why
20:03must the
20:03woman always
20:04be shown
20:04as attractive?
20:05The answer
20:05lies in
20:06who
20:07made the
20:08sketch?
20:11Where
20:14is it
20:15coming
20:15from?
20:17What's
20:18the gender
20:18of the
20:19artist?
20:22Even
20:23somebody
20:23who
20:23was
20:24as
20:27austerely
20:28ascetic
20:28as,
20:29let's
20:30say,
20:31Laleshwari.
20:32Look at
20:33the way
20:33she is
20:33depicted.
20:35I mean,
20:36I don't
20:37think she
20:37is going
20:38to look
20:38all that
20:39nice
20:40with the
20:41kind of
20:41lifestyle
20:42she chose
20:42for herself.
20:45But it's
20:46very important
20:46that when
20:47you portray
20:49a woman,
20:49even in
20:50the spiritual
20:50field,
20:51she must
20:51look
20:51attractive.
20:53Why?
20:55the answer
20:56is
20:57unsettling.
20:58But the
20:58question must
20:59be asked,
20:59why?
21:03I've
21:05been through
21:06that.
21:07I've
21:07spent
21:08six years
21:09in
21:10college
21:11campus.
21:14I know
21:15how
21:16the
21:17male
21:18mind
21:18works,
21:19especially
21:19in a
21:20crowd.
21:24my
21:24batch
21:24at
21:25IIT
21:25had
21:25some
21:2513
21:26or
21:2617
21:26girls.
21:34There
21:34were some
21:3518
21:35dorms,
21:36out of
21:36which
21:37only
21:38two
21:38were
21:39women's
21:39dorms.
21:41So
21:41that's
21:42the
21:43kind of
21:43ratio,
21:44one
21:44is to
21:44nine
21:44there.
21:45My
21:46time,
21:46now it's
21:46probably
21:47a little
21:47more
21:47equal.
21:54Yes,
21:55obviously,
21:55batch
21:55mates,
21:56colleagues,
21:59group
21:59members,
22:02all
22:02that,
22:02yes.
22:04But
22:04above
22:05all,
22:07women.
22:10Lots
22:10of
22:10identities,
22:11yes,
22:11we
22:11understand,
22:12lots of
22:12identities.
22:13Batch
22:13topper,
22:13maybe.
22:14Batch
22:15topper,
22:15maybe,
22:16yes.
22:19There
22:19were these
22:20groups that
22:21were made,
22:21so group
22:21member,
22:22maybe.
22:25And we
22:26acknowledge those
22:26identities.
22:27Those identities
22:27were functional
22:28identities.
22:28Yes,
22:29they existed.
22:30But along
22:31with those
22:31identities,
22:32there did
22:33exist an
22:34overriding
22:34identity.
22:37The
22:38extent to
22:38which that
22:39identity
22:40mattered
22:40depends on
22:41the specific
22:42individual.
22:43In some
22:43cases,
22:4420%
22:45weightage.
22:46In other
22:46cases,
22:4780%
22:48weightage.
22:49So that
22:49was the
22:50range.
22:50And that's
22:51a very
22:51unfortunate
22:52thing.
22:53Because even
22:5420%
22:54is a lot.
23:00It's like
23:01this.
23:01The Indian
23:01cricket team
23:02and then
23:02the Indian
23:03women's
23:03cricket team.
23:08You see
23:09this?
23:09Yes,
23:09the Indian
23:09cricket team
23:10but
23:12Indian
23:13women's
23:13cricket
23:13team.
23:20Men's
23:21is omitted
23:22because
23:23that's
23:23understood.
23:29Men
23:30owning a
23:31field
23:31is natural.
23:34A birthright.
23:36Women
23:37stepping into
23:38field
23:42is a
23:44description
23:44to be
23:45added.
23:46A peculiarity
23:47to be
23:47highlighted.
23:48Therefore,
23:49Indian
23:50women's
23:50cricket
23:50team.
23:57Because
23:58it's an
23:58aberration,
23:59you know.
24:02again,
24:03no problems.
24:04No problems.
24:05You see,
24:06gender-wise,
24:07I belong
24:08to the
24:09privileged
24:10side.
24:12But when I
24:13look at the
24:13other side,
24:15there is
24:15this
24:21nauseatic
24:21thing.
24:23why are you
24:25participating in
24:26this?
24:28Why are you
24:30upholding a
24:30system that
24:31oppresses you?
24:32Why are you
24:44upholding a
24:45system that
24:47oppresses you?
24:49nobody made
24:50it from
24:51above.
24:53It has
24:54been made
24:54here
24:55by making
24:56a fool of
24:57you.
24:59With
25:00your
25:00consent,
25:02withdraw
25:03that consent.
25:06Your
25:06status as
25:07a thing,
25:08as a
25:08position,
25:09as property,
25:10you leave
25:11your places,
25:12you step
25:13into a
25:14stranger's
25:14house,
25:15you even
25:17drop your
25:17surname.
25:20I challenge
25:21you,
25:21turn me
25:21into a
25:22woman today,
25:22I won't
25:22do that.
25:24I cannot
25:25tolerate that.
25:28Maybe that's
25:29coming from
25:30my conditioning,
25:32my privilege,
25:34maybe that's
25:35coming from
25:35the male
25:35hormones itself,
25:36I don't know
25:37where that's
25:37coming from.
25:39But I
25:40cannot see
25:42somebody
25:43successfully
25:48substituting
25:49my surname
25:51with
25:52something
25:53strange.
25:55Who the
25:56hell are you
25:56to change
25:58my name?
25:59And now
26:00in the guise
26:01of feminism,
26:02it is
26:02Nikita
26:04Tanjan
26:04Tiwari.
26:06even hypocrisy
26:07died a
26:08thousand
26:08deaths.
26:12It's
26:13almost as
26:13if they're
26:13telling the
26:15woman,
26:16how dare you
26:16take our
26:17place and
26:18be an
26:19action
26:20heroine.
26:20So that's
26:21fine.
26:22That's
26:22fine.
26:23In a
26:25beastly
26:25world,
26:26you expect
26:28the beasts
26:29to
26:32assert their
26:33authority
26:34and
26:36try to
26:37retain the
26:38status quo.
26:40My
26:40wonderment
26:41is
26:43at the
26:44half
26:46that
26:48consents
26:49to
26:53that
26:53kind
26:53of
26:58life.
27:01It's
27:01not about
27:02your surname
27:02or your
27:03status or
27:04your rights.
27:05It's
27:06about
27:06the one
27:07life that
27:07you have.
27:08That
27:09life is
27:11...
27:13Don't
27:13try to
27:13justify that
27:14life.
27:15Please,
27:15don't say,
27:16Acharya Ji,
27:16how do you
27:17know?
27:19You are
27:19a man
27:20and you
27:21are a
27:21Brahmin.
27:23What do
27:24you know
27:24of the
27:26travails of
27:27the normal
27:27woman?
27:28Don't
27:29give me
27:29that.
27:31In
27:31certain
27:32fields I
27:32have been
27:32privileged,
27:33in certain
27:33fields I
27:34have been
27:34not
27:38boasting,
27:40but I
27:41know
27:42things can
27:42be fought
27:43out.
27:44I
27:45things can
27:46be fought
27:47and the
27:48rot runs
27:49very deep.
27:50This
27:50morning
27:50itself,
27:51there was
27:51this
27:52question
27:52on
27:53community
27:53on
27:53periods.
27:54Today
27:54itself,
27:55right?
27:57Veteran
27:58vintage
27:58members of
27:59the
27:59community,
28:00they
28:01respond,
28:01oh,
28:01we don't
28:01agree
28:02with
28:02this.
28:04Do you
28:05allow
28:05somebody
28:06to go
28:07and urinate
28:08in a
28:08place of
28:09worship?
28:09Then how
28:10can
28:11menstruating
28:12woman
28:12be
28:13allowed
28:15in
28:15places
28:16of
28:16worship?
28:19you
28:20are
28:20defiling
28:20a
28:21sacred
28:21space.
28:23This
28:23is
28:24coming
28:24from
28:24veteran
28:25members
28:25of
28:26the
28:26community.
28:26The
28:27discharge
28:27is
28:28a lot
28:28of
28:28dead
28:29cells
28:31from
28:32the
28:32uterus.
28:33So,
28:34what is
28:34the problem
28:35with
28:35dead
28:35cells?
28:37They're
28:37not
28:38dropping
28:38the
28:38dead
28:38cells
28:38in
28:38there.
28:40This
28:40arm
28:41is
28:42covered
28:42with
28:42dead
28:42cells.
28:43These
28:43are
28:43all
28:43dead
28:43cells.
28:45Don't
28:45carry
28:45this
28:46arm
28:46to
28:46the
28:46temple.
28:50This
28:50is
28:51dead
28:51cells.
28:51Is
28:52the
28:52hair
28:52alive?
28:54Do you
28:54feel pain
28:55when your
28:55hair is
28:55cut?
28:56These
28:56dead
28:57cells.
28:57Don't
28:57carry
28:57this
28:57to
28:57the
28:58temple.
29:02Mucus.
29:04Everybody
29:04is carrying
29:05mucus
29:05here.
29:07Saliva.
29:08All
29:08that
29:08is
29:09dead
29:09cells.
29:11What is
29:11the problem
29:11with
29:12dead
29:12cells?
29:15Yes,
29:16obviously
29:16if you
29:16spit
29:17there,
29:17then it's
29:18a
29:18hygiene
29:18issue.
29:18I
29:18understand.
29:20But
29:21the
29:21woman
29:21is
29:21not
29:22dropping
29:22her
29:23blood
29:23there.
29:28And
29:28even
29:28if
29:29it
29:29is
29:29dropped,
29:30that
29:30would
29:30be
29:30at
29:31most
29:31a
29:31hygiene
29:32issue,
29:33not
29:33a
29:33moral
29:34issue.
29:44the
29:45problem
29:46again
29:46is
29:47some
29:48of
29:48those
29:48veteran
29:49members
29:49are
29:49women.
29:54That's
29:55the
29:55real
29:56problem.
29:57Women
29:58have
29:58internalized
30:01their
30:02own
30:03subjugation.
30:04They
30:05don't
30:06just
30:06internalize
30:06it,
30:07they
30:07glorify
30:08it.
30:16Just
30:17download
30:17the
30:17Acharya
30:17Prasanth
30:18app.
30:18And
30:19there
30:19you
30:19go
30:19to
30:19the
30:20community
30:20section.
30:21And
30:22you
30:22have
30:23live
30:24testimonials
30:25streaming
30:25in at
30:26the rate
30:27of one
30:27every five
30:28minutes.
30:28I'm
30:28seeing
30:29lives
30:29change
30:30in
30:31thousands
30:31if not
30:32millions.
30:32Every
30:33day in
30:33front of
30:33my
30:34eyes.
30:34We're
30:34doing
30:34it.
30:35We
30:35have
30:35actually
30:35done
30:36it.
30:36Join
30:37the
30:37community
30:37of
30:38more
30:38than
30:382
30:38lakh
30:39participants
30:39on
30:40the
30:40Acharya
30:41Prasanth
30:41app.
30:42Your
30:42first
30:42month
30:43is
30:43completely
30:43free.
30:44You'll
30:44get
30:44full
30:45access
30:45to
30:45Gita
30:46mission.
30:46On
30:47the
30:47app
30:47you
30:47will
30:48get
30:48regular
30:49live
30:49sessions,
30:50daily
30:50exclusive
30:51conversations
30:51with
30:52Acharya
30:52Prasanth,
30:53access
30:54to
30:54the
30:54vibrant
30:54Gita
30:55community,
30:56wisdom
30:56exams,
30:58curated
30:58news,
30:59audiobooks,
31:00quotes,
31:00and much
31:01more.
31:02Search
31:02Acharya
31:03Prasanth
31:04on
31:04Google
31:04Play
31:04Store
31:05or
31:05Apple
31:06App
31:06Store
31:06and
31:06download
31:07now.
31:12All
31:16of
31:17the
31:18of
Comments