00:00In relation to the question I asked you, though, to establish credentials of journalistic impartiality,
00:06did you go to the scene of where the Iranian regime massacred its own people?
00:12First of all, I'm not impartial. I'm absolutely not impartial.
00:16I am not objective. And the concept of objectivity, as we understand it, is set out by the corporate media,
00:23according to the parameters devised for them by their militant Zionist ruling class owners.
00:29Okay, but did you go to the scene?
00:30Did you go to the scene of the massacred?
00:31You literally own the networks that you appear on and others appear on.
00:33So I'm not impartial.
00:34I understand.
00:35But to your direct question, and I really want to have a conversation about how this reflects on journalism and
00:42the Constitution,
00:43but to your direct question, you previously hosted me in January, and basically I was sandbagged.
00:49I was sandwiched between an actual war criminal, Jonathan Conricus, from the Israeli military, and three Iranian monarchists.
00:57And I debated this very question, and I acknowledged that at least 3,000 people were killed in two days
01:05of protests,
01:06which the Israeli Mossad and U.S. intelligence have expressly taken credit for.
01:11Scott Bessent, the Treasury Secretary, explicitly took credit for fawning these riots by devaluing Iran's currency.
01:18The Iranian government has released the IDs and names of everyone who was killed there.
01:243,000 people is a lot of people, but they were not all just innocent protesters, and many of them
01:29were police officers.
01:30This all began with attacks on police stations.
01:33And I was actually, while I was there, and I'm about to produce a report on this, able to interview
01:37some off-duty cops.
01:39I wasn't set up to meet them.
01:41I started a conversation with them, and they told me how their police stations came under attack, how police officers
01:46were burned and killed.
01:48Some were beheaded by the People's MEK, which is a CIA-backed militant organization.
01:53There were also Kurdish militant groups like Komaleh and PJAK, which were involved.
01:58These were militarized riots.
02:00They weren't innocent protests.
02:02And it was a bridge between the 12-day war from last year to the current war, which you say
02:06you oppose.
02:07But, you know, I watched you manufacture consent for that war by allowing people to lie about the number who
02:14were killed, claiming 40,000, 50,000.
02:16Well, I don't think you know how many, I don't think you know any better than they do how many
02:19were killed.
02:20I do know, and Iran International, which is a network that's actually-
02:22Well, you don't.
02:23You know what the Iranian regime has told you.
02:25No.
02:26Iran International, which is basically run by Israel and used to be run by the Saudis, has acknowledged that less
02:32than 5,000 were killed.
02:33I've seen multiple reports.
02:34Again, it's a lot.
02:35Listen, I don't know the exact number, nor do you, nor do I don't think anybody else does.
02:40And hopefully one day we will find out.
02:41OK, Pierce, Pierce, what would the UK do if Russian intelligence and Chinese intelligence were arming rioters to attack police
02:50stations?
02:51You know what we wouldn't do?
02:52And were masquerading people and turning churches.
02:54What do you think would happen in the UK?
02:56What we were going to do is, you know, we were going to have you debate with somebody.
02:59Will Chamberlain wanted to do it.
03:00You didn't want to debate with him.
03:01He sent this message-
03:02I don't even know who that is.
03:03Is that like the basketball player?
03:04He's a regular guest on my show, and he's somebody who-
03:08And then you wanted me to debate like a pansexual former Disney actor.
03:12I mean, I deserve some respect.
03:15It's OK.
03:15You're not debating with me.
03:16You're debating with me.
