00:00How do you think about it?
00:16When I was born in 2001, I was born in a foreign dictator.
00:50is from the
00:51There is a pen card, a pen card, a pen card, a NRC, a print of documents.
01:04The evidence sector is a certificate, and the certificate is a valid certificate.
01:21I thought it was classified as 65 B.A.
01:24So, during the Supreme Court, the reason why the law doesn't accept it is value.
01:35I told you he is going to accept it as the law.
01:36So, we should accept it as the law of law and the law.
01:46It is not a pen card, it is not a citizenship certificate, not a document post proving citizenship.
02:10This person has a
02:12citizenship certificate, but here it is not a document.
02:21It is not a document.
02:30This is a minor discrepancies.
02:37This is a minor discrepancies.
02:40This is a minor discrepancies.
02:55This is a minor discrepancies.
03:00Since we've been технолог to the adults reported,
03:10this is a minor discrepancies.
03:12This is a minor discrepancies.
03:13This is the minor discrepancies.
03:19When the ADD is in the same way, the ADD is no one or the other.
03:25In other words, this is a this could do not recover.
03:30I think it's not a word for ADD is the name of ADD and the ADD.
03:41Whether you had an ADD a certain role,
03:43When the Supreme Court has minor discrepancies, it can be accepted by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court.
03:53The Supreme Court is not the case.
03:55The Supreme Court could not have a good name.
04:00The Supreme Court has minor discrepancies.
04:03So, what do you think about the foreign tribunals?
04:19The foreign tribunals have been written on the basis of documents.
04:27As we have had a perfect height of the basis of evidence, we have accepted a high court and we
04:35have read petition, lack of evidence, under the search of jurisdiction.
04:40And high court is reported that when the scroll of the paper, the point of the paper is not complete.
04:46High court is not complete.
04:53It is not complete.
04:55And if the evidence is properly handled by the evidence, the evidence is not the evidence that the evidence is
05:05correctly declared.
05:06So, high court is not supposed to be declared.
05:08High court is not supposed to be declared in the tribunal that this evidence is not supposed to be declared.
05:15So, they don't notice the evidence.
05:17But they don't have to be arrested.
05:19If the court recorded the Channing Court with a criminalに assigned to The Court in 저�TO water, then True locking
05:23the court unjust.
05:24Dent square, during the tribunal has filed the court with the file.
05:32They have been declared by the court and the court.
05:40But they have been declared by the court,
05:45and the court has been declared by the court.
05:48This is not a high-quality interview.
05:50This is not a position of law.
05:53This is not a position of law.
05:56In fact, our NRC is in 1951,
06:08NRC documents can be certified as evidence, but that cannot be used as evidence.
06:17The documents can be used in 1974.
06:28Passport is not a proof of citizenship.
06:37The first question is that Passport is not a proof of citizenship.
06:46Passport is not a proof of citizenship.
06:51This is not a proof of citizenship.
06:54Passport is not a proof of citizenship.
06:58The Supreme Court is not a proof of citizenship.
07:00The fact that the story is not a proof of citizenship.
07:11This is not the case.
07:13The evidence is not the case.
07:19So, we have to collaborate and prove.
07:21This is not the case.
07:22We have to do this.
07:23We don't have to do this case.
07:28We are not the case of this case.
07:58What do you think?
08:01His date of birth, his place of birth, citizenship of his parents, citizenship of his grandparents.
08:34I think that that will be your parents.
Comments