Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 15 minutes ago
Royal historian Anna Whitelock says it is "unlikely that [Buckingham Palace] will return to be the pre-eminent residence" of the royal family, at least under King Charles and his successor William. It was announced King Charles III would keep Clarence House as his main London residence for the rest of his reign, despite the larger Buckingham Palace having recently recieved a £370 million refurbishment. Report by Keechl. Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/itn and follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/itn

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Yeah, I mean, I think it is unlikely that the palace will return to be the preeminent
00:07residence of the monarch. It's been signalled clearly that that's not going to be the case
00:12with King Charles and Camilla, and so too with William and Catherine. I mean, I think
00:17the question will be, could it ever be again, really? You know, does the idea of the royal
00:24family, the monarch, living in a palace with such visible opulence, you know, there in
00:31the heart of London, does that now look sort of out of step with the times? And of course
00:39you could say, well, you know, the royal family are hugely wealthy, they have, you know, huge
00:45privilege and influence and power and, you know, the Buckingham Palace and them living
00:49there just simply reflects that. But I think there is a sense that the future of the monarchies
00:55signalled by William and Kate, and indeed the way that they're bringing up their children,
00:59it will be a less showy monarchy. And that in some ways now Buckingham Palace perhaps will
01:07be seen as a sort of living, breathing relic to the past sort of position of the monarchy
01:15in this country, post-Queen Victoria.
Comments

Recommended