Skip to playerSkip to main content
A heated confrontation erupted between Senator Elizabeth Warren and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent over stock trading by former President Donald Trump and members of Congress. Warren pressed concerns over potential conflicts of interest and market transparency, while Bessent fired back, arguing that Congress should first ban individual stock trading for its own members before targeting others. The exchange has reignited debate over insider trading, ethics rules, and whether lawmakers should be allowed to trade individual stocks while in office.

#ElizabethWarren #ScottBessent #TrumpStockTrading #CongressStockTrading #InsiderTrading #StockTradingBan #WarrenVsBessent #TrumpNews #CongressEthics #USPolitics #PoliticalClash #BreakingNews #CapitolHill #GovernmentEthics #MarketTransparency #WashingtonPolitics #USCongress

~PR.460~HT.408~ED.194~VG.HM~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Mr. Chairman. So, Secretary Bessent, let's start with something you
00:04and I agree strongly on. Last year you came out in support of a trading ban
00:10for members of Congress, and I have introduced legislation to do exactly
00:15that. You explained the need for a ban on our trading stock by saying, quote, you
00:22look at some of these eye-popping returns, every hedge fund would be jealous of
00:28them, and that, quote, if any private citizen traded that way, the SEC would be
00:34knocking on their door. Those are strong words from someone who used to run a hedge
00:39fund. Last month, President Trump's latest financial disclosures came out, and they
00:45show that he made more than 3,400 stock trades worth more than a quarter of a
00:52billion dollars in just the first three months of 2026. That's roughly half of
01:00what all 535 members of Congress made last year combined. And the value of
01:07virtually every one of those stocks that the president traded in is directly
01:12affected by President Trump's official actions. So, Secretary Bessent, you and I
01:18agree that it is a conflict of interest for members of Congress to trade stocks. Do
01:25you also agree that it's conflict of interest for President Trump to trade
01:29stocks? Well, a couple of things, Senator. One, President Trump is not sitting in the
01:35Oval Office engaging in a high-frequency trading strategy. Clearly he had an
01:40outside manager who was doing that. And so, and I think it's incumbent upon both
01:47houses of Congress to get their house in order before you move to the
01:52Administrative O'Brien. Before? You think it's okay for the President to do this? Because let's be
01:56clear, you are a Wall Street guy, so you know better. The investments that the
02:01Trump, that President Trump has made are not blind. President Trump literally signed the
02:09113 page document publicly listing all of his individual stock trades at the same
02:16time that he is making decisions affecting those stocks. So you're gonna sit
02:20here with straight face and say it's not a conflict of interest for the
02:23President of the United States to do that? I am going to say this body needs to
02:27get its house in order first. How about we get the White House in order at the same time?
02:31I would encourage you to do that. I don't trade in individual stocks. I don't own any
02:36individual stocks. My house is in order. Thank you. Senator, you're very rich.
02:40Mr. Secretary. Others on this committee can't say that, Senator.
02:43Let's look at some individual trades. On January 6th, Donald Trump purchased up to a
02:49million dollars worth of Nvidia stock. One week later, his administration changed
02:54U.S. policy and loosened the rules on export controls so that Nvidia could sell its
03:02chips to China. Now the price of Nvidia stock is through the roof. So Secretary
03:07Bessett, you said last year if any private citizen traded the way members of
03:12Congress do, quote, the SEC would be knocking on their door. So my question is,
03:18should the SEC be knocking on President Trump's door to start an
03:23investigation over this trade? Again, if this body wants to ban individual stock
03:29trading, which I would advocate for yourself, start there. And if you want
03:33legislative action to continue, that's your prerogative. So it's our prerogative.
03:39So you would support our saying that President Trump should be
03:42investigated over this? I would support getting... Our trade should be investigated and President Trump should be investigated.
03:49I would support you getting your house in order, Senator. And how about the White House getting its house in
03:53order?
03:53Would you support that investigation? Please lead by example. Would the... I would like to see the
03:59President of the United States lead by example. You say there should be an
04:04investigation when that kind of activity takes place? How about we start with the
04:07White House? Let's do one more. You create statute. The President is not.
04:11President Trump bought tens of thousands of dollars worth of stock in Robin Hood and the
04:16Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, known as BNY. On April 6th, your Treasury
04:21Department announced it had chosen the financial agent to implement the new Trump
04:27accounts program, BNY, and its partner Robin Hood. Both stocks, of course, have risen since then.
04:34So, Secretary Bessett, let me ask you a different question. If these stock purchases
04:39that Trump made were made using inside information, would that be illegal?
04:45Again, I'm not a lawyer. I'm not going to speak to that. And I think...
04:50Would it be worth investigating? You don't have to be a lawyer. You're the one who said what should be
04:56investigated.
04:56Why don't we investigate many people in this committee, Senator? Many people.
05:00And you don't think the White House should have to follow the same set of rules that are already the
05:06law.
05:06I think you should get your house in order here. My house is in order. Thank you, Mr. Secretary.
05:11And you should have your fellow committee members, many on your, mostly on your side of the aisle, do the
05:15same.
05:16We need stronger anti-corruption rules and conflict of interest rules in Washington for everyone.
05:22And that includes the President, and it includes Congress.
05:27And instead of draining the swamp, what Donald Trump is doing is he is enriching himself by taking advantage of
05:34his position.
05:35That is not public service. He's the one who should lead by example.
05:42Subscribe to One India and never miss an update.
05:47Download the One India app now.
Comments

Recommended